<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neurosurgery Blog &#187; Glioblastoma</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/tag/glioblastoma/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com</link>
	<description>Daily bibliographic and video review of the Neurosurgery Department. La Fe University Hospital. Valencia, Spain</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:00:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A clinical trial of bevacizumab, temozolomide, and radiation for newly diagnosed glioblastoma</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3802</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3802#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clinical Trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oncology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outcome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bevacizumab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glioblastoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation therapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Temozolomide]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=3802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J Neurosurg 116:341–345, 2012.DOI: 10.3171/2011.9.JNS11656
The presence of angiogenesis is a hallmark of glioblastoma (GBM). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which drives angiogenesis, provides an additional target for conventional therapy. The authors conducted a prospective clinical trial to test the effectiveness of bevacizumab, an inhibitor of VEGF, in newly diagnosed GBM.
Methods. From 2006 through 2010, 51 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/A-clinical-trial-of-bevacizumab-temozolomide-and-radiation-for-newly-diagnosed-glioblastoma.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3804" title="A clinical trial of bevacizumab, temozolomide, and radiation for newly diagnosed glioblastoma" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/A-clinical-trial-of-bevacizumab-temozolomide-and-radiation-for-newly-diagnosed-glioblastoma-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>J Neurosurg 116:341–345, 2012.DOI: 10.3171/2011.9.JNS11656</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The presence of angiogenesis is a hallmark of glioblastoma (GBM). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which drives angiogenesis, provides an additional target for conventional therapy. The authors conducted a prospective clinical trial to test the effectiveness of bevacizumab, an inhibitor of VEGF, in newly diagnosed GBM.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Methods. From 2006 through 2010, 51 eligible patients with newly diagnosed GBM were treated with involvedfield radiation therapy and concomitant temozolomide (75 mg/m2 daily for 42 days) along with bevacizumab (10 mg/ kg every 2 weeks), starting 29 days after surgery. This was followed by 6 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide therapy (150 mg/m2 on Days 1–7 of a 28-day cycle) with bevacizumab administered at 10 mg/kg on Days 8 and 22 of each 28-day cycle.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results. The 6- and 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 85.1% and 51%, respectively. The 12- and 24-month overall survival (OS) rates were 85.1% and 42.5%, respectively. Grade III/IV toxicities were noted in 10 patients (19.6%). No treatment-related deaths were observed. Asymptomatic intracranial bleeding was noted in 5 patients.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusions. The addition of bevacizumab to conventional therapy in newly diagnosed GBM appears to improve both PFS and OS in patients with newly diagnosed GBM, with acceptable morbidity. A shift toward diffuse relapse was noted in a significant number of patients. Ongoing Phase III clinical trials will show the true benefit of this antiangiogenic approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3802/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regression of Recurrent Malignant Gliomas With Convection-Enhanced Delivery of Topotecan</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3490</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3490#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 23:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clinical Trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oncology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glioblastoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topotecan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=3490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neurosurgery 69:1272–1280, 2011 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182233e24
Convection-enhanced delivery of chemotherapeutics for the treatment of malignant glioma is a technique that delivers drugs directly into a tumor and the surrounding interstitium through continuous, low-grade positive-pressure infusion. This allows high local concentrations of drug while overcoming the limitations imposed by toxicity and the blood-brain barrier in systemic therapies that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Convection-enhanced-delivery-of-chemotherapeutics.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3496" title="Convection-enhanced delivery of chemotherapeutics" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Convection-enhanced-delivery-of-chemotherapeutics-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Neurosurgery 69:1272–1280, 2011 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182233e24</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Convection-enhanced delivery of chemotherapeutics for the treatment of malignant glioma is a technique that delivers drugs directly into a tumor and the surrounding interstitium through continuous, low-grade positive-pressure infusion. This allows high local concentrations of drug while overcoming the limitations imposed by toxicity and the blood-brain barrier in systemic therapies that prevent the use of many potentially effective drugs.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">OBJECTIVE: To examine the safety profile of a conventional chemotherapeutic agent, topotecan, via convection-enhanced delivery in the treatment of recurrent malignant gliomas and secondarily to assess radiographic response and survival.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">METHODS: We performed a prospective, dose-escalation phase Ib study of the topoisomerase- I inhibitor topotecan given by convection-enhanced delivery in patients with recurrent malignant gliomas.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">RESULTS: Significant antitumor activity as described by radiographic changes and prolonged overall survival with minimal drug-associated toxicity was demonstrated. A maximum tolerated dose was established for future phase II studies.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">CONCLUSION: Topotecan by convection-enhanced delivery has significant antitumor activity at concentrations that are nontoxic to normal brain. The potential for use of this therapy as a generally effective treatment option for malignant gliomas will be tested in subsequent phase II and III trials</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3490/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Postoperative Infection May Influence Survival in Patients With Glioblastoma: Simply a Myth?</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3332</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3332#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 22:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oncology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outcome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glioblastoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical infection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survival]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=3332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neurosurgery 69:864–869, 2011 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318222adfa
