<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neurosurgery Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com</link>
	<description>Daily bibliographic and video review of the Neurosurgery Department. La Fe University Hospital. Valencia, Spain</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:00:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Optimizing Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characterization of Brain Metastases: Relevance to Stereotactic Radiosurgery</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/5977</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/5977#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MRI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oncology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain metastases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadobutrol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadolinium-based contrast media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stereotactic radiosurgery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=5977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neurosurgery 72:691–701, 2013 Intracranial metastases are the most common form of intra-axial brain tumor. Management approaches to brain metastases include surgical resection, whole-brain radiotherapy, and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The management approach that is selected is based typically on algorithms that incorporate the number, size, and location of lesions. SRS is the treatment of choice when [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Optimizing_Contrast_Enhanced_Magnetic_Resonance.jpg"><img class="aligncenter  wp-image-5978" alt="Optimizing_Contrast_Enhanced_Magnetic_Resonance" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Optimizing_Contrast_Enhanced_Magnetic_Resonance-300x224.jpg" width="400" height="298" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #993300;">Neurosurgery 72:691–701, 2013</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Intracranial metastases are the most common form of intra-axial brain tumor. Management approaches to brain metastases include surgical resection, whole-brain radiotherapy, and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The management approach that is selected is based typically on algorithms that incorporate the number, size, and location of lesions.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">SRS is the treatment of choice when metastases detected on imaging are few (maximum, 3-5) and/or of small size (#30 mm) and offers the advantages of noninvasiveness and the ability to treat inaccessible lesions compared with surgical resection.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the standard imaging technique for determining the number, size, and location of metastatic lesions. In SRS, the capability of MRI to delineate lesion borders precisely in 3 dimensions helps reduce recurrence rates and minimize radiation necrosis in surrounding tissue.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Optimization of the MRI protocol, including selection of the appropriate gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA), is paramount for accurate lesion imaging. GBCAs differ in their safety, tolerability, and efficacy because of their diverse physicochemical properties. Gadobutrol and gadobenate dimeglumine are high-relaxivity GBCAs that demonstrate superior efficacy for imaging metastatic lesions compared with other GBCAs, whereas gadobutrol additionally provides macrocyclic stability.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This article reviews recent comparative trials of GBCAs and discusses their relevance for optimizing MRI protocols in the management of brain metastases, with particular relevance to SRS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/5977/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Superior cerebellar artery–posterior cerebral artery bypass</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/5964</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/5964#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 22:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[complications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical technique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vascular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fusiform posterior cerebral artery aneurysm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iatrogenic cerebral aneurysm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In situ bypass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[side-to-side anastomosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transsphenoidal surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vascular disorders]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=5964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J Neurosurg 118:1053–1057, 2013 Iatrogenic pseudoaneurysms are rare but serious complications of transsphenoidal surgery, and an iatrogenic pseudoaneurysm of the posterior cerebral artery (PCA) has been reported just once in the literature. The authors encountered such a case with a new P1 segment PCA pseudoaneurysm after endoscopic transsphenoidal resection of a pituitary adenoma. The aneurysm [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Superior-cerebellar-artery–posterior-cerebral-artery-bypass.jpg"><img class="aligncenter  wp-image-5967" alt="Superior cerebellar artery–posterior cerebral artery bypass" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Superior-cerebellar-artery–posterior-cerebral-artery-bypass-300x135.jpg" width="400" height="180" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #333300;">J Neurosurg 118:1053–1057, 2013</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Iatrogenic pseudoaneurysms are rare but serious complications of transsphenoidal surgery, and an iatrogenic pseudoaneurysm of the posterior cerebral artery (PCA) has been reported just once in the literature.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The authors encountered such a case with a new P1 segment PCA pseudoaneurysm after endoscopic transsphenoidal resection of a pituitary adenoma. The aneurysm proved ideal for a novel intracranial–intracranial bypass in which the superior cerebellar artery (SCA) was used as an in situ donor artery to revascularize the recipient P2 segment. The bypass allowed aneurysm trapping without causing ischemic stroke or neurological morbidity.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This case represents the first reported surgical treatment of an iatrogenic PCA pseudoaneurysm. Endovascular occlusion with coils was an option, but dolichoectatic morphology requires sacrifice of the P1 segment, with associated risks to the thalamoperforators and circumflex perforators. The SCA-PCA bypass was ideal because of low-flow demands. Like other in situ bypasses, it requires no dissection of extracranial arteries, no second incision for harvesting interposition grafts, and has a high likelihood of long-term patency. The SCA-PCA bypass is also applicable to fusiform SCA aneurysms requiring revascularization with trapping.