<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neurosurgery Blog &#187; Deep Brain Stimulation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/tag/deep-brain-stimulation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com</link>
	<description>Daily bibliographic and video review of the Neurosurgery Department. La Fe University Hospital. Valencia, Spain</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:00:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Hardware-related infections after deep brain stimulation surgery: review of incidence, severity and management in 212 single-center procedures in the first year after implantation</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3600</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3600#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 23:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deep Brain Stimulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deep brain stimulation complications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Device-related infections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware complications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical complications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=3600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Acta Neurochir (2011) 153:2337–2341. DOI 10.1007/s00701-011-1130-2
Device-related infection is a common occurrence after deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery, and may result in additional interventions and a loss of efficacy of therapy. This retrospective review aimed to evaluate the incidence, severity and management of device-related infections in 212 DBS procedures performed in our institute.
Methods Data on 106 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/deep-brain-stimulation-surgery1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3605" title="deep brain stimulation surgery" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/deep-brain-stimulation-surgery1-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Acta Neurochir (2011) 153:2337–2341. DOI 10.1007/s00701-011-1130-2</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Device-related infection is a common occurrence after deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery, and may result in additional interventions and a loss of efficacy of therapy. This retrospective review aimed to evaluate the incidence, severity and management of device-related infections in 212 DBS procedures performed in our institute.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Methods Data on 106 patients, in whom 212 DBS procedures were performed between 2001 and 2011 at our institute by a single neurosurgeon (M.P.), were reviewed to assess the incidence, severity, management and clinical characteristics of infections in the first year after the implantation of a DBS system.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results Infections occurred in 8.5% of patients and 4.2% of procedures. Of the nine infections, eight involved the neurostimulator and extensions, and one the whole system. The infections occurred 30.7 days after implantation: 7 within 30 days and 2 within 6 months. Infected and uninfected patients were comparable in terms of age, sex, indication for DBS implantation and neurostimulator location. In eight cases, the system components involved were removed and re-implanted after 3 months, while in one case the complete hardware was removed and not re-implanted.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusion The overall incidence of postoperative infections after DBS system implantation was 4.2%; this rate decreased over time. All infections required further surgery. Correct and timely management of partial infections may result in successful salvage of part of the system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3600/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Accuracy of Frame-Based Stereotactic Magnetic Resonance Imaging vs Frame-Based Stereotactic Head Computed Tomography Fused With Recent Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Postimplantation Deep Brain Stimulator Lead Localization</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3510</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3510#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 23:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Functional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accuracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deep Brain Stimulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postimplantation intraoperative computed tomography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postimplantation intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stereotactic surgery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=3510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neurosurgery 69:1299–1306, 2011 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31822b7069
Introduction of the portable intraoperative CT scanner provides for a precise and cost-effective way of fusing head CT images with high-tesla MRI for the exquisite definition of soft tissue needed for stereotactic targeting.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of stereotactic electrode placement in patients undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) by comparing frame-based [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Accuracy_of_Frame_Based_Stereotactic_Magnetic.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3515" title="Accuracy_of_Frame_Based_Stereotactic_Magnetic" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Accuracy_of_Frame_Based_Stereotactic_Magnetic-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Neurosurgery 69:1299–1306, 2011 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31822b7069</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Introduction of the portable intraoperative CT scanner provides for a precise and cost-effective way of fusing head CT images with high-tesla MRI for the exquisite definition of soft tissue needed for stereotactic targeting.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of stereotactic electrode placement in patients undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) by comparing frame-based postimplantation intraoperative CT (iCT) images fused to a recent 3T-MRI with frame-based postimplantation intraoperative MRI (iMRI) alone.