<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neurosurgery Blog &#187; embolization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/tag/embolization/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com</link>
	<description>Daily bibliographic and video review of the Neurosurgery Department. La Fe University Hospital. Valencia, Spain</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:00:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Endovascular Treatment of Cervical Giant Perimedullary Arteriovenous Fistulas</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3757</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3757#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Endovascular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vascular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arteriovenous fistula]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Direct puncture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[embolization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Giant perimedullary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transarterial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transvenous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=3757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neurosurgery 70:141–149, 2012 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31822ec19e
Giant perimedullary arteriovenous fistulas (GPMAVFs) located in the cervical region are a rare pathology with distinctive characteristics.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical presentation and different endovascular treatment options of cervical GPMAVFs and review previously published data in the literature regarding cervical GPMAVFs.
METHODS: Six patients with cervical GPMAVFs were found in the spinal vascular [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Endovascular_Treatment_of_Cervical_Giant-1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3760" title="Endovascular_Treatment_of_Cervical_Giant-1" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Endovascular_Treatment_of_Cervical_Giant-1-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Neurosurgery 70:141–149, 2012 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31822ec19e</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Giant perimedullary arteriovenous fistulas (GPMAVFs) located in the cervical region are a rare pathology with distinctive characteristics.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical presentation and different endovascular treatment options of cervical GPMAVFs and review previously published data in the literature regarding cervical GPMAVFs.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">METHODS: Six patients with cervical GPMAVFs were found in the spinal vascular malformations database of our group collected between 1990 and 2009. Endovascular techniques and treatment outcomes were evaluated and compared with other published series.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">RESULTS: Clinical presentations were progressive motor deficit (5 patients), hematomyelia (1 patient), meningeal syndrome (1 patient), and respiratory arrest and gait apraxia (1 patient). Three patients were treated by the transarterial approach. One patient was treated by the transvenous approach due to previous embolizations resulting in a proximal occlusion and preventing a safe transarterial approach. A transvenous approach was used in another patient due to complex arterial anatomy. In 1 patient, direct percutaneous puncture of the venous pouch was necessary because of previous proximal occlusion of the arteries. All embolizations resulted in complete occlusions with clinical improvement, and there was no recanalization during a mean follow-up of 21 months.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">CONCLUSION: Transarterial embolization of cervical GPMAVFs is safe and effective when it is done in highly experienced centers. Cervical GPMAVFs that cannot be accessed by the transarterial technique due to their complex angioarchitecture can be treated by transvenous embolization or direct puncture of the venous pouch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3757/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Small (&lt; 10-mm) incidentally found intracranial aneurysms, Part 2: treatment recommendations, natural history, complications, and short-term outcome in 212 consecutive patients</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3525</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3525#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Outcome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vascular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain aneurysm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cerebral angiography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[embolization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stroke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subarachnoid hemorrhage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=3525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neurosurg Focus 31 (6):E4, 2011. DOI: 10.3171/2011.9.FOCUS11237
The management of incidental small unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) is controversial and many factors need to be considered in the decision-making process. The authors describe a large consecutive series of patients harboring small incidental intracranial aneurysms. Treatment strategy, natural history, complications, and short-term outcomes are presented.
Methods. Between January 2008 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/brainaneurysm.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3529" title="brainaneurysm" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/brainaneurysm-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Neurosurg Focus 31 (6):E4, 2011. DOI: 10.3171/2011.9.FOCUS11237</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The management of incidental small unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) is controversial and many factors need to be considered in the decision-making process. The authors describe a large consecutive series of patients harboring small incidental intracranial aneurysms. Treatment strategy, natural history, complications, and short-term outcomes are presented.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Methods. Between January 2008 and May 2011, the authors prospectively evaluated 212 patients with 272 small (&lt; 10-mm) incidental aneurysms. Treatment recommendations (observation, endovascular treatment, or surgery), complications of treatment, and short-term outcomes were assessed.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results. Recommended treatment consisted of observation in 125 patients, endovascular embolization in 64, and surgery in 18. Six patients were excluded from further analysis because they underwent treatment elsewhere. In the observation group, at a mean follow-up of 16.7 months, only 1 patient was moved to the embolization group. Seven (6%) of the 125 patients in the observation group died of causes unrelated to aneurysm. Sixty-five patients underwent 69 embolization procedures. The periprocedural permanent morbidity and mortality rates in patients undergoing endovascular treatment were 1.5% and 1.5%, respectively (overall morbidity and mortality rate 3.0%). In the surgery group no periprocedural complications were observed, although 1 patient did not return to her previous occupation. No aneurysmal rupture was documented in any of the 3 treatment groups during the follow-up period.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusions. A cautious and individualized approach to incidental UIAs is of utmost importance for formulation of a safe and effective treatment algorithm. Invasive treatment (either endovascular or surgery) can be considered in selected younger patients, certain “higher-risk” locations, expanding aneurysms, patients with a family history of aneurysmal hemorrhage, and in those who cannot live their lives knowing that they harbor the UIA. Although the complication rate of invasive treatment is very low, it is not negligible. The study confirms that small incidental UIAs deemed to be not in need of treatment have a very benign short-term natural history, which makes observation a reasonable approach in selected patients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3525/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Onyx embolization for the treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2489</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2489#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 04:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Endovascular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vascular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain arteriovenous malformations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[embolization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endovascular treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Onyx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=2489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Acta Neurochir (2011) 153:869–878. DOI 10.1007/s00701-010-0848-6
Onyx has emerged in recent years for the endovascular treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). However, the role of Onyx embolization is still under discussion. We report our initial experiences in the treatment of brain AVMs with Onyx embolization.
