<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neurosurgery Blog &#187; Endoscopy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/tag/endoscopy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com</link>
	<description>Daily bibliographic and video review of the Neurosurgery Department. La Fe University Hospital. Valencia, Spain</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:00:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Supraorbital Endoscopic Approach to Colloid Cysts</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3552</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3552#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 23:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Developmental Malformations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical technique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colloid cyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endoscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supraorbital approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Third ventricle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=3552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neurosurgery 69[ONS Suppl 2]:ons176–ons183, 2011 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318219563c
Surgical approaches to colloid cysts of the third ventricle have evolved over time. In recent years, endoscopy has been recognized as an effective alternative to open surgery. The disadvantage of endoscopic treatment is the difficulty in controlling the adhesion of the cyst to the roof of the third ventricle [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Supraorbital_Endoscopic_Approach_to_Colloid_Cysts.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3558" title="Supraorbital_Endoscopic_Approach_to_Colloid_Cysts" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Supraorbital_Endoscopic_Approach_to_Colloid_Cysts-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Neurosurgery 69[ONS Suppl 2]:ons176–ons183, 2011 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318219563c</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Surgical approaches to colloid cysts of the third ventricle have evolved over time. In recent years, endoscopy has been recognized as an effective alternative to open surgery. The disadvantage of endoscopic treatment is the difficulty in controlling the adhesion of the cyst to the roof of the third ventricle and in obtaining complete removal of the cyst.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">OBJECTIVE: To design and carry out a supraorbital approach to obtain a better viewing angle of the cyst and better control of the adhesion of the cyst to the roof of the third ventricle.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">METHODS: From September 2005 to February 2008, we operated on 7 consecutive patients with colloid cysts in the third ventricle. All procedures were performed with the endoscopic supraorbital approach. The endoscopic procedure was performed with a rigid STORZ endoscope with 3 working channels. In 4 patients, the surgical supraorbital trajectory was planned with the help of a navigator.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">RESULTS: The procedures lasted between 60 and 110 minutes, including the registration on the navigation system. Near-total removal of the cyst was achieved in 6 patients. All patients were discharged within 6 days.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">CONCLUSION: Endoscopic treatment may be an effective and safe alternative to open surgical craniotomy. Our series shows that the endoscopic supraorbital endoscopic resection is a valuable approach to colloid cysts of the third ventricle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3552/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Endonasal endoscopic resection of esthesioneuroblastoma: the Johns Hopkins Hospital experience and review of the literature</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2885</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2885#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 22:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oncology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outcome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical technique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endoscopic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endoscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Esthesioneuroblastoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expanded endonasal approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olfactory neuroblastoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skull base]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=2885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neurosurg Rev. DOI 10.1007/s10143-011-0329-2
Esthesioneuroblastoma is an uncommon malignant tumor originating in the upper nasal cavity. The surgical treatment for this tumor has traditionally been via an open craniofacial resection. Over the past decade, there has been tremendous development in endoscopic techniques.
In this report, we performed a retrospective analysis of patients with esthesioneuroblastomas treated with a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Endonasal-endoscopic-resection-of-esthesioneuroblastoma1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2888" title="Endonasal endoscopic resection of esthesioneuroblastoma1" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Endonasal-endoscopic-resection-of-esthesioneuroblastoma1-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Neurosurg Rev. DOI 10.1007/s10143-011-0329-2</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Esthesioneuroblastoma is an uncommon malignant tumor originating in the upper nasal cavity. The surgical treatment for this tumor has traditionally been via an open craniofacial resection. Over the past decade, there has been tremendous development in endoscopic techniques.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In this report, we performed a retrospective analysis of patients with esthesioneuroblastomas treated with a purely endonasal endoscopic approach and resection at the Johns Hopkins Hospital between January 2005 and April 2010.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">A total of eight patients with esthesioneuroblastoma, five men and three women, were identified. Six patients were treated for primary disease, and two were treated for tumor recurrence. The modified Kadish staging was A in one patient (12.5%), B in two patients (25%), C in four patients (50%), and D in one patient (12.5%). All patients had a complete resection with negative intraoperative margins. One patient had intraoperative hypertension; there were no perioperative complications. With a mean follow-up of over 27 months, all patients are without evidence of disease. In addition, we reviewed the literature and identified several overlapping case series of patients with esthesioneuroblastoma treated via a purely endoscopic technique.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Our series adds to the growing experience of expanded endonasal endoscopic surgery in the treatment of skull base tumors including esthesioneuroblastoma. Longer follow-up on a larger number of patients is required to further demonstrate the utility of endoscopic approaches in the management of this malignancy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2885/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rathke cleft cysts: a review of clinical and surgical management</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2840</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2840#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 22:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clinical Guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Developmental Malformations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pituitary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[craniopharyngioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endoscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pituitary adenoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rathke cleft cyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transsphenoidal approach]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neurosurg Focus 31 (1):E1, 2011. DOI: 10.3171/2011.5.FOCUS1183
The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review of clinical, imaging, and histopathological features, as well as operative and nonoperative management strategies in patients with Rathke cleft cysts (RCCs).