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">METHODS: Frame-based DBS surgeries of 46 targets performed from February 8, 2007 to April 28, 2008 in 26 patients with the use of immediate postimplantation iMRI for target localization were compared with frame-based immediate postimplantation iCT fused with a recent 3T brain MRI for DBS localization of 50 targets performed from August 13, 2008 to February 18, 2010 in 26 patients. Pre- and postoperative mid anterior commissure-posterior commissure line coordinates and XYZ coordinates for preoperatively calculated DBS targets (intended target) and for the permanent DBS lead tips were determined. The differences between preoperative DBS target and postoperative permanent DBS lead-tip coordinates based on postimplantation intraoperative MRI for the MRI-alone group and based on postimplantation intraoperative CT fused to recent preoperative MRI in the CTMRI group were measured. The t test and Yuen test were used for comparison.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups when comparing the pre- and postperative changes in mid anterior commissure-posterior commissure line coordinates and XYZ coordinates.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">CONCLUSION: Postimplantation DBS lead localization and therefore targeting accuracy was not significantly different between frame-based stereotactic 1.5T-MRI and framebased stereotactic head CT fused with recent 3T-MRI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3510/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Discrepancies between the MRI and the electrophysiologically defined subthalamic nucleus</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3499</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3499#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 23:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Functional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain shift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deep Brain Stimulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microelectrode recording]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subthalamic nucleus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=3499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Acta Neurochir (2011) 153:2307–2318. DOI 10.1007/s00701-011-1081-7
The aim of our study was to evaluate discrepancies between the electrophysiologically and MRI-defined subthalamic nucleus (STN) in order to contribute to the ongoing debate of whether or not microelectrode recording (MER) provides additional information to imageguided targeting in deep brain stimulation.
Methods: Forty-four STNs in 22 patients with Parkinson’s disease [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Discrepancies-between-theMRI-and-the-electrophysiologically-defined-subthalamic-nucleus.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3500" title="Discrepancies between theMRI- and the electrophysiologically defined subthalamic nucleus" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Discrepancies-between-theMRI-and-the-electrophysiologically-defined-subthalamic-nucleus-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Acta Neurochir (2011) 153:2307–2318. DOI 10.1007/s00701-011-1081-7</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The aim of our study was to evaluate discrepancies between the electrophysiologically and MRI-defined subthalamic nucleus (STN) in order to contribute to the ongoing debate of whether or not microelectrode recording (MER) provides additional information to imageguided targeting in deep brain stimulation.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Methods: Forty-four STNs in 22 patients with Parkinson’s disease were investigated. The three-dimensional MRI-defined STN was derived from segmentations of axial and coronal T2-weighted images. The electrophysiological STNs were generated from intraoperative MERs in 1,487 locations. The stereotactical coordinates of positive and negative STN recordings were re-imported to the planning software, where a three-dimensional reconstruction of the electrophysiological STN was performed and fused to the MRI data set. The estimated borders of the MRI- and MERSTN were compared. For statistical analysis Student&#8217;s t, Mann-Whitney rank sum and Fisher&#8217;s exact tests were used.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results: MER-STN volumes, which were found outside the MRI-STN, ranged from 0 mm3 to 87 mm3 (mean: 45 mm3). A mean of 44% of the MER-STN volumes exceeded the MRI-STN (maximum: 85.1%; minimum: 15.1 %); 53.4% (n=793) of the microelectrode recordings were concordant and 46.6% (n=694) discordant with the MRI-defined anatomical STN. Regarding the dorsal borders, we found discrepancies between the MER- and MRI-STN of 0.27 mm (= mean; SD: 0.51 mm) on the first operated side and 1.51 mm (SD: 1.5 mm) on the second (p=0.010, t-test).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusions: MER provides additional information to highresolution anatomical MR images and may help to detect the amount and direction of brain shift.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3499/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Expanding applications of deep brain stimulation: a potential therapeutic role in obesity and addiction management</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3443</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3443#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 23:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Functional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meta-analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Addiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Binge eating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deep Brain Stimulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypothalamus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nucleus accumbens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obesity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=3443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Acta Neurochir (2011) 153:2293–2306. DOI 10.1007/s00701-011-1166-3
The indications for deep brain stimulation (DBS) are expanding, and the feasibility and efficacy of this surgical procedure in various neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders continue to be tested.
