Category: Robotics

Posted on

Image‑based robot‑assisted deep brain stimulation under general anesthesia

Acta Neurochirurgica (2026) 168:149

This technical report details a fully image-based, robot-assisted workflow for deep brain stimulation (DBS) performed under general anesthesia using the Neuromate® platform, integrating high-resolution MRI–CT fusion, fiducial-based robotic registration, and intraoperative O-arm 3D imaging for verification. The method emphasizes millimetric anatomical targeting across STN, GPi, VIM, ANT, and VTA, with specific considerations for trajectory safety and directional lead orientation.

The document also describes operative logistics: Leksell frame fixation coupled to the robot, burr-hole and guide-cannula techniques, bilateral lead implantation, same-session generator placement, and perioperative management to minimize CSF loss, pneumocephalus, and hemorrhagic risk. Limitations, learning-curve aspects, costs, and key checklist items for procedural reproducibility are summarized.

Purpose: Robot-assisted DBS is used to enhance stereotactic accuracy and workflow reproducibility, offering a fully image-based alternative to physiological mapping and enabling procedures under general anesthesia.

Targets: Common anatomical targets include STN, GPi, VIM, ANT, and VTA, selected based on therapeutic goal; target choice also determines instrumentation.

Planning: Preoperative planning relies on high-resolution MRI for direct anatomical targeting plus thin-slice CT for stereotactic registration and image fusion; DTI/atlases are optional adjuncts.

Fixation & setup: The head is rigidly fixed with a Leksell frame for stability (not stereotactic referencing), coupled to the Neuromate® robot; positioning includes slight trunk elevation to reduce pneumocephalus risk.

Registration & safety: Robotic accuracy is verified using a frontal fiducial marker, Neurolocate laser-based recognition, and O-arm intraoperative 3D imaging fused to the plan; a virtual safety sphere constrains robotic movements and a test trajectory confirms calibration.

Implant workflow: A robot-guided burr hole is created and a fixation device (e.g., Stimloc®/SureTek®) placed; a guide cannula is advanced to target depth, held ~30–45 s to reduce recoil, then withdrawn before inserting the electrode along the carved trajectory.

Complication mitigation: Minimize CSF loss to reduce pneumocephalus/brain shift; plan trajectories to avoid sulci, ventricular transgression, and vascular structures; ensure deliberate directional lead rotational alignment using the manufacturer marker.

Verification & completion: Intraoperative O-arm 3D imaging verifies lead depth/alignment and detects complications; bilateral cases repeat contralaterally after first-side confirmation; generator implantation is performed in the same session with impedance testing to confirm system integrity.

Posted on

A New Area of Neurosurgery: First Robotic Neurosurgery Clinical Case Series

Operative Neurosurgery 30:929–937, 2026

This clinical report presents the first institutional case series using the da Vinci Xi robotic system applied to neurosurgical procedures, detailing patient selection, operative technique, training, and outcomes for five patients with lesions including clivus chordoma, odontoid metastasis, peroneal neuropathy, and an arachnoid cyst. The series emphasizes procedural feasibility, intraoperative setup, and interdisciplinary collaboration with otolaryngology for transoral and intracranial approaches.

The authors highlight benefits such as enhanced precision, tremor filtration, and minimally invasive access in narrow corridors, while candidly discussing limitations including lack of haptic feedback, high capital costs, training needs, and the current absence of neurosurgery-specific instrument integration; postoperative follow-up showed favorable outcomes without new neurological deficits.

Goal Share early clinical experience adapting the da Vinci Xi surgical robot for neurosurgical procedures, addressing limited current adoption in neurosurgery.

Training Surgeon completed formal robotic training plus simulation, then practiced planned operations on cadavers and calf brains under guidance before clinical use.

Series Five patients underwent robot-assisted neurosurgery (2018–2022) for clivus chordoma (2), odontoid metastatic mass (1), peroneal neuropathy (1), and arachnoid cyst (1).

Technique Cases used a typical 2 robotic arms + 4K camera setup; the surgeon operated from a console with tremor filtration and enhanced instrument dexterity.

Approaches Robotic procedures included transoral tumor resection/odontoidectomy, peroneal nerve decompression, and intracranial arachnoid cyst fenestration (robot used after initial craniotomy steps in the cyst case).

