<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neurosurgery Blog &#187; Outcome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/category/outcome/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com</link>
	<description>Daily bibliographic and video review of the Neurosurgery Department. La Fe University Hospital. Valencia, Spain</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:00:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Natural History of Cranial Dural Arteriovenous Fistulae With Cortical Venous Reflux—The Significance of Venous Ectasia</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3795</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3795#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Outcome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vascular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cortical venous drainage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dural arteriovenous fistula]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hemorrhage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venous ectasia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=3795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neurosurgery 70:312–319, 2012 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318230966f
The quoted risk of hemorrhage from dural arteriovenous fistulae with cortical venous reflux varies widely, and the influence of angiographic grade on clinical course has not previously been reported.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of hemorrhage and the influence of angiographic grade on this risk, compared with known predictors of hemorrhage such [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/The-Natural-History-of-Cranial-Dural-Arteriovenous-Fistulae-With-Cortical-Venous-Reflux—The-Significance-of-Venous-Ectasia.gif"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3799" title="The Natural History of Cranial Dural Arteriovenous Fistulae With Cortical Venous Reflux—The Significance of Venous Ectasia" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/The-Natural-History-of-Cranial-Dural-Arteriovenous-Fistulae-With-Cortical-Venous-Reflux—The-Significance-of-Venous-Ectasia-150x150.gif" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Neurosurgery 70:312–319, 2012 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318230966f</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The quoted risk of hemorrhage from dural arteriovenous fistulae with cortical venous reflux varies widely, and the influence of angiographic grade on clinical course has not previously been reported.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of hemorrhage and the influence of angiographic grade on this risk, compared with known predictors of hemorrhage such as presentation.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">METHODS: Seventy-five fistulae with cortical venous reflux identified in our arteriovenous malformations clinic between 1992 and 2007 were followed up clinically, and their angiograms were reviewed.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">RESULTS: There were 8 hemorrhages in 90 years of follow-up. The annual incidence of hemorrhage before any treatment was 13%, and 4.7% after partial treatment, giving an overall incidence of 8.9% before definitive treatment. Borden and Cognard grades were poor discriminators of risk for lesions with the exception of Cognard type IV lesions. These lesions, characterized by venous ectasia, had a 7-fold increase in the incidence of hemorrhage (3.5% no ectasia vs 27% with ectasia). Patients presenting with hemorrhage (20%) or nonhemorrhagic neurological deficit (22%) had a higher incidence of hemorrhage than those with a benign presentation (4.3%), but this may be directly linked to the presence of venous ectasia.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">CONCLUSION: In this series untreated dural arteriovenous fistulae with cortical venous reflux had a 13% annual incidence of hemorrhage after diagnosis. There was a significant difference between those with and without venous ectasia. This should be confirmed by further studies, but probably defines a high-risk subgroup of patients that requires rapid intervention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3795/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A clinical trial of bevacizumab, temozolomide, and radiation for newly diagnosed glioblastoma</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3802</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3802#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clinical Trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oncology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outcome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bevacizumab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glioblastoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation therapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Temozolomide]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=3802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J Neurosurg 116:341–345, 2012.DOI: 10.3171/2011.9.JNS11656
The presence of angiogenesis is a hallmark of glioblastoma (GBM). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which drives angiogenesis, provides an additional target for conventional therapy. The authors conducted a prospective clinical trial to test the effectiveness of bevacizumab, an inhibitor of VEGF, in newly diagnosed GBM.
