Neurosurg Focus 61(1):E5, 2026
This retrospective propensity score–matched analysis of 18,916 adults compares long-term functional and surgical outcomes after cervical disc replacement (CDR) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using a large federated EHR network. Results across 6 months to 5 years show consistently lower risks after CDR for anterior reoperation, posterior revision, adjacent segment disease, new-onset cervical pain, ADL dependence, and surgical site infections.
The study emphasizes durable biomechanical advantages of motion-preserving CDR, with sustained reductions in opioid use and functional impairment at 5 years, while acknowledging limitations of EHR-based retrospective study design, potential selection bias, and absence of granular radiographic and patient-reported outcome data.
Objective Compare long-term functional and clinical outcomes of cervical disc replacement (CDR) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for degenerative cervical disc disease, focusing on whether motion preservation reduces adjacent segment disease and reoperation.
Methods Queried TriNetX EHR network for adults (≥18) undergoing CDR or ACDF for degenerative indications; performed 1:1 propensity score matching and assessed outcomes from 6 months to 5 years, including Kaplan–Meier analyses for reoperation/adjacent segment disease.
Cohort After matching, 9458 patients were included in each group (mean age 48 years).
Reoperation & pain Across follow-up time points, CDR was associated with lower risk of anterior reoperation (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.52–0.74) and new-onset cervical pain (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.55–0.73) versus ACDF.
Infection At 1-, 2-, and 5-year follow-ups, CDR showed lower surgical site infection risk (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.48–0.78).
Sagittal alignment No difference between groups in coding for acquired cervical kyphosis/lordosis after 2 years (p > 0.05).
Opioids (5-year) At 5 years, CDR was associated with lower opioid use (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.54–0.82).
Conclusion & caution Results suggest superior long-term outcomes with CDR versus ACDF, but interpretation should be cautious due to limitations of retrospective EHR-based analyses; CDR is presented as a viable alternative for degenerative cervical pathologies.



















You must be logged in to post a comment.