Neurosurgery. 2026;99(2):285–294
Objective
To determine whether multidisciplinary expert review improves outcomes by guiding the decision to add fusion to decompression in grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Methods
Randomized trial conducted at 14 North American hospitals. A total of 663 patients were randomized to expert-panel review or usual surgical decision-making. Outcomes were available for 523 operated patients at one year.
Main results
The overall rate of surgical failure measured with EQ-5D was 16.7% after expert review and 17.4% without review (p=0.92). Therefore, the primary comparison was negative. However, when more than 80% of panelists recommended fusion, failure occurred in 8.4% of reviewed patients versus 18.4% of controls. The between-group difference was 10 percentage points (95% CI 2–18; p=0.03).
Interpretation
Routine panel review did not improve overall outcomes. The favorable result in cases with strong expert agreement is interesting but should be considered a secondary subgroup finding.
Limitations
The potentially beneficial signal emerged in a selected subgroup rather than in the primary analysis. Panel composition and recommendations may not be reproducible in other systems.
Clinical takeaway
Expert review should not be routinely required, but strong consensus may help identify selected patients more likely to benefit from fusion.



















You must be logged in to post a comment.