<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neurosurgery Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com</link>
	<description>Daily bibliographic and video review of the Neurosurgery Department. La Fe University Hospital. Valencia, Spain</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 16:27:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The intermediate trunk of the middle cerebral artery</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/4304</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/4304#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 22:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Laboratory investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vascular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angiography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intermediate trunk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[middle cerebral artery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vascular anatomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=4304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J Neurosurg 116:1024–1034, 2012 (http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2012.1.JNS111013) The branching structure of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) remains a debated issue. In this study the authors aimed to describe this branching structure in detail. Methods. Twenty-seven fresh, human brains (54 hemispheres) obtained from routine autopsies were used. The cerebral arteries were first filled with colored latex and contrast [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/mca.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-4309" title="mca" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/mca-300x122.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="122" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>J Neurosurg 116:1024–1034, 2012</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong></strong><strong>(<a href="http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2012.1.JNS111013">http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2012.1.JNS111013</a>)</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The branching structure of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) remains a debated issue. In this study the authors aimed to describe this branching structure in detail.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Methods. Twenty-seven fresh, human brains (54 hemispheres) obtained from routine autopsies were used. The cerebral arteries were first filled with colored latex and contrast agent, followed by fixation with formaldehyde. All dissections were done under a microscope. During examination, the trunk structures of the MCA and their relations with cortical branches were demonstrated. Lateral radiographs of the same hemispheres were then obtained and comparisons were made. Angles between the MCA trunks were measured on 3D CT cerebral angiography images in 25 patients (50 hemispheres), and their correlations with the angles obtained in the cadaver brains were evaluated.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results. A new classification was made in relation to the terminology of the intermediate trunk, which is still a subject of debate. The intermediate trunk was present in 61% of cadavers and originated from a superior trunk in 55% and from an inferior trunk in 45%. Cortical branches supplying the motor cortex (precentral, central, and postcentral arteries) significantly originated from the intermediate trunk, and the diameter of the intermediate trunk significantly increased when it originated from the superior trunk. In measurements of the angles between the superior and intermediate trunks, it was found that the intermediate trunk had significant dominance in supplying the motor cortex as the angle increased. The intermediate trunk was classified into 3 types based on the angle values and the distance to the bifurcation point as Group A (pseudotrifurcation type), Group B (proximal type), and Group C (distal type). Group A trunks were seemingly closer to the trifurcation structure that has been reported on in the literature and was seen in 15%. Group B trunks were the most common type (55%), and Group C trunks were characterized as the farthest from the bifurcation point. Group C trunks also had the smallest diameter and fewest cortical branches. Similarities were found between the angles in cadaver specimens and on 3D CT cerebral angiography images. Beyond the separation point of the MCA, trunk structures always included the superior trunk and inferior trunk, and sometimes the intermediate trunk.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusions. Interrelations of these vascular structures and their influences on the cortical branches originating from them are clinically important. The information presented in this study will ensure reliable diagnostic approaches and safer surgical interventions, particularly with MCA selective angiography.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/4304/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clinical presentation and prognostic factors of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/4298</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/4298#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clinical Guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vascular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central nervous system vascular malformation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dural arteriovenous fistula]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinal cord disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinal cord ischemia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=4298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neurosurg Focus 32 (5):E17, 2012. (http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2012.1.FOCUS11376) Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs), the most common type of spinal cord vascular malformation, can be a challenge to diagnose and treat promptly. The disorder is rare, and the presenting clinical symptoms and signs are nonspecific and insidious at onset. Spinal dural AVFs preferentially affect middle-aged men, and patients [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Clinical-presentation-and-prognostic-factors-of-spinal-dural-arteriovenous-fistulas-an-overview.