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This case demonstrates a dangerous complication that results from the limited view of the posterolateral surgical field through the endoscope and the imprecision of endoscopic instruments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/5964/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Accuracy of stimulating electrode placement in paediatric pallidal deep brain stimulation for primary and secondary dystonia</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/5971</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/5971#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 22:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Functional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stereotactic neurosurgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deep Brain Stimulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dystonia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electrode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pallidal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=5971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Acta Neurochir (2013) 155:823–836 Accuracy of electrode placement is an important determinant of outcome following deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery. Data on accuracy of electrode placement into the globus pallidum interna (GPi) in paediatric patients is limited, particularly those with non-primary dystonia who often have smaller GPi. Pallidal DBS is known to bemore effective in [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/DBS-in-pediatric-dystonia.jpg"><img class="aligncenter  wp-image-5974" alt="DBS in pediatric dystonia" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/DBS-in-pediatric-dystonia-290x300.jpg" width="400" height="413" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #000080;">Acta Neurochir (2013) 155:823–836</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Accuracy of electrode placement is an important determinant of outcome following deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery. Data on accuracy of electrode placement into the globus pallidum interna (GPi) in paediatric patients is limited, particularly those with non-primary dystonia who often have smaller GPi. Pallidal DBS is known to bemore effective in the treatment of primary dystonia compared with secondary dystonia.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Objectives We aimed to determine if accuracy of pallidal electrode placement differed between primary, secondary and NBIA (neuronal degeneration and brain iron accumulation) associated dystonia and how this related to motor outcome following surgery.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Methods A retrospective review of a consecutive cohort of children and young people undergoing DBS surgery in a single centre. Fused in frame preoperative planning magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and postoperative computed tomography (CT) brain scans were used to determine the accuracy of placement of DBS electrode tip in Leskell stereotactic system compared with the planned target. The differences along X, Y, and Z coordinates were calculated, as was the Euclidean distance of electrode tip from the target. The relationship between proximity to target and change in Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale at 1 year was also measured.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results Data were collected from 88 electrodes placed in 42 patients (14 primary dystonia, 18 secondary dystonia and 10 NBIA associated dystonia). Median differences between planned target and actual position were: left-side X-axis 1.05 mm, Y-axis 0.85 mm, Z-axis 0.94 mm and Euclidean difference 2.04 mm; right-side X-axis 1.28 mm, Y-axis 0.70 mm, Z-axis 0.70 mm and Euclidean difference 2.45 mm. Accuracy did not differ between left and right-sided electrodes. No difference in accuracy was seen between primary, secondary or NBIA associated dystonia. Dystonia reduction at 1 year post surgery did not appear to relate to proximity of implanted electrode to surgical target across the cohort.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusions Accuracy of surgical placement did not differ between primary, secondary or NBIA associated dystonia. Decreased efficacy of pallidal DBS in secondary and NBIA associated dystonia is unlikely to be related to difficulties in achieving the planned electrode placement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/5971/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amygdalohippocampotomy: surgical technique and clinical results</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/5958</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/5958#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 22:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Epilepsy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical technique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amygdalohippocampectomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amygdalohippocampotomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epilepsy surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesial temporal lobe sclerosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Temporal lobe epilepsy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=5958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J Neurosurg 118:1107–1113, 2013 The removal of mesial temporal structures, namely amygdalohippocampectomy, is the most efficient surgical procedure for the treatment of epilepsy. However, disconnection of the epileptogenic zones, as in temporal lobotomy or, for different purposes, hemispherotomy, have shown equivalent results with less morbidity. Thus, authors of the present study began performing selective amygdalohippocampotomy [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Amygdalohippocampotomy.jpg"><img class="aligncenter  wp-image-5960" alt="Amygdalohippocampotomy" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Amygdalohippocampotomy-300x211.jpg" width="400" height="281" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #333300;">J Neurosurg 118:1107–1113, 2013</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The removal of mesial temporal structures, namely amygdalohippocampectomy, is the most efficient surgical procedure for the treatment of epilepsy. However, disconnection of the epileptogenic zones, as in temporal lobotomy or, for different purposes, hemispherotomy, have shown equivalent results with less morbidity. Thus, authors of the present study began performing selective amygdalohippocampotomy in cases of refractory mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) to treat mesial temporal lobe sclerosis (MTLS).