Outcomes No intraoperative or postoperative neurological deficits or complications were observed; all 5 patients had favorable outcomes with 6–24 months follow-up.

Advantages Particular value noted for working in narrow/deep corridors (eg, clivus/odontoid) and for tasks like transoral resection and cyst fenestration, leveraging articulated movement and tremor cancellation.

Limitations/needs Key constraints include lack of tactile feedback, potential device malfunction, nonstandardized training, dedicated staffing needs, and high costs; practical training is emphasized as essential, with further evaluation needed.

Posted on

Disruptive technologies in spine surgery: current trends, outcomes, and ethical implications

J Neurosurg Spine 44:756–768, 2026

Disruptive technologies in spine surgery—AR/VR, robotics, neuronavigation, endoscopy, and patient-specific implants—are examined for their roles in enhancing precision, training, and patient outcomes. The review summarizes evidence for preoperative simulation, AR-assisted planning, and 3D segmentation, highlighting improvements in accuracy, reduced fluoroscopy, and trainee confidence.

Intraoperative advances such as robot-assisted techniques, computer-assisted navigation, and endoscopic approaches offer minimally invasive alternatives with favorable recovery profiles but face challenges of cost, learning curves, and equitable access. The authors emphasize ethical considerations, need for standardized outcomes, and strategies to expand accessibility and training.

Scope Disruptive spine-surgery technologies emphasized include AR/VR (XR), advanced navigation, robotics, patient-specific implants/3D printing, and endoscopic spine surgery.

XR definitions VR provides a fully immersive digital environment, AR overlays digital content onto the real world, and MR blends both; all fall under XR.

Training impact VR simulation in spine training improved trainee comfort and autonomy and reduced fluoroscopy use in lateral lumbar interbody fusion simulations; VR-trained learners also made fewer pedicle-screw placement errors than traditional instruction.

Preop planning VR-based planning can reduce fluoroscopy/localization time and improve puncture accuracy in endoscopic lumbar discectomy; segmented 3D models support rehearsal, trajectory planning, and risk assessment around critical structures.

AR navigation outcomes Wearable AR navigation (e.g., FDA-cleared xvision) has shown high pedicle-screw placement accuracy (reported ~96.7% thoracic and ~99.1% lumbosacral) and may reduce operative time and radiation exposure.

Patient-specific surgery Segmentation + 3D printing/predictive modeling enable personalized approaches and implants (e.g., patient-specific rods, templates, custom cages), with early reports of high accuracy for template-guided instrumentation and promising feasibility for custom interbody devices.

Endoscopic techniques ESS supports minimally invasive treatment across multiple pathologies and can match conventional outcomes for lumbar disc herniation while improving recovery (e.g., shorter stays/earlier return to work), but broader adoption is constrained by learning curve and reimbursement challenges.

Implementation ethics/costs High acquisition/maintenance costs and limited reimbursement risk widening access disparities; recommended mitigations include subsidized training, shared equipment models, and reimbursement policies to support equitable implementation alongside standardized outcomes and training.

Posted on

Utilization of robotic pars repair for early return to activity in adolescents with symptomatic spondylolysis

J Neurosurg Spine 44:349–354, 2026

This case series from a tertiary academic spine center reports outcomes of robot-assisted percutaneous pars repair in nine adolescents with symptomatic lumbar spondylolysis who failed conservative management. The authors describe a single–midline incision technique using CT-based robotic guidance and a single lagged transdefect screw, detailing operative workflow, implant sizes, and a standardized postoperative rehabilitation protocol.

Results show most patients returned to preinjury or higher activity within months, with low complication rates and radiographic evidence of union in those who obtained CT follow-up. The authors conclude that minimally invasive robotic pars repair is a viable option after failed nonoperative care and advocate timely surgical consultation to potentially accelerate return to sport and avoid progressive spondylolisthesis.

Clinical problem Symptomatic lumbar pars interarticularis fractures (spondylolysis) are a common cause of adolescent low-back pain; nonoperative care with activity modification is standard first-line treatment.

Nonunion risk Despite conservative management, about 20% of patients may progress to symptomatic nonunion, and some can later develop spondylolisthesis that may require fusion.

Study aim Robotic surgical guidance was used to enable percutaneous pars screw placement; the series reports the largest cohort of adolescents treated with robot-assisted pars repair to date.