Methods Between January 2004 and December 2007, 86 patients with brain AVMs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Onyx_AVM.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2490" title="Onyx_AVM" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Onyx_AVM-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Acta Neurochir (2011) 153:869–878. DOI 10.1007/s00701-010-0848-6</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Onyx has emerged in recent years for the endovascular treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). However, the role of Onyx embolization is still under discussion. We report our initial experiences in the treatment of brain AVMs with Onyx embolization.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Methods Between January 2004 and December 2007, 86 patients with brain AVMs were embolized with Onyx. Clinical presentation included intracerebral hemorrhage in 32 patients, seizures in 25 patients, headaches in 20 patients, neurologic deficits in 3 patients, and in 6 patients the AVM was an incidental finding. According to the Spetzler–Martin scale, three AVMs were grade I, 13 were grade II, 45 were grade III, 19 were grade IV, and 6 were grade V. Seventy-four AVMs were located in eloquent regions.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results Initial complete obliteration after final embolization was achieved in 16 patients (18.6%), with an average of 80.5% (range, 30–100%) volume reduction. Partial embolization was followed by surgery in 18 patients, whereas 17 AVMs were cured. In 48 patients treated by embolization and radiosurgery, four patients were lost to follow-up. Three-year follow-up angiography was performed on 30 patients and showed complete obliteration after radiosurgery in 23 patients. The remaining 14 patients are awaiting 3-year postradiosurgery results. Embolization-related permanent morbidity was 3.5%, whereas mortality was 1.2%.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusions Although Onyx allows moderate obliteration rates, combined management, such as adjunctive embolization with microsurgery or radiosurgery, may be effective for selected large AVMs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2489/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Endovascular Treatment of Side Wall Aneurysms Using a Liquid Embolic Agent: A US Single-Center Prospective Trial</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1548</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1548#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 04:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surgical technique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vascular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[embolization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endovascular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intracranial aneurysm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liquid embolic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Onyx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=1548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
Neurosurgery 67:855-860, 2010 DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000374772.22745.C3
Onyx HD-500 is a liquid embolic agent consisting of ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide and mixed with tantalum. This viscous embolic agent was designed to treat intracranial side wall aneurysms, but there have been no prospective published series from the United States. From this early experience, we developed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/OnyxHD500.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1550" title="OnyxHD500" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/OnyxHD500-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="96" height="96" /></a><strong>Neurosurgery 67:855-860, 2010 DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000374772.22745.C3</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">Onyx HD-500 is a liquid embolic agent consisting of ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide and mixed with tantalum. This viscous embolic agent was designed to treat intracranial side wall aneurysms, but there have been no prospective published series from the United States. From this early experience, we developed several protocol revisions, technical details, and clinical pearls that have not been published for liquid embolic embolization of aneurysms.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">CLINICAL PRESENTATION:We present our single-center prospective series of patients treated with Onyx HD-500 from a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Thirteen patients received Onyx HD-500, and their ages ranged from 43 to 81 years. Twelve patients had aneurysms on the internal carotid artery, and 1 patient had an aneurysm the vertebral artery. Every patient had an immediate postangiographic result with 90% or more occlusion by an independent core laboratory assessment. In 1 patient, the Onyx HD-500 injection was aborted, and the aneurysm was embolized with coils. Eleven of 13 patients (85%) underwent 6-month follow-up angiography that demonstrated persistent durable occlusion with no recanalization. There was 1 complication (8%) and no deaths.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">CONCLUSION: This is the only prospective series of intracranial aneurysms treated with Onyx HD-500 in the United States. This is also the first publication that describes detailed procedure techniques, recommended protocol revisions, lessons learned from early complications, clinical pearls, and advantages and disadvantages of liquid embolic embolization of aneurysms.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1548/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Repeat Gamma Knife Surgery for Incompletely Obliterated Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1290</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1290#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 04:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vascular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiosurgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arteriovenous malformations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[embolization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gamma-knife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Repeat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=1290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neurosurgery 67:55-64, 2010 DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000370204.68711.AC
The causes of failure after an initial Gamma procedure were studied, along with imaging and clinical outcomes, in a series of 140 patients with cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) treated with repeat Gamma Knife surgery (GKS).
