The posterior approach for removal of all thoracic disc herniations

J Neurosurg Spine 44:876–883, 2026

his single-surgeon series evaluates a posterior partial transpedicular approach for symptomatic thoracic disc herniation augmented by intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) and ultrasonic aspiration (UA). Over 108 patients (137 discs) treated from 2012–2024, the technique produced significant neurological improvement with an acceptable complication and reoperation profile.

The report details patient selection, operative steps, radiographic grading, neuromonitoring use, outcomes (Frankel grade improvements), and multivariate predictors, highlighting the method’s versatility for giant and calcified herniations and its accessibility to general spine surgeons.

Clinical problem Thoracic disc herniation is surgically challenging due to ventral location, frequent calcification, and risk of severe neurologic compromise; anterior/lateral approaches can be effective but carry substantial morbidity and technical demands.

Study aim Evaluated safety, efficacy, and versatility of a posterior partial transpedicular discectomy augmented with intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) and ultrasonic aspiration (UA) for symptomatic TDH.

Cohort & design Retrospective single-surgeon series of 108 consecutive patients (137 TDHs) treated from 2012–2024; outcomes tracked with Frankel grades preop, 3–6 months, and final follow-up; multivariate regression used to identify predictors of improvement.

Key technique Posterior midline exposure with laminectomy, <50% medial facetectomy, and superomedial caudal pedicle removal using UA to create a corridor; IOUS used after laminectomy, during ventral work, and after resection to confirm decompression and detect residual/migrated fragments; IONM used in all cases.

Case mix severity Most patients presented with myelopathy (86.1%); many discs were giant (>40% stenosis, 68.6%) and frequently calcified (complete 38.7%, incomplete 21.2%).

Neurologic outcomes Mean Frankel grade improved from 3.77 preop to 4.54 at last follow-up (p < 0.001); 61.1% improved by ≥1 Frankel grade; follow-up for the primary outcome was 100%.

Safety & complications IOUS and UA enabled safe decompression in all cases; reoperation-requiring complications occurred in 9.3% (most commonly reherniation 4.6%); no postoperative CSF leaks through the wound were reported.

Predictors & conclusion Less neurologic improvement was associated with diabetes and obesity (and heart disease); overall conclusion: posterior partial transpedicular approach with IOUS and UA is safe, effective, and broadly applicable for TDH (including large/calcified lesions) and can be adopted by general spine surgeons.

Disruptive technologies in spine surgery: current trends, outcomes, and ethical implications

J Neurosurg Spine 44:756–768, 2026

Disruptive technologies in spine surgery—AR/VR, robotics, neuronavigation, endoscopy, and patient-specific implants—are examined for their roles in enhancing precision, training, and patient outcomes. The review summarizes evidence for preoperative simulation, AR-assisted planning, and 3D segmentation, highlighting improvements in accuracy, reduced fluoroscopy, and trainee confidence.

Intraoperative advances such as robot-assisted techniques, computer-assisted navigation, and endoscopic approaches offer minimally invasive alternatives with favorable recovery profiles but face challenges of cost, learning curves, and equitable access. The authors emphasize ethical considerations, need for standardized outcomes, and strategies to expand accessibility and training.

Scope Disruptive spine-surgery technologies emphasized include AR/VR (XR), advanced navigation, robotics, patient-specific implants/3D printing, and endoscopic spine surgery.

XR definitions VR provides a fully immersive digital environment, AR overlays digital content onto the real world, and MR blends both; all fall under XR.

Training impact VR simulation in spine training improved trainee comfort and autonomy and reduced fluoroscopy use in lateral lumbar interbody fusion simulations; VR-trained learners also made fewer pedicle-screw placement errors than traditional instruction.

Preop planning VR-based planning can reduce fluoroscopy/localization time and improve puncture accuracy in endoscopic lumbar discectomy; segmented 3D models support rehearsal, trajectory planning, and risk assessment around critical structures.

AR navigation outcomes Wearable AR navigation (e.g., FDA-cleared xvision) has shown high pedicle-screw placement accuracy (reported ~96.7% thoracic and ~99.1% lumbosacral) and may reduce operative time and radiation exposure.

Patient-specific surgery Segmentation + 3D printing/predictive modeling enable personalized approaches and implants (e.g., patient-specific rods, templates, custom cages), with early reports of high accuracy for template-guided instrumentation and promising feasibility for custom interbody devices.