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-4299" title="Clinical presentation and prognostic factors of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas- an overview" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Clinical-presentation-and-prognostic-factors-of-spinal-dural-arteriovenous-fistulas-an-overview-272x300.jpg" alt="" width="272" height="300" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Neurosurg Focus 32 (5):E17, 2012. (http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2012.1.FOCUS11376)</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs), the most common type of spinal cord vascular malformation, can be a challenge to diagnose and treat promptly. The disorder is rare, and the presenting clinical symptoms and signs are nonspecific and insidious at onset.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Spinal dural AVFs preferentially affect middle-aged men, and patients most commonly present with gait abnormality or lower-extremity weakness and sensory disturbances. Symptoms gradually progress or decline in a stepwise manner and are commonly associated with pain and sphincter disturbances. Surgical or endovascular disconnection of the fistula has a high success rate with a low rate of morbidity. Motor symptoms are most likely to improve after treatment, followed by sensory disturbances, and lastly sphincter disturbances.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Patients with severe neurological deficits at presentation tend to have worse posttreatment functional outcomes than those with mild or moderate pretreatment disability. However, improvement or stabilization of symptoms is seen in the vast majority of treated patients, and thus treatment is justified even in patients with substantial neurological deficits.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The extent of intramedullary spinal cord T2 signal abnormality does not correlate with outcomes and should not be used as a prognostic factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/4298/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Influence of Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Surgical Planning for Tumors in or Near the Motor Cortex</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/4289</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/4289#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 22:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Neuronavigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oncology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain tumor surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motor cortex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transcranial magnetic stimulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=4289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neurosurgery 70:1248–1257, 2012 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318243881e  Brain tumor surgery near the motor cortex requires careful planning to achieve the optimal balance between completeness of tumor resection and preservation of motor function. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) can be used to map functionally essential motor areas preoperatively. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how much influence, benefit, and impact nTMS [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/navigated-tcms.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-4293" title="navigated-tcms" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/navigated-tcms-300x117.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="117" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Neurosurgery 70:1248–1257, 2012 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318243881e </strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Brain tumor surgery near the motor cortex requires careful planning to achieve the optimal balance between completeness of tumor resection and preservation of motor function. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) can be used to map functionally essential motor areas preoperatively.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how much influence, benefit, and impact nTMS has on the surgical planning for tumors near the motor cortex.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">METHODS: This study reviewed the records of 73 patients with brain tumors in or near the motor cortex, mapped preoperatively with nTMS. The surgical team prospectively classified how much influence the nTMS results had on the surgical planning. Stepwise regression analysis was used to explore which factors predict the amount of influence, benefit, and impact nTMS has on the surgical planning.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">RESULTS: The influence of nTMS on the surgical planning was as follows: it confirmed the expected anatomy in 22% of patients, added knowledge that was not used in 23%, added awareness of high-risk areas in 27%, modified the approach in 16%, changed the planned extent of resection in 8%, and changed the surgical indication in 3%.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">CONCLUSION: nTMS had an objective benefit on the surgical planning in one fourth of the patients and a subjective benefit in an additional half of the patients. It had an impact on the surgery itself in just more than half of the patients. By mapping the spatial relationship between the tumor and functional motor cortex, nTMS improves surgical planning for tumors in or near the motor cortex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/4289/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy in stereotactic surgery</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/4283</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/4283#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 22:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stereotactic neurosurgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical technique]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=4283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Acta Neurochir (2012) 154:815–821. DOI 10.1007/s00701-012-1288-2 Intraoperative localisation of a stereotactic probe remains challenging. Stereotactic X-ray, the “gold standard”, as well as intraoperative magnetic resonance (MRI) and computed tomography (CT), require a dedicated operating room (OR). Fluoroscopy with crosshairs confirms only grossly the target position. An alternative would be a mobile three-dimensional (3D) fluoroscopy C-arm. