<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neurosurgery Blog &#187; Clinical Guide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/category/clinical-guide/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com</link>
	<description>Daily bibliographic and video review of the Neurosurgery Department. La Fe University Hospital. Valencia, Spain</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:00:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A standardized protocol to reduce cerebrospinal fluid shunt infection: The Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network Quality Improvement Initiative</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2919</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2919#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 22:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clinical Guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrocephalus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality improvement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standardized protocol]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=2919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J Neurosurg Pediatrics 8:22–29, 2011. DOI: 10.3171/2011.4.PEDS10551
Quality improvement techniques are being implemented in many areas of medicine. In an effort to reduce the ventriculoperitoneal shunt infection rate, a standardized protocol was developed and implemented at 4 centers of the Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network (HCRN).
Methods. The protocol was developed sequentially by HCRN members using the current [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/A-standardized-protocol-to-reduce-cerebrospinal-fluid-shunt-infection-The-Hydrocephalus-Clinical-Research-Network-Quality-Improvement-Initiative.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2923" title="A standardized protocol to reduce cerebrospinal fluid shunt infection- The Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network Quality Improvement Initiative" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/A-standardized-protocol-to-reduce-cerebrospinal-fluid-shunt-infection-The-Hydrocephalus-Clinical-Research-Network-Quality-Improvement-Initiative-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>J Neurosurg Pediatrics 8:22–29, 2011. DOI: 10.3171/2011.4.PEDS10551</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Quality improvement techniques are being implemented in many areas of medicine. In an effort to reduce the ventriculoperitoneal shunt infection rate, a standardized protocol was developed and implemented at 4 centers of the Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network (HCRN).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Methods. The protocol was developed sequentially by HCRN members using the current literature and prior institutional experience until consensus was obtained. The protocol was prospectively applied at each HCRN center to all children undergoing a shunt insertion or revision procedure. Infections were defined on the basis of CSF, wound, or pseudocyst cultures; wound breakdown; abdominal pseudocyst; or positive blood cultures in the presence of a ventriculoatrial shunt. Procedures and infections were measured before and after protocol implementation.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results. Twenty-one surgeons at 4 centers performed 1571 procedures between June 1, 2007, and February 28, 2009. The minimum follow-up was 6 months. The Network infection rate decreased from 8.8% prior to the protocol to 5.7% while using the protocol (p = 0.0028, absolute risk reduction 3.15%, relative risk reduction 36%). Three of 4 centers lowered their infection rate. Shunt surgery after external ventricular drainage (with or without prior infection) had the highest infection rate. Overall protocol compliance was 74.5% and improved over the course of the observation period. Based on logistic regression analysis, the use of BioGlide catheters (odds ratio [OR] 1.91, 95% CI 1.19–3.05; p = 0.007) and the use of antiseptic cream by any members of the surgical team (instead of a formal surgical scrub by all members of the surgical team; OR 4.53, 95% CI 1.43–14.41; p = 0.01) were associated with an increased risk of infection.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusions. The standardized protocol for shunt surgery significantly reduced shunt infection across the HCRN. Overall protocol compliance was good. The protocol has established a common baseline within the Network, which will facilitate assessment of new treatments. Identification of factors associated with infection will allow further protocol refinement in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2919/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rathke cleft cysts: a review of clinical and surgical management</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2840</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2840#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 22:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clinical Guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Developmental Malformations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pituitary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[craniopharyngioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endoscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pituitary adenoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rathke cleft cyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transsphenoidal approach]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neurosurg Focus 31 (1):E1, 2011. DOI: 10.3171/2011.5.FOCUS1183
The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review of clinical, imaging, and histopathological features, as well as operative and nonoperative management strategies in patients with Rathke cleft cysts (RCCs).
A literature review was performed to identify previous articles that reported surgical and nonsurgical management of RCCs.
