<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neurosurgery Blog &#187; elderly patient</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/tag/elderly-patient/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com</link>
	<description>Daily bibliographic and video review of the Neurosurgery Department. La Fe University Hospital. Valencia, Spain</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:00:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Trends, Major Medical Complications, and Charges Associated With Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Older Adults</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/869</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/869#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 04:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Outcome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elderly patient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lumbar spinal stenosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morbidity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surgical treatment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JAMA. 2010;303(13):1259-1265
In recent decades, the fastest growth in lumbar surgery occurred in older patients with spinal stenosis. Trials indicate that for selected patients, decompressive surgery offers an advantage over nonoperative treatment, but surgeons often recommend more invasive fusion procedures. Comorbidity is common in older patients, so benefits and risks must be carefully weighed in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Lumbar-stenosis-Medicare.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-870" title="Lumbar stenosis Medicare" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Lumbar-stenosis-Medicare-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="120" height="120" /></a>JAMA. 2010;303(13):1259-1265</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In recent decades, the fastest growth in lumbar surgery occurred in older patients with spinal stenosis. Trials indicate that for selected patients, decompressive surgery offers an advantage over nonoperative treatment, but surgeons often recommend more invasive fusion procedures. Comorbidity is common in older patients, so benefits and risks must be carefully weighed in the choice of surgical procedure.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Objective: To examine trends in use of different types of stenosis operations and the association of complications and resource use with surgical complexity.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Design, Setting, and Patients: Retrospective cohort analysis of Medicare claims for 2002-2007, focusing on 2007 to assess complications and resource use in US hospitals. Operations for Medicare recipients undergoing surgery for lumbar stenosis (n=32 152 in the first 11 months of 2007) were grouped into 3 gradations of invasiveness: decompression alone, simple fusion (1 or 2 disk levels, single surgical approach), or complex fusion (more than 2 disk levels or combined anterior and posterior approach).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Main Outcome Measures: Rates of the 3 types of surgery, major complications, postoperative mortality, and resource use.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results: Overall, surgical rates declined slightly from 2002-2007, but the rate of complex fusion procedures increased 15-fold, from 1.3 to 19.9 per 100.000 beneficiaries. Lifethreatening complications increased with increasing surgical invasiveness, from 2.3% among patients having decompression alone to 5.6% among those having complex fusions. After adjustment for age, comorbidity, previous spine surgery, and other features, the odds ratio (OR) of life-threatening complications for complex fusion compared with decompression alone was 2.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.50-3.49). A similar pattern was observed for rehospitalization within 30 days, which occurred for 7.8% of patients undergoing decompression and 13.0% having a complex fusion (adjusted OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.74-2.17). Adjusted mean hospital charges for complex fusion procedures were US $80.888 compared with US $23.724 for decompression alone.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusions: Among Medicare recipients, between 2002 and 2007, the frequency of complex fusion procedures for spinal stenosis increased while the frequency of decompression surgery and simple fusions decreased. In 2007, compared with decompression, simple fusion and complex fusion were associated with increased risk of major complications, 30-day mortality, and resource use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/869/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Craniotomy for resection of meningioma in the elderly: a multicenter, prospective analysis from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/336</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/336#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 05:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oncology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elderly patient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meningioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surgical treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survival]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J Neurol Psychiatry. DOI:10.1136/jnnp.2009.185074
Whether there is an increased surgical risk in elderly patients who undergo craniotomy for meningioma resection, remains a point of controversy. Utilizing multicenter, prospective data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, the present study sought to address this controversy.
All patients who underwent a craniotomy for resection of intracranial meningioma between 1997 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica;">J Neurol Psychiatry. DOI:10.1136/jnnp.2009.185074</p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px Helvetica;">Whether there is an increased surgical risk in elderly patients who undergo craniotomy for meningioma resection, remains a point of controversy. Utilizing multicenter, prospective data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, the present study sought to address this controversy.</p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px Helvetica;">All patients who underwent a craniotomy for resection of intracranial meningioma between 1997 and 2006 at 123 VA hospitals around the country were included. After controlling for preoperative factors such as ASA class, race, diabetes mellitus, disseminated cancer, tobacco use, tumor location, and functional health status in a multivariate logistic regression model, the effect of elderly age (age greater than 70 years) on 30-day mortality was determined.</p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px Helvetica;">Our study included 1,281 patients who underwent surgical resection of an intracranial meningioma. The elderly cohort, represented 21.2% (n=258) of our total study population. Elderly patients had a higher 30-day mortality (12.0%) than younger subjects (4.6%) (P &lt; 0.0001). Similarly, elderly patients were more likely to have one or more complications (29.8% vs. 13.1%, P &lt; 0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression identified age, functional status, preoperative disseminated cancer, and tumor location as important predictors of 30-day mortality. After controlling for preoperative comorbidities and risk factors, the odds of perioperative mortality in elderly patients were 3 times that of younger patients (95% CI = 1.7 &#8211; 5.3, P = 0.0102).</p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px Helvetica;">After carefully controlling for various patient characteristics, ASA class and functional status, elderly patients have poorer outcome after surgical resection of intracranial meningioma than younger subjects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/336/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surgical results of cervical myelopathy in patients older than 80 years of age</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/320</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/320#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cervical myelopathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elderly patient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrophysiological evaluation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laminoplasty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J Neurosurg Spine 11:421–426, 2009. DOI: 10.3171/2009.4.SPINE08584
 
 In this prospective analysis the authors describe the clinical results of surgical treatment in patients &#62; 80 years of age in whom spinal function was evaluated with motor evoked potential (MEPs) monitoring.