A literature review was performed to identify previous articles that reported surgical and nonsurgical management of RCCs.
Rathke cleft [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Rathke-cyst.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2841" title="Rathke cyst" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Rathke-cyst-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Neurosurg Focus 31 (1):E1, 2011. DOI: 10.3171/2011.5.FOCUS1183</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review of clinical, imaging, and histopathological features, as well as operative and nonoperative management strategies in patients with Rathke cleft cysts (RCCs).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">A literature review was performed to identify previous articles that reported surgical and nonsurgical management of RCCs.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Rathke cleft cysts are often incidental lesions found in the sellar and suprasellar regions and do not require surgical intervention in the majority of cases. In symptomatic RCCs, the typical clinical presentation includes headache, visual loss, and/or endocrine dysfunction. Visual field testing and endocrine laboratory studies may reveal more subtle deficiencies associated with RCCs. When indicated, the transsphenoidal approach typically offers the least invasive and safest method for treating these lesions.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Various surgical strategies including cyst wall resection, intralesional alcohol injection, and sellar floor reconstruction are discussed. Although headache and visual symptoms frequently improve after surgical drainage of RCCs, hypopituitarism and diabetes insipidus are less likely to do so.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">A subset of more aggressive, atypical RCCs associated with pronounced clinical symptoms and higher recurrence rates is discussed, as well as the possible relationship of these lesions to craniopharyngiomas.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Rathke cleft cysts are typically benign, asymptomatic lesions that can be monitored. In selected patients, transsphenoidal surgery provides excellent rates of improvement in clinical symptoms and long-term cyst resolution. Complete cyst wall resection, intraoperative alcohol cauterization, and sellar floor reconstruction in the absence of a CSF leak are not routinely recommended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2840/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intracranial Cysts Containing Cerebrospinal Fluid- Like Fluid: Results of Endoscopic Neurosurgery in a Series of 64 Consecutive Cases</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2414</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2414#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 04:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Developmental Malformations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endoscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arachnoid cyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyst brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ependymal cyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fenestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroendoscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuronavigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=2414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neurosurgery 68:788–803, 2011 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318207ac91
Intracranial cysts containing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) may be developmental or acquired.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the results of endoscopic neurosurgery in the management of intracranial CSF cysts.
METHODS: In a 7-year period, 64 consecutive patients underwent endoscopic neurosurgery for CSF cysts. Group 1 consisted of 13 patients with acquired cysts; group 2 included 51 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Intracranial-cyst.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2417" title="Intracranial cyst" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Intracranial-cyst-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Neurosurgery 68:788–803, 2011 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318207ac91</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Intracranial cysts containing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) may be developmental or acquired.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">OBJECTIVE: To analyze the results of endoscopic neurosurgery in the management of intracranial CSF cysts.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">METHODS: In a 7-year period, 64 consecutive patients underwent endoscopic neurosurgery for CSF cysts. Group 1 consisted of 13 patients with acquired cysts; group 2 included 51 patients with developmental cysts. In all cases, the cyst walls were fenestrated through small burr holes with frameless guided operative endoscopes. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 6 years (mean, 3.4 years).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">RESULTS: There were no mortality and no permanent morbidity, apart from a patient (1.6%) who remained neurologically intact but required ventriculoperitoneal shunting because of intraoperative hemorrhage. The planned fenestrations could be performed in all patients except 2, owing to thick, opaque cyst walls. In group 1, 6 patients fully recovered and remained intact throughout the follow-up, whereas 7 improved but had various degrees of neurological disabilities that were related to their initial diseases. Radiological results were excellent in all cases. In group 2, there were 7 asymptomatic patients who remained unchanged and 44 ‘‘symptomatic’’ patients: 40 (91%) clinically improved, 4 (9%) remained unchanged, and none worsened. Cyst size decreased in 37 patients (74%) and remained unchanged in 13 (26%).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">CONCLUSION: In this series, patients of different ages, harboring cysts of various sizes and locations, could be satisfactorily treated with endoscopic neurosurgery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2414/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Variability among pediatric neurosurgeons in the threshold for ventricular shunting in asymptomatic children with hydrocephalus</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2249</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2249#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 05:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pediatrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrocephalus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endoscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pediatric neurosurgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shunt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J Neurosurg Pediatrics 7:000–000, 2011.DOI: 10.3171/2010.11.PEDS10275