It is a prevalent myth that a postoperative infection may actually confer a survival advantage in patients with malignant glioma. This contention is based largely on anecdotal reports. Recently, a single-center study showed there was no survival advantage in those patients who had glioblastoma with postoperative infection.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Postop-infection-GBM.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3334" title="Postop infection GBM" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Postop-infection-GBM-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Neurosurgery 69:864–869, 2011 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318222adfa</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">It is a prevalent myth that a postoperative infection may actually confer a survival advantage in patients with malignant glioma. This contention is based largely on anecdotal reports. Recently, a single-center study showed there was no survival advantage in those patients who had glioblastoma with postoperative infection.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of postoperative infections on outcome in patients with glioblastoma treated at our center.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">METHODS: This study included 197 patients with newly diagnosed primary glioblastoma treated from January 2001 to January 2008. Of the 197 patients, 10 (5.08%) had postoperative bacterial infection. The Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Breslow test were used in the univariate approach; Cox regression was used in the multivariable approach.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">RESULTS: The median survival was 16 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 14-18 mo). The infection group had a significant advantage in the median survival: 30 months (95% CI, 21-39) vs 15 months (95% CI, 13-17) for patients without postoperative infection. This advantage was also confirmed by Cox regression; in fact, patients not developing a postoperative infection showed an adjusted hazard ratio for death of 2.3 (95% CI, 1-5.3).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">CONCLUSION: The association between infection and prolonged survival is not definitive; we acknowledge the considerable difficulties in undertaking this type of study in a retrospective manner. Our results can instead stimulate further multicentric studies (to increase the number of patients) or experimental studies using genetically modified bacteria for treatment of glioblastoma.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/3332/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surgery guided by 5-aminolevulinic fluorescence in glioblastoma: volumetric analysis of extent of resection in single-center experience</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2349</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2349#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 05:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oncology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5-aminolevulinic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glioblastoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross total resection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volumetric MRI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=2349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J Neurooncol (2011) 102:105–113.DOI 10.1007/s11060-010-0296-4
We analyzed the efficacy and applicability of surgery guided by 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) fluorescence in consecutive patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).
Thirty-six patients with GBM were operated on using ALA fluorescence. Resections were performed using the fluorescent light to assess the right plane of dissection. In each case, biopsies with different fluorescent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/5-ALA_GBM.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2354" title="5-ALA_GBM" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/5-ALA_GBM.jpg" alt="" width="191" height="145" /></a>J Neurooncol (2011) 102:105–113.DOI 10.1007/s11060-010-0296-4</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">We analyzed the efficacy and applicability of surgery guided by 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) fluorescence in consecutive patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Thirty-six patients with GBM were operated on using ALA fluorescence. Resections were performed using the fluorescent light to assess the right plane of dissection. In each case, biopsies with different fluorescent quality were taken from the tumor center, from the edges, and from the surrounding tissue. These samples were analyzed separately with hematoxylin–eosin examination and immunostaining against Ki67. Tumor volume was quantified with pre- and postoperative volumetric magnetic resonance imaging.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Strong fluorescence identified solid tumor with 100% positive predictive value. Invaded tissue beyond the solid tumor mass was identified by vague fluorescence with 97% positive predictive value and 66% negative predictive value, measured against hematoxylin–eosin examination. All the contrast-enhancing volume was resected in 83.3% of the patients, all patients had resection over 98% of the volume and mean volume resected was 99.8%. One month after surgery there was no mortality, and new or increased neurological morbidity was 8.2%.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The fluorescence induced by 5-aminolevulinic can help to achieve near total resection of enhancing tumor volume in most surgical cases of GBM. It is possible during surgery to obtain separate samples of the infiltrating cells from the tumor border.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2349/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Identification of diagnostic serum protein profiles of glioblastoma patients</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2329</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2329#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 05:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Laboratory investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oncology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glioblastoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Serum marker proteins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J Neurooncol (2011) 102:71–80.DOI 10.1007/s11060-010-0284-8
Diagnosis of a glioblastoma (GBM) is triggered by the onset of symptoms and is based on cerebral imaging and histological examination. Serum-based biomarkers may support detection of GBM. Here, we explored serum protein concentrations of GBM patients and used data mining to explore profiles of biomarkers and determine whether these are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/proteinexpression.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2332" title="proteinexpression" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/proteinexpression-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>J Neurooncol (2011) 102:71–80.DOI 10.1007/s11060-010-0284-8</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Diagnosis of a glioblastoma (GBM) is triggered by the onset of symptoms and is based on cerebral imaging and histological examination. Serum-based biomarkers may support detection of GBM. Here, we explored serum protein concentrations of GBM patients and used data mining to explore profiles of biomarkers and determine whether these are associated with the clinical status of the patients.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Gene and protein expression data for astrocytoma and GBM were used to identify secreted proteins differently expressed in tumors and in normal brain tissues. Tumor expression and serum concentrations of 14 candidate proteins were analyzed for 23 GBM patients and nine healthy subjects. Datamining methods involving all 14 proteins were used as an initial evaluation step to find clinically informative profiles.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Data mining identified a serum protein profile formed by BMP2, HSP70, and CXCL10 that enabled correct assignment to the GBM group with specificity and sensitivity of 89 and 96%, respectively (p&lt; 0.0001, Fischer’s exact test). Survival for more than 15 months after tumor resection was associated with a profile formed by TSP1, HSP70, and IGFBP3, enabling correct assignment in all cases (p&lt; 0.0001, Fischer’s exact test). No correlation was found with tumor size or age of the patient.