Design & cohort Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database identified 9 adolescents/young adults (13–25 years) treated with a single-screw pars repair technique.

Technique Using Excelsius robotic planning/registration and intraoperative 3D imaging, bilateral screw trajectories were planned to converge so bilateral pars screws could be placed through a single 1–2 cm midline incision; compression was achieved via a “lag-by-technique” preparation without direct pars visualization/grafting.

Postop protocol Patients walked only for 2 weeks, then added stationary biking for 2 weeks, followed by 4 weeks of sport-directed physical therapy; if tolerated symptom-free, they were cleared for activity (cleared to begin return-to-sport training at 4 weeks).

Outcomes Mean preop activity cessation at consultation was 8.6 ± 10.6 months; at mean follow-up 11.4 ± 9.1 months, 78% had returned to baseline activity or were cleared to return to sport.

Safety/efficacy conclusion Robot-assisted pars repair was reported as a safe, effective option after failed nonoperative care, enabling return to activity in as little as 8 weeks; a single lag-style screw may be clinically effective compared with prior open debridement/bone-grafting approaches.

Posted on

Spinal versus general anesthesia in robotic minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative study on surgical outcomes

J Neurosurg Spine 44:99–107, 2026

This clinical study compares spinal anesthesia (SA) versus general anesthesia (GA) for robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (RA‑MIS TLIF), reporting retrospective outcomes from 209 patients treated 2018–2024. Primary findings show SA patients had significantly shorter operative times, lower immediate postoperative pain scores, reduced estimated blood loss, and shorter hospital length of stay after propensity score matching and regression adjustment.

The authors contextualize results within advances in robotic spinal surgery and awake spine techniques, discuss safety and potential cost and opioid‑reduction benefits, and acknowledge limitations including retrospective design, single‑center data, and reduced matched cohort size. Conclusions support SA as a safe, efficient approach for RA‑MIS TLIF with calls for larger prospective studies and formal patient‑selection guidelines.

Spinal Anesthesia (SA) vs General Anesthesia (GA): In robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (RA-MIS TLIF), SA significantly reduces operative times, postoperative pain, and hospital length of stay compared to GA, with no increase in complications or adverse outcomes.

Robotic Assistance Benefits: Robotic technology in spine surgery improves pedicle screw placement accuracy, reduces radiation exposure, and is associated with lower complication and revision rates, enhancing surgical safety and efficiency.

Study Design: A retrospective analysis of 209 patients (31 SA, 178 GA) from 2018–2024, with propensity score matching applied to control for confounders, allowing fair comparison between SA and GA cohorts for single-level procedures.

Key Outcomes (After Matching): SA cohort had shorter median total OR time (159 vs 283 min), procedure time (115 vs 201 min), lower intraoperative blood loss (25 vs 50 mL), lower first postoperative pain scores (median VAS 0 vs 5), and reduced mean length of stay (0.90 vs 2.64 days) compared to GA.

Patient Selection: The choice between SA and GA was based on patient preference and eligibility, with all SA cases being single-level procedures and comparable baseline demographics after matching.

Safety Profile: No increase in intraoperative or postoperative complications was observed with SA; screw placement accuracy remained high with robotic assistance.

Implications for Practice: Combining SA with RA-MIS TLIF offers a safe, efficient, and patient-centered approach that may lower healthcare costs and opioid requirements by reducing pain and hospitalization.

Limitations: Single-center, retrospective design with a relatively small matched cohort may limit generalizability; further prospective, multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings.

Posted on

Robotic Resection of Spinal and Paraspinal Tumors

Operative Neurosurgery 28:608–616, 2025

The study evaluates robotic resection of spinal nerve sheath tumors, demonstrating improved gross total resection rates and reduced hospital stays compared to open surgery. The multidisciplinary approach and advanced robotic techniques offer promising outcomes for complex paraspinal tumor surgeries.

• Robotic arm surgical systems, like the DaVinci robot, are used for minimally invasive surgeries, though their application in neurosurgery is limited.

• A study evaluated the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of robotic resection for spinal nerve sheath tumors (NST).

• Gross total resection was achieved in all cases, with reduced length of stay and increased resection rates compared to traditional open surgery.

