Exploring the Diagnostic Test Accuracy of MicroRNAs as Potential Biomarkers for Glioblastoma

Neurosurgery 98:1221–1230, 2026

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates microRNA (miRNA)–based liquid biopsies for diagnosing glioblastoma (GBM), synthesizing data from 15 studies and 28 biomarker evaluations across 868 samples. Key diagnostic metrics—pooled sensitivity 0.84 and specificity 0.89—indicate strong potential, with miR-21 showing the highest accuracy among single-miRNA assays.

The report details search strategy, inclusion criteria, statistical methods, subgroup analyses (miRNA type, biofluid source, control type), and study quality assessment. Limitations include methodological heterogeneity, high risk of bias in patient selection, inconsistent reporting (CSF source, IDH status), and small cohort sizes, underscoring need for standardized clinical validation.

Aim Evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of microRNA (miRNA) liquid biopsies (blood/serum/plasma/CSF) for diagnosing glioblastoma (GBM) via systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods PRISMA-guided searches of Ovid Medline and Embase (updated through Oct 16, 2024); included studies had histologic GBM confirmation and extractable 2×2 diagnostic data; pooled estimates generated using a random-effects bivariate model.

Evidence base 15 included articles (published 2011–2022) provided 28 miRNA evaluations, totaling 868 samples from 551 GBM patients and 811 samples from 578 controls.

Overall accuracy Pooled sensitivity 0.84 and specificity 0.89, with heterogeneity of 66% (sensitivity) and 39% (specificity); pooled AUC 0.89.

Likelihood ratios Pooled PLR 7.26, NLR 0.19, and DOR 40.17, indicating strong overall discriminatory performance.

Key biomarker miR-21 showed the highest pooled performance among assessed groupings (sensitivity 0.90, specificity 0.95).

Subgroups Single miRNAs had higher specificity than multi-miRNA panels, while diagnostic capability did not differ clearly by biofluid source (CSF vs blood) in this dataset.

Limitations All included studies had high risk of bias in patient selection, and many had bias in index test interpretation/flow-timing; limited CSF comparisons and inconsistent qPCR thresholds/normalization contributed to heterogeneity and constrain clinical translation without standardization and validation.

Risk Factors and Reoperation Rate in Revision Lumbar Disc Herniation Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 1,031,348 Patients

Global Spine Journal 2026, Vol. 16(3) 1633-1647

This systematic review and meta-analysis examines reoperation rates and associated risk factors following primary lumbar disc herniation surgery across 25 studies totaling 1,031,348 patients. Pooled reoperation rate was 8.5% overall (adjusted to 10.3% for publication bias), with rates varying by follow-up: 4% at ≤1 year, 11.1% at 1–5 years, and 8.8% beyond 5 years.

Key risk factors identified include smoking, older age, diabetes, and large annular defects, while sex was not significant. The review highlights heterogeneity across study designs and follow-up durations, recommends careful patient selection, extended conservative management or closer surveillance for high-risk patients, and calls for trials comparing revision techniques.

Objective Estimate the reoperation rate after lumbar disc herniation surgery and identify associated risk factors.

Evidence base 25 studies (including observational studies and 3 RCTs) totaling 1,031,348 patients were included.

Overall reoperation rate Pooled reoperation rate was 8.5% (95% CI 6.2%–11.6%); after trim-and-fill adjustment for publication bias it was 10.3% (95% CI 7.6%–14.0%).

Follow-up pattern Reoperation rates differed by follow-up duration: 4% at ≤1 year, 11.1% at 1–5 years, and 8.8% at >5 years (significant subgroup differences).

Smoking risk Smoking was associated with higher odds of reoperation (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.09–1.78).

Age risk Older age was associated with higher odds of reoperation (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.25–1.85).

Annular defect risk Larger annular defect size was associated with higher odds of reoperation (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.07–4.48).

Other factors Diabetes and certain surgical techniques were linked to higher reoperation risk in individual studies; sex was not a significant predictor (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.96–1.55).