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This study shows that robust serum profiles for GBM may be identified by data mining on the basis of a relatively small study cohort. Profiles of more than one biomarker enable more specific assignment to the GBM and survival group than those based on single proteins, confirming earlier attempts to correlate  single markers with cancer. These conceptual findings will be a basis for validation in a larger sample size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/2329/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patterns of Care and Survival in a Retrospective Analysis of 1059 Patients With Glioblastoma Multiforme Treated Between 2002 and 2007: A Multicenter Study by the Central Nervous System Study Group of Airo (Italian Association of Radiation Oncology)</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1344</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1344#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 04:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oncology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outcome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glioblastoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patterns of care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiotherapy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=1344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neurosurgery 67:446-458, 2010 DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000371990.86656.E8
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pattern of care and outcomes for newly diagnosed glioblastoma in Italy and compare our results with the previous Italian Patterns of Care study to determine whether significant changes occurred in clinical practice during the past 10 years.
METHODS: Clinical, pathological, therapeutic, and survival data regarding 1059 patients treated [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/survival.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1345" title="survival" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/survival-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="120" height="120" /></a>Neurosurgery 67:446-458, 2010 DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000371990.86656.E8</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pattern of care and outcomes for newly diagnosed glioblastoma in Italy and compare our results with the previous Italian Patterns of Care study to determine whether significant changes occurred in clinical practice during the past 10 years.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">METHODS: Clinical, pathological, therapeutic, and survival data regarding 1059 patients treated in 18 radiotherapy centers between 2002 and 2007 were collected and retrospectively reviewed.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">RESULTS:Most patients underwent both computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging either preoperatively (62.7%) or postoperatively (35.5%). Only 123 patients (11.6%) underwent a biopsy. Radiochemotherapy with temozolomide was the most frequent adjuvant treatment (70.7%). Most patients (88.2%) received 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Median survival was 9.5 months. Two- and 5-year survival rates were 24.8% and 3.9%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed the statistical significance of age, postoperative Karnofsky Performance Status scale score, surgical extent, use of 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, and use of chemotherapy. Use of a more aggressive approach was associated with longer survival in elderly patients. Comparing our results with those of the subgroup of patients included in our previous study who were treated between 1997 and 2001, relevant differences were found: more frequent use of magnetic resonance imaging, surgical removal more common than biopsy, and widespread use of 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy + temozolomide. Furthermore, a significant improvement in terms of survival was noted (P &lt; .001).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">CONCLUSION: Changes in the care of glioblastoma over the past few years are documented. Prognosis of glioblastoma patients has slightly but significantly improved with a small but noteworthy number of relatively long-term survivors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/1344/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neurological outcome of long-term glioblastoma survivors</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/397</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/397#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 05:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oncology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glioblastoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long-term survivors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality of life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J Neurooncol (2009) 95:301–305 DOI 10.1007/s11060-009-9946-9

Extended survival of 3 or more years is rare in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) but is becoming more common. Clinical outcome has not been well studied. We reviewed GBM patients at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between 2001 and 2003 who were seen for two or more visits. Patient characteristics and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px Helvetica;">J Neurooncol (2009) 95:301–305 DOI 10.1007/s11060-009-9946-9</p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px Helvetica; min-height: 14.0px;">
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px Helvetica;">Extended survival of 3 or more years is rare in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) but is becoming more common. Clinical outcome has not been well studied. We reviewed GBM patients at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between 2001 and 2003 who were seen for two or more visits. Patient characteristics and long-term clinical outcomes were reviewed for patients who had survived 3 or more years following diagnosis. Thirty-nine (11%) of 352 GBM patients were identified as long-term survivors. Median survival was 9.15 years (range: 3–18 years). Median age was 47 years (range: 16–69); 13% were 65 years or older. Median KPS was 90 (range: 50–100). One long-term survivor underwent biopsy alone; 19 patients each had either complete or subtotal resection. All received focal radiotherapy (RT) with a median dose of 5940 cGy; 18% received concurrent temozolomide. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 35 (90%). Twelve patients (31%) remained in continuous remission. Twenty-seven had tumor progression a median of 29.2 months after diagnosis (range: 1.2–167 months); 18 had multiple relapses. Median KPS at last follow-up was 70 (range: 40–100); 85% of long-term survivors had at least one significant neurologic deficit. Eleven (28%) had clinically significant RT-induced leukoencephalopathy, 9 (23%) developed RT necrosis and 9 (23%) treatment-related strokes. Treatment-related complications occurred a median of 2.7 years from diagnosis (range: 0.9–11.5 years).</p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px Helvetica;">Long-term survivors remain rare, but are found across all age groups despite multiple recurrences; clinically significant delayed complications of treatment are common.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/397/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Long-term survivors of glioblastoma: clinical features and molecular analysis</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/345</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/345#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 05:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oncology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glioblastoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long-term survival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MGMT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p53]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PTEN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Acta Neurochir (2009) 151:1349–1358. DOI 10.1007/s00701-009-0387-1

Glioblastoma is a highly lethal neoplasm with a median survival of 12–14 months; only 2–5% of patients survive &#62;3 years.