Rathke cleft [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Rathke-cyst.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2841" title="Rathke cyst" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Rathke-cyst-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Neurosurg Focus 31 (1):E1, 2011. DOI: 10.3171/2011.5.FOCUS1183</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review of clinical, imaging, and histopathological features, as well as operative and nonoperative management strategies in patients with Rathke cleft cysts (RCCs).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">A literature review was performed to identify previous articles that reported surgical and nonsurgical management of RCCs.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Rathke cleft cysts are often incidental lesions found in the sellar and suprasellar regions and do not require surgical intervention in the majority of cases. In symptomatic RCCs, the typical clinical presentation includes headache, visual loss, and/or endocrine dysfunction. Visual field testing and endocrine laboratory studies may reveal more subtle deficiencies associated with RCCs. When indicated, the transsphenoidal approach typically offers the least invasive and safest method for treating these lesions.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Various surgical strategies including cyst wall resection, intralesional alcohol injection, and sellar floor reconstruction are discussed. Although headache and visual symptoms frequently improve after surgical drainage of RCCs, hypopituitarism and diabetes insipidus are less likely to do so.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">A subset of more aggressive, atypical RCCs associated with pronounced clinical symptoms and higher recurrence rates is discussed, as well as the possible relationship of these lesions to craniopharyngiomas.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Rathke cleft cysts are typically benign, asymptomatic lesions that can be monitored. In selected patients, transsphenoidal surgery provides excellent rates of improvement in clinical symptoms and long-term cyst resolution. Complete cyst wall resection, intraoperative alcohol cauterization, and sellar floor reconstruction in the absence of a CSF leak are not routinely recommended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2840/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cauda equina syndrome: a review of the current clinical and medico-legal position</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2702</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2702#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 22:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clinical Guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bilateral sciatica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cauda equina syndrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central disc prolapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perineal hypoaesthesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual dysfunction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urinary retention]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=2702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eur Spine J (2011) 20:690–697. DOI 10.1007/s00586-010-1668-3
Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a rare condition with a disproportionately high medico-legal profile. It occurs most frequently following a large central lumbar disc herniation, prolapse or sequestration.
Review of the literature indicates that around 50–70% of patients have urinary retention (CES-R) on presentation with 30–50% having an incomplete syndrome [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/caudaequinasyndrome.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2706" title="caudaequinasyndrome" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/caudaequinasyndrome-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Eur Spine J (2011) 20:690–697. DOI 10.1007/s00586-010-1668-3</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a rare condition with a disproportionately high medico-legal profile. It occurs most frequently following a large central lumbar disc herniation, prolapse or sequestration.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Review of the literature indicates that around 50–70% of patients have urinary retention (CES-R) on presentation with 30–50% having an incomplete syndrome (CES-I). The latter group, especially if the history is less than a few days, usually requires emergency MRI to confirm the diagnosis followed by prompt decompression by a suitably experienced surgeon. Every effort should be made to avoid CES-I with its more favourable prognosis becoming CES-R while under medical supervision either before or after admission to hospital. The degree of urgency of early surgery in CES-R is still not in clear focus but it cannot be doubted that earliest decompression removes the mechanical and perhaps chemical factors which are the causes of progressive neurological damage.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">A full explanation and consent procedure prior to surgery is essential in order to reduce the likelihood of misunderstanding and litigation in the event of a persistent neurological deficit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2702/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Endocrinologic, neurologic, and visual morbidity after treatment for craniopharyngioma</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2183</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2183#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 05:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clinical Guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oncology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outcome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meta-analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[craniopharyngioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morbidity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiosurgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=2183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J Neurooncol (2011) 101:463–476. DOI 10.1007/s11060-010-0265-y
Craniopharyngiomas are locally aggressive tumors which typically are focused in the sellar and suprasellar region near a number of critical neural and vascular structures mediating endocrinologic, behavioral, and visual functions. The present study aims to summarize and compare the published literature regarding morbidity resulting from treatment of craniopharyngioma.