The thresholds for shunting CSF in children with asymptomatic hydrocephalus are unclear; there are neither guidelines nor sufficient research to determine what degree of hydrocephalus should be treated. The authors hypothesize that 1) pediatric neurosurgeons currently have high thresholds for recommending treatment for these children, but 2) there is significant [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/ventricularsizeworksheet.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2250" title="ventricularsizeworksheet" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/ventricularsizeworksheet-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>J Neurosurg Pediatrics 7:000–000, 2011.DOI: 10.3171/2010.11.PEDS10275</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The thresholds for shunting CSF in children with asymptomatic hydrocephalus are unclear; there are neither guidelines nor sufficient research to determine what degree of hydrocephalus should be treated. The authors hypothesize that 1) pediatric neurosurgeons currently have high thresholds for recommending treatment for these children, but 2) there is significant variability among these treatment thresholds.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Methods. The authors surveyed attendees of the Joint Pediatric Neurosurgery Section meeting in Spokane, Washington, in December 2008, regarding their treatment thresholds for 22 clinical scenarios. Each participant was provided an illustration of 5 imaging studies (3 slices each) showing progressively larger ventricles. For each scenario, respondents were asked to indicate the minimum ventricular size they would treat, if any. Responses were quantified from 1 to 6 from smaller to larger, with 6 being no treatment, and a mean theoretical treated ventricular size (MTTVS) was calculated for each scenario.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results. Respondents were relatively conservative in recommending treatment, with MTTVSs of 3.7–6.0; in 13 scenarios, the MTTVS was greater than 5.0 (larger than the largest presented ventricular size). For scenarios in which a mean frontooccipital ratio could be calculated, the value ranged from 0.55 to 0.67 (moderate to severe hydrocephalus). Although there were clear majority responses for each scenario, there was also significant variability. There were no patterns of association with the respondent’s age, training, board certification, or type or location of practice.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusions. This study demonstrates that pediatric neurosurgeons’ thresholds for treating asymptomatic children with hydrocephalus are generally high, but there is also significant variability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2249/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arachnoid cysts of the middle cranial fossa accompanied by subdural effusions—experience with 60 consecutive cases</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2106</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2106#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 05:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Developmental Malformations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outcome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[craniotomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endoscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subdural hematoma]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=2106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Acta Neurochir (2011) 153:75–84 DOI 10.1007/s00701-010-0820-5
Subdural effusions (SDEs) can complicate arachnoid cysts of the middle cranial fossa (ACMFs). While there is a consensus that at least in adults asymptomatic ACMFs should not be operated, those with concomitant subdural and/or intracystic effusions are clinically apparent in the majority of cases and should be surgically treated. But [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/ACSDH.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2110" title="AC&amp;SDH" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/ACSDH-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Acta Neurochir (2011) 153:75–84 DOI 10.1007/s00701-010-0820-5</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Subdural effusions (SDEs) can complicate arachnoid cysts of the middle cranial fossa (ACMFs). While there is a consensus that at least in adults asymptomatic ACMFs should not be operated, those with concomitant subdural and/or intracystic effusions are clinically apparent in the majority of cases and should be surgically treated. But it remains unclear, which surgical procedure is best.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Methods Since 1980, 60 out of 343 patients with an ACMF presented with accompanying SDEs. Four categories of SDEs were differentiated radiologically. This collective was controlled in a follow-up study up to 60 months after con- servative or operative treatment by clinical and radiological means.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results In 54 of the 60 patients, we saw an indication for surgical treatment. Twenty-nine patients received a burr hole, 13 cases were treated by craniotomy, seven by endoscopical means, three patients underwent shunting and two combined procedures. Six patients were treated conservatively. An excellent final clinical outcome was observed in 55 cases. While craniotomy succeeded best to reduce the cyst volume in postoperative CT, the final clinical outcome did not differ significantly compared with burr hole trepanation.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusions Patients with small effusions can be treated conservatively in selected cases. Based on our experience, we prefer a differentiated therapy. As first procedure, burr hole and subdural drainage were performed, leaving the cyst alone, seeming sufficient for the majority of cases. Craniotomy or endoscopical means should be reserved as treatment of choice for special cases, depending on category and acuteness of SDE and size/localisation of the ACMF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2106/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The endoscopic, endonasal, transmaxillary transpterygoid approach to the pterygopalatine fossa, infratemporal fossa, petrous apex, and the Meckel cave</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1821</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1821#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 05:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Endoscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Anatomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical technique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encephalocele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infratemporal fossa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minimally invasive approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petrous apex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pterygopalatine fossa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skull base]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transpterygoid approach]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J Neurosurg 113:967–974, 2010. DOI: 10.3171/2009.10.JNS09157
In this paper the authors’ goal was to present their clinical experience with lesions of the pterygopalatine fossa, infratemporal fossa, lateral sphenoid sinus, cavernous sinus, petrous apex, and Meckel cave using simple and extended endoscopic transpterygoid approaches to the lateral skull base.