Endoscopic techniques ESS supports minimally invasive treatment across multiple pathologies and can match conventional outcomes for lumbar disc herniation while improving recovery (e.g., shorter stays/earlier return to work), but broader adoption is constrained by learning curve and reimbursement challenges.

Implementation ethics/costs High acquisition/maintenance costs and limited reimbursement risk widening access disparities; recommended mitigations include subsidized training, shared equipment models, and reimbursement policies to support equitable implementation alongside standardized outcomes and training.

Addressing Temporal Muscle Atrophy and Enhancing Cranioplasty Outcome

Operative Neurosurgery 30:588–594, 2026

This multicenter prospective study evaluates a dual-layer dural substitute technique during decompressive craniectomy to prevent adhesions between the temporalis muscle and dura, thereby improving subsequent cranioplasty outcomes. Across 59 patients, the method reduced adhesions, preserved temporalis muscle thickness, shortened cranioplasty operative time, minimized blood loss, and eliminated postoperative cranioplasty-related seizures.

The paper details surgical steps, material selection (Neuro-Patch), intraoperative placement of two dural layers, and cranioplasty retrieval of the superficial patch to restore muscle function. Results show improved wound healing metrics, shorter hospital stays, and a low complication profile, while noting limitations including lack of a control group and nonstandardized long-term follow-up.

Problem: After decompressive craniectomy (DC), adhesions commonly form between the temporalis muscle (TM), dura, and brain surface, making later cranioplasty (CP) dissection difficult and increasing risks such as TM injury/atrophy and poor cosmetic outcome.

Technique: During DC, place a dual-layer dural substitute—a large patch for duraplasty plus a second patch beneath the TM (and sometimes an additional patch between TM and subcutaneous tissue)—to preserve a separable plane for future CP.

CP approach: During CP, reopen the prior incision and elevate the musculocutaneous flap between the two Neuro-Patch layers, then remove the patch under the TM and reposition the TM anatomically over the implant.

Study design: Three-year prospective multicenter series of 59 patients undergoing DC then CP; outcomes included adhesion formation, ease of dissection, TM thickness (CT-based), operative time, blood loss, and postoperative events.

Adhesion/TM preservation results: TM elevation during CP was consistently facilitated with nearly absent fibrotic adhesion, and TM thickness remained essentially unchanged pre- vs postoperatively (median 5.6 mm vs 5.5 mm).

Operative metrics: Median CP operative time was 66 minutes vs a previously estimated 105 minutes in centers not using the technique; mean blood loss was 24 mL.

Safety/complications: No reported infections, wound dehiscence, or CSF leak after DC and CP; 0% post-CP new-onset seizures in this cohort.

Conclusion: Dual-layer dural substitute placement during DC can prevent adhesions and improve subsequent CP by facilitating TM elevation, reducing operative time and blood loss, preserving TM integrity, and potentially lowering post-CP epilepsy rates.

Postoperative loss in segmental lumbar lordosis following L5–S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion

J Neurosurg Spine 44:420–425, 2026

This clinical study evaluates predictors and thresholds for postoperative loss of L5–S1 segmental lordosis following anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in 94 adults treated for degenerative disc disease. Multivariate analyses identified baseline obesity, absence of posterior fixation, and larger immediate lordotic correction as independent predictors of 6-week to 1-year segmental lordosis loss, which related to higher rates of cage subsidence and revision.

The authors derived 6-week postoperative L5–S1 lordosis thresholds (overall range 21.6°–26.8°, PI-specific: low 19.0°–24.8°, average 21.0°–26.4°, high 24.1°–28.7°) that minimized subsequent loss and need for revision. Findings support targeted preoperative planning to achieve sustainable correction while balancing risks of overcorrection and subsidence.

Segmental Lordosis Restoration: L5–S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) provides strong and durable correction of segmental lumbar lordosis and disc height, with most correction maintained at 1 year postoperatively.

Predictors of Lordosis Loss: Baseline obesity, lack of posterior fixation, and larger initial correction in L5–S1 lordosis are independent predictors of postoperative segmental lordosis loss within 1 year.

Complications: Loss of segmental lordosis increases the risk of cage subsidence and revision surgery, particularly due to pseudarthrosis.