Methods. From 2006 through 2010, 51 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/A-clinical-trial-of-bevacizumab-temozolomide-and-radiation-for-newly-diagnosed-glioblastoma.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3804" title="A clinical trial of bevacizumab, temozolomide, and radiation for newly diagnosed glioblastoma" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/A-clinical-trial-of-bevacizumab-temozolomide-and-radiation-for-newly-diagnosed-glioblastoma-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>J Neurosurg 116:341–345, 2012.DOI: 10.3171/2011.9.JNS11656</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The presence of angiogenesis is a hallmark of glioblastoma (GBM). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which drives angiogenesis, provides an additional target for conventional therapy. The authors conducted a prospective clinical trial to test the effectiveness of bevacizumab, an inhibitor of VEGF, in newly diagnosed GBM.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Methods. From 2006 through 2010, 51 eligible patients with newly diagnosed GBM were treated with involvedfield radiation therapy and concomitant temozolomide (75 mg/m2 daily for 42 days) along with bevacizumab (10 mg/ kg every 2 weeks), starting 29 days after surgery. This was followed by 6 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide therapy (150 mg/m2 on Days 1–7 of a 28-day cycle) with bevacizumab administered at 10 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22 of each 28-day cycle.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results. The 6- and 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 85.1% and 51%, respectively. The 12- and 24-month overall survival (OS) rates were 85.1% and 42.5%, respectively. Grade III/IV toxicities were noted in 10 patients (19.6%). No treatment-related deaths were observed. Asymptomatic intracranial bleeding was noted in 5 patients.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusions. The addition of bevacizumab to conventional therapy in newly diagnosed GBM appears to improve both PFS and OS in patients with newly diagnosed GBM, with acceptable morbidity. A shift toward diffuse relapse was noted in a significant number of patients. Ongoing Phase III clinical trials will show the true benefit of this antiangiogenic approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3802/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comparative Evaluation of Percutaneous Retrogasserian Glycerol Rhizolysis and Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation Techniques in the Management of Trigeminal Neuralgia</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3788</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3788#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Outcome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical technique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anhydrous glycerol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radiofrequency thermocoagulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trigeminal neuralgia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=3788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neurosurgery 70:407–413, 2012 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318233a85f
Among the percutaneous procedures for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia, percutaneous anhydrous glycerol rhizolysis (PRGR) and radiofrequency (RF) ablation of trigeminal neuralgia have stood the test of time.
OBJECTIVE: A prospective study was conducted to compare PRGR and RF ablation techniques in patients with trigeminal neuralgia in terms of (1) efficacy of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Trigeminal-neuralgia.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3792" title="Trigeminal neuralgia" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Trigeminal-neuralgia-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Neurosurgery 70:407–413, 2012 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318233a85f</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Among the percutaneous procedures for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia, percutaneous anhydrous glycerol rhizolysis (PRGR) and radiofrequency (RF) ablation of trigeminal neuralgia have stood the test of time.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">OBJECTIVE: A prospective study was conducted to compare PRGR and RF ablation techniques in patients with trigeminal neuralgia in terms of (1) efficacy of pain relief, (2) duration of pain relief and (3) side effects.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">METHODS: All patients presenting to our pain clinic for the first time for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia were enrolled to receive either PRGR or RF ablation; the treatment was chosen by the patient. Demographic data, magnetic resonance imaging scan, relevant medical disease, amount of anhydrous glycerol, lesion temperature, and total duration of RF were noted. The presence or absence of cerebrospinal fluid egress, immediate pain relief, duration of pain-free period, need for repeat injection or additional peripheral nerve block, and recurrence of pain were also noted. The degree of pain relief was recorded every 3 months. Any complications during the procedure and side effects were also recorded.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients underwent either PRGR (n = 40) or RF thermocoagulation (n = 39). A total of 23 patients (58.9%) in the PRGR group and 33 patients (84.6%) in the RF group experienced excellent pain relief. The mean duration of excellent pain relief in the PRGR and RF groups was comparable. By the end of the study period, 39.1% patients in the PRGR group and 51.5% patients in the RF group experienced recurrence of pain.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">CONCLUSION: Both PRGR and RF techniques can achieve acceptable pain relief with minimal side effects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3788/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cervical decompression and reconstruction without intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3781</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3781#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Developmental Malformations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outcome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cervical myelopathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cervical spine surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cervical spondylosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intraoperative monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motor evoked potential]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[somatosensory evoked potential]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=3781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J Neurosurg Spine 16:107–113, 2012. DOI: 10.3171/2011.10.SPINE11199
The primary goal of this study was to review the immediate postoperative neurological function in patients surgically treated for symptomatic cervical spine disease without intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. The secondary goal was to assess the economic impact of intraoperative monitoring (IOM) in this patient population.