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Method. The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of all cases of amygdalohippocampotomy collected in a database between November 2007 and March 2011.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results. Since 2007, 21 patients (14 males and 7 females), ages 20–58 years (mean 41 years), all with TLE due to MTLS, were treated with selective ablation of the lateral amygdala plus perihippocampal disconnection (anterior one-half to two-thirds in dominant hemisphere), the left side in 11 cases and the right in 10. In 20 patients the followup was 2 or more years (range 24–44 months, average 32 months). Clinical outcome for epilepsy 2 years after surgery (20 patients) was good/very good in 19 patients (95%) with an Engel Class I (15 patients [75%]) or II outcome (4 patients [20%]) and bad in 1 patient (5%) with an Engel Class IV outcome (extratemporal focus and later reoperation). Surgical morbidity included hemiparesis (capsular hypertensive hemorrhage 24 hours after surgery, 1 patient), verbal memory worsening (2 patients), and quadrantanopia (permanent in 2 patients, transient in 1). Late psychiatric depression developed in 3 cases. Operative time was reduced by about 30 minutes (15%) on average with this technique.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusions. Amygdalohippocampotomy is as effective as amygdalohippocampectomy to treat MTLS and is a potentially safer, time-saving procedure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/5958/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Comparison of Language Mapping by Preoperative Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Direct Cortical Stimulation During Awake Surgery</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/5943</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/5943#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 22:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surgical technique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awake surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preoperative mapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transcranial magnetic stimulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tumor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=5943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neurosurgery 72:808–819, 2013 Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) is increasingly used in presurgical brain mapping. Preoperative nTMS results correlate well with direct cortical stimulation (DCS) data in the identification of the primary motor cortex. Repetitive nTMS can also be used for mapping of speech-sensitive cortical areas. OBJECTIVE: The current cohort study compares the safety and [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/A_Comparison_of_Language_Mapping_by_Preoperative.jpg"><img class="aligncenter  wp-image-5946" alt="A_Comparison_of_Language_Mapping_by_Preoperative" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/A_Comparison_of_Language_Mapping_by_Preoperative-300x137.jpg" width="400" height="182" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #993300;">Neurosurgery 72:808–819, 2013</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) is increasingly used in presurgical brain mapping. Preoperative nTMS results correlate well with direct cortical stimulation (DCS) data in the identification of the primary motor cortex. Repetitive nTMS can also be used for mapping of speech-sensitive cortical areas.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">OBJECTIVE: The current cohort study compares the safety and effectiveness of preoperative nTMS with DCS mapping during awake surgery for the identification of language areas in patients with left-sided cerebral lesions.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">METHODS: Twenty patients with tumors in or close to left-sided language eloquent regions were examined by repetitive nTMS before surgery. During awake surgery, language-eloquent cortex was identified by DCS. nTMS results were compared for accuracy and reliability with regard to DCS by projecting both results into the cortical parcellation system.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">RESULTS: Presurgical nTMS maps showed an overall sensitivity of 90.2%, specificity of 23.8%, positive predictive value of 35.6%, and negative predictive value of 83.9% compared with DCS. For the anatomic Broca’s area, the corresponding values were a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 13.0%, positive predictive value of 56.5%, and negative predictive value of 100%, respectively.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">CONCLUSION: Good overall correlation between repetitive nTMS and DCS was observed, particularly with regard to negatively mapped regions. Noninvasive inhibition mapping with nTMS is evolving as a valuable tool for preoperative mapping of language areas. Yet its low specificity in posterior language areas in the current study necessitates further research to refine the methodology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/5943/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Visual outcomes for surgical treatment of large and giant carotid ophthalmic segment aneurysms</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/5950</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/5950#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 22:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surgical technique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vascular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carotid ophthalmic segment aneurysm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Giant aneurysm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retrograde suction decompression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vascular disorders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visual outcome.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=5950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J Neurosurg 118:937–946, 2013 The authors report their results in a series of large or giant carotid ophthalmic segment aneurysms clipped using retrograde suction decompression. Methods. A retrospective review of clinical data and treatment summaries was performed for 18 patients with large or giant carotid artery ophthalmic segment aneurysms managed operatively via retrograde suction decompression. [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Vision-after-aneurysm-clipping-with-suction-decompression.jpg"><img class="aligncenter  wp-image-5953" alt="Vision after aneurysm clipping with suction decompression" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Vision-after-aneurysm-clipping-with-suction-decompression-300x125.jpg" width="400" height="166" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #000080;">J Neurosurg 118:937–946, 2013</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The authors report their results in a series of large or giant carotid ophthalmic segment aneurysms clipped using retrograde suction decompression.