Neurosurgery 98:1325–1338, 2026
This article reports a 7-year single-center retrospective analysis comparing one-year neurological outcomes after microsurgical clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in patients >65 years versus younger adults. It details patient selection, aneurysm characteristics, statistical methods, and primary endpoint assessment using the modified Rankin Scale.
Findings indicate similar favorable 1-year outcomes between older and younger cohorts, with diabetes and de novo aneurysm formation/growth identified as independent predictors of poor outcome in the older group. The discussion contextualizes results against endovascular options, comorbidity considerations, and limitations of retrospective single-center data.
Question addressed Whether to treat unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) in patients >65 remains controversial because of frailty/comorbidities and procedural risk vs rupture risk under conservative management.
Study design Retrospective review of UIA patients treated with microsurgical clipping (single quaternary center, 2014–2020), including only those with admission mRS ≤2; primary endpoint was 1-year mRS, with poor outcome defined as mRS >2.
Cohort 390 total surgically treated patients; 132 (34%) were >65 with mean age 71±4 years.
Main outcome No significant difference in poor neurological outcome at 1 year between older vs younger patients (11% vs 9.3%, P=.82), indicating comparable functional outcomes after microsurgery in selected older adults.
Aneurysm differences with age Older patients had larger aneurysm dimensions and more calcification (e.g., calcification 15% vs 2.8%) and higher PHASES/ELAPSS scores than younger patients.
Univariate risk factors (older group) Factors associated with poor 1-year outcome included diabetes, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, calcification, treating multiple aneurysms, de novo formation/growth, and higher aspect ratio.
Independent predictors On multivariable analysis in older patients, only diabetes (OR 19.1, P=.02) and de novo formation or growth (OR 12.7, P=.02) predicted poor neurological outcome.
Clinical implication Chronological age alone is not a stand-alone contraindication to microsurgical treatment; individualized selection and comorbidity/risk stratification (notably diabetes and aneurysm growth patterns) are key.




















You must be logged in to post a comment.