Methods. The authors included 57 patients &#62; 80 years of age who were suspected of having [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;">J Neurosurg Spine 11:421–426, 2009. DOI: 10.3171/2009.4.SPINE08584</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica; min-height: 14.0px;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px Helvetica;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;"> In this prospective analysis the authors describe the clinical results of surgical treatment in patients &gt; 80 years of age in whom spinal function was evaluated with motor evoked potential (MEPs) monitoring.</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px Helvetica;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;">Methods. The authors included 57 patients &gt; 80 years of age who were suspected of having cervical myelopathy. The mean age of the patients was 83.0 years (range 80–90 years). The central motor conduction time (CMCT) was calculated from the latencies of the MEPs following transcranial magnetic stimulation and from M and F waves fol- lowing peripheral nerve stimulation.</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px Helvetica;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;">Results. Preoperative electrophysiological evaluation demonstrated significant elongation of CMCT or abnor- malities in MEP waveforms in 37 patients (65%), and 35 patients of these underwent laminoplasty. In 30 patients cervical spondylotic myelopathy was diagnosed and 5 patients ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament was diagnosed. The preoperative mean Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scale score was 8.6 (range 3–12.5) and the mean postoperative score was 12.6 (range 6–14.5) with an average recovery rate of 45% (range −21 to 100%). There were no major complications in any of the patients during the operative period and there were no cases of death resulting from operative intervention.</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px Helvetica;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;">Conclusions. Sufficient clinical results are expected even in patients with myelopathy who are older than 80 years of age, provided the patients are correctly selected by electrophysiological evaluation with MEPs and CMCT.</span></p>
<div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Helvetica, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-size: small;"><span style="line-height: normal;"><br />
</span></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/320/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Risk factors for postoperative systemic complications in elderly patients with brain tumors</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/37</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/37#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 22:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oncology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain tumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elderly patient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postoperative systemic complication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk factor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In elderly patients with brain tumors, the prevention of postoperative systemic complications is extremely important, and identification of the risk factors would be useful for planning therapy. The authors investigated ways to avoid postoperative complications by identifying risk factors.
Methods
The study population included 84 patients, 70 years of age or older, who underwent surgical brain tumor [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In elderly patients with brain tumors, the prevention of postoperative systemic complications is extremely important, and identification of the risk factors would be useful for planning therapy. The authors investigated ways to avoid postoperative complications by identifying risk factors.</p>
<p>Methods<br />
The study population included 84 patients, 70 years of age or older, who underwent surgical brain tumor removal. The following independent factors were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses: sex, age, preoperative underlying diseases and complications, histopathological findings, preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score, preoperative whole blood hemoglobin (Hb) level, preoperative serum total protein (TP) level, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, change in Hb level (difference between pre- and postoperative values), and change in TP level (difference between pre- and postoperative values). The cutoff values for significant independent factors were also determined.</p>
<p>Results<br />
Overall, 35 (41.7%) of the 84 patients had a total of 56 postoperative systemic complications. Univariate analysis identified the preoperative KPS score, intraoperative blood loss, change in Hb level, and change in TP level as risk factors for postoperative complications, and multivariate analysis extracted the following risk factors: the preoperative KPS score (p = 0.0450, OR 4.020), intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.0104, OR 6.571), and change in Hb levels (p = 0.0023, OR 9.301). The cutoff values were: KPS score &lt; 80%, intraoperative blood loss ≥ 350 ml, and change in Hb level ≥ 2.0 g/dl.</p>
<p>Conclusions<br />
In elderly patients with brain tumors, low preoperative KPS score, high intraoperative blood loss, and a large difference between pre- and postoperative Hb levels are significant risk factors for postoperative systemic complications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/37/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