Risk Factors of 90-Day Unplanned Readmission After Lumbar Spine Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Disk Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Neurosurgery 97:908–916, 2025

This meta-analysis identified a 7.72% 90-day unplanned readmission rate after lumbar spine surgery. Significant risk factors include older age, higher BMI, depression, diabetes, hypertension, renal failure, and ASA grade >2. Enhanced preoperative optimization and targeted strategies for high-risk patients are recommended to reduce readmissions.

• A meta-analysis of 11 studies (648,415 patients) found a 7.72% incidence of unplanned 90-day readmission after lumbar spine surgery.

• Significant risk factors for readmission include older age, higher body mass index (BMI), depression, diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN), renal failure, and an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade greater than 2.

• Surgical factors such as fusion and laminectomy were not significantly associated with readmission.

• Main causes for readmission included wound infection, wound dehiscence, and implant failure; disk reherniation was the leading cause at 90 days.

• Enhanced preoperative optimization and careful patient selection are recommended, especially for elderly and high-comorbidity patients.

• Targeted preventive strategies may reduce readmissions and improve healthcare resource utilization.

• Limitations include retrospective study designs and insufficient data on some perioperative risk factors.

Intraoperative vancomycin for preventing infection after open spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

J Neurosurg Spine 43:509–518, 2025

A meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials found that intraoperative vancomycin use in open spine surgery did not significantly reduce rates of superficial or deep surgical site infections. Further large-scale studies are needed to clarify its efficacy and inform clinical guidelines.

• A systematic review and meta-analysis of 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 2235 patients assessed the efficacy of intraoperative vancomycin in preventing infections after open spine surgery.

• No significant reduction in overall surgical site infections (SSI), deep infections, or superficial infections was found with intraoperative vancomycin compared to control.

• Subgroup analyses showed no benefit in either instrumented or uninstrumented spine surgeries.

• There was no significant shift toward gram-negative or culture-negative infections with vancomycin use.

• Potential risks include local cytotoxicity and possible impairment of bone healing and spinal fusion.

• Current evidence is limited by small sample sizes, heterogeneity in vancomycin administration, and variable follow-up durations.

• The study concludes intraoperative vancomycin may not reduce infection risk and further large RCTs are warranted.

Microsurgical management of 883 previously coiled intracranial aneurysms

J Neurosurg 143:654–667, 2025

This systematic review and meta-analysis found that microsurgical management of previously coiled intracranial aneurysms is effective and safe in well-selected patients, achieving high complete occlusion and good functional outcomes, especially with delayed direct clipping, small aneurysm size, and anterior location.

• Microsurgical management of previously coiled intracranial aneurysms (IAs) is effective and safe in well-selected patients.

• Meta-analysis included 874 patients with 883 previously coiled IAs; most underwent direct clipping.

• Complete occlusion rate was 97.2%, good functional outcome 82.9%, and perioperative mortality 3.7%.

• Direct clipping had the best safety and efficacy, with the lowest rates of complications and highest rates of good outcomes.

• Smaller, anteriorly located, and unruptured aneurysms were associated with the most favorable outcomes.

• Early microsurgery (within 1 month of coiling) and Gurian group C IAs had higher perioperative death rates.

• Key management factors: IA size, location, rupture status, indication, and timing/type of microsurgery.

• Most studies were retrospective case series, limiting subgroup analysis and introducing some heterogeneity.

Outcomes After Decompression Only Versus Decompression and Fusion for Lumbar Facet Cysts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Neurosurgery 97:536–544, 2025

This meta-analysis compared decompression only (DO) versus decompression and fusion (DF) for lumbar facet cysts. DF reduced cyst recurrence and improved back pain resolution but had longer hospital stays. Reoperation and radiculopathy resolution rates were similar between groups. Most studies lacked standardized criteria for choosing DF over DO.

• Lumbar facet cysts (LFCs) are associated with facet degeneration and segmental instability; surgical management is debated between decompression only (DO) and decompression with fusion (DF).

• This systematic review and meta-analysis included 9 comparative studies with 3393 patients (DO: 1940, DF: 1453).