• The DaVinci robotic platform uses high-resolution 3D imaging and wristed instruments, enhancing precision in surgical procedures.

• Multidisciplinary collaboration is crucial, involving neurosurgeons and other specialists for successful robotic-assisted surgeries.

• Training and simulation are essential for neurosurgeons to effectively utilize robotic systems, given the lack of haptic feedback.

• The integration of robotic surgery in neurosurgery is expected to expand with technological advancements and improved training programs

Posted on

Clinical and radiographic comparison of robot-assisted single-position versus traditional dual-position lateral lumbar interbody fusion

J Neurosurg Spine 42:443–452, 2025

The study compares robot-assisted single-position (RA-SP) and traditional dual-position (DP) lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) surgeries, finding RA-SP-LLIF reduces operative and fluoroscopy times with similar clinical and radiographic outcomes, suggesting enhanced surgical efficiency and safety.

• The study compares robot-assisted single-position (RA-SP) lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with traditional dual-position LLIF in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes.

• 59 patients were analyzed, with 31 undergoing RA-SP-LLIF and 28 undergoing traditional LLIF. Surgical parameters like operative duration, blood loss, and fluoroscopy duration were recorded.

• No significant differences were found in postoperative and follow-up times between groups, but both showed improvements in clinical scores such as VAS, ODI, and SF-36.

• RA-SP-LLIF showed significantly greater improvements in lumbar lordosis and segmental lordosis immediately postoperatively, although these differences were not significant at later evaluations.

• The RA-SP-LLIF group had shorter operative and fluoroscopy durations compared to the traditional LLIF group.

• RA-SP-LLIF is considered a promising technique for enhancing surgical efficiency, safety, and precision in lumbar spinal fusion procedures.

• Both procedures improved sagittal alignment parameters, but RA-SP-LLIF reduced surgery and anesthesia times by eliminating the need for repositioning.

Posted on

Feasibility of Robotic Transorbital Surgery

Operative Neurosurgery 28:506–510, 2025

This study explores the feasibility of robotic-assisted lateral transorbital surgery for accessing Meckel cave. Challenges include tool size and limited entry space, though internal surgical space is adequate. Future advancements in smaller, haptic-enabled tools could enhance the practicality of this approach.

• The study explores the feasibility of robotic-assisted lateral transorbital approach (LTOA) using the DaVinci Xi model for neurosurgery.

• Six cadaver heads were used for dissection to evaluate tool insertion and movement.

• The current robotic tools are too large for effective LTOA, limiting the insertion to one tool and a camera.

• Removing the lateral orbital rim (LOR) provides more space but still limits tool usage due to size constraints.

• There is potential for LTOA with smaller, more precise tools in the future, offering a wide surgical field around Meckel cave.

• The study highlights the need for development of narrower robotic instruments and haptic feedback systems for better surgical outcomes.

• Multiportal techniques, like adding a transnasal portal, could enhance tool use, but haptic feedback remains a critical need.

Posted on

Robotic Spine Surgery: Systematic Review of Common Error Types and Best Practices

Operative Neurosurgery 28:295–302, 2025

• Robotic systems enhance accuracy in pedicle screw placement, reducing complications and hospital stays.

• Common errors in robotic spine surgery include registration, skiving, and interference errors.

• Registration errors occur due to imaging discrepancies or unexpected intraoperative movements.

• Skiving errors result from sliding of drilling instruments, often due to poor entry points.

• Interference errors arise from unintended interactions with soft tissue or robotic system malfunctions.

• Best practices include meticulous preoperative planning and careful patient positioning to minimize errors.

• High BMI and female sex are risk factors for screw deviation due to bone quality issues.

• Modern systems use sharp burrs to reduce skiving by ensuring smooth entry points.

• Soft tissue management is crucial to prevent interference errors during surgery.

• Intraoperative imaging helps confirm accurate screw placement, reducing registration errors.

• Screw failure rates: Registration errors (60%), skiving errors (26.8%), interference errors (19.5%).

• Newer robotic systems show improved accuracy but still face challenges with registration errors.

• Study limitations include varied resources, surgeon experience, and subjective error reporting.