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Intraoperative-3D-fluoroscopy-in-stereotactic-surgery.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-4284" title="Intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy in stereotactic surgery" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Intraoperative-3D-fluoroscopy-in-stereotactic-surgery-300x108.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="108" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Acta Neurochir (2012) 154:815–821. DOI 10.1007/s00701-012-1288-2</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Intraoperative localisation of a stereotactic probe remains challenging. Stereotactic X-ray, the “gold standard”, as well as intraoperative magnetic resonance (MRI) and computed tomography (CT), require a dedicated operating room (OR). Fluoroscopy with crosshairs confirms only grossly the target position. An alternative would be a mobile three-dimensional (3D) fluoroscopy C-arm. To our knowledge, this is the first report on 3D C-arm fluoroscopy to verify stereotactical trajectories. The objective was to assess the feasibility of using a 3D C-arm to verify the intraoperative trajectory and target.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Methods A total of 12 stereotactic trajectories in 10 patients were analysed, comprising 8 biopsies and 4 electrode trajectories. The fluoroscopic scan was performed after implantation of the deep brain stimulation electrode or after advancing the biopsy needle to the tumour. An image set is acquired during a rotation of the 3D C-arm. The image set is reconstructed and merged to the preoperative CT scan. Calculating the vector error and the deviation assesses target and trajectory accuracy.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results The mean trajectory deviation was 0.6 mm (±0.54 mm) and the mean vector error was 1.44 mm (±1.43 mm). There was no influence on the surgical time and the mean irradiation dosage was 401.9 cGy/cm<sup>2</sup>.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusions This target and trajectory verification is feasible. Its accuracy seems comparable with MRI and CT. There is no additional time consumption. Irradiation is comparable with stereotactic X-ray.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/4283/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Frameless robotically targeted stereotactic brain biopsy</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/4277</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/4277#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 22:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Neuronavigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stereotactic neurosurgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical technique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diagnostic and operative techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frameless brain biopsy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oncology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stereotaxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tumor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=4277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J Neurosurg 116:1002–1006, 2012. (http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2012.1.JNS111746) Frameless stereotactic brain biopsy has become an established procedure in many neurosurgical centers worldwide. Robotic modifications of image-guided frameless stereotaxy hold promise for making these procedures safer, more effective, and more efficient. The authors hypothesized that robotic brain biopsy is a safe, accurate procedure, with a high diagnostic yield and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Frameless-robotic-stereotactic-brain-biopsy.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-4278" title="Frameless robotic stereotactic brain biopsy" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Frameless-robotic-stereotactic-brain-biopsy-300x153.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="153" /></a></p>
<p>J Neurosurg 116:1002–1006, 2012. (<a href="http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2012.1.JNS111746">http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2012.1.JNS111746</a>)</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Frameless stereotactic brain biopsy has become an established procedure in many neurosurgical centers worldwide. Robotic modifications of image-guided frameless stereotaxy hold promise for making these procedures safer, more effective, and more efficient. The authors hypothesized that robotic brain biopsy is a safe, accurate procedure, with a high diagnostic yield and a safety profile comparable to other stereotactic biopsy methods.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Methods. This retrospective study included 41 patients undergoing frameless stereotactic brain biopsy of lesions (mean size 2.9 cm) for diagnostic purposes. All patients underwent image-guided, robotic biopsy in which the Surgi-Scope system was used in conjunction with scalp fiducial markers and a preoperatively selected target and trajectory. Forty-five procedures, with 50 supratentorial targets selected, were performed.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results. The mean operative time was 44.6 minutes for the robotic biopsy procedures. This decreased over the second half of the study by 37%, from 54.7 to 34.5 minutes (p &lt; 0.025). The diagnostic yield was 97.8% per procedure, with a second procedure being diagnostic in the single nondiagnostic case. Complications included one transient worsening of a preexisting deficit (2%) and another deficit that was permanent (2%). There were no infections.