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Methods. A retrospective review of clinical data and treatment summaries was performed for 18 patients with large or giant carotid artery ophthalmic segment aneurysms managed operatively via retrograde suction decompression. Visual outcomes, Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores, and operative complications were determined. Postoperative angiography was assessed.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results. During a 17-year period, 18 patients underwent surgery performed using retrograde suction decompression. The mean aneurysm size was 26 mm. Three patients presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Fourteen of 18 patients presented with visual symptoms. Eleven (79%) of these 14 patients experienced visual improvement and the remaining 3 (21%) experienced worsened vision after surgery. Of 3 patients without visual symptoms and a complete visual examination before and after surgery, 1 had visual worsening postoperatively. One aneurysm required trapping and bypass, and all others could be clipped. Postoperative angiography demonstrated complete occlusion in 9 of 17 clipped aneurysms and neck remnants in the other 8 clipped aneurysms. One (5.5%) of 18 patients experienced a stroke. Eighteen patients had a GOS score of 5 (good outcome), and 1 patient had a GOS score of 4 (moderately disabled). There were no deaths. There was no morbidity related to the second incision or decompression procedure. Prolonged improvement did occur, and even in some cases of visual worsening in 1 eye, the overall vision did improve enough to allow driving.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusions. Retrograde suction decompression greatly facilitates surgical clipping for large and giant aneurysms of the ophthalmic segment. Visual preservation and improvement occur in the majority of these cases and is an important outcome measure. Developing endovascular technology must show equivalence or superiority to surgery for this specific outcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/5950/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Risk Factors for Pediatric Arachnoid Cyst Rupture/Hemorrhage: A Case-Control Study</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/5938</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/5938#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 22:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Developmental Malformations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pediatrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arachnoid cyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case-control study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hemorrhage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pediatric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trauma]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=5938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the availability of imaging modalities has increased, the finding of arachnoid cysts has become common. Accurate patient counseling regarding physical activity or risk factors for cyst rupture or hemorrhage has been hampered by the lack of definitive association studies. OBJECTIVE: This case-control study evaluated factors that are associated with arachnoid cyst rupture (intracystic hemorrhage, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #993300;"><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Risk_Factors_for_Pediatric_Arachnoid_Cyst.jpg"><img class="aligncenter  wp-image-5939" alt="Risk_Factors_for_Pediatric_Arachnoid_Cyst" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Risk_Factors_for_Pediatric_Arachnoid_Cyst-248x300.jpg" width="400" height="483" /></a></span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">As the availability of imaging modalities has increased, the finding of arachnoid cysts has become common. Accurate patient counseling regarding physical activity or risk factors for cyst rupture or hemorrhage has been hampered by the lack of definitive association studies.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">OBJECTIVE: This case-control study evaluated factors that are associated with arachnoid cyst rupture (intracystic hemorrhage, adjacent subdural hematoma, or adjacent subdural hygroma) in pediatric patients with previously asymptomatic arachnoid cysts.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">METHODS: Patients with arachnoid cysts and intracystic hemorrhage, adjacent subdural hygroma, or adjacent subdural hematoma treated at a single institution from 2005 to 2010 were retrospectively identified. Two unruptured/nonhemorrhagic controls were matched to each case based on patient age, sex, anatomical cyst location, and side. Risk factors evaluated included arachnoid cyst size, recent history of head trauma, and altitude at residence.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">RESULTS: The proportion of imaged arachnoid cysts that presented either originally or subsequently with a rupture or hemorrhage was 6.0%. Larger cyst size, as defined by maximal cyst diameter, was significantly associated with cyst rupture/hemorrhage (P &lt; .001). When dichotomized with a 5-cm cutoff, 9/13 larger cysts ruptured and/or hemorrhaged, whereas only 5/29 smaller cysts ruptured/hemorrhaged (odds ratio = 16.5 (confidence interval [2.5, N]). A recent history of head trauma was also significantly associated with the outcome (P &lt; .001; odds ratio = 25.1 (confidence interval [4.0, N]). Altitude was not associated with arachnoid cyst rupture or hemorrhage.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">CONCLUSION: This case-control study suggests that larger arachnoid cyst size and recent head trauma are risk factors for symptomatic arachnoid cyst rupture/hemorrhage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/5938/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Infection rates of external ventricular drains are reduced by the use of silver-impregnated catheters</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/5932</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/5932#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 22:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cerebrospinal fluid infection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External ventricular drainage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrocephalus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=5932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Acta Neurochir (2013) 155:875–881 External ventricular drainage (EVD) placement for temporary cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion is a frequent therapeutic procedure. Several types of EVD catheters are currently available, some of which have an antibacterial effect. This study compares the rates of CSF infections in patients with different types of EVD catheters. Methods This is a [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/silverline_evd_catheter_3001202_1_m.jpg"><img class="aligncenter  wp-image-5936" alt="silverline_evd_catheter_3001202_1_m" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/silverline_evd_catheter_3001202_1_m-300x168.jpg" width="400" height="224" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #003300;">Acta Neurochir (2013) 155:875–881</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">External ventricular drainage (EVD) placement for temporary cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion is a frequent therapeutic procedure. Several types of EVD catheters are currently available, some of which have an antibacterial effect. This study compares the rates of CSF infections in patients with different types of EVD catheters.