Optimal Correction Thresholds: Achieving 6-week postoperative L5–S1 segmental lordosis between 21.6° and 26.8° minimizes the risk of lordotic loss and need for revision; PI-specific thresholds are 19.0°–24.8° (low PI), 21.0°–26.4° (average PI), and 24.1°–28.7° (high PI).

Risks of Overcorrection/Undercorrection: Overcorrection (>26.8°) increases risk of cage subsidence and mechanical complications, while undercorrection (<21.6°) may predispose to implant failure and adjacent segment disease.

Surgical Planning Importance: Preoperative planning should target lordosis correction within these thresholds and consider modifiable risk factors to optimize outcomes and reduce complications.

Comparison to Other Techniques: ALIF offers greater segmental correction than other lumbar interbody fusion techniques such as TLIF or XLIF.

Clinical Implications: Nearly half of patients experience some degree of lordosis loss post-ALIF, highlighting the need for careful patient selection, surgical technique, and postoperative monitoring.

Spinal versus general anesthesia in robotic minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative study on surgical outcomes

J Neurosurg Spine 44:99–107, 2026

This clinical study compares spinal anesthesia (SA) versus general anesthesia (GA) for robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (RA‑MIS TLIF), reporting retrospective outcomes from 209 patients treated 2018–2024. Primary findings show SA patients had significantly shorter operative times, lower immediate postoperative pain scores, reduced estimated blood loss, and shorter hospital length of stay after propensity score matching and regression adjustment.

The authors contextualize results within advances in robotic spinal surgery and awake spine techniques, discuss safety and potential cost and opioid‑reduction benefits, and acknowledge limitations including retrospective design, single‑center data, and reduced matched cohort size. Conclusions support SA as a safe, efficient approach for RA‑MIS TLIF with calls for larger prospective studies and formal patient‑selection guidelines.

Spinal Anesthesia (SA) vs General Anesthesia (GA): In robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (RA-MIS TLIF), SA significantly reduces operative times, postoperative pain, and hospital length of stay compared to GA, with no increase in complications or adverse outcomes.

Robotic Assistance Benefits: Robotic technology in spine surgery improves pedicle screw placement accuracy, reduces radiation exposure, and is associated with lower complication and revision rates, enhancing surgical safety and efficiency.

Study Design: A retrospective analysis of 209 patients (31 SA, 178 GA) from 2018–2024, with propensity score matching applied to control for confounders, allowing fair comparison between SA and GA cohorts for single-level procedures.

Key Outcomes (After Matching): SA cohort had shorter median total OR time (159 vs 283 min), procedure time (115 vs 201 min), lower intraoperative blood loss (25 vs 50 mL), lower first postoperative pain scores (median VAS 0 vs 5), and reduced mean length of stay (0.90 vs 2.64 days) compared to GA.

Patient Selection: The choice between SA and GA was based on patient preference and eligibility, with all SA cases being single-level procedures and comparable baseline demographics after matching.

Safety Profile: No increase in intraoperative or postoperative complications was observed with SA; screw placement accuracy remained high with robotic assistance.

Implications for Practice: Combining SA with RA-MIS TLIF offers a safe, efficient, and patient-centered approach that may lower healthcare costs and opioid requirements by reducing pain and hospitalization.

Limitations: Single-center, retrospective design with a relatively small matched cohort may limit generalizability; further prospective, multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings.

Erector spinae plane block during standalone anterior lumbar surgery: impact on early ambulation, length of stay, and inpatient opioid use

J Neurosurg Spine 44:90–98, 2026

This clinical retrospective study assesses the impact of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) as an adjunct to multimodal analgesia in standalone anterior lumbar procedures (ALIF and lumbar TDR). Outcomes compared between ESPB and non-ESPB cohorts include in-hospital pain scores, opioid consumption (MME), time to ambulation, length of stay (LOS), and opioid-related complications.

Results show ESPB associated with lower day-of-surgery pain scores, earlier ambulation, and shorter LOS, with reduced in-hospital oral MME in univariate analysis; preoperative opioid use predicted higher perioperative opioid consumption and urinary retention despite ESPB. The authors emphasize ESPB as a component of enhanced recovery protocols and note limitations of retrospective design and sample size.

Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB): ESPB is a regional analgesic technique used as an adjunct in anterior-only lumbar surgeries, such as ALIF and total disc replacement, aiming to improve perioperative pain control and recovery outcomes.

Reduced Pain and Opioid Use: ESPB significantly lowers pain scores on the day of surgery and reduces in-hospital opioid use, especially oral morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), compared to patients not receiving ESPB.

Shorter Hospital Stay: Patients receiving ESPB experience a significantly shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) and are more likely to be discharged earlier, including same-day discharge, than those without ESPB.

Faster Ambulation: ESPB is associated with a significantly shorter time to first ambulation after surgery, facilitating earlier rehabilitation.

Predictors of Opioid Use: Baseline (preoperative) opioid use is the strongest predictor of higher perioperative opioid requirements and is also linked to a higher incidence of postoperative urinary retention, regardless of ESPB administration.

Subgroup Benefits: Among ESPB patients, those with a shorter LOS (<2 days) had earlier ambulation, lower opioid use, and lower pain scores on postoperative day 1, indicating enhanced early recovery.

Multimodal Pain Management: ESPB should be considered as one component within a comprehensive multimodal pain management strategy (such as ERAS protocols), rather than as a standalone intervention.

Study Limitations: The findings are limited by the retrospective design, potential selection bias, lack of randomization, and incomplete data on preoperative opioid use, highlighting the need for larger, prospective studies

Minimally invasive lumbar decompression versus open decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a propensity score–matched analysis

J Neurosurg Spine 44:55–61, 2026

This propensity score–matched retrospective study compares minimally invasive lumbar decompression (mild) with open decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis at a tertiary multisite center from 2005–2024. Primary outcomes included pain change (NRS), reoperation, and perioperative complications, with MCID defined as 30% NRS improvement.

Results show open decompression yielded greater pain improvement, higher MCID attainment, and lower overall reoperation rates, while mild had fewer durotomies but more neurological deficits. The authors recommend independent prospective studies to validate comparative efficacy and cost-effectiveness and note limitations including retrospective design and incomplete radiographic severity data.

Open decompression is more effective than the mild (minimally invasive lumbar decompression) procedure for achieving clinically significant pain improvement in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (43.1% vs 22.2% reached MCID; p < 0.001).

Reoperation rates are higher after the mild procedure compared to open decompression (46.2% vs 29.3%; p = 0.008), indicating less durable symptom relief with mild.

Pain outcomes favor open decompression, with patients reporting lower pain scores at last follow-up (mean NRS 2.3 vs 5.4; p < 0.001) and greater overall improvement from baseline.

Complication profiles are similar overall, but mild is associated with higher rates of postoperative neurological deficits (6.3% vs 0.6%; p = 0.003), while open decompression has a higher rate of durotomy (2.9% vs 0%; p = 0.024).

Procedure characteristics: The mild procedure is performed percutaneously through a small incision, typically by pain medicine physicians, and targets debulking the ligamentum flavum without muscle dissection.

Study limitations include retrospective design, incomplete matching for stenosis severity and baseline pain, and missing data on some outcomes, suggesting a need for prospective studies.

Existing literature on mild is often industry-sponsored and lacks direct comparison to open decompression; independent studies show mild may be less effective and more likely to require further surgery.

Clinical recommendation: Open decompression remains the gold standard for patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis who fail conservative management, while the mild procedure may offer less pain relief and higher reoperation risk.

Technique and outcomes of the trans-superior articular process approach for endoscopic thoracic discectomy

J Neurosurg Spine 42:775–783, 2025

The trans-superior articular process (SAP) approach for endoscopic thoracic discectomy enables safe, minimally invasive treatment of symptomatic thoracic disc herniation, particularly in challenging upper/mid-thoracic regions, with significant improvements in pain and disability, short operative time, and low complication rates in a 38-patient series.

• Trans-superior articular process (trans-SAP) approach for endoscopic thoracic discectomy is described for symptomatic thoracic disc herniation (TDH).

• This technique creates a controlled corridor through the SAP using a Jamshidi needle and manual bone drills, minimizing facet removal and neural injury.

• Study included 38 patients (mean age 48.9), mostly with central or middle thoracic herniations.

• Mean operative time was 42 minutes, hospital stay 1.3 days, and follow-up 11.5 months.