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusions. Robotic biopsy involving a preselected target and trajectory is safe, accurate, efficient, and comparable to other procedures employing either frame-based stereotaxy or frameless, nonrobotic stereotaxy. It permits biopsy in all patients, including those with small target lesions. Robotic biopsy planning facilitates careful preoperative study and optimization of needle trajectory to avoid sulcal vessels, bridging veins, and ventricular penetration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/4277/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells after spinal cord injury</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/4263</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/4263#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 22:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clinical Trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Activities of daily living]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Axon regeneration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetic resonance imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesenchymal stem cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinal cord injury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=4263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neurosurgery 70:1238–1247, 2012 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31824387f9 Although the transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) after spinal cord injury (SCI) has shown promising results in animals, less is known about the effects of autologous MSCs in human SCI. OBJECTIVE: To describe the long-term results of 10 patients who underwent intramedullary direct MSCs transplantation into injured spinal cords. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Stem-cells-SCI.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-4265" title="Stem cells SCI" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Stem-cells-SCI-300x171.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="171" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Neurosurgery 70:1238–1247, 2012</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31824387f9</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Although the transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) after spinal cord injury (SCI) has shown promising results in animals, less is known about the effects of autologous MSCs in human SCI.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">OBJECTIVE: To describe the long-term results of 10 patients who underwent intramedullary direct MSCs transplantation into injured spinal cords.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">METHODS: Autologous MSCs were harvested from the iliac bone of each patient and expanded by culturing for 4 weeks. MSCs (8 · 106) were directly injected into the spinal cord, and 4 x 10(7) cells were injected into the intradural space of 10 patients with American Spinal Injury Association class A or B injury caused by traumatic cervical SCI. After 4 and 8 weeks, an additional 5 x 10(7) MSCs were injected into each patient through lumbar tapping. Outcome assessments included changes in the motor power grade of the extremities, magnetic resonance imaging, and electrophysiological recordings.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">RESULTS: Although 6 of the 10 patients showed motor power improvement of the upper extremities at 6-month follow-up, 3 showed gradual improvement in activities of daily living, and changes on magnetic resonance imaging such as decreases in cavity size and the appearance of fiber-like low signal intensity streaks. They also showed electrophysiological improvement. All 10 patients did not experience any permanent complication associated with MSC transplantation.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">CONCLUSION: Three of the 10 patients with SCI who were directly injected with autologous MSCs showed improvement in the motor power of the upper extremities and in activities of daily living, as well as significant magnetic resonance imaging and electrophysiological changes during long-term follow-up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/4263/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cervical Myelopathy After Cervical Total Disc Arthroplasty</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/4257</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/4257#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 22:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[complications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cervical spine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neurological complications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[total disc arthroplasty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=4257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spine 2012 ; 37 : E624 – E628  This article reports 2 cases in which the patients accepted revision surgery after cervical total disc arthroplasty (CTDA) because of iatrogenic neurological injury. Summary of Background Data. CTDA has been increasingly investigated to treat cervical degenerative disc disease. However, there are limited reports focused on its complications, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Cervical-Myelopathy-After-Cervical-Total-Disc-Arthroplasty.tif"><img class="aligncenter  wp-image-4259" title="Cervical Myelopathy After Cervical Total Disc Arthroplasty" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Cervical-Myelopathy-After-Cervical-Total-Disc-Arthroplasty.tif" alt="" width="469" height="155" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Spine 2012 ; 37 : E624 – E628 </strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This article reports 2 cases in which the patients accepted revision surgery after cervical total disc arthroplasty (CTDA) because of iatrogenic neurological injury.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Summary of Background Data. CTDA has been increasingly investigated to treat cervical degenerative disc disease. However, there are limited reports focused on its complications, especially the neurological complications after the procedure.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Methods. A 52-year-old man underwent total disc arthroplasty for C5–C6, but immediately after surgery, he experienced paralysis of his upper and lower limbs. Radiographical images indicated residual compression to the spinal cord in the level of C5–C6. Another patient, a 60-year-old man, underwent total disc arthroplasty for C4–C5. Afterward, he experienced severe neck pain and paralysis of upper and lower limbs. He was unresponsive to conservative treatments; thus, a laminectomy was performed 3 months later. However, little improvement was observed. Radiographical images indicated kyphosis and spinal cord compression at the level of C4– C5. Furthermore, both cases showed a high signal in the spinal cord by T2-weighted magnetic resonance image, suggestive of spinal cord injuries.