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Methods This is a retrospective study of 403 patients with a total of 529 implanted EVDs. We analyze the occurrence of EVD-associated infections, microbiological diagnosis, type of EVD catheter (plain polyurethane vs. silver-impregnated), duration of CSF diversion, primary disease, and outcome.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results There were a total of 29 patients with EVD infections in the whole study group (7.1 %). A pathogen was detected in all cases. Coagulase-negative staphylococci were detected most frequently (20 out of 29 cases, 70 %). The rate of infections by catheter type was 7.6 % (11 of 145) and 13.8 % (4 out of 29) for two different types of noncoated polyurethane catheters. Silver-impregnated polyurethane catheters became infected in 6.1 % (14 out of 228). The differences between non-coated and silver-coated catheters were statistically significant.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusions This study provides comparative data on EVD infections with regard to the type of catheter. Silverimpregnated catheters showed significantly lower infection rates when compared to non-impregnated catheters. The results are critically discussed and compared with the published literature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/5932/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indocyanine green videoangiography ‘‘in negative’’: definition and usefulness in spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/5927</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/5927#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 22:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vascular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dural arteriovenous fistula]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indocyanine green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videoangiography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=5927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eur Spine J (2013) 22 (Suppl 3):S471–S477 Indocyanine green videoangiography (IGV) has proven its effectiveness in the field of exovascular neurosurgery, both in the intracranial and spinal compartment, but is necessary to define a systematic process for the performance of the IGV to facilitate its interpretation during the procedure. We have defined and applied the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/SDAVF.jpg"><img class="aligncenter  wp-image-5930" alt="SDAVF" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/SDAVF-300x135.jpg" width="400" height="180" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Eur Spine J (2013) 22 (Suppl 3):S471–S477</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Indocyanine green videoangiography (IGV) has proven its effectiveness in the field of exovascular neurosurgery, both in the intracranial and spinal compartment, but is necessary to define a systematic process for the performance of the IGV to facilitate its interpretation during the procedure. We have defined and applied the concept of videoangiography ‘‘in negative’’ (INIGV) to spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae (dAVF) for the detection and treatment of arteriovenous shunts, so called because the first phase is performed with the vessel suggestive of being pathological occluded.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Methods A Pentero-operating microscope with nearinfrared IGV-integrated system (Carl Zeiss Co., Germany) was used. At our institution, 24 patients were treated for a spinal dAVF between 1995 and 2011, only in the last 4 cases, INIGV was performed.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results We describe the IGV in negative procedure and show the most illustrative cases. In all cases, the fistula occlusion was confirmed by postoperative selective digital subtraction angiography (DSA). INIGV demonstrate its capacity in detecting vessels not actually arterialized that should be respected and avoid some of the main limitations of the conventional IGV. This is a technical description about an Indocyanine green (ICG) videoangiographic procedure modification that is superior to merely performing ICG before and after clipping of a dAVF.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusion The INIGV results are rapid and easy to interpret procedure and provide great advantages to the dAVF treatment. Nevertheless, further studies are needed with a larger sample size to determine if INIGV may reduce the need to perform immediate postoperative DSA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/5927/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C2 root nerve sheath tumors management</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/5920</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/5920#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 22:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical technique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cervical nerve sheath tumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[craniovertebral junction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extreme lateral transcondylar approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laminectomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=5920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Acta Neurochir (2013) 155:779–784 Upper cervical nerve sheath tumors (NST) arising mainly from C2 root and to lesser extent from C1 root are not uncommon, they constitute approximately 5-12% of spinal nerve sheath tumors and 18-30% of all cervical nerve sheath tumors, unique in presentation and their relationship to neighbouring structures owing to the discrete [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml><br />
<o:documentproperties><br />
<o:version>14.00</o:version><br />
</o:documentproperties><br />
<o:officedocumentsettings><br />