This review attempts to provide background and rationale for applying this therapeutic option to obesity and addiction. We review neural targets currently under [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Expanding-applications-of-deep-brain-stimulation-a-potential-therapeutic-role-in-obesity-and-addiction-management.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3444" title="Expanding applications of deep brain stimulation- a potential therapeutic role in obesity and addiction management" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Expanding-applications-of-deep-brain-stimulation-a-potential-therapeutic-role-in-obesity-and-addiction-management-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Acta Neurochir (2011) 153:2293–2306. DOI 10.1007/s00701-011-1166-3</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The indications for deep brain stimulation (DBS) are expanding, and the feasibility and efficacy of this surgical procedure in various neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders continue to be tested.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This review attempts to provide background and rationale for applying this therapeutic option to obesity and addiction. We review neural targets currently under clinical investigation for DBS—the hypothalamus and nucleus accumbens—in conditions such as cluster headache and obsessive-compulsive disorder. These brain regions have also been strongly implicated in obesity and addiction. These disorders are frequently refractory, with very high rates of weight regain or relapse, respectively, despite the best available treatments.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Methods We performed a structured literature review of the animal studies of DBS, which revealed attenuation of food intake, increased metabolism, or decreased drug seeking. We also review the available radiologic evidence in humans, implicating the hypothalamus and nucleus in obesity and addiction.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results The available evidence of the promise of DBS in these conditions combined with significant medical need, support pursuing pilot studies and clinical trials of DBS in order to decrease the risk of dietary and drug relapse.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusions Well-designed pilot studies and clinical trials enrolling carefully selected patients with obesity or addiction should be initiated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3443/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Colored Fractional Anisotropy Mapping of the Ventralis Intermedius Nucleus of the Thalamus</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3341</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3341#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 23:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Functional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deep Brain Stimulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diffusion tensor imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiber tractography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fractional anisotropy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ventralis intermedius]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=3341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neurosurgery 69:1124–1130, 2011 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182296a42
The ventralis intermedius (VIM) nucleus of the thalamus is the primary surgical target for treatment of tremor. Most centers rely on indirect targeting based on atlas-defined coordinates rather than patient-specific anatomy, making intraoperative physiological mapping critical. Detailed identification of this target based on patientspecific anatomic features can help optimize the surgical [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/VIM-DTI.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3342" title="VIM-DTI" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/VIM-DTI-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Neurosurgery 69:1124–1130, 2011 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182296a42</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The ventralis intermedius (VIM) nucleus of the thalamus is the primary surgical target for treatment of tremor. Most centers rely on indirect targeting based on atlas-defined coordinates rather than patient-specific anatomy, making intraoperative physiological mapping critical. Detailed identification of this target based on patientspecific anatomic features can help optimize the surgical treatment of tremor.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">OBJECTIVE: To study colored fractional anisotropic images and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) tractography to identify characteristic magnetic resonance appearances of the VIM nucleus.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">METHODS: Four patients undergoing stereotactic surgery for essential tremor (ET) were retrospectively studied with analysis of magnetic resonance imaging-based colored fractional anisotropy (FA) images and fiber tractography. All were scanned with a 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging unit, and all sequences were obtained before frame placement. Because the goal of this study was to identify the DTI characteristics of physiologically defined VIM nucleus, we selected and studied patients who had undergone DTI and had efficacious tremor control with intraoperative microlesioning effect and tremor reduction with less than 2.0-V stimulation.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">RESULTS: Analysis of color FA maps, which graphically illustrate fiber directionality, revealed consistent anatomic patterns. The region of the VIM nucleus can be seen as an intermediate region where there is a characteristic transition of color. Presumptive VIM nucleus interconnectivity with sensorimotor cortex and cerebellum was identified via the internal capsule and the superior cerebellar peduncle, respectively. FA maps could also be used to distinguish segments of gray matter, white matter, and gray-white matter boundaries.