• Significant improvements in pain (VAS) and disability (ODI) scores were observed at all follow-up points.

• Only one complication (2.6%, recurrent herniation) was reported.

• Trans-SAP approach is safe, effective, and minimally invasive, but has a steep learning curve and is not suitable for hard disc, severe myelopathy, or ossified ligament cases.

• Technique enables treatment of central and paramedian TDH and can be performed under local anesthesia.

Designing and clinical application of a 3D-printed personalized model of a radiofrequency needle guide with a maxillary fixator for puncture of the gasserian ganglion for trigeminal neuralgia treatment

J Neurosurg 142:1256–1262, 2025

The study presents a 3D-printed personalized model (3D PPM) for radiofrequency needle guidance in trigeminal neuralgia treatment, reducing radiation exposure and pain during procedures. It showed effectiveness in controlled needle insertion and minimized postoperative complications compared to traditional methods.

• A 3D-printed personalized model (3D PPM) of a radiofrequency needle guide with a maxillary fixator was designed for gasserian ganglion puncture in trigeminal neuralgia treatment.

3D PPM reduces radiation exposure and pain during needle insertion, and minimizes postoperative complications.

• The study found that the use of 3D PPM significantly decreased radiation time and dose area product compared to traditional methods.

Pain severity during the procedure was less in patients using 3D PPM, with more reporting mild pain compared to those not using it.

Cheek swelling was less frequent in the group using 3D PPM, though not statistically significant due to small sample size.

• The 3D PPM enhances the accuracy of needle insertion and reduces radiation exposure, making it beneficial for less experienced neurosurgeons.

• Limitations include the unsuitability for patients with metal dental implants or missing teeth due to fixation issues.

• Despite limitations, the study shows promising results for 3D PPM in radiofrequency therapy of the gasserian ganglion, suggesting further research is needed.

A novel robot-assisted method for implanting intracortical sensorimotor devices for brain-computer interface studies

J Neurosurg 142:1280–1288, 2025

A novel robot-assisted method for implanting intracortical microelectrode arrays in brain-computer interface studies was successfully demonstrated in a tetraplegic participant. The technique ensured precise placement, facilitating high-quality signal communication for motor control and sensory feedback, with promising implications for restoring upper-limb function.

• A novel robot-assisted method for implanting intracortical microelectrode arrays in brain-computer interface (BCI) studies is presented, focusing on surgical techniques and challenges.

• The technique was applied in a 31-year-old male with tetraplegia, enabling 2D control of a virtual arm with high success rates and maintaining recording quality over time.

• The robotic neurosurgery technique provides high accuracy and time efficiency, reducing human error and surgeon burden in repetitive procedures.

Preoperative imaging and robotic systems were used for precise planning and execution of array implantations, ensuring minimal cortical damage and high signal quality.

• The study demonstrated that robotic neurosurgery could be successfully translated into BCI device implantation, aiming to restore upper-limb function.

• Future challenges include refining insertion methods, increasing automation, and addressing intraoperative adjustments for microvessels.

• The study was conducted under an investigational device exemption from the US Food and Drug Administration and received institutional review board approval.

Management of intracavitary bleeding during ultra-early minimally invasive intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation

J Neurosurg 142:1003–1013, 2025

Ultra-early minimally invasive endoscopic evacuation of intracerebral hemorrhage within 5 hours increases intraoperative bleeding but does not elevate risks of postoperative rebleeding or worsen long-term outcomes, suggesting safe exploration of its clinical benefits with proper techniques.

Objective: The study examines the management of intracavitary bleeding during ultra-early minimally invasive intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation.

Methodology: Patients with spontaneous supratentorial ICH were triaged for surgical evacuation using a 5-point intraoperative bleeding scale.

Findings: Ultra-early evacuation within 5 hours is associated with increased intraoperative bleeding but not with postoperative rebleeding or worse long-term outcomes.

Bleeding Scale: A score of 1 indicates no active bleeding, while a score of 5 indicates severe bleeding requiring extensive irrigation and cauterization.

Results: Ultra-early evacuation had a mean bleeding score of 4.9, compared to 2.3 for evacuations conducted 5 to 10 hours after ictus.