• Spondylolisthesis rates were significantly higher in the DF group (65.8% vs 24.3% in DO).

• DO had higher odds of cyst recurrence (6.3% vs 0%) and lower odds of back pain resolution (56.6% vs 74.5%) compared to DF.

• Reoperation rates (DO 7.2%, DF 5.9%) and radiculopathy resolution (DO 77.3%, DF 87.2%) were similar between groups.

• Length of hospital stay was shorter in the DO group.

• Criteria for choosing DF vs DO varied and were often not clearly defined across studies.

• The study concludes DF reduces cyst recurrence and improves back pain resolution but has longer hospital stays; reoperation and radiculopathy outcomes are comparable.

Comparison of outcomes between cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy

J Neurosurg Spine 42:705–717, 2025

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Based on 12 randomized controlled trials including 2,612 patients, the study found that CDA shows superior clinical effectiveness and a more favorable safety profile than ACDF. Neck pain improvement (VAS) with CDA was clinically meaningful within the first postoperative year. CDA also had lower reoperation rates and reduced incidence of adjacent segment disease (ASD), although with slightly longer operative times. Further high-quality, large-scale trials are needed to confirm these findings.
Key Points
• • Objective: Compare the efficacy and safety of CDA vs. ACDF in CSM patients through meta-analysis.
• • Methods: 12 RCTs with 2,612 patients (1,464 CDA, 1,148 ACDF); outcomes included NDI, VAS, ROM, SF-36, complications, and reoperations.
• • Overall success: Higher in CDA group (RR 1.21; p = 0.004).
• • Neck pain (VAS): Significantly improved in CDA up to 12 months post-op; clinically meaningful.
• • Arm pain (VAS): Slight improvement at 3 and 12 months; not clinically significant.
• • NDI scores: Statistically better in CDA, though often below MCID thresholds.
• • ROM: Better preserved in CDA; data limited and heterogeneous.
• • Quality of life (SF-36): No significant differences between groups.
• • Operative time: Longer in CDA (MD 18.75 min; p < 0.00001).
• • Complications: Similar blood loss and adverse event rates; lower ASD and reoperation rates in CDA.
• • Limitations: Limited CSM-specific data, inconsistent surgical protocols, and risk of bias in several trials.
• • Conclusion: CDA offers better early clinical outcomes and fewer mechanical complications than ACDF, but broader validation is needed.

Efficacy and safety of intraoperative MRI in glioma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials

J Neurosurg 142:1319–1330, 2025

This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials found that intraoperative MRI significantly increases gross-total resection rates and progression-free survival in glioma surgery, without increasing neurological deficits or most complications, though it prolongs surgery and may raise infection risk. iMRI is effective and generally safe for maximizing tumor removal.

• Intraoperative MRI (iMRI) significantly increases the rate of gross-total resection (GTR) in glioma surgery compared to conventional neuronavigation.

• Greater extent of resection (EOR) with iMRI leads to improved progression-free survival (PFS), especially in high-grade gliomas.

• No significant difference in overall survival (OS) was observed between iMRI and conventional surgery groups.

• Rates of postoperative neurological deterioration, motor, and language decline are similar between iMRI and control groups.

• iMRI does not increase the risk of postoperative intracranial hemorrhage, but may be associated with higher rates of wound infections in some studies.

• Use of iMRI prolongs surgery time by an average of 42 minutes.

• Only three randomized controlled trials with a total of 384 patients met inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis.

• Combined use of iMRI and 5-ALA may further enhance EOR, but more randomized studies are needed for definitive conclusions.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Endovascular Versus Surgical Treatment in Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Spine 2025;50:562–574

This systematic review and meta-analysis reveal that surgical treatment for spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVFs) achieves higher rates of complete occlusion and successful treatment compared to endovascular approaches, with lower recurrence and retreatment rates, despite similar neurological improvements and periprocedural complications.

Objective: Compare the efficacy and safety of surgical vs. endovascular treatments for spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVFs) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: Searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases until July 2024, identifying 1192 articles, with 40 studies meeting inclusion criteria, involving 1818 patients.