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">CONCLUSION: Analysis of DTI and FA maps on widely available 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging yields clear identification of various structures key to neurosurgical targeting. Prospective evaluation of integrating DTI into neurosurgical planning may be warranted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3341/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging findings during deep brain stimulation surgery</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3266</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3266#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 22:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Functional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deep Brain Stimulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functional neurosurgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intracranial hemorrhage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intraoperative MR imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parkinson disease]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=3266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J Neurosurg 115:852–857, 2011.DOI: 10.3171/2011.5.JNS101457
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established neurosurgical technique used to treat a variety of neurological disorders, including Parkinson disease, essential tremor, dystonia, epilepsy, depression, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. This study reports on the use of intraoperative MR imaging during DBS surgery to evaluate acute hemorrhage, intracranial air, brain shift, and accuracy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Intraoperative-magnetic-resonance-imaging-findings-during-deep-brain-stimulation-surgery1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3271" title="Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging findings during deep brain stimulation surgery" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Intraoperative-magnetic-resonance-imaging-findings-during-deep-brain-stimulation-surgery1-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>J Neurosurg 115:852–857, 2011.DOI: 10.3171/2011.5.JNS101457</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established neurosurgical technique used to treat a variety of neurological disorders, including Parkinson disease, essential tremor, dystonia, epilepsy, depression, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. This study reports on the use of intraoperative MR imaging during DBS surgery to evaluate acute hemorrhage, intracranial air, brain shift, and accuracy of lead placement.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Methods. During a 46-month period, 143 patients underwent 152 DBS surgeries including 289 lead placements utilizing intraoperative 1.5-T MR imaging. Imaging was supervised by an MR imaging physicist to maintain the specific absorption rate below the required level of 0.1 W/kg and always included T1 magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo and T2* gradient echo sequences with selected use of T2 fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and T2 fast spin echo (FSE). Retrospective review of the intraoperative MR imaging examinations was performed to quantify the amount of hemorrhage and the amount of air introduced during the DBS surgery.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results. Intraoperative MR imaging revealed 5 subdural hematomas, 3 subarachnoid hemorrhages, and 1 intraparenchymal hemorrhage in 9 of the 143 patients. Only 1 patient experiencing a subarachnoid hemorrhage developed clinically apparent symptoms, which included transient severe headache and mild confusion. Brain shift due to intracranial air was identified in 144 separate instances.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusions. Intraoperative MR imaging can be safely performed and may assist in demonstrating acute changes involving intracranial hemorrhage and air during DBS surgery. These findings are rarely clinically significant and typically resolve prior to follow-up imaging. Selective use of T2 FLAIR and T2 FSE imaging can confirm the presence of hemorrhage or air and preclude the need for CT examinations</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3266/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Frameless deep brain stimulation using intraoperative O-arm technology</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3006</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3006#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 22:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Functional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deep Brain Stimulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functional neurosurgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intraoperative imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead accuracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead location]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuronavigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stereotactic and functional radiosurgery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=3006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J Neurosurg 115:301–309, 2011. DOI: 10.3171/2011.3.JNS101642
Correct lead location in the desired target has been proven to be a strong influential factor for good clinical outcome in deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery. Commonly, a surgeon’s first reliable assessment of such location is made on postoperative imaging. While intraoperative CT (iCT) and intraoperative MR imaging have been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/O-arm-DBS.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3008" title="O-arm DBS" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/O-arm-DBS-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>J Neurosurg 115:301–309, 2011. DOI: 10.3171/2011.3.JNS101642</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Correct lead location in the desired target has been proven to be a strong influential factor for good clinical outcome in deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery. Commonly, a surgeon’s first reliable assessment of such location is made on postoperative imaging. While intraoperative CT (iCT) and intraoperative MR imaging have been previously described, the authors present a series of frameless DBS procedures using O-arm iCT.