Methods. This study is a retrospective [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Cervical-decompression-and-reconstruction-without-intraoperative-neurophysiological-monitoring.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3783" title="Cervical decompression and reconstruction without intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Cervical-decompression-and-reconstruction-without-intraoperative-neurophysiological-monitoring-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>J Neurosurg Spine 16:107–113, 2012. DOI: 10.3171/2011.10.SPINE11199</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The primary goal of this study was to review the immediate postoperative neurological function in patients surgically treated for symptomatic cervical spine disease without intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. The secondary goal was to assess the economic impact of intraoperative monitoring (IOM) in this patient population.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Methods. This study is a retrospective review of 720 consecutively treated patients who underwent cervical spine procedures. The patients were identified and the data were collected by individuals who were not involved in their care.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results. A total of 1534 cervical spine levels were treated in 720 patients using anterior, posterior, and combined (360°) approaches. Myelopathy was present preoperatively in 308 patients. There were 185 patients with increased signal intensity within the spinal cord on preoperative T2-weighted MR images, of whom 43 patients had no clinical evidence of myelopathy. Three patients (0.4%) exhibited a new neurological deficit postoperatively. Of these patients, 1 had a preoperative diagnosis of radiculopathy, while the other 2 were treated for myelopathy. The new postoperative deficits completely resolved in all 3 patients and did not require additional treatment. The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for IOM during cervical decompression include 95925 and 95926 for somatosensory evoked potential monitoring of the upper and lower extremities, respectively, as well as 95928 and 95929 for motor evoked potential monitoring of the upper and lower extremities. In addition to the charge for the baseline [monitoring] study, patients are charged hourly for ongoing electrophysiology testing and monitoring using the CPT code 95920. Based on these codes and assuming an average of 4 hours of monitoring time per surgical case, the savings realized in this group of patients was estimated to be $1,024,754.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusions. With the continuing increase in health care costs, it is our responsibility as providers to minimize expenses when possible. This should be accomplished without compromising the quality of care to patients. This study demonstrates that decompression and reconstruction for symptomatic cervical spine disease without IOM may reduce the cost of treatment without adversely impacting patient safety.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3781/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Expansile Cervical Laminoplasty and Cervical Laminectomy and Fusion for Multilevel Cervical Myelopathy</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3765</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3765#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Outcome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical technique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cervical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laminoplasty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myelopathy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=3765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neurosurgery 70:264–277, 2012 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182305669
Controversy exists as to the best posterior operative procedure to treat multilevel compressive cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
OBJECTIVE: To determine clinical, radiological, and patient satisfaction outcomes between expansile cervical laminoplasty (ECL) and cervical laminectomy and fusion (CLF).
METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized study of ECL vs CLF in patients suffering from cervical spondylotic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/A_Prospective_Randomized_Trial_Comparing.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3768" title="A_Prospective,_Randomized_Trial_Comparing" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/A_Prospective_Randomized_Trial_Comparing-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Neurosurgery 70:264–277, 2012 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182305669</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Controversy exists as to the best posterior operative procedure to treat multilevel compressive cervical spondylotic myelopathy.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">OBJECTIVE: To determine clinical, radiological, and patient satisfaction outcomes between expansile cervical laminoplasty (ECL) and cervical laminectomy and fusion (CLF).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized study of ECL vs CLF in patients suffering from cervical spondylotic myelopathy. End points included the Short Form-36, Neck Disability Index, Visual Analog Scale, modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score, Nurick score, and radiographic measures.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">RESULTS: A survey of academic North American spine surgeons (n = 30) demonstrated that CLF is the most commonly used (70%) posterior procedure to treat multilevel spondylotic cervical myelopathy. A total of 16 patients were randomized: 7 to CLF and 9 to ECL. Both groups showed improvements in their Nurick grade and Japanese Orthopedic Association score postoperatively, but only the improvement in the Nurick grade for the ECL group was statistically significant (P &lt; .05). The cervical range of motion between C2 and C7 was reduced by 75% in the CLF group and by only 20% in the ECL group in a comparison of preoperative and postoperative range of motion. The overall increase in canal area was significantly (P &lt; .001) greater in the CLF group, but there was a suggestion that the adjacent level was more narrowed in the CLF group in as little as 1 year postoperatively.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">CONCLUSION: In many respects, ECL compares favorably to CLF. Although the patient numbers were small, there were significant improvements in pain measures in the ECL group while still maintaining range of motion. Restoration of spinal canal area was superior in the CLF group.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3765/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Midterm outcome after a microsurgical unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3750</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3750#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 23:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Outcome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical technique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical outcome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[degenerative spondylolisthesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unilateral approach]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=3750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J Neurosurg Spine 16:68–76, 2012. DOI: 10.3171/2011.7.SPINE11222
The aim of this study was to evaluate the results and effectiveness of bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach in the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS).