Results: Surgical treatment showed higher rates of complete occlusion (96.8%) and successful treatment (97.5%) compared to endovascular treatment (72.5% and 66.7%, respectively).

Recurrence and Retreatment: Lower rates in the surgical group, with endovascular treatment showing higher initial treatment failure.

Neurological Improvement: Both treatments had similar improvements in neurological status and periprocedural complications, but surgery showed greater improvement in the ALS score.

Conclusion: Surgical treatment is preferred for definitive results in SDAVFs, but decisions should be individualized based on patient-specific factors. Further research is needed.

Limitations: Potential publication bias and heterogeneity among included studies.

Key Insight: This study is the most updated and comprehensive meta-analysis on SDAVF treatments, providing valuable insights for clinical and policy decisions.

Effect of pituitary stalk preservation during craniopharyngioma removal on pituitary function, extent of resection, and recurrence: systematic review and meta-analysis

J Neurosurg 142:741–755, 2025

The meta-analysis evaluates the impact of pituitary stalk preservation during craniopharyngioma surgery on pituitary function, resection extent, and recurrence. Preservation reduces diabetes insipidus risk but may increase incomplete resection risk in pediatric patients. Results are cautious due to small study sizes and reporting biases.

Pituitary stalk preservation reduces risk of postoperative diabetes insipidus (DI) and anterior pituitary dysfunction.

• Preservation shows no significant impact on tumor recurrence or extent of resection.

Pediatric patients face higher risk of incomplete resection with stalk preservation.

Meta-analysis included 33 studies with 2366 patients.

Significant heterogeneity observed in DI and recurrence risk across studies.

Stalk preservation benefits posterior pituitary function long-term, not anterior.

High risk of bias in individual studies; findings should be interpreted cautiously.

Subgroup analysis highlights higher recurrence risk in pediatric stalk preservation.

Egger’s test indicates publication bias in DI analysis.

Previous meta-analysis by Li et al. lacked age stratification and EEA cases.

Authors recommend careful consideration of stalk preservation in pediatric cases.

Lack of age-stratified data limits analysis and may increase bias.

Study methods followed PRISMA guidelines, with data extracted from eligible studies

Endoscopic Versus Traditional Thoracic Discectomy: A Multicenter Retrospective Case Series and Meta-Analysis

Neurosurgery 96:152–171, 2025

Surgical treatment for symptomatic thoracic disc herniations (TDH) involves invasive open surgical approaches with relatively high complication rates and prolonged hospital stays. Although advantages of full endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) are well-established in lumbar disc herniations, data are limited for the endoscopic treatment of TDH despite potential benefits regarding surgical invasiveness. The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive evaluation of potential benefits of FESS for the treatment of TDH.

METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus were systematically searched for the term “thoracic disc herniation” up to March 2023 and study quality appraised with a subsequent meta-analysis. Primary outcomes were perioperative complications, need for instrumentation, and reoperations. Simultaneously, we performed a multicenter retrospective evaluation of outcomes in patients undergoing full endoscopic thoracic discectomy.

RESULTS: We identified 3190 patients from 108 studies for the traditional thoracic discectomy meta-analysis. Pooled incidence rates of complications were 25% (95% CI 0.22-0.29) for perioperative complications and 7% (95% CI 0.05-0.09) for reoperation. In this cohort, 37% (95% CI 0.26-0.49) of patients underwent instrumentation. The pooled mean for estimated blood loss for traditional approaches was 570 mL (95% CI 477.3-664.1) and 7.0 days (95% CI 5.91-8.14) for length of stay. For FESS, 41 patients from multiple institutions were retrospectively reviewed, perioperative complications were reported in 4 patients (9.7%), 4 (9.7%) required revision surgery, and 6 (14.6%) required instrumentation. Median blood loss was 5 mL (IQR 5-10), and length of stay was 0.43 days (IQR 0-1.23).

CONCLUSION: The results suggest that full endoscopic thoracic discectomy is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with symptomatic TDH. When compared with open surgical approaches, FESS dramatically diminishes invasiveness, the rate of complications, and need for prolonged hospitalizations. Full endoscopic spine surgery has the capacity to alter the standard of care for TDH treatment toward an elective outpatient surgery.

Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomies for Surgical Correction of Fixed Sagittal Imbalance: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Neurosurgery 95:1223–1231, 2024

Disruption of the spine’s sagittal balance is associated with significant negative impacts on quality of life. Compared with other spinal osteotomies, pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), which can potentially offer greater correction, is considered technically challenging and performed at lower rates. The aim of this study was to review the use of PSO to correct fixed sagittal imbalance and assess its efficacy and associated perioperative complications.

METHODS: In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, the PubMed, EBSCO host, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar databases were queried for full-text English manuscripts published from 1961 to 2022, exploring PSO for the management of fixed sagittal imbalance. Studies were included if they reported preoperative and postoperative radiographic measurements. The mean Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS) for included articles was 9.6 ± 1.1. The outcomes of interest included etiology, operative time, blood loss, complications, radiographic outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using a random-effects, inverse variance-weighted meta-analysis of observational data. Pre and postoperative radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared using a Student t-test.

RESULTS: Fourteen studies with 595 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that the mean operative time was 7.2 ± 2.0 hours, and the average blood loss was 2033 ± 629 mL. After PSO, there was a significant improvement in sagittal vertebral axis (12.41-3.92 cm, P = .0003), LL (13.35°-42.60°, P = .000002), PSO angle (5.11°to À26.91°, P = .0001), and Oswestry Disability Index (55.36-27.35, P = .02). Common complications include pseudarthrosis (8.1%), neurological deficits (7.8%), and proximal junctional failure (6.0%).

CONCLUSION: PSO offers significant correction of sagittal vertebral axis, lumbar lordosis, PSO angle, and Oswestry Disability Index scores despite its reduced utilization in recent years. Blood loss and high complication rates must be considered when evaluating the efficacy of this procedure; however, surgeon experience and operative techniques can be used to reduce morbidity.

Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in the management of chronic subdural hematoma

J Neurosurg 141:945–954, 2024

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a prevalent neurosurgical condition, particularly among the elderly. Various treatment options exist, but recurrence rates remain high. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid (TXA) in the management of CSDH.

METHODS The authors conducted a comprehensive literature search adhering to the 2020 PRISMA guidelines, involving three primary databases (Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science) that were searched for articles compiled from inception until October 20, 2023. The primary outcome was recurrence of CSDH, and secondary outcomes included complications and SDH volume following TXA treatment. The mean difference and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the random-effects model.

RESULTS A total of 5 studies, involving 643 patients in the TXA group and 736 patients in the non-TXA group, met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed that TXA use led to a significantly lower CSDH recurrence (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.23–0.53; p < 0.01) without increasing complications (OR 1.84, 95% CI 0.43–7.95; p = 0.42). Additionally, TXA users had a significantly lower CSDH volume compared to the non-TXA group at 3-month follow-up (mean difference −4.56, 95% CI −8.76 to −0.36; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS The findings suggest that TXA might be a promising agent for reducing the risk of CSDH recurrence without elevating the risk of complications. However, these results should be interpreted cautiously due to the limited number of studies included and the methodological heterogeneity. Further large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Awake Versus Asleep Craniotomy for Patients With Eloquent Glioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Neurosurgery 94:38–52, 2024

Awake vs asleep craniotomy for patients with eloquent glioma is debatable. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to compare awake vs asleep craniotomy for the resection of gliomas in the eloquent regions. METHODS: MEDLINE and PubMed were searched from inception to December 13, 2022. Primary outcomes were the extent of resection (EOR), overall survival (month), progression-free survival (month), and rates of neurological deficit, Karnofsky performance score, and seizure freedom at the 3-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were duration of operation (minute) and length of hospital stay (LOS) (day).