Conclusion: The benefits of ultra-early evacuation can be explored without increased risk of postoperative rebleeding using minimally invasive endoscopic techniques.

Significance: The study supports the safety and feasibility of early evacuation strategies in improving functional outcomes for ICH patients.

The risk of intraoperative venous air embolism from neurosurgical procedures performed in the lounging position

J Neurosurg 142:797–807, 2025

The study investigated the risk of venous air embolism (VAE) during neurosurgery in the lounging position, finding no permanent sequelae or fatal events. Despite a 51.4% VAE detection rate, no hemodynamic instability occurred, suggesting experienced teams can safely use this position.

Study Overview

Objective: Assess venous air embolism (VAE) risk and outcomes in lounging position neurosurgery.

Study Design: Retrospective analysis of 1000 patients from 2010 to 2020.

Primary Focus: VAE incidence, severity, and associated complications.

Key Findings

VAE Detection: 51.4% of patients experienced VAE, with no grade 5 events.

Complications: 0.3% developed acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) linked to VAE grade.

No Permanent Sequelae: No patients suffered permanent neurological deficits from VAE.

Patient Demographics

Mean Age: 47.7 years; 56.5% female.

Common Pathologies: 94.9% had posterior fossa tumors, mainly vestibular schwannomas.

Surgical Approach and Positioning

Lounging Position: Feet elevated above head to improve venous return.

Surgical Benefits: Reduced intracranial pressure and improved surgical field visibility.

Risk Factors and Outcomes

High-Grade VAE: Associated with older age and lower BMI.

No PFO Contraindication: PFO is not linked to paradoxical embolism in this cohort.

Outcome Predictors: Preoperative KPS score is most relevant for clinical outcomes.

Comparison of accuracy, revision, and perioperative outcomes in robot-assisted spine surgeries: systematic review and meta-analysis

J Neurosurg Spine 41:519–531, 2024

Pedicle screw placement guidance is critical in spinal fusions, and spinal surgery robots aim to improve accuracy and reduce complications. Current literature has yet to compare the relative merits of available robotic systems. In this review, the authors aimed to 1) assess the current state of spinal robotics literature; 2) conduct a meta-analysis of robotic performance based on accuracy, speed, and safety; and 3) offer recommendations for robotic system selection.

METHODS Following PRISMA guidelines, the authors conducted a systematic literature review across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus as of April 28, 2022, for studies on approved robots for placing lumbar pedicle screws. Three reviewers screened and extracted data relating to the study characteristics, accuracy rate, intraoperative revisions, and reoperations. Secondary performance metrics included operative time, blood loss, and radiation exposure. The authors statistically compared the performance of the robots using a random-effects model to account for variation within and between the studies. Each robot was also compared with performance benchmarks of traditional techniques including freehand, fluoroscopic, and CT-navigated insertion. Finally, we performed a Duval and Tweedie trim-and-fill test to assess for the presence of publication bias.

RESULTS The authors identified 46 studies, describing 4670 patients and 25,054 screws, that evaluated 4 different robotic systems: Mazor X, ROSA, ExcelsiusGPS, and Cirq. The weighted accuracy rates of Gertzbein-Robbins classification grade A or B screws were as follows: ExcelsiusGPS, 98.0%; ROSA, 98.0%; Mazor, 98.2%; and Cirq, 94.2%. No robot was significantly more accurate than the others. However, the accuracy of the ExcelsiusGPS was significantly higher than that of traditional methods, and the accuracies of the Mazor and ROSA were significantly higher than that of fluoroscopy. The intraoperative revision rates were Cirq, 0.55%; ROSA, 0.91%; Mazor, 0.98%; and ExcelsiusGPS, 1.08%. The reoperation rates were Cirq, 0.28%; ExcelsiusGPS, 0.32%; and Mazor, 0.76% (no reoperations were reported for ROSA). Operative times were similar for all robots. Both the ExcelsiusGPS and Mazor were associated with significantly less blood loss than the ROSA. The Cirq had the lowest radiation exposure. Robots tended to be more accurate and generally their use was associated with fewer reoperations and less blood loss than freehand, fluoroscopic, or CT-navigated techniques.

CONCLUSIONS Robotic platforms perform comparably based on key metrics, with high accuracy rates and low intraoperative revision and reoperation rates. The spinal robotics publication rate will continue to accelerate, and choosing a robot will depend on the context of the practice.