Methods. Operations were performed in 84 selected patients (mean age 62.1 ± 10 years) with lumbar DS between the years 2001 and 2008. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/New-approach-for-degenerative-spondylolisthesis.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3755" title="New approach for degenerative spondylolisthesis" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/New-approach-for-degenerative-spondylolisthesis-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>J Neurosurg Spine 16:68–76, 2012. DOI: 10.3171/2011.7.SPINE11222</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The aim of this study was to evaluate the results and effectiveness of bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach in the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Methods. Operations were performed in 84 selected patients (mean age 62.1 ± 10 years) with lumbar DS between the years 2001 and 2008. The selection criteria included lower back pain with or without sciatica, neurogenic claudication that had not improved after at least 6 months of conservative treatment, and a radiological diagnosis of Grade I DS and lumbar stenosis. Decompression was performed at 3 levels in 15.5%, 2 levels in 54.8%, and 1 level in 29.7% of the patients with 1 level of spondylolisthesis. All patients were followed up for at least 24 months. For clinical evaluations, a visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Neurogenic Claudication Outcome Score (NCOS) were used. Spinal canal size and (neutral and dynamic) slip percentages were measured both pre- and postoperatively.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results. Neutral and dynamic slip percentages did not significantly change after surgery (p = 0.67 and p = 0.63, respectively). Spinal canal size increased from 50.6 ± 5.9 to 102.8 ± 9.5 mm2 (p &lt; 0.001). The ODI decreased significantly in both the early and late follow-up evaluations, and good or excellent results were obtained in 64 cases (80%). The NCOS demonstrated significant improvement in the late follow-up results (p &lt; 0.001). One patient (1.2%) required secondary fusion during the follow-up period.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusions. Postoperative clinical improvement and radiological findings clearly demonstrated that the unilateral approach for treating 1-level and multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis with DS is a safe, effective, and minimally invasive method in terms of reducing the need for stabilization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3750/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patient comorbidity score predicting the incidence of perioperative complications: assessing the impact of comorbidities on complications in spine surgery</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3740</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3740#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Outcome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comorbidity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spine surgery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J Neurosurg Spine 16:37–43, 2012. DOI: 10.3171/2011.9.SPINE11283
Present attempts to control health care costs focus on reducing the incidence of complications and hospital-acquired conditions (HACs). One approach uses restriction or elimination of hospital payments for HACs. Present approaches assume that all HACs are created equal and that payment restrictions should be applied uniformly. Patient factors, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/MI-AP1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3748" title="MI-AP" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/MI-AP1-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>J Neurosurg Spine 16:37–43, 2012. DOI: 10.3171/2011.9.SPINE11283</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Present attempts to control health care costs focus on reducing the incidence of complications and hospital-acquired conditions (HACs). One approach uses restriction or elimination of hospital payments for HACs. Present approaches assume that all HACs are created equal and that payment restrictions should be applied uniformly. Patient factors, and especially patient comorbidities, likely impact complication incidence. The relationship of patient comorbidities and complication incidence in spine surgery has not been prospectively reported.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">METHODS: The authors conducted a prospective assessment of complications in spine surgery during a 6-month period; an independent auditor and a validated definition of perioperative complications were used. Initial demographics captured relevant patient comorbidities. The authors constructed a model of relative risk assessment based on the presence of a variety of comorbidities. They examined the impact of specific comorbidities and the cumulative effect of multiple comorbidities on complication incidence.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">RESULTS: Two hundred forty-nine patients undergoing 259 procedures at a tertiary care facility were evaluated during the 6-month duration of the study. Eighty percent of the patients underwent fusion procedures. One hundred thirty patients (52.2%) experienced at least 1 complication, with major complications occurring in 21.4% and minor complications in 46.4% of the cohort. Major complications doubled the median duration of hospital stay, from 6 to 12 days in cervical spine patients and from 7 to 14 days in thoracolumbar spine patients. At least 1 comorbid condition was present in 86% of the patients. An increasing number of comorbidities strongly correlated with increased risk of major, minor, and any complications (p = 0.017, p &lt; 0.0001, and p &lt; 0.0001, respectively). Patient factors correlating with increased risk of specific complications included systemic malignancy and cardiac conditions other than hypertension.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidities significantly increase the risk of perioperative complications. An increasing number of comorbidities in an individual patient significantly increases the risk of a perioperative adverse event. Patient factors significantly impact the relative risk of HACs and perioperative complications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3740/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Postoperative Outcome of Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy-Related Lobar Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Case Series and Systematic Review</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3734</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3734#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Outcome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vascular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cerebral amyloid angiopathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Length of stay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobar intracerebral hemorrhage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postoperative]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=3734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neurosurgery 70:125–130, 2012 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31822ea02a
Despite its accessible superficial location, the indication for surgical evacuation in cases of lobar intracerebral hemorrhage (LICH) suspected to be related to cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is controversial because of advanced patient age and concerns about postoperative hemostasis.