RESULTS: Fifteen studies yielded 2032 patients, from which 800 (39.4%) and 1232 (60.6%) underwent awake and asleep craniotomy, respectively. The meta-analysis concluded that the awake group had greater EOR (mean difference [MD]= MD= 8.52 [4.28, 12.76], P < .00001), overall survival (MD = 2.86 months [1.35, 4.37], P = .0002), progression-free survival (MD = 5.69 months [0.75, 10.64], P = .02), 3-month postoperative Karnofsky performance score (MD = 13.59 [11.08, 16.09], P < .00001), and 3-month postoperative seizure freedom (odds ratio = 8.72 [3.39, 22.39], P < .00001). Furthermore, the awake group had lower 3-month postoperative neurological deficit (odds ratio = 0.47 [0.28, 0.78], P = .004) and shorter LOS (MD = -2.99 days [-5.09, -0.88], P = .005). In addition, the duration of operation was similar between the groups (MD = 37.88 minutes [-34.09, 109.86], P = .30).

CONCLUSION: Awake craniotomy for gliomas in the eloquent regions benefits EOR, survival, postoperative neurofunctional outcomes, and LOS. When feasible, the authors recommend awake craniotomy for surgical resection of gliomas in the eloquent regions.

Optimizing surgical management of facet cysts of the lumbar spine: systematic review, meta-analysis, and local case series of 1251 patients

J Neurosurg Spine 39:793–806, 2023

Lumbar facet cysts (LFCs) can cause neurological dysfunction and intractable pain. Surgery is the current standard of care for patients in whom conservative therapy fails, those with neurological deficits, and those with evidence of spinal instability. No study to date has comprehensively examined surgical outcomes comparing the multiple surgical treatment options for LFCs. Therefore, the authors aimed to perform a combined analysis of cases both in the literature and of patients at a single institution to compare the outcomes of various surgical treatment options for LFC.

METHODS The authors performed a literature review in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and meta-analysis of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases and reviewed all studies from database inception published until February 3, 2023. Studies that did not contain 3 or more cases, clearly specify follow-up durations longer than 6 months, or present new cases were excluded. Bias was evaluated using Cochrane Collaboration’s Risk of Bias in Nonrandomised Studies–of Interventions (ROBINS-I). The authors also reviewed their own local institutional case series from 2015 to 2020. Primary outcomes were same-level cyst recurrence, same-level revision surgery, and perioperative complications. ANOVA, common and random-effects modeling, and Wald testing were used to compare treatment groups.

RESULTS A total of 1251 patients were identified from both the published literature (29 articles, n = 1143) and the authors’ institution (n = 108). Patients were sorted into 5 treatment groups: open cyst resection (OCR; n = 720), tubular cyst resection (TCR; n = 166), cyst resection with arthrodesis (CRA; n = 165), endoscopic cyst resection (ECR; n = 113), and percutaneous cyst rupture (PCR; n = 87), with OCR being the analysis reference group. The PCR group had significantly lower complication rates (p = 0.004), higher recurrence rates (p < 0.001), and higher revision surgery rates (p = 0.001) compared with the OCR group. Patients receiving TCR (3.01%, p = 0.021) and CRA (0.0%, p < 0.001) had significantly lower recurrence rates compared with those undergoing OCR (6.36%). The CRA group (6.67%) also had significantly lower rates of revision surgery compared with the OCR group (11.3%, p = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS While PCR is less invasive, it may have high rates of same-level recurrence and revision surgery. Recurrence and revision rates for modalities such as ECR were not significantly different from those of OCR. While concomitant arthrodesis is more invasive, it might lead to lower recurrence rates and lower rates of subsequent revision surgery. Given the limitations of our case series and literature review, prospective, randomized studies are needed.

Robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement accuracy compared with alternative guidance in lateral single-position surgery

J Neurosurg Spine 39:443–451, 2023

While single-position surgery (SPS) eliminates the need for patient repositioning, the placement of screws in the unconventional lateral position poses unique challenges related to asymmetry relative to the surgical table. Use of robotic guidance or intraoperative navigation can help to overcome this. The aim of this study was to compare the relative accuracies offered by these various navigation modalities for pedicle screws placed in lateral SPS.