External assessment of preoperative scores for predicting outcome after microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia

J Neurosurg 141:1056–1062, 2024

Recently, two scoring systems have been developed for predicting pain-free outcomes after microvascular decompression (MVD). Evaluation of these scores on large external datasets has been limited. In this study, the authors aimed to evaluate the performance of published MVD scoring systems in predicting pain-free outcome.

METHODS A total of 458 patients who underwent MVD for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) between 2007 and 2020 and had at least 6 months of follow-up were included in this study. Hardaway and Panczykowski scores were retrospectively computed for each patient and compared with postoperative pain recurrence and pain-free duration.

RESULTS The mean ± SD area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting any pain recurrence after MVD was 0.567 ± 0.081 using the Hardaway score and 0.546 ± 0.085 using the Panczykowski score. On log-rank tests and Kaplan-Meier analysis, the patients with Hardaway scores of 0–2 had significantly shorter pain-free survival times after MVD than did those with a score of 3. Patients with a Panczykowski score of 1 had a significantly shorter pain-free duration after surgery compared with both patients with scores of 2–3 and patients with scores of 4–5. Patients with Panczykowski scores of 2–3 also had significantly shorter pain-free duration compared with patients with scores of 4–5.

CONCLUSIONS Both the Hardaway and Panczykowski scores may be useful for predicting postoperative pain-free duration in TN patients, and their utility may be greatest when scores are clustered. Continued refinement of both scoring systems will help to improve our ability to predict patient outcomes after MVD.

The endaural subtemporal keyhole: a novel minimally invasive approach to the middle cranial fossa

J Neurosurg 141:1063–1070, 2024

The goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a minimally invasive approach to the middle cranial fossa using a novel endaural keyhole.

METHODS The charts of all patients who underwent this novel minimally invasive approach to the middle cranial fossa were retrospectively reviewed. In addition, cadaveric dissection was performed to demonstrate the feasibility of the endaural keyhole to the middle cranial fossa.

RESULTS Six patients (5 female and 1 male; age range 47–77 years) who underwent craniotomy for CSF leak (n = 3), intracerebral hematoma evacuation (n = 2), and tumor resection (n = 1) via the endaural subtemporal approach were identified. There were no approach-related complications noted. Representative imaging from cadaveric dissection is provided with a stepwise discussion of the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS The endaural subtemporal keyhole craniotomy provides a novel approach to middle fossa skull base pathology, as well as a minimally invasive approach to intra-axial pathology of the temporal lobe and basal ganglia. Further research is needed to establish the limitations and potential complications of this novel approach.

Standard operating procedure and surgical technique innovation in fully endoscopic microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia

Acta Neurochirurgica (2024) 166:351

Microvascular decompression (MVD) is a well-established and effective treatment for primary trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Endoscopy has been implemented to provide a comprehensive view of neurovascular conflict and minimizes the damages of brain retraction during MVD.

Objectives To preliminarily evaluate the surgical safety and efficacy of fully endoscopic microvascular decompression (EMVD) for primary TN with surgeon performing two-hand manipulation and assistant holding endoscope.

Methods Retrospective clinical analysis of 189 patients with primary TN underwent EMVD between June 2019 and August 2022 was performed. By analyzing the intraoperative situation, the outcomes of postoperative symptoms and the main complications, we evaluated the reliability and effectivity of the operative technique in the treatment of primary TN.

Results We summarized the standard operating procedure of EMVD for primary TN with surgeon performing two-hand manipulation and assistant holding endoscope. In addition, acicular bipolar electrocoagulation technique was developed to handle venous compression. During the follow-up period, good pain relief was achieved in 178 patients (94.2%) and recurrence of pain was observed in 4 patients (2.1%). Postoperative temporary complications included trigeminal dysesthesias (7 patients, 4.8%), cerebrospinal fluid leak (2 patients, 1.1%), hearing difficulty (3 patient, 1.6%), facial paresis (2 patients, 1.1%) and vertigo (5 patients, 2.7%). There were no cases of intracranial hemorrhage, cerebellar swelling and death.

Conclusion This EMVD technique is reliable and effective, and can be used as a routine surgical procedure for primary TN.