Methods. Simple and expanded endoscopic transpterygoid approaches were performed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/TM-TPT-App.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1822" title="TM-TPT App" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/TM-TPT-App-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="108" height="108" /></a>J Neurosurg 113:967–974, 2010. DOI: 10.3171/2009.10.JNS09157</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In this paper the authors’ goal was to present their clinical experience with lesions of the pterygopalatine fossa, infratemporal fossa, lateral sphenoid sinus, cavernous sinus, petrous apex, and Meckel cave using simple and extended endoscopic transpterygoid approaches to the lateral skull base.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Methods. Simple and expanded endoscopic transpterygoid approaches were performed in a series of 13 patients with varying pathology that included lateral sphenoid sinus encephaloceles, benign and malignant sinonasal tumors, and lesions of neural origin.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results. A gross-total resection was achieved in 5 of 9 patients, while a subtotal resection for tissue diagnosis and cytoreduction prior to further adjuvant treatment was performed in the remaining patients. Sphenoid sinus encephaloceles were successfully repaired via a transpterygoid approach in all 4 patients. The skull base defect was reconstructed using a multilayered closure. One patient developed a postoperative CSF leak, which was successfully treated conservatively. The mean follow-up time was 16 months. Five patients complained of recurrent sinusitis. One patient experienced xerophthalmia and palate numbness. Three patients had died by the time of this report. Two patients died of unrelated causes. The third patient died of progression of an aggressive pterygopalatine osteosarcoma despite undergoing cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusions. An endoscopic transpterygoid approach is a minimally invasive endoscopic approach for lesions located or extending to the pterygopalatine fossa, infratemporal fossa, petrous apex, Meckel cave, and other regions of the paramedian skull base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1821/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Endoscopic Treatment of Arachnoid Cysts: A Detailed Account of Surgical Techniques and Results</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1473</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1473#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 04:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Developmental Malformations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endoscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outcome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical technique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arachnoid cyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cystocisternostomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cystoventriculostomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ventriculocystocisternostomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ventriculocystostomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=1473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neurosurgery 67:824-836, 2010 DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000377852.75544.E4
Surgical treatment of arachnoid cysts remains under debate. Although many authors favor endoscopic techniques, others attribute a higher recurrence rate to the endoscope.
OBJECTIVE: The authors report their experience with endoscopic procedures for arachnoid cyst.
METHODS: All pure endoscopic procedures for arachnoid cysts performed by the authors were analyzed. Particular reference was given [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/cystostomy.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1474" title="cystostomy" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/cystostomy.jpg" alt="" width="90" height="84" /></a>Neurosurgery 67:824-836, 2010 DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000377852.75544.E4</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Surgical treatment of arachnoid cysts remains under debate. Although many authors favor endoscopic techniques, others attribute a higher recurrence rate to the endoscope.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">OBJECTIVE: The authors report their experience with endoscopic procedures for arachnoid cyst.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">METHODS: All pure endoscopic procedures for arachnoid cysts performed by the authors were analyzed. Particular reference was given to surgical complications and patient outcome in relation to cyst location and endoscopic technique.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">RESULTS: Sixty-six endoscopic procedures were performed in 61 patients (mean age, 28 years; range, 23 days to 74 years; 35 males, 26 females). The main presenting symptoms were cephalgia (61%), hemisymptoms (18%), and macrocephalus (18%). Cyst location was temporobasal (34%), suprasellar (21%), at the cisterna quadrigemina (18%), paraxial supratentorial (16%), and various (10%). Thirty cystocisternostomies, 14 ventriculocystostomies, 12 cystoventriculostomies, and 10 ventriculocystocisternostomies were performed. The overall clinical success rate was 90%. The endoscopic technique was abandoned in 4 cases (7%). Postoperative complications were found in 16%; there was only one permanent deficit (2%). Five recurrences (8%) occurred up to 7 years after the first procedure. Of the various locations, the temporobasal cysts were the most difficult to treat with lowest clinical success (81%), highest recurrence (19%), and highest complication rate (24%). Of the various endoscopic techniques, ventriculocystostomy and ventriculocystocisternostomy reached the highest success rates with 100%.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic techniques provide very good results in arachnoid cyst treatment. The most frequent cyst location is the most difficult to treat. A long-term follow-up is recommended since recurrences can occur many years after the procedure</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1473/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy Vs Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunt in the Treatment of Hydrocephalus in Children: A Propensity Score–Adjusted Analysis</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1448</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1448#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 04:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Endoscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outcome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrocephalus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pediatrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Propensity score]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=1448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neurosurgery 67:588-593, 2010 DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000373199.79462.21
Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) has preferentially been offered to patients with more favorable prognostic features compared with shunt.