METHODS: Causes of initial treatment failure included inaccurate nidus definition in 14 patients, failure to fill part [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/nidus.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1291" title="nidus" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/nidus-150x141.jpg" alt="" width="120" height="113" /></a>Neurosurgery 67:55-64, 2010 DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000370204.68711.AC</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The causes of failure after an initial Gamma procedure were studied, along with imaging and clinical outcomes, in a series of 140 patients with cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) treated with repeat Gamma Knife surgery (GKS).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">METHODS: Causes of initial treatment failure included inaccurate nidus definition in 14 patients, failure to fill part of the nidus as a result of hemodynamic factors in 16, recanalization of embolized AVM compartments in 6, and suboptimal dose (&lt; 20 Gy) in 23. Nineteen patients had repeat GKS for subtotal obliteration of AVMs. In 62 patients, the AVM failed to obliterate despite correct target definition and adequate dose. At the time of retreatment, the nidus volume ranged from 0.1 to 6.9 cm3 (mean, 1.4 cm3), and the mean prescription dose was 20.3 Gy.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">RESULTS: Repeat GKS yielded a total angiographic obliteration in 77 patients (55%) and subtotal obliteration in 9 (6.4%). In 38 patients (27.1%), the AVMs remained patent, and in 16 patients (11.4%), no flow voids were observed on magnetic resonance imaging. Clinically, 126 patients improved or remained stable, and 14 experienced deterioration (8 resulting from a rebleed, 2 caused by persistent arteriovenous shunting, and 4 related to radiationinduced changes).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">CONCLUSION: By using repeat GKS, we achieved a 55% angiographic cure rate. Although radiation-induced changes as visualized on magnetic resonance imaging occurred in 48 patients (39%), only 4 patients (3.6%) developed permanent neurological deficits. These findings may be useful in deciding the management of AVMs in whom total obliteration after initial GKS was not achieved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1290/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Acute serious rebleeding after angiographically successful coil embolization of ruptured cerebral aneurysms</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/921</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/921#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 04:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vascular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neurorradiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aneurysm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[embolization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rebleeding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Acta Neurochir (2010) 152:771–781. DOI 10.1007/s00701-009-0593-x
The present study investigated the incidence of acute rebleeding after successful coil embolization of a ruptured cerebral aneurysm, including clinical outcomes, and possible mechanisms of the events other than coil compaction and/or incomplete embolization.
Materials and methods. This study included 591 consecutive patients who presented with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, were treated [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div lang="en">
<div>
<p><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/An.coil_.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-931" title="An.coil" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/An.coil_-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="120" height="120" /></a>Acta Neurochir (2010) 152:771–781. DOI 10.1007/s00701-009-0593-x</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The present study investigated the incidence of acute rebleeding after successful coil embolization of a ruptured cerebral aneurysm, including clinical outcomes, and possible mechanisms of the events other than coil compaction and/or incomplete embolization.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Materials and methods. This study included 591 consecutive patients who presented with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, were treated with coil embolization, and whose post-procedural angiography revealed successful embolization. Data were collected retrospectively from six patients who showed acute rebleeding despite that angiographically successful coil embolization was achieved. All clinical, radiological data and intraoperative videos were reviewed to identify causative factors which could have contributed to the occurrence of rebleeding.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results. Incidence of acute rebleeding after successful coil embolization of ruptured cerebral aneurysm was 1.0% (6/591). In all of these six patients, complete angiographic occlusion was achieved except in one case where a small residual neck was intentionally left to avoid compromise of the parent artery. Four of the six patients showed poor clinical courses, either died or recovered with severe disability. Whenever possible, we performed an immediate craniotomy for exploration and additional clipping. Based on intraoperative findings, we hypothesized that uneven distribution of the coil masses and spontaneous resolution of thrombus among the strands of coil (inter-coil-loop thrombolysis) could be possible mechanisms of rebleeding.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusion. Acute rebleeding is extremely rare, but is possible as a complication of coil embolization of a ruptured cerebral aneurysm even when a case is angiographically successful. The higher degree of morbidity and mortality is a major concern. Therefore, further investigation to discover risk factors and causative mechanisms for such a complication is sorely needed.</p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/921/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Endovascular Coiling of Intracranial Aneurysms in Elderly Patients: Report of 205 Treated Aneurysms</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/944</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/944#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 04:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vascular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neurorradiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aneurysm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elderly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[embolization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endovascular]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neurosurgery 66:714-721, 2010 DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000367451.59090.D7
More elderly patients are presenting with intracranial aneurysms. Many are poor surgical candidates and often undergo endovascular treatment.