We performed a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Craniopharyngioma.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2187" title="Craniopharyngioma" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Craniopharyngioma-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>J Neurooncol (2011) 101:463–476. DOI 10.1007/s11060-010-0265-y</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Craniopharyngiomas are locally aggressive tumors which typically are focused in the sellar and suprasellar region near a number of critical neural and vascular structures mediating endocrinologic, behavioral, and visual functions. The present study aims to summarize and compare the published literature regarding morbidity resulting from treatment of craniopharyngioma.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">We performed a comprehensive search of the published English language literature to identify studies publishing outcome data of patients undergoing surgery for craniopharyngioma. Comparisons of the rates of endocrine, vascular, neurological, and visual complications were performed using Pearson’s chi-squared test, and covariates of interest were fitted into a multivariate logistic regression model.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In our data set, 540 patients underwent surgical resection of their tumor. 138 patients received biopsy alone followed by some form of radiotherapy. Mean overall follow-up for all patients in these studies was 54 ± 1.8 months. The overall rate of new endocrinopathy for all patients undergoing surgical resection of their mass was 37% (95% CI = 33– 41). Patients receiving GTR had over 2.5 times the rate of developing at least one endocrinopathy compared to patients receiving STR alone or STR + XRT (52 vs. 19 vs. 20%, v2 P&lt;0.00001). On multivariate analysis, GTR conferred a significant increase in the risk of endocrinopathy compared to STR + XRT (OR = 3.45, 95% CI = 2.05–5.81, P&lt;0.00001), after controlling for study size and the presence of significant hypothalamic involvement. There was a statistical trend towards worse visual outcomes in patients receiving XRT after STR compared to GTR or STR alone (GTR = 3.5% vs. STR 2.1% vs. STR + XRT 6.4%, P = 0.11). Given the difficulty in obtaining class 1 data regarding the treatment of this tumor, this study can serve as an estimate of expected outcomes for these patients, and guide decision making until these data are available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2183/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Investigating shunt function using continuous intracranial pressure monitoring in adults: single center experience</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1923</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1923#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 05:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clinical Guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrocephalus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diagnosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intracranial pressure monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shunt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=1923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J Neurosurg 113:1326–1330, 2010. (DOI: 10.3171/2010.8.JNS1067)
Managing symptomatic ventriculoperitoneal shunts with no clear evidence of shunt malfunction either clinically or radiologically can be a difficult task. The aim of this study was to assess intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring as a method of investigating shunt function.
Methods. The authors performed a retrospective analysis of 38 continuous ICP monitoring [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Algoritmo-malfuncion-shunt.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1926" title="Algoritmo malfuncion shunt" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Algoritmo-malfuncion-shunt-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>J Neurosurg 113:1326–1330, 2010. (DOI: 10.3171/2010.8.JNS1067)</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Managing symptomatic ventriculoperitoneal shunts with no clear evidence of shunt malfunction either clinically or radiologically can be a difficult task. The aim of this study was to assess intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring as a method of investigating shunt function.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Methods. The authors performed a retrospective analysis of 38 continuous ICP monitoring procedures done in patients with ventriculoperitoneal shunts and suspected shunt malfunction.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results. Thirty-eight procedures were performed in 31 patients between January 2005 and October 2008. Sixteen recordings were normal, 6 revealed overdrainage or low pressure, 11 indicated underdrainage or high pressure, and 5 showed variable shunt function. Based on the findings after 20 procedures (53%), patients were treated conservatively: 4 by readjusting the valve setting and 16 by referral to the headache neurologist for medical treatment. Forty-five percent of the conservatively treated patients improved. Surgical exploration was undertaken following 18 procedures (47%); 72% of the surgically treated patients improved.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusions. Continuous ICP monitoring using an intraparenchymal probe is a safe and effective method of investigating adult hydrocephalus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1923/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guidelines for the Management of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1554</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1554#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 04:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clinical Guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence-based]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vascular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meta-analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AHA Scientific Statements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diagnosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrocephalus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intracerebral  hemorrhage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intracranial pressure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treatment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=1554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stroke. 2010;41:2108-2129. DOI: 10.1161/STR.0b013e3181ec611b
Purpose—The aim of this guideline is to present current and comprehensive recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.