Posted on

Robotic‑assisted single‑position lateral for multilevel circumferential lumbar interbody fusion

Acta Neurochirurgica (2023) 165:3963–3967

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion supplemented with insertion of pedicle screws is a surgical procedure that has gained popularity in the last years, becoming an important tool in the armamentarium of spine surgeons. In recent years, there is a trend to complete both procedures in a single position, thus avoiding flipping the patient prone to insert the pedicle screws. Methods

We describe a step-by-step workflow of the robotic-assisted technique for multilevel lateral lumbar interbody fusion supplemented with posterior instrumentation. The surgical procedure is performed in a single lateral position. For access to L4–5 or L5–S1, an oblique abdominal incision is performed in the same position, and the desired disc space is approached through an oblique or anterior corridor in the retroperitoneal space.

Conclusion Robotic-assisted single-position lateral for multilevel circumferential lumbar interbody fusion is a safe and effective procedure in patients where lumbar stabilization is required. This technique provides patients with a faster recovery and low risk of complications.

Posted on

Impact of landmark crater creation on improving accuracy of pedicle screw insertion in robot-assisted scoliosis surgery

European Spine Journal (2024) 33:4730–4739

This study evaluated the impact of the Landmark Crater (LC) method on pedicle perforation rates in robot-guided surgery for pediatric scoliosis for each pedicle diameter.

Methods Seventy-six scoliosis patients underwent robot-assisted posterior spinal fusion. The cohort consisted of 19 male and 57 female patients, with a mean ± standard deviation age of 17.5 ± 7.7 years and a preoperative Cobb angle of 57.0 ± 18.5°. The LC method is a method in which craters that serves as a landmark are created in advance at the planned PS insertion site of all pedicles within the intraoperative CT imaging area. The patients were divided into the LC group, in which PS insertion was performed using the LC method, and the control group using the conventional PS insertion method. Overall and pedicle perforation rates for each pedicle outer diameter were compared between the groups by Fisher’s exact test.

Results The LC group exhibited a significantly lower pedicle major perforation rate than did the control group (2.7% vs. 6.2%, P = 0.001). The perforation rates in pedicles with a pedicle outer diameter > 6 mm, 4–6 mm, 2–4 mm, and < 2 mm were 0.61%, 1.6%, 5.1%, and 21%, in the LC group and 0.75%, 4.1%, 12%, and 50% in the control group, respectively.

Conclusion In robot-assisted surgery for pediatric scoliosis, the LC method enabled significantly lower pedicle perforation rates over the conventional method. Both the LC and conventional methods exhibited higher perforation rates for smaller pedicle diameters.

Posted on

Comparison of accuracy, revision, and perioperative outcomes in robot-assisted spine surgeries: systematic review and meta-analysis

J Neurosurg Spine 41:519–531, 2024

Pedicle screw placement guidance is critical in spinal fusions, and spinal surgery robots aim to improve accuracy and reduce complications. Current literature has yet to compare the relative merits of available robotic systems. In this review, the authors aimed to 1) assess the current state of spinal robotics literature; 2) conduct a meta-analysis of robotic performance based on accuracy, speed, and safety; and 3) offer recommendations for robotic system selection.

METHODS Following PRISMA guidelines, the authors conducted a systematic literature review across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus as of April 28, 2022, for studies on approved robots for placing lumbar pedicle screws. Three reviewers screened and extracted data relating to the study characteristics, accuracy rate, intraoperative revisions, and reoperations. Secondary performance metrics included operative time, blood loss, and radiation exposure. The authors statistically compared the performance of the robots using a random-effects model to account for variation within and between the studies. Each robot was also compared with performance benchmarks of traditional techniques including freehand, fluoroscopic, and CT-navigated insertion. Finally, we performed a Duval and Tweedie trim-and-fill test to assess for the presence of publication bias.