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results. Revision surgeries were performed in both cases. Cervical implants were first removed by the anterior approach, and fusion was then performed after a complete decompression. Motor examination of the patient in case 1 showed grade 3 strength in both of his hands and feet 6 months after revision surgery. In case 2, the patient’s severe neck pain was resolved at the early postoperative stage. Motor examination showed grade 1 strength in both of his hands and feet 3 months after revision surgery.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusion. On the basis of presented cases and other reports, the surgical goals in these patients were prioritized as follows: (1) safe and adequate neurological decompression and (2) establishment and maintenance of cervical sagittal balance. Moreover, a criterion for selecting patients undergoing CTDA needs to be established in order to reduce the occurrence of neurological complications associated with the procedure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/4257/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surgery of Insular Nonenhancing Gliomas: Volumetric Analysis of Tumoral Resection, Clinical Outcome, and Survival in a Consecutive Series of 66 Cases</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/4249</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/4249#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 22:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oncology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outcome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical technique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain mapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct electrical stimulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extent of resection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functional outcome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insular gliomas surgery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=4249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neurosurgery 70:1081–1094, 2012.  DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31823f5be5 Despite intraoperative technical improvements, the insula remains a challenging area for surgery because of its critical relationships with vascular and neurophysiological functional structures. OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively investigate the morbidity profile in insular nonenhancing gliomas, with special emphasis on volumetric analysis of tumoral resection. METHODS: From 2000 to 2010, 66 patients [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Insular-gliomas.tif"><img class="aligncenter  wp-image-4253" title="Insular gliomas" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Insular-gliomas.tif" alt="" width="426" height="167" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Neurosurgery 70:1081–1094, 2012.  </strong><strong>DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31823f5be5</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Despite intraoperative technical improvements, the insula remains a challenging area for surgery because of its critical relationships with vascular and neurophysiological functional structures.<br />
OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively investigate the morbidity profile in insular nonenhancing gliomas, with special emphasis on volumetric analysis of tumoral resection.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">METHODS: From 2000 to 2010, 66 patients underwent surgery. All surgical procedures were conducted under cortical-subcortical stimulation and neurophysiological monitor- ing. Volumetric scan analysis was applied on T2-weighted magnetic resonance images (MRIs) to establish preoperative and postoperative tumoral volume.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">RESULTS: The median preoperative tumor volume was 108 cm3. The median extent of resection was 80%. The median follow-up was 4.3 years. An immediate postoperative worsening was detected in 33.4% of cases; a definitive worsening resulted in 6% of cases. Patients with extent of resection of . 90% had an estimated 5-year overall survival rate of 92%, whereas those with extent of resection between 70% and 90% had a 5-year overall survival rate of 82% (P , .001). The difference between preoperative tumoral volumes on T2-weighted MRI and on postcontrast T1-weighted MRI ([T2 2 T1] MRI volume) was computed to evaluate the role of the diffusive tumoral growing pattern on overall survival. Patients with preoperative volumetric difference , 30 cm3 demonstrated a 5-year overall survival rate of 92%, whereas those with a difference of . 30 cm3 had a 5-year overall survival rate of 57% (P = .02).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">CONCLUSION: With intraoperative cortico-subcortical mapping and neurophysiologi- cal monitoring, a major resection is possible with an acceptable risk and a significant result in the follow-up.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/4249/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intradural spinal metastases: a surgical series of 15 patients</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/4240</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/4240#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 22:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oncology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outcome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intradural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metastasis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=4240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Acta Neurochir (2012) 154:871–877. DOI 10.1007/s00701-012-1313-5 Intradural spinal metastases are rare, and little is known regarding surgical indications and outcomes. Methods A retrospective search identified adults with intradural spinal metastases operated on at the Mayo Clinic from 1994-2011. Data were collected regarding demographics, tumor type and location, and outcomes. Results Fifteen patients with intradural spinal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;">