METHODS According to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, the PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were queried for studies reporting pedicle screw placement accuracy using fluoroscopic, CT-navigated, O-arm, or robotic guidance in lateral SPS, and a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Included studies all compared evaluated screw placement accuracy in lateral SPS using a single navigation method. Quality assessment was performed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system; risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. The primary outcome, rate of pedicle screw breach, was analyzed using random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS Eleven studies were included comprising 548 patients who underwent the placement of instrumentation with 2488 screws. For the fluoroscopic, CT-navigated, O-arm, and robotic guidance cohorts, there were 3, 2, 3, and 3 studies, respectively. Breach rates by modality were as follows: fluoroscopic guidance (6.6%), CT navigation (4.7%), O-arm (3.9%), and robotic guidance (3.9%). Random-effects meta-analysis showed a significant difference between studies, with an overall breach rate of 4.9% (95% CI 3.1%–7.5%; p < 0.001); however, testing for subgroup differences failed to show a significant difference between guidance modalities (Q M = 0.69, df = 3; p = 0.88). Heterogeneity between studies was significant (I 2 = 79.0%, τ 2 = 0.41, χ 2 = 47.65, df = 10; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS Robotic guidance of screws is noninferior to alternative guidance modalities in lateral SPS; however, additional prospective studies directly comparing different guidance types are merited.

Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization Versus Conventional Management for Patients With Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Neurosurgery 92:1142–1154, 2023

The results from studies that compare middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization vs conventional management for patients with chronic subdural hematoma are varied.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on studies that compared MMA embolization vs conventional management.

METHODS: Medline, PubMed, and Embase databases were searched. Primary outcomes were treatment failure and surgical rescue; secondary outcomes were complications, follow-up modified Rankin scale > 2, mortality, complete hematoma resolution, and length of hospital stay (day). The certainty of the evidence was determined using the GRADE approach.

RESULTS: Nine studies yielding 1523 patients were enrolled, of which 337 (22.2%) and 1186 (77.8%) patients received MMA embolization and conventionalmanagement, respectively.MMA embolization was superior to conventional management for treatment failure (relative risk [RR] = 0.34 [0.14-0.82], P = .02), surgical rescue (RR = 0.33 [0.14-0.77], P = .01), and complete hematoma resolution (RR = 2.01 [1.10-3.68], P = .02). There was no difference between the 2 groups for complications (RR= 0.93 [0.63-1.37], P = .72), follow-up modified Rankin scale >2 (RR= 0.78 [0.449-1.25], P= .31), mortality (RR= 1.05 [0.51-2.14], P = .89), and length of hospital stay (mean difference = 0.57 [ 2.55, 1.41], P = .57). ForMMAembolization, the number needed to treat for treatment failure, surgical rescue, and complete hematoma resolution was 7, 9, and 3, respectively. The certainty of the evidence was moderate to high for primary outcomes and low to moderate for secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSION: MMA embolization decreases treatment failure and the need for surgical rescue without furthering the risk of morbidity and mortality. The authors recommend considering MMA embolization in the chronic subdural hematoma management.

Internal Ventricular Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunt for Adult Hydrocephalus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Infection Rate

Hydrocephalus is a common neurological condition that usually requires internal ventricular cerebrospinal fluid shunt (IVCSFS). The reported infection rate (IR) varies greatly from below 1% up to over 50%, but no meta-analysis to assess the overall IR has ever been performed.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the IVCSFS overall IR in the adult population and search for associated factors.

METHODS: Six databases were searched from January 1990 to July 2022. Only original articles reporting on adult IVCSFS IR were included. Random-effects meta-analysis with generalized linear mixed model method and logit transformation was used to assess the overall IR. RESULTS: Of 1703 identified articles, 44 were selected, reporting on 57259 patients who had IVCSFS implantation and 2546 infections. The pooled IR value and its 95% CI were 4.75%, 95% CI (3.8 to 5.92). Ninety-five percent prediction interval ranged from 1.19% to 17.1%. The patients who had IVCSFS after intracranial hemorrhage showed a higher IR (7.65%, 95% CI [5.82 to 10], P-value = .002). A meta-regression by year of publication found a decreasing IR (À0.031, 95% CI [À0.06 to 0.003], P-value = .032) over the past 32 years.