<o:allowpng></o:allowpng><br />
</o:officedocumentsettings><br />
</xml>< ![endif]--></p>
<p><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml><br />
<w:worddocument><br />
<w:view>Normal</w:view><br />
<w:zoom>0</w:zoom><br />
<w:trackmoves></w:trackmoves><br />
<w:trackformatting></w:trackformatting><br />
<w:hyphenationzone>21</w:hyphenationzone><br />
<w:punctuationkerning></w:punctuationkerning><br />
<w:validateagainstschemas></w:validateagainstschemas><br />
<w:saveifxmlinvalid>false</w:saveifxmlinvalid><br />
<w:ignoremixedcontent>false</w:ignoremixedcontent><br />
<w:alwaysshowplaceholdertext>false</w:alwaysshowplaceholdertext><br />
<w:donotpromoteqf></w:donotpromoteqf><br />
<w:lidthemeother>ES</w:lidthemeother><br />
<w:lidthemeasian>X-NONE</w:lidthemeasian><br />
<w:lidthemecomplexscript>X-NONE</w:lidthemecomplexscript><br />
<w:compatibility><br />
<w:breakwrappedtables></w:breakwrappedtables><br />
<w:snaptogridincell></w:snaptogridincell><br />
<w:wraptextwithpunct></w:wraptextwithpunct><br />
<w:useasianbreakrules></w:useasianbreakrules><br />
<w:dontgrowautofit></w:dontgrowautofit><br />
<w:splitpgbreakandparamark></w:splitpgbreakandparamark><br />
<w:enableopentypekerning></w:enableopentypekerning><br />
<w:dontflipmirrorindents></w:dontflipmirrorindents><br />
<w:overridetablestylehps></w:overridetablestylehps><br />
</w:compatibility><br />
<m:mathpr><br />
<m:mathfont m:val="Cambria Math"></m:mathfont><br />
<m:brkbin m:val="before"></m:brkbin><br />
<m:brkbinsub m:val="&#45;-"></m:brkbinsub><br />
<m:smallfrac m:val="off"></m:smallfrac><br />
<m:dispdef></m:dispdef><br />
<m:lmargin m:val="0"></m:lmargin><br />
<m:rmargin m:val="0"></m:rmargin><br />
<m:defjc m:val="centerGroup"></m:defjc><br />
<m:wrapindent m:val="1440"></m:wrapindent><br />
<m:intlim m:val="subSup"></m:intlim><br />
<m:narylim m:val="undOvr"></m:narylim><br />
</m:mathpr></w:worddocument><br />
</xml>< ![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml><br />
<w:latentstyles DefLockedState="false" DefUnhideWhenUsed="true"<br />
DefSemiHidden="true" DefQFormat="false" DefPriority="99"<br />
LatentStyleCount="267"><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="0" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Normal"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="heading 1"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 2"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 3"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 4"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 5"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 6"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 7"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 8"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 9"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 1"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 2"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 3"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 4"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 5"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 6"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 7"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 8"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 9"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="35" QFormat="true" Name="caption"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="10" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Title"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="1" Name="Default Paragraph Font"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="11" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtitle"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="22" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Strong"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="20" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Emphasis"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="59" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Table Grid"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Placeholder Text"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="1" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="No Spacing"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 1"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 1"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 1"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 1"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 1"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 1"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Revision"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="34" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="List Paragraph"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="29" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Quote"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="30" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Quote"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 1"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 1"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 1"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 1"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 1"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 1"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 1"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 1"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 2"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 2"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 2"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 2"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 2"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 2"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 2"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 2"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 2"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 2"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 2"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 2"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 2"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 2"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 3"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 3"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 3"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 3"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 3"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 3"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 3"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 3"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 3"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 3"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 3"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 3"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 3"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 