OBJECTIVE: We present our experience with embolization in elderly patients.
METHODS:We performed a retrospective review of a prospective database of elderly patients treated with coil embolization for intracranial aneurysms.
RESULTS: In a period of 16 years, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/80y-coil.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-948" title="80y-coil" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/80y-coil-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="105" height="105" /></a>Neurosurgery 66:714-721, 2010 DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000367451.59090.D7</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">More elderly patients are presenting with intracranial aneurysms. Many are poor surgical candidates and often undergo endovascular treatment.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">OBJECTIVE: We present our experience with embolization in elderly patients.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">METHODS:We performed a retrospective review of a prospective database of elderly patients treated with coil embolization for intracranial aneurysms.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">RESULTS: In a period of 16 years, 205 aneurysms were treated in 196 individuals (age range, 70–96 years; mean age, 77.3 years), including 159 females (average follow-up, 16.2 months). Ninety-seven patients presented with unruptured aneurysms, and 99 patients presented after subarachnoid hemorrhage; the diagnosis was confirmed by computed tomographic scan or lumbar puncture. Complete occlusion was achieved in 53 aneurysms (26%), with a neck remnant in 127 (62%), incomplete occlusion in 13 (6%), and 12 unsuccessful attempts. Postembolization, 89.3% of patients were neurologically intact or unchanged, whereas 8.7% had new deficits. Four patients died. By modified Rankin Scale score, at last clinical evaluation, 128 patients (65%) had a good outcome. Follow-up angiograms were available for 113 aneurysms; they revealed that 62% were unchanged, 21% were further thrombosed, and 17% had recanalized. Three aneurysms ruptured after treatment during follow-up. Rupture was not associated with incomplete occlusion or neck remnant results (P = .6). Twenty-five aneurysms required reembolization. Reembolization was not associated with new deficits or death (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.19–1.58; P = .27).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">CONCLUSION: Coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms is safe and effective in the elderly. Preembolization clinical condition strongly correlates with clinical outcome. Incomplete embolizations are not associated with a higher rerupture risk. Additional embolization does not affect the clinical results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/944/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Single-center experience with the Neuroform stent for endovascular treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/478</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/478#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vascular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aneurysm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[embolization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intracranial stent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Surgical Neurology 72 (2009) 612–619. DOI:10.1016/j.surneu.2009.03.038
 
Background: Stent-assisted coiling is an accepted endovascular treatment (EVT) for wide-necked intracranial aneurysms. The Neuroform stent (Target Therapeutics, Fremont, Calif) is a flexible nitinol self-expandable stent that was designed to potentially overcome the limitations of balloon expandable coronary stents in the intracranial circulation. The aim of this study was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;">Surgical Neurology 72 (2009) 612–619. DOI:10.1016/j.surneu.2009.03.038</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica; min-height: 14.0px;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px Helvetica;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;">Background: Stent-assisted coiling is an accepted endovascular treatment (EVT) for wide-necked intracranial aneurysms. The Neuroform stent (Target Therapeutics, Fremont, Calif) is a flexible nitinol self-expandable stent that was designed to potentially overcome the limitations of balloon expandable coronary stents in the intracranial circulation. The aim of this study was to reenforce the use of this stent for EVT of wide-necked cerebral aneurysms. </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px Helvetica;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;">Methods: Between March 2005 and March 2008, 24 patients harboring wide-necked cerebral aneurysms were treated with stent reconstruction of the aneurysm neck. Inclusion criteria restricted the group to adult patients with wide-necked intracranial aneurysms (ruptured and unruptured lesions). Immediate postprocedure angiography studies were performed to determine successful coil occlusion of the aneurysm as well as patency of the parent