OBJECTIVE: To use advanced statistical methods to adjust for treatment selection bias to determine whether ETV survival is superior to shunt survival once the bias of patientrelated prognostic factors is removed.
METHODS: An international cohort [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neurosurgery 67:588-593, 2010 DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000373199.79462.21</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) has preferentially been offered to patients with more favorable prognostic features compared with shunt.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">OBJECTIVE: To use advanced statistical methods to adjust for treatment selection bias to determine whether ETV survival is superior to shunt survival once the bias of patientrelated prognostic factors is removed.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">METHODS: An international cohort of children (≤ 19 years of age) with newly diagnosed hydrocephalus treated with ETV (n = 489) or shunt (n = 720) was analyzed. We used propensity score adjustment techniques to account for 2 important patient prognostic factors: age and cause of hydrocephalus. Cox regression survival analysis was performed to compare time-to-treatment failure in an unadjusted model and 3 propensity score—adjusted models, each of which would adjust for the imbalance in prognostic factors.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">RESULTS: In the unadjusted Cox model, the ETV failure rate was lower than the shunt failure rate from the immediate postoperative phase and became even more favorable with longer duration from surgery. Once patient prognostic factors were corrected for in the 3 adjusted models, however, the early failure rate for ETV was higher than that for shunt. It was only after about 3 months after surgery did the ETV failure rate become lower than the shunt failure rate.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">CONCLUSIONS: The relative risk of ETV failure is initially higher than that for shunt, but after about 3 months, the relative risk becomes progressively lower for ETV. Therefore, after the early high-risk period of ETV failure, a patient could experience a long-term treatment survival advantage compared with shunt. It might take several years, however, to realize this benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1448/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Variations of endonasal anatomy: relevance for the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1134</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1134#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 04:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Endoscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pituitary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anatomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endonasal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pituitary surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transsphenoidal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=1134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Acta Neurochir (2010) 152:1015–1020. DOI 10.1007/s00701-010-0629-2
The endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach (EETA) to the pituitary is performed by ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgeons in collaboration with neurosurgeons but also by neurosurgeons alone even though neurosurgeons have not been trained in rhinological surgery.
Purpose To register the frequency of endonasal anatomical variations and to evaluate whether these [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/turbinate.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1135" title="turbinate" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/turbinate-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="120" height="120" /></a>Acta Neurochir (2010) 152:1015–1020. DOI 10.1007/s00701-010-0629-2</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach (EETA) to the pituitary is performed by ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgeons in collaboration with neurosurgeons but also by neurosurgeons alone even though neurosurgeons have not been trained in rhinological surgery.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Purpose</strong> To register the frequency of endonasal anatomical variations and to evaluate whether these variations hinder the progress of EETA and require extra rhinological surgical skills.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Methods</strong> A prospective cohort study of 185 consecutive patients receiving an EETA through a binostril approach was performed. All anatomical endonasal variations were noted and the relevance for the progress of surgery evaluated.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Results</strong> In 48% of patients, anatomical variations were recognized, the majority of which were spinae septi and septum deviations. In 5% of patients, the planned binostril approach had to be converted into a mononostril approach; whereas in 18% of patients with an anatomical variation, a correction had to be performed. There was no difference between the ENT surgeon and the neurosurgeon performing the approach. Complications related to the endonasal phase of the surgery occurred in 3.8%. Fluoroscopy or electromagnetic navigation has been used during 6.5% of the surgeries.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Conclusion</strong> Although endonasal anatomical variations are frequent, they do not pose a relevant obstacle for EETA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1134/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