CONCLUSION: IVCSF is a procedure that every neurosurgeon should be well trained to perform. However, the complication rate remains high, with an estimated overall IR of 4.75%. The IR is especially elevated for hydrocephalic patients who require IVCSFS after intracranial hemorrhage. However, decades of surgical advances may have succeeded in reducing IR over the past 32 years.

Neurosurgery 92:894–904, 2023

Sacrifice or preserve the superior petrosal vein in microvascular decompression surgery

J Neurosurg 138:390–398, 2023

In microvascular decompression (MVD) surgery through the retrosigmoid approach, the surgeon may have to sacrifice the superior petrosal vein (SPV). However, this is a controversial maneuver. To date, high-level evidence comparing the operative outcomes of patients who underwent MVD with and without SPV sacrifice is lacking. Therefore, this study sought to bridge this gap.

METHODS The authors searched the Medline and PubMed databases with appropriate Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms and keywords. The primary outcome was vascular-related complications; secondary outcomes were new neurological deficit, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, and neuralgia relief. The pooled proportions of outcomes and OR (95% CI) for categorical data were calculated by using the logit transformation and Mantel-Haenszel methods, respectively.

RESULTS Six studies yielding 1143 patients were included, of which 618 patients had their SPV sacrificed. The pooled proportion (95% CI) values were 3.82 (0.87–15.17) for vascular-related complications, 3.64 (1.0–12.42) for new neurological deficits, 2.85 (1.21–6.58) for CSF leaks, and 88.90 (84.90–91.94) for neuralgia relief. The meta-analysis concluded that, whether the surgeon sacrificed or preserved the SPV, the odds were similar for vascular-related complications (2.5% vs 1.5%, OR [95% CI] 1.01 [0.33–3.09], p = 0.99), new neurological deficits (1.2% vs 2.8%, OR [95% CI] 0.55 [0.18–1.66], p = 0.29), CSF leak (3.1% vs 2.1%, OR [95% CI] 1.16 [0.46–2.94], p = 0.75), and neuralgia relief (86.6% vs 87%, OR [95% CI] 0.96 [0.62–1.49], p = 0.84).

CONCLUSIONS SPV sacrifice is as safe as SPV preservation. The authors recommend intentional SPV sacrifice when gentle retraction fails to enhance surgical field visualization and if the surgeon encounters SPV-related neurovascular conflict and/or anticipates impeding SPV-related bleeding.

 

Failure of Internal Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunt: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Overall Prevalence in Adults

World Neurosurg. (2023) 169:20-30

Reported rates of failures of internal cerebrospinal fluid shunt (ICSFS) vary greatly from less than 5% to more than 50% and no meta-analysis to assess the overall prevalence has been performed. We estimated the failure rate after ICSFS insertion and searched for associated factors.

METHODS: Six databases were searched from January 1990 to February 2022. Only original articles reporting the rate of adult shunt failure were included. Random-effects meta-analysis with a generalized linear mixed model method and logit transformation was used to compute the overall failure prevalence. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were implemented to search for associated factors.

RESULTS: Of 1763 identified articles, 46 were selected, comprising 70,859 ICSFS implantations and 13,603 shunt failures, suggesting an accumulated incidence of 19.2%. However, the calculated pooled prevalence value and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were 22.7% (95% CI, 19.8e5.8). The CI of the different estimates did not overlap, indicating a strong heterogeneity confirmed by a high I 2 of 97.5% (95% CI, 97.1e97.8; P < 0.001; s 2 [ 0.3). Ninety-five percent prediction interval of shunt failure prevalence ranged from 8.75% to 47.36%. A meta-regression of prevalence of publication found a barely significant decreasing failure rate of about 2% per year (e2.11; 95% CI, e4.02 to e0.2; P [ 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS: Despite being a simple neurosurgical procedure, ICSFS insertion has one of the highest risk of complications, with failure prevalence involving more than 1 patient of 5. Nonetheless, all efforts to lower this high level of shunt failure seem to be effective.