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Methods. Twelve consecutive patients with 15 leads underwent frameless DBS placement using electrophysiological testing and O-arm iCT. Initial target coordinates were made using standard indirect and direct assessment. Microelectrode recording (MER) with kinesthetic responses was performed, followed by microstimulation to evaluate the side-effect profile. Intraoperative 3D CT acquisitions obtained between each MER pass and after final lead placement were fused with the preoperative MR image to verify intended MER movements around the target area and to identify the final lead location. Tip coordinates from the initial plan, final intended target, and actual lead location on iCT were later compared with the lead location on postoperative MR imaging, and euclidean distances were calculated. The amount of radiation exposure during each procedure was calculated and compared with the estimated radiation exposure if iCT was not performed.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results. The mean euclidean distances between the coordinates for the initial plan, final intended target, and actual lead on iCT compared with the lead coordinates on postoperative MR imaging were 3.04 ± 1.45 mm (p = 0.0001), 2.62 ± 1.50 mm (p = 0.0001), and 1.52 ± 1.78 mm (p = 0.0052), respectively. The authors obtained good merging error during image fusion, and postoperative brain shift was minimal. The actual radiation exposure from iCT was invariably less than estimates of exposure using standard lateral fluoroscopy and anteroposterior radiographs (p &lt; 0.0001).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusions. O-arm iCT may be useful in frameless DBS surgery to approximate microelectrode or lead locations intraoperatively. Intraoperative CT, however, may not replace fundamental DBS surgical techniques such as electrophysiological testing in movement disorder surgery. Despite the lack of evidence for brain shift from the procedure, iCT-measured coordinates were statistically different from those obtained postoperatively, probably indicating image merging inaccuracy and the difficulties in accurately denoting lead location. Therefore, electrophysiological testing may truly be the only means of precisely knowing the location in 3D space intraoperatively. While iCT may provide clues to electrode or lead location during the procedure, its true utility may be in DBS procedures targeting areas where electrophysiology is less useful. The use of iCT appears to reduce radiation exposure compared with the authors’ traditional frameless technique.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3006/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transgressing the Ventricular Wall During Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery for Parkinson Disease Increases the Risk of Adverse Neurological Sequelae</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2988</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2988#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 22:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Functional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deep Brain Stimulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parkinson disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stereotactic surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical complications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=2988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neurosurgery 69:294–300, 2011 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318214abda
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) at the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an effective treatment for the motor manifestations of advanced medically refractory Parkinson disease. Because of the medial location of the target, surgical trajectories to the STN may violate the ipsilateral lateral ventricle.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether violating the ventricle during STN DBS [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/air-in-tne-ventricle1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2992" title="air in tne ventricle" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/air-in-tne-ventricle1-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Neurosurgery 69:294–300, 2011 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318214abda</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Deep brain stimulation (DBS) at the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an effective treatment for the motor manifestations of advanced medically refractory Parkinson disease. Because of the medial location of the target, surgical trajectories to the STN may violate the ipsilateral lateral ventricle.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">OBJECTIVE: To determine whether violating the ventricle during STN DBS surgery is associated with postoperative confusion.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all STN implantation procedures for Parkinson disease performed by 1 surgeon between January 2005 and September 2008 was performed. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging was performed in all cases, and each scan was reviewed for evidence of ventricular wall violation. All charts were reviewed for postoperative confusion and/or increased length of hospital stay.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">RESULTS: A total of 145 leads were implanted in 81 patients over 102 admissions. Fortythree patients underwent contemporaneous bilateral lead implantation; 23 underwent unilateral implantation; and 18 underwent staged bilateral implantation. The cases of 8 patients were complicated by postoperative confusion and increased length of stay. Sixteen magnetic resonance imaging scans demonstrated evidence of ventricular wall violation including all 8 patients with postoperative confusion. The relative risk of having postoperative confusion after traversing the ventricle is 87 (P , .001).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">CONCLUSION: Violating the ventricular system during STN DBS surgery correlated significantly with postoperative altered mental status and subsequent increased length of hospital stay. This finding may explain why cognitive complications are observed more frequently in Parkinson disease patients undergoing DBS at the STN compared with the internal globus pallidus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2988/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Accuracy of Postoperative Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Image Fusion for Assessing Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2835</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2835#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Functional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computed tomography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CT/MRI fusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deep Brain Stimulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Implantable guide tube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Implanted electrodes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetic resonance imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stereotactic techniques]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=2835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neurosurgery 69:207–214, 2011 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318218c7ae