3"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 4"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 4"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 4"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 4"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 4"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 4"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 4"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 4"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 4"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 4"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 4"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 4"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 4"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 4"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 5"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 5"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 5"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 5"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 5"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 5"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 5"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 5"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 5"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 5"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 5"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 5"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 5"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 5"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 6"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 6"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 6"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 6"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 6"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 6"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 6"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 6"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 6"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 6"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 6"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 6"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 6"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 6"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="19" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Emphasis"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="21" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Emphasis"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="31" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Reference"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="32" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Reference"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="33" SemiHidden="false"<br />
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Book Title"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="37" Name="Bibliography"></w:lsdexception><br />
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="39" QFormat="true" Name="TOC Heading"></w:lsdexception><br />
</w:latentstyles><br />
</xml>< ![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]></p>
<style>
 /* Style Definitions */
 table.MsoNormalTable
	{mso-style-name:"Tabla normal";
	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
	mso-style-noshow:yes;
	mso-style-priority:99;
	mso-style-parent:"";
	mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
	mso-para-margin-top:0cm;
	mso-para-margin-right:0cm;
	mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;
	mso-para-margin-left:0cm;
	line-height:115%;
	mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
	font-size:11.0pt;
	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
	mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
	mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
	mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
	mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
	mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
	mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;
	mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
</style>
<p>< ![endif]--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/C2-tumor.jpg"><img class="aligncenter  wp-image-5923" alt="C2 tumor" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/C2-tumor-300x282.jpg" width="400" height="376" /></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #003300;">Acta Neurochir (2013) 155:779–784</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;">Upper cervical nerve sheath tumors (NST) arising mainly from C2 root and to lesser extent from C1 root are not uncommon, they constitute approximately 5-12% of spinal nerve sheath tumors and 18-30% of all cervical nerve sheath tumors, unique in presentation and their relationship to neighbouring structures owing to the discrete anatomy at the upper cervical-craniovertebral region, and have a tendency for growth reaching large-sized tumors before manifesting clinically due to the capacious spinal canal at this region; accordingly the surgical approaches to such tumors are modified. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;">The aim of this paper is to discuss the surgical strategies for upper cervical nerve sheath tumors. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;">Methods Eleven patients (8 male and 3 females), age range 28 – 63 years, with C2 root nerve sheath tumors were operated upon based on their anatomical relations to the spinal cord. The magnetic resonance imaging findings were utilized to determine the surgical approach. The tumors had extra and intradural components in 10 patients, while in one the tumor was purely intradural. The operative approaches included varied from extreme lateral transcondylar approach( n =1) to laminectomy, whether complete( n =3) or hemilaminectomy( n =7), with partial facetectomy( n =7), and with suboccipital craniectomy( n =2). </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;">Results The clinical picture ranged from spasticity ( n =8, 72,72 %), tingling and numbness below neck ( n =6, 54,54 %), weakness ( n =6, 54,54 %), posterior column involvement ( n =4, 26,36 %), and neck pain ( n =4, 36,36 %). The duration of symptoms ranged from 1 to 54 months, total excision was performed in 7 patients; while in 3 patients an extraspinal component, and in 1 patient a small intradural component, were left in situ. Eight patients showed improvement of myelopathy; 2 patients maintained their grades. One poor-grade patient was deteriorated. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;">Conclusion The surgical approaches for the C2 root nerve sheath tumors should be tailored according to the relationship to the spinal cord, determined by magnetic resonance imaging. </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/5920/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