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Intradural-Mx.gif"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-4275" title="Intradural Mx" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Intradural-Mx-300x137.gif" alt="" width="300" height="137" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Acta Neurochir (2012) 154:871–877. DOI 10.1007/s00701-012-1313-5</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Intradural spinal metastases are rare, and little is known regarding surgical indications and outcomes.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Methods A retrospective search identified adults with intradural spinal metastases operated on at the Mayo Clinic from 1994-2011. Data were collected regarding demographics, tumor type and location, and outcomes.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results Fifteen patients with intradural spinal metastases were investigated. The age range was 38-74 years (mean= 55 years; ±SD=11.1). Predominant tumor location and type were lumbosacral and adenocarcinoma, respectively: 3 intramedullary and 12 extramedullary. Patients were operated on to relieve or prevent progressive/intractable neurological sequelae and/or pain. Of 13 who underwent resection, gross total removal was reported in 10; simple biopsy was performed in 2. There was one surgical complication, no medical complications, and no surgical mortality. At median follow-up of 1 month postoperatively, 10 of 15 patients were stable or improved. Of 13 patients who underwent resection, 10 were stable or improved. Of two patients who underwent biopsy, neither was stable or improved at follow-up. Using the Modified McCormick Scale, 11 of 15 patients were “functional” preoperatively and 4 went from “functional” preoperatively to “non-functional” postoperatively. Three of those four died within 60 days of surgery from systemic disease progression. Median hospital stay was 8 days. Ten of 15 patients died by the end of the study period, and the median survival of 15 patients was 5 months.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusions With improved outcomes in metastatic cancer, more patients are encountered in practice. An aggressive surgical approach is warranted for extramedullary lesions, whereas caution is advised for intramedullary lesions. Postoperative functional decline is more likely due to systemic disease progression rather than surgery.</p>
<div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/4240/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Optimal trajectory of endoscopic third ventriculostomy</title>
		<link>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/4233</link>
		<comments>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/4233#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 22:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Endoscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrocephalus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diagnostic and operative techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entry point]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Image guidance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/?p=4233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J Neurosurg 116:1153–1157, 2012. http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2012.2.JNS111287 An optimal entry point for endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) helps protect critical structures from undue manipulation. A commonly accepted ideal entry point is 3 cm from the midline and 1 cm anterior to the coronal suture. The authors of this study reexamine this ideal entry point. Methods. Trajectory views from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Optimal-trajectory-of-endoscopic-third-ventriculostomy.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-4236" title="Optimal trajectory of endoscopic third ventriculostomy" src="http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Optimal-trajectory-of-endoscopic-third-ventriculostomy-300x143.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="143" /></a></p>
<p><strong>J Neurosurg 116:1153–1157, 2012. http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2012.2.JNS111287</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">An optimal entry point for endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) helps protect critical structures from undue manipulation. A commonly accepted ideal entry point is 3 cm from the midline and 1 cm anterior to the coronal suture. The authors of this study reexamine this ideal entry point.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Methods. Trajectory views from MR images or CT scans used for cranial image guidance in 53 patients (age range 3–85 years) who had undergone ETV were retrospectively evaluated. The trajectory from the tuber cinereum back through the center of the foramen of Monro was projected to the surface of the head. The relation of the entry point to the midline and the coronal suture was established.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Results. The mean perpendicular distance from the ideal entry point to the midline was 30.1 ± 7 mm (median 31.9 mm, range 12.5–42.2 mm). The mean perpendicular distance to the coronal suture was 8.9 ± 14.1 mm posterior (median 10.4 mm), ranging from 30.6 mm anterior to 35.8 mm posterior. The entry point tended to be located more posteriorly in women and adults: 5.8 ± 15.4 mm posterior in males versus 13.1 ± 13.2 mm posterior in females (p = 0.08) and 9.1 ± 14.8 mm posterior in adults versus 8.2 ± 11.7 mm posterior in children (p = 0.84).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conclusions. While the entry point may need to be modified from the ideal trajectory for other anatomical reasons, such as a trajectory through the motor cortex, in general, the authors found that the optimal entry point for ETV was more posterior than previously published and highly variable. Using image guidance or a customized trajectory based on analysis of a patient’s own imaging is highly preferable to using an empirical ideal trajectory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neurosurgery-blog.com/archives/4233/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