vessel. We assessed the clinical history, aneurysm dimensions, and technical detail of the procedures, including any difficulties with stent placement and deployment, degree of aneurysm occlusion, and complications. Clinical outcome was assessed with the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px Helvetica;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;">Results: The stent was easily navigated and precisely positioned in 24 of 26 cases. However, technical difficulties occurred in 9 patients, including difficulties in crossing the stents interstice in 6 cases, inadvertent stent delivery (n = 1), and incapacity of stent delivery (n = 1) and incapacity of crossing the neck (n = 1). These latter 2 cases were classified as failures of the stent-assisted technique. A single procedural complication occurred, involving transient nonocclusive intrastent thrombus formation, which was treated uneventfully with abciximab. Seventeen patients experienced excellent clinical outcomes (GOS 5), with good outcomes (GOS 4) in 5 patients and a poor outcome (GOS 3) in 2 patients. There were no treatment-related deaths or neurologic complications (mean clinical follow-up, 12 months). Angiographic results consisted of 17 complete occlusions, 4 neck remnants, and 3 incomplete occlusions. </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px Helvetica;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;">Conclusions: The Neuroform stent is very useful for EVT of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms because it is easy to navigate and to deploy accurately. In most cases, the stent can be deployed precisely, even in very tortuous carotid siphons. Although in some cases delivery and deployment was challenging, clinically significant complications were not observed.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/478/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Endovascular treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations using onyx: Results of a prospective, multicenter study</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/86</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/86#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 17:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vascular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain arteriovenous malformations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[embolization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haemorrhage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiosurgery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Journal of Neuroradiology (36)   3:  147  &#8211;  152 (01/06/2009)
Background and purpose. &#8211; To evaluate the safety and efficacy of onyx for embolization of brain arteriovenous malformations (BAVM). Methods. &#8211; A prospective, multicenter study was conducted in France to evaluate embolization of BAVM with onyx. From May 2003 to March 2005, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span id="ctl00_phContenidos_fvArticulo_lblRevista">Journal of Neuroradiology (</span><span id="ctl00_phContenidos_fvArticulo_lblVolumen">36)</span> <span id="ctl00_phContenidos_fvArticulo_lblNum"> </span> <span id="ctl00_phContenidos_fvArticulo_lblNumero">3</span><span id="ctl00_phContenidos_fvArticulo_lblPag">: </span> <span id="ctl00_phContenidos_fvArticulo_lblPagDesde">147</span> <span id="ctl00_phContenidos_fvArticulo_Label3"> &#8211; </span> <span id="ctl00_phContenidos_fvArticulo_lblPagHasta">152</span> (<span id="ctl00_phContenidos_fvArticulo_lblFecha">01/06/2009)</span></p>
<p><span id="ctl00_phContenidos_fvArticulo_lblResumenValor">Background and purpose. &#8211; To evaluate the safety and efficacy of onyx for embolization of brain arteriovenous malformations (BAVM). Methods. &#8211; A prospective, multicenter study was conducted in France to evaluate embolization of BAVM with onyx. From May 2003 to March 2005, 50 patients (26 females, 24 mates; mean age: 34.8 years, range: 16-64 years) were included. Clinical. Presentation was haemorrhage in 22 patients (44.0%), seizures in 16 patients (32.0%), headaches in six patients (12.0%) and progressive neurological. Deficit in two cases (4.0%). Four patients were asymptomatic (8.0%). Results. &#8211; One hundred and forty-nine sessions of embolization were performed: one to eight sessions/patient with a mean of 3.0 sessions. One hundred and sixteen sessions (77.9%) were performed with onyx, 20 sessions (13.4%) with glue and 13 sessions (8.7%) with onyx and glue. Symptomatic acute postembolization haemorrhage (APEH) was observed in four cases (8.0% per patient). At 1 month, morbidity and mortality related to the treatment were of 8% and 2%, respectively. Complete BAVM occlusion was obtained in 8.3% of cases. In the remaining cases, occlusion rate was between 99 and 80% in 56.3% of patients, 79 and 60% in 16.7%, and less than 60 in 18.7%. In case of incomplete occlusion, complementary treatment was performed by radiosurgery. Conclusion. &#8211; Onyx is suitable for BAVM embolization with acceptable morbidity and mortality.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/86/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