Generation and applications of synthetic computed tomography images for neurosurgical planning

J Neurosurg 141:742–751, 2024

CT and MRI are synergistic in the information provided for neurosurgical planning. While obtaining both types of images lends unique data from each, doing so adds to cost and exposes patients to additional ionizing radiation after MRI has been performed. Cross-modal synthesis of high-resolution CT images from MRI sequences offers an appealing solution. The authors therefore sought to develop a deep learning conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN) which performs this synthesis.

METHODS Preoperative paired CT and contrast-enhanced MR images were collected for patients with meningioma, pituitary tumor, vestibular schwannoma, and cerebrovascular disease. CT and MR images were denoised, field corrected, and coregistered. MR images were fed to a cGAN that exported a “synthetic” CT scan. The accuracy of synthetic CT images was assessed objectively using the quantitative similarity metrics as well as by clinical features such as sella and internal auditory canal (IAC) dimensions and mastoid/clinoid/sphenoid aeration.

RESULTS A total of 92,981 paired CT/MR images obtained in 80 patients were used for training/testing, and 10,068 paired images from 10 patients were used for external validation. Synthetic CT images reconstructed the bony skull base and convexity with relatively high accuracy. Measurements of the sella and IAC showed a median relative error between synthetic CT scans and ground truth images of 6%, with greater variability in IAC reconstruction compared with the sella. Aerations in the mastoid, clinoid, and sphenoid regions were generally captured, although there was heterogeneity in finer air cell septations. Performance varied based on pathology studied, with the highest limitation observed in evaluating meningiomas with intratumoral calcifications or calvarial invasion.

CONCLUSIONS The generation of high-resolution CT scans from MR images through cGAN offers promise for a wide range of applications in cranial and spinal neurosurgery, especially as an adjunct for preoperative evaluation. Optimizing cGAN performance on specific anatomical regions may increase its clinical viability.

Standard operating procedure and surgical technique innovation in fully endoscopic microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia

Acta Neurochirurgica (2024) 166:351

Microvascular decompression (MVD) is a well-established and effective treatment for primary trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Endoscopy has been implemented to provide a comprehensive view of neurovascular conflict and minimizes the damages of brain retraction during MVD.

Objectives To preliminarily evaluate the surgical safety and efficacy of fully endoscopic microvascular decompression (EMVD) for primary TN with surgeon performing two-hand manipulation and assistant holding endoscope.

Methods Retrospective clinical analysis of 189 patients with primary TN underwent EMVD between June 2019 and August 2022 was performed. By analyzing the intraoperative situation, the outcomes of postoperative symptoms and the main complications, we evaluated the reliability and effectivity of the operative technique in the treatment of primary TN.

Results We summarized the standard operating procedure of EMVD for primary TN with surgeon performing two-hand manipulation and assistant holding endoscope. In addition, acicular bipolar electrocoagulation technique was developed to handle venous compression. During the follow-up period, good pain relief was achieved in 178 patients (94.2%) and recurrence of pain was observed in 4 patients (2.1%). Postoperative temporary complications included trigeminal dysesthesias (7 patients, 4.8%), cerebrospinal fluid leak (2 patients, 1.1%), hearing difficulty (3 patient, 1.6%), facial paresis (2 patients, 1.1%) and vertigo (5 patients, 2.7%). There were no cases of intracranial hemorrhage, cerebellar swelling and death.

Conclusion This EMVD technique is reliable and effective, and can be used as a routine surgical procedure for primary TN.

 

Standard operating procedure and surgical technique innovation in fully endoscopic microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: technical note on 189 patients

Acta Neurochirurgica (2024) 166:351

Microvascular decompression (MVD) is a well-established and effective treatment for primary trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Endoscopy has been implemented to provide a comprehensive view of neurovascular conflict and minimizes the damages of brain retraction during MVD.

Objectives To preliminarily evaluate the surgical safety and efficacy of fully endoscopic microvascular decompression (EMVD) for primary TN with surgeon performing two-hand manipulation and assistant holding endoscope.

Methods Retrospective clinical analysis of 189 patients with primary TN underwent EMVD between June 2019 and August 2022 was performed. By analyzing the intraoperative situation, the outcomes of postoperative symptoms and the main complications, we evaluated the reliability and effectivity of the operative technique in the treatment of primary TN.