RESULTS The authors identified 46 studies, describing 4670 patients and 25,054 screws, that evaluated 4 different robotic systems: Mazor X, ROSA, ExcelsiusGPS, and Cirq. The weighted accuracy rates of Gertzbein-Robbins classification grade A or B screws were as follows: ExcelsiusGPS, 98.0%; ROSA, 98.0%; Mazor, 98.2%; and Cirq, 94.2%. No robot was significantly more accurate than the others. However, the accuracy of the ExcelsiusGPS was significantly higher than that of traditional methods, and the accuracies of the Mazor and ROSA were significantly higher than that of fluoroscopy. The intraoperative revision rates were Cirq, 0.55%; ROSA, 0.91%; Mazor, 0.98%; and ExcelsiusGPS, 1.08%. The reoperation rates were Cirq, 0.28%; ExcelsiusGPS, 0.32%; and Mazor, 0.76% (no reoperations were reported for ROSA). Operative times were similar for all robots. Both the ExcelsiusGPS and Mazor were associated with significantly less blood loss than the ROSA. The Cirq had the lowest radiation exposure. Robots tended to be more accurate and generally their use was associated with fewer reoperations and less blood loss than freehand, fluoroscopic, or CT-navigated techniques.

CONCLUSIONS Robotic platforms perform comparably based on key metrics, with high accuracy rates and low intraoperative revision and reoperation rates. The spinal robotics publication rate will continue to accelerate, and choosing a robot will depend on the context of the practice.

Posted on

Robot‑assisted transcerebellar stereotactic approach for brainstem lesion

Acta Neurochirurgica (2024) 166:389

Stereotactic approaches to diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPGs) remain essential due to advances in molecular biology and management, necessitating tissue sampling. Here we present an effective technique with a biopsy by robot-assisted transcerebellar approach.

Method Our procedure was performed using the ROSA robotic system and the OARM CT scan, which provided stereotactic conditions for this transcerebellar approach to brainstem lesions.

Conclusion The robot-assisted transcerebellar stereotactic approach remains essential to provide complications for biopsy of brainstem lesions.

Posted on

Posterolateral lumbar spine fixation and decompression with navigation interfaced with a robotic exoscope with head mounted display

Acta Neurochirurgica (2024) 166:342

Lumbar spine fixation and fusion is currently performed with intraoperative tools such as intraoperative CT scan integrated to navigation system to provide accurate and safe positioning of the screws. The use of microscopic visualization systems enhances visualization and accuracy during decompression of the spinal canal as well.

Methods We introduce a novel setting in microsurgical decompression and fusion of lumbar spine using an exoscope with robotized arm (RoboticScope) interfaced with navigation and head mounted displays.

Conclusion Spinal canal decompression and fusion can effectively be performed with RoboticScope, with significant advantages especially regarding ergonomics.

Posted on

What is the Marginal Cost of Using Robot Assistance or Navigation for Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion? A Time-Driven Activity-Based Cost Analysis

Neurosurgery 95:556–565, 2024

Our primary objective was to compare the marginal intraoperative cost of 3 different methods for pedicle screw placement as part of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIFs). Specifically, we used time-driven activity-based costing to compare costs between robot-assisted TLIF (RA-TLIF), TLIF with intraoperative navigation (ION-TLIF), and freehand (non-navigated, nonrobotic) TLIF.

METHODS: Total cost was divided into direct and indirect costs. We identified all instances of RA-TLIF (n = 20), ION-TLIF (n = 59), and freehand TLIF (n = 233) from 2020 to 2022 at our institution. Software was developed to automate the extraction of all intraoperatively used personnel and material resources from the electronic medical record. Total costs were determined through a combination of direct observation, electronic medical record extraction, and interdepartmental collaboration (business operations, sterile processing, pharmacy, and plant operation departments). Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to compare costs between TLIF modalities, accounting for patient-specific factors as well as number of levels fused, surgeon, and hospital site.

RESULTS: The average total intraoperative cost per case for the RA-TLIF, ION-TLIF, and freehand TLIF cohorts was $24 838 ± $10 748, $15 991 ± $6254, and $14 498 ± $6580, respectively. Regression analysis revealed that RA-TLIF had significantly higher intraoperative cost compared with both ION-TLIF ( β -coefficient: $7383 ± $1575, P < .001) and freehand TLIF ( β -coefficient: $8182 ± $1523, P < .001). These cost differences were primarily driven by supply cost. However, there were no significant differences in intraoperative cost between ION-TLIF and freehand TLIF (P = .32).

CONCLUSION: We demonstrate a novel use of time-driven activity-based costing methodology to compare different modalities for executing the same type of lumbar fusion procedure. RA-TLIF entails significantly higher supply cost when compared with other modalities, which explains its association with higher total intraoperative cost. The use of ION, however, does not add extra expense compared with freehand TLIF when accounting for confounders. This might have implications as surgeons and hospitals move toward bundled payments.