OBJECTIVE: To examine factors associated with postoperative outcome in CAA-related LICH.
METHODS: Review of consecutive [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Cerebral-Amyloid-Angiopathy-Related-Lobar-Intracerebral-Hemorrhage.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3735" title="Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy-Related Lobar Intracerebral Hemorrhage" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Cerebral-Amyloid-Angiopathy-Related-Lobar-Intracerebral-Hemorrhage-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Neurosurgery 70:125–130, 2012 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31822ea02a</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Despite its accessible superficial location, the indication for surgical evacuation in cases of lobar intracerebral hemorrhage (LICH) suspected to be related to cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is controversial because of advanced patient age and concerns about postoperative hemostasis.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">OBJECTIVE: To examine factors associated with postoperative outcome in CAA-related LICH.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">METHODS: Review of consecutive patients with pathologically proven CAA who underwent LICH evacuation at Saint Marys Hospital, Rochester, Minnesota, between 1987 and 2006. End points were length of stay and postoperative outcome at discharge and last follow-up using the Glasgow Outcome Scale. We also performed a systematic review of all published studies evaluating the outcome of surgically treated CCA-related LICH published between 1984 and 2010.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">RESULTS: We identified 23 patients with CAA-related LICH treated surgically. Favorable outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale .3) at discharge was noted in 5 patients (22%), and at 6- to 12-month follow-up (n = 15) in 7 patients (47%). Three (13%) died in the hospital, including 1 of 4 patients with postoperative hemorrhage. Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) was associated with poor outcome at discharge. Older age ($75 years), history of hypertension, and degree of preoperative midline shift were associated with more prolonged length of stay. In our systematic review, we identified 14 studies including 278 cases. Overall mortality rate was 25%, and poor postoperative outcome was associated with older age, IVH, and preoperative dementia.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">CONCLUSION: Neurosurgical evacuation may be performed with acceptable safety in patients with CAA-related LICH. A systematic literature review indicates that older age, preexistent dementia, and presurgical IVH portend poor postoperative outcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3734/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Early development and progression of heterotopic ossification in cervical total disc replacement</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3705</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3705#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 23:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Outcome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cervical total disc replacement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heterotopic ossification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spontaneous fusion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=3705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J Neurosurg Spine 16:31–36, 2012. DOI: 10.3171/2011.8.SPINE11303
The purpose of cervical total disc replacement (TDR) is to decrease the incidence of adjacent segment disease through motion preservation. Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a well-known complication after hip and knee arthroplasties. There are few reports regarding HO in patients undergoing cervical TDR, however; and the occurrence of HO [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Early-development-and-progression-of-heterotopic-ossification-in-cervical-total-disc-replacement.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3710" title="Early development and progression of heterotopic ossification in cervical total disc replacement" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Early-development-and-progression-of-heterotopic-ossification-in-cervical-total-disc-replacement-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>J Neurosurg Spine 16:31–36, 2012. DOI: 10.3171/2011.8.SPINE11303</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The purpose of cervical total disc replacement (TDR) is to decrease the incidence of adjacent segment disease through motion preservation. Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a well-known complication after hip and knee arthroplasties. There are few reports regarding HO in patients undergoing cervical TDR, however; and the occurrence of HO and its effects on cervical motion have rarely been reported. Moreover, temporal progression of HO has not been fully addressed. One goal of this study involved determining the incidence of HO following cervical TDR, as identified from plain radiographs, and demonstrating the progression of HO during the follow-up period. A second goal consisted of determining whether segmental motion could be preserved and identifying the relationship between HO and clinical outcomes.