Methods At our institute, patients with glioblastoma are initially treated with maximum tumor resection followed by radiation and the intravenous injection of nimustine hydrochloride (ACNU).
Results Using this strategy, 18 of 123 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica;">Acta Neurochir (2009) 151:1349–1358. DOI 10.1007/s00701-009-0387-1</p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica; min-height: 14.0px;">
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px Helvetica;">Glioblastoma is a highly lethal neoplasm with a median survival of 12–14 months; only 2–5% of patients survive &gt;3 years.</p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px Helvetica;">Methods At our institute, patients with glioblastoma are initially treated with maximum tumor resection followed by radiation and the intravenous injection of nimustine hydrochloride (ACNU).</p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px Helvetica;">Results Using this strategy, 18 of 123 (14.6%) patients treated at our hospital survived &gt;3 years; 7 manifested no recurrence, and the other 11 had early recurrence and received additional therapies. To identify factors associated with prolonged survival, we compared these patients with 21 short-term (&lt;1.5 years) glioblastoma survivors. In the long-term survivors, the MGMT promoter methylation was significantly more frequent. The rate of p53 mutation was lower, and the rate of PTEN mutations and the proliferation index were slightly higher in short-term survivors.</p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px Helvetica;">Conclusion By multivariate analysis,  we found that a younger age and MGMT promoter methylation were significant favorable factors in patients with glioblastoma.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/345/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Improving the prognosis for patients with glioblastoma: the rationale for targeting Src</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/291</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/291#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 04:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oncology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dasatinib]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glioblastoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Src family of tyrosine kinases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Src inhibitors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J Neurooncol (2009) 95:151–163 DOI 10.1007/s11060-009-9916-2
 
Glioblastoma is the most common and aggressive form of primary brain tumor. The prognosis for patients diagnosed with glioblastoma is poor, with a median survival of 12–14 months and a 5-year survival rate of &#60;5%. The upfront standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, consisting of surgery followed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px Helvetica;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;">J Neurooncol (2009) 95:151–163 DOI 10.1007/s11060-009-9916-2</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px Helvetica; min-height: 14.0px;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px Helvetica;"><span style="letter-spacing: 0.0px;">Glioblastoma is the most common and aggressive form of primary brain tumor. The prognosis for patients diagnosed with glioblastoma is poor, with a median survival of 12–14 months and a 5-year survival rate of &lt;5%. The upfront standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, consisting of surgery followed by chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy, provides only short-term survival benefits. Recurrent glioblastoma is an extremely challenging therapeutic setting because of the aggressive and resistant nature of the tumor. A set of key molecular targets in oncology is the Src family of non-receptor protein kinases. Dysregulated signaling via the Src kinases has been shown to underlie glioma-related proliferation, angiogenesis, migration, and survival. Here we review the biologic role of Src in malignant glioma and discuss key preclinical studies demonstrating the potential utility of inhibiting Src in glioma. Proof of clinical benefit is forthcoming from the first clinical studies involving the newest generation of small molecule Src inhibitors currently in clinical trials for recurrent glioblastoma. Blocking Src alone will likely not translate into a significant clinical benefit; thus, strategies for combining Src inhibitors with potential synergistic therapeutic modalities will be discussed. This review focus on dasatinib, the most advanced Src inhibitor being tested in glioblastoma, which is currently in phase I/II trials in this setting.</span></p>
<div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Helvetica, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-size: small;"><span style="line-height: normal;"><br />
</span></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/291/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