Posted on

Surgical Characteristics of Intracranial Biopsy Using a Frameless Stereotactic Robotic Platform: A Single-Center Experience

Operative Neurosurgery 26:502–510, 2024

Cranial robotics are a burgeoning field of neurosurgery. To date, all cranial robotic systems described have been computerized, arm-based instruments that take up significant space in the operating room. The Medtronic Stealth Autoguide robot has a smaller operating room footprint and offers multiaxial, frame-based surgical targeting. The authors set out to define the surgical characteristics of a novel robotic platform for brain biopsy in a large patient cohort.

METHODS: Patients who underwent stereotactic biopsy using the Stealth Autoguide cranial robotic platform from July 2020 to March 2023 were included in this study. Clinical, surgical, and histological data were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS: Ninety-six consecutive patients (50 female, 46 male) were included. The mean age at biopsy was 53.7 ± 18.0 years. The mean target depth was 68.2 ± 15.3 mm. The biopsy diagnostic tissue acquisition rate was 100%. The mean time from incision to biopsy tissue acquisition was 15.4 ± 9.9 minutes. Target lesions were located throughout the brain: in the frontal

lobe (n = 32, 33.3%), parietal lobe (n = 21, 21.9%), temporal lobe (n = 22, 22.9%), deep brain nuclei/thalamus (n = 13, 13.5%),

cerebellum (n = 7, 7.3%), and brainstem (n = 1, 1.0%). Most cases were gliomas (n = 75, 78.2%). Patients were discharged home on postoperative day 0 or 1 in 62.5% of cases. A total of 7 patients developed postoperative complications (7.2%).

CONCLUSION: This cranial robotic platform can be used for efficient, safe, and accurate cranial biopsies that allow for reliable diagnosis of intracranial pathology in a minimally invasive setting.

Posted on

Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Asleep Single-Stage Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery

Operative Neurosurgery 26:363–371, 2024

Robotic assistance has garnered increased use in neurosurgery. Recently, this has expanded to include deep brain stimulation (DBS). Several studies have reported increased accuracy and improved efficiency with robotic assistance, but these are limited to individual robotic platforms with smaller sample sizes or are broader studies on robotics not specific to DBS. Our objectives are to report our technique for robot-assisted, minimally invasive, asleep, single-stage DBS surgery and to perform a meta-analysis comparing techniques from previous studies.

METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective review of DBS procedures using a floor-mounted robot with a frameless transient fiducial array registration. We compiled accuracy data (radial entry error, radial target error, and 3dimensional target error) and efficiency data (operative time, setup time, and total procedure time). We then performed a meta-analysis of previous studies and compared these metrics.

RESULTS: We analyzed 315 electrodes implanted in 160 patients. The mean radial target error was 0.9 ± 0.5 mm, mean target 3-dimensional error was 1.3 ± 0.7 mm, and mean radial entry error was 1.1 ± 0.8 mm. The mean procedure time (including pulse generator placement) was 182.4 ± 47.8 minutes, and the mean setup time was 132.9 ± 32.0 minutes. The overall complication rate was 8.8% (2.5% hemorrhagic/ischemic, 2.5% infectious, and 0.6% revision). Our meta-analysis showed increased accuracy with floor-mounted over skull-mounted robotic platforms and with fiducial-based registrations over optical registrations.

CONCLUSION: Our technique for robot-assisted, minimally invasive, asleep, single-stage DBS surgery is safe, accurate, and efficient. Our data, combined with a meta-analysis of previous studies, demonstrate that robotic assistance can provide similar or increased accuracy and improved efficiency compared with traditional frame-based techniques. Our analysis also suggests that floor-mounted robots and fiducial-based registration methods may be more accurate.

 

Posted on

Robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement accuracy compared with alternative guidance in lateral single-position surgery

J Neurosurg Spine 39:443–451, 2023

While single-position surgery (SPS) eliminates the need for patient repositioning, the placement of screws in the unconventional lateral position poses unique challenges related to asymmetry relative to the surgical table. Use of robotic guidance or intraoperative navigation can help to overcome this. The aim of this study was to compare the relative accuracies offered by these various navigation modalities for pedicle screws placed in lateral SPS.