Methods—A formal literature search of MEDLINE was performed. Data were synthesized with the use of evidence tables. Writing committee members met by teleconference to discuss data-derived recommendations. The American Heart Association [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/ICHGuidelines.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1553" title="ICHGuidelines" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/ICHGuidelines-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="120" height="120" /></a>Stroke. 2010;41:2108-2129. DOI: 10.1161/STR.0b013e3181ec611b</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Purpose—The aim of this guideline is to present current and comprehensive recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Methods—A formal literature search of MEDLINE was performed. Data were synthesized with the use of evidence tables. Writing committee members met by teleconference to discuss data-derived recommendations. The American Heart Association Stroke Council’s Levels of Evidence grading algorithm was used to grade each recommendation. Prerelease review of the draft guideline was performed by 6 expert peer reviewers and by the members of the Stroke Council Scientific Statements Oversight Committee and Stroke Council Leadership Committee. It is intended that this guideline be fully updated in 3 years’ time.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results—Evidence-based guidelines are presented for the care of patients presenting with intracerebral hemorrhage. The focus was subdivided into diagnosis, hemostasis, blood pressure management, inpatient and nursing management, preventing medical comorbidities, surgical treatment, outcome prediction, rehabilitation, prevention of recurrence, and future considerations.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusions—Intracerebral hemorrhage is a serious medical condition for which outcome can be impacted by early, aggressive care. The guidelines offer a framework for goal-directed treatment of the patient with intracerebral hemorrhage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1554/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best surgical practices: a stepwise approach to the University of Pennsylvania deep brain stimulation protocol</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1467</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1467#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 04:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clinical Guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stereotactic neurosurgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical technique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deep Brain Stimulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dystonia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essential tremor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=1467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neurosurg Focus 29 (2):E3, 2010. (DOI: 10.3171/2010.4.FOCUS10103)
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is the treatment of choice for otherwise healthy patients with advanced Parkinson disease who are suffering from disabling dyskinesias and motor fluctuations related to dopaminergic therapy. As DBS is an elective procedure, it is essential to minimize the risk of morbidity. Further, precision in targeting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/STXbestpractice.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1468" title="STXbestpractice" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/STXbestpractice.jpg" alt="" width="136" height="132" /></a>Neurosurg Focus 29 (2):E3, 2010. (DOI: 10.3171/2010.4.FOCUS10103)</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is the treatment of choice for otherwise healthy patients with advanced Parkinson disease who are suffering from disabling dyskinesias and motor fluctuations related to dopaminergic therapy. As DBS is an elective procedure, it is essential to minimize the risk of morbidity. Further, precision in targeting deep brain structures is critical to optimize efficacy in controlling motor features. The authors have already established an operational checklist in an effort to minimize errors made during DBS surgery. Here, they set out to standardize a strict, step-by-step approach to the DBS surgery used at their institution, including preoperative evaluation, the day of surgery, and the postoperative course. They provide careful instruction on Leksell frame assembly and placement as well as the determination of indirect coordinates derived from MR images used to target deep brain structures. Detailed descriptions of the operative procedure are provided, outlining placement of the stereotactic arc as well as determination of the appropriate bur hole location, lead placement using electrophysiology, and placement of the internal pulse generator. The authors also include their approach to preventing postoperative morbidity. They believe that a strategic, step-by-step approach to DBS surgery combined with a standardized checklist will help to minimize operating room mistakes that can compromise targeting and increase the risk of complication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1467/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Selection of patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus for shunt placement: a single-institution experience</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1257</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1257#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 04:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clinical Guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrocephalus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cerebrospinal fluid outflow resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elastance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infusion test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Normal pressure hydrocephalus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shunt placement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=1257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J Neurosurg 113:64–73, 2010. DOI: 10.3171/2010.1.JNS091296