Knowledge of the anatomic location of the deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode in the brain is essential in quality control and judicious selection of stimulation parameters. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging coregistered with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used to document the electrode location safely. The accuracy of this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Accuracy_of_Postoperative_Computed_Tomography_and2.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2838" title="Accuracy_of_Postoperative_Computed_Tomography_and2" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Accuracy_of_Postoperative_Computed_Tomography_and2-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Neurosurgery 69:207–214, 2011 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318218c7ae</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Knowledge of the anatomic location of the deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode in the brain is essential in quality control and judicious selection of stimulation parameters. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging coregistered with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used to document the electrode location safely. The accuracy of this method, however, depends on many factors, including the quality of the source images, the area of signal artifact created by the DBS lead, and the fusion algorithm.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">OBJECTIVE: To calculate the accuracy of determining the location of active contacts of the DBS electrode by coregistering postoperative CT image to intraoperative MRI.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">METHODS: Intraoperative MRI with a surrogate marker (carbothane stylette) was digitally coregistered with postoperative CT with DBS electrodes in 8 consecutive patients. The location of the active contact of the DBS electrode was calculated in the stereotactic frame space, and the discrepancy between the 2 images was assessed.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">RESULTS: The carbothane stylette significantly reduces the signal void on the MRI to a mean diameter of 1.4 6 0.1 mm. The discrepancy between the CT and MRI coregistration in assessing the active contact location of the DBS lead is 1.6 6 0.2 mm, P &lt; .001 with iPlan (BrainLab AG, Erlangen, Germany) and 1.5 6 0.2 mm, P &lt; .001 with Framelink (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) software.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">CONCLUSION: CT/MRI coregistration is an acceptable method of identifying the anatomic location of DBS electrode and active contacts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2835/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High-Frequency Pallidal Stimulation for Camptocormia in Parkinson Disease: Case Report</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2663</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2663#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 22:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Functional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camptocormia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deep Brain Stimulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dystonia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globus pallidus interna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parkinson disease]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=2663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neurosurgery 68:E1501–E1505, 2011 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318210c859
Camptocormia is characterized by abnormal flexion of the thoracolumbar spine that increases during upright posture and abates in the recumbent position and has been reported to occur in patients with Parkinson disease. Camptocormia causes significant spinal and abdominal pain, impairment of balance, and social stigma.
CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 57-year-old woman with Parkinson [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/High_Frequency_Pallidal_Stimulation_for.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2664" title="High_Frequency_Pallidal_Stimulation_for" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/High_Frequency_Pallidal_Stimulation_for-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Neurosurgery 68:E1501–E1505, 2011 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318210c859</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Camptocormia is characterized by abnormal flexion of the thoracolumbar spine that increases during upright posture and abates in the recumbent position and has been reported to occur in patients with Parkinson disease. Camptocormia causes significant spinal and abdominal pain, impairment of balance, and social stigma.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 57-year-old woman with Parkinson disease developed severe camptocormia, which did not improve with trials of antiparkinsonian and muscle relaxant medications. The patient was successfully treated with bilateral globus pallidus interna deep brain stimulation surgery under general anesthesia. High-frequency neuromodulation afforded relief of camptocormia and improvement in Parkinson disease symptoms.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">CONCLUSION: Camptocormia in Parkinson disease may represent a form of dystonia and can be treated effectively with chronic pallidal neuromodulation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2663/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