METHODS According to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, the PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were queried for studies reporting pedicle screw placement accuracy using fluoroscopic, CT-navigated, O-arm, or robotic guidance in lateral SPS, and a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Included studies all compared evaluated screw placement accuracy in lateral SPS using a single navigation method. Quality assessment was performed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system; risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. The primary outcome, rate of pedicle screw breach, was analyzed using random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS Eleven studies were included comprising 548 patients who underwent the placement of instrumentation with 2488 screws. For the fluoroscopic, CT-navigated, O-arm, and robotic guidance cohorts, there were 3, 2, 3, and 3 studies, respectively. Breach rates by modality were as follows: fluoroscopic guidance (6.6%), CT navigation (4.7%), O-arm (3.9%), and robotic guidance (3.9%). Random-effects meta-analysis showed a significant difference between studies, with an overall breach rate of 4.9% (95% CI 3.1%–7.5%; p < 0.001); however, testing for subgroup differences failed to show a significant difference between guidance modalities (Q M = 0.69, df = 3; p = 0.88). Heterogeneity between studies was significant (I 2 = 79.0%, τ 2 = 0.41, χ 2 = 47.65, df = 10; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS Robotic guidance of screws is noninferior to alternative guidance modalities in lateral SPS; however, additional prospective studies directly comparing different guidance types are merited.

Posted on

Retrospective single-surgeon study of prone versus lateral robotic pedicle screw placement: a CT-based assessment of accuracy

J Neurosurg Spine 39:490–497, 2023

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion including anterior-to-psoas oblique lumbar interbody fusion has conventionally relied on pedicle screw placement (PSP) for construct stabilization. Single-position surgery with lumbar interbody fusion in the lateral decubitus position with concomitant PSP has been associated with increased operative efficiency. What remains unclear is the accuracy of PSP with robotic guidance when compared with the more familiar prone patient positioning. The present study aimed to compare robot-assisted screw placement accuracy between patients with instrumentation placed in the prone and lateral positions.

METHODS The authors identified all consecutive patients treated with interbody fusion and PSP in the prone or lateral position by a single surgeon between January 2019 and October 2022. All pedicle screws placed were analyzed using CT scans to determine appropriate positioning according to the Gertzbein-Robbins classification grading system (grade C or worse was considered as a radiographically significant breach). Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to identify risk factors for the occurrence of a radiographically significant breach.

RESULTS Eighty-nine consecutive patients (690 screws) were included, of whom 46 (477 screws) were treated in the prone position and 43 (213 screws) in the lateral decubitus position. There were fewer breaches in the prone (n = 13, 2.7%) than the lateral decubitus (n = 15, 7.0%) group (p = 0.012). Nine (1.9%) radiographically significant breaches occurred in the prone group compared with 10 (4.7%) in the lateral decubitus group (p = 0.019), for a prone versus lateral decubitus PSP accuracy rate of 98.1% versus 95.3%. There were no significant differences in BMI between prone versus lateral decubitus cohorts (30.1 vs 29.6) or patients with screw breach versus those without (31.2 vs 29.5). In multivariate models, the prone position was the only significant protective factor for screw accuracy; no other significant risk factors for screw breach were identified.

CONCLUSIONS The present data suggest that pedicle screws placed with robotic assistance have higher placement accuracy in the prone position. Further studies will be needed to validate the accuracy of PSP in the lateral position as single-position surgery becomes more commonplace in the treatment of spinal disorders.

Posted on

Robot‑assisted endoscopic third ventriculostomy under intraoperative CT imaging guidance

Acta Neurochirurgica (2023) 165:2525–2531

The robot-assisted neurosurgical procedures have recently benefited of the evolution of intraoperative imaging, including mobile CT unit available in the operating room. This facilitated use paved the way to perform more neurosurgical procedures under robotic assistance. Endoscopic third ventriculocisternostomy requires both a safe transcortical trajectory and a smooth manipulation.

Method We describe our technique of robot-assisted endoscopic third ventriculocisternostomy combining robotic assistance and intraoperative CT imaging.

Conclusion Robot-assisted endoscopic third ventriculocisternostomy using modern intraoperative neuroimaging can be easily implemented and prevented erroneous trajectory and abrupt endoscopic movements, reducing surgically induced brain damages.

Proudly powered by WordPress