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Methods. The authors conducted a retrospective clinical and radiological study of 28 consecutive patients who underwent cervical TDR with Mobi-C prostheses (LDR Medical) between September 2006 and October 2008. Radiological outcomes were evaluated using lateral dynamic radiographs obtained preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. The occurrence of HO was interpreted on lateral radiographs using the McAfee classification. Cervical range of motion (ROM) was also measured. The visual analog scale (VAS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) were used to evaluate clinical outcome.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results. The mean follow-up period was 21.6 ± 7.0 months, and the mean occurrence of HO was at 8.0 ± 6.6 months postoperatively. At the last follow-up, 18 (64.3%) of 28 patients had HO: Grade I, 6 patients; Grade II, 8 patients; Grade III, 3 patients; and Grade IV, 1 patient. Heterotopic ossification progression was proportional to the duration of follow-up; HO was present in 3 (10.7%) of 28 patients at 1 month; 7 (25.0%) of 28 patients at 3 months; 11 (42.3%) of 26 patients at 6 months; 15 (62.5%) of 24 patients at 12 months; and 17 (77.3%) of 22 patients at 24 months. Cervical ROM was preserved in Grades I and II HO but was restricted in Grades III and IV HO. Clinical improvement according to the VAS and NDI was not significantly correlated with the occurrence of HO.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusions. The overall incidence of HO after cervical TDR was relatively high. Moreover, HO began unexpectedly to appear early after surgery. Heterotopic ossification progression was proportional to the time that had elapsed postoperatively. Grade III or IV HO can restrict the cervical ROM and may lead to spontaneous fusion; however, the occurrence of HO did not affect clinical outcome. The results of this study indicate that a high incidence of HO with the possibility of spontaneous fusion is to be expected during long-term follow-up and should be considered before performing cervical TDR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3705/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Impact of admission month and hospital teaching status on outcomes in subarachnoid hemorrhage: evidence against the July effect</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3697</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3697#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Outcome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vascular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[July effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subarachnoid hemorrhage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teaching hospital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vascular disorders]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=3697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J Neurosurg 116:157–163, 2012. DOI: 10.3171/2011.8.JNS11324
The authors sought to identify the presence of a “July effect,” a transient increase in adverse outcomes during July, among a cohort of spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) admissions recorded in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS).
Methods. The discharge status, admission month, patient demographics, treatment parameters, and hospital characteristics among spontaneous SAH [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/emergencyroom.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3703" title="emergencyroom" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/emergencyroom-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>J Neurosurg 116:157–163, 2012. DOI: 10.3171/2011.8.JNS11324</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The authors sought to identify the presence of a “July effect,” a transient increase in adverse outcomes during July, among a cohort of spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) admissions recorded in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Methods. The discharge status, admission month, patient demographics, treatment parameters, and hospital characteristics among spontaneous SAH admissions were extracted from the 2001–2008 NIS. Multivariate regression was used to determine whether an unfavorable discharge status and/or in-hospital mortality significantly increased in summer months in a pattern suggestive of a July effect. Additional models were generated to assess the impact of hospital teaching status on these outcomes.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results. Among 57,663,486 hospital admissions from the 2001–2008 NIS, 52,879 cases of spontaneous SAH (ICD-9-CM 430) were treated at teaching (36,914 cases [70%]) and nonteaching (15,965 cases [30%]) facilities. Regression models failed to reveal a July effect for in-hospital mortality (c2 = 0.75, p = 1.000) or unfavorable discharges (c2 = 1.69, p = 0.999) among monthly SAH admissions, although they did suggest a significant reduction in these outcomes (in-hospital mortality, OR = 0.89, p &lt; 0.001; unfavorable discharges, OR = 0.88, p &lt; 0.001) among teaching hospitals as compared with nonteaching hospitals after adjustment for disparities in demographic, treatment, and hospital characteristics.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusions. The discharge disposition among SAH admissions within the NIS was not suggestive of a July effect but did reveal that teaching institutions have significantly lower rates of adverse outcomes when compared with nonteaching hospitals. Note, however, that the origins of this difference related to teaching status remain unclear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3697/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