The ability to predict outcome after shunt placement in patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) represents a challenge. To date, no single diagnostic tool or combination of tools has proved capable of reliably predicting whether the condition of a patient with suspected NPH will improve after a shunting procedure. In [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Katzman.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1258" title="Katzman" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Katzman-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="120" height="120" /></a>J Neurosurg 113:64–73, 2010. DOI: 10.3171/2010.1.JNS091296</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The ability to predict outcome after shunt placement in patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) represents a challenge. To date, no single diagnostic tool or combination of tools has proved capable of reliably predicting whether the condition of a patient with suspected NPH will improve after a shunting procedure. In this paper, the authors report their experience with 120 patients with the goal of identifying CSF hydrodynamics criteria capable of selecting patients with idiopathic NPH. Specifically, they focused on the comparison between CSF-outflow resistance (R-out) and intracranial elastance (IE).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Methods. Between January 1977 and December 2005, 120 patients in whom idiopathic NPH had been diagnosed (on the basis of clinical findings and imaging) underwent CSF hydrodynamics evaluation based on an intraventricular infusion test. Ninety-six patients underwent CSF shunt placement: 32 between 1977 and 1989 (Group I) on the basis of purely clinical and radiological criteria; 44 between 1990 and 2002 (Group II) on the basis of the same criteria as Group I and because they had an IE slope &gt; 0.25; and 20 between 2003 and 2005 (Group III) on the basis of the same criteria as Group II but with an IE slope ≥ 0.30. Outcomes were evaluated by means of both Stein-Langfitt and Larsson scores. Patients’ conditions were considered improved when there was a stable decrease (at 6- and 12-month follow-up) of at least 1 point in the Stein-Langfitt score and 2 points in the Larsson score.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results. Group I: while no statistically significant difference in mean R-out value between improved and unimproved cases was observed, a clear-cut IE slope value of 0.25 differentiated very sharply between unimproved and improved cases. Group II: R-out values in the 2 unimproved cases were 20 and 47 mm Hg/ml/min, respectively. The mean IE slope in the improved cases was 0.56 (range 0.30–1.4), while the IE slopes in the 2 unimproved cases were 0.26 and 0.27. Group III: the mean IE slope was 0.51 (range 0.31–0.7). The conditions of all patients improved after shunting. A significant reduction of the Evans ratio was observed in 34 (40.5%) of the 84 improved cases and in none of the unimproved cases.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusions. Our strategy based on the analysis of CSF pulse pressure parameters seems to have a great accuracy in predicting surgical outcome in clinical practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1257/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overview of disc arthroplasty—past, present and future</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/656</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/656#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 05:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clinical Guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical technique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Degenerative disc disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intervertebral disc disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spinal arthroplasty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Systematic review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Total disc replacement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Acta Neurochir (2010) 152:393–404. DOI 10.1007/s00701-009-0529-5
Degenerative disc disease is one of the most frequent spinal disorders. The anatomy and the biomechanics of the intervertebral disc are very complex, and the pathomechanics of its degeneration are poorly understood. Despite this complexity and uncertainty, great advances have been made in the field of disc replacement technology, with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Maverick-Medtronic-Sofamor-Danek-artificial-disc.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-657" title="Maverick (Medtronic Sofamor Danek) artificial disc" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Maverick-Medtronic-Sofamor-Danek-artificial-disc-300x194.jpg" alt="" width="210" height="136" /></a>Acta Neurochir (2010) 152:393–404. DOI 10.1007/s00701-009-0529-5</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Degenerative disc disease is one of the most frequent spinal disorders. The anatomy and the biomechanics of the intervertebral disc are very complex, and the pathomechanics of its degeneration are poorly understood. Despite this complexity and uncertainty, great advances have been made in the field of disc replacement technology, with promising results. Difficulties are continuously being encountered, but careful analysis of the results and intensive research and development will assist in countering these problems. There are approximately 40 clinical reports in the literature describing various aspects of randomised controlled trials involving intervertebral disc arthroplasty. However, the majority of these publications do not provide reliable information, in that they give only interim results and/or the results from just one of the many centres in multicentre studies. Such publications must be interpreted with caution, since they do not always represent the results of the whole study population and may hence be underpowered. We identified six randomised controlled trials that compared the final clinical outcomes of disc arthroplasty and spinal fusion. The present systematic review attempts to give an overview of the current status of disc arthroplasty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/656/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Emergency reversal of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapies in neurosurgical patients</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/577</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/577#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clinical Guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coagulopathy; anticoagulant; antiplatelet agent; intracranial hemorrhage.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DOI: 10.3171/2009.7.JNS0982

Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a common problem encountered by neurosurgeons. Patient outcomes are influenced by hematoma size, growth, location, and the timing of evacuation, when indicated. Patients may have abnormal coagulation due to pharmacological anticoagulation or coagulopathy due to underlying systemic disease or blood transfusions. Strategies to reestablish the integrity of the clotting cascade [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">DOI: 10.3171/2009.7.JNS0982</p>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a common problem encountered by neurosurgeons. Patient outcomes are influenced by hematoma size, growth, location, and the timing of evacuation, when indicated. Patients may have abnormal coagulation due to pharmacological anticoagulation or coagulopathy due to underlying systemic disease or blood transfusions. Strategies to reestablish the integrity of the clotting cascade and platelet function assume a familiarity with these processes. As patients are increasingly treated with anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents, it is essential that the physicians who care for patients with ICH understand these pathways and recognize how they can be manipulated to restore hemostasis.</p>
</div>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><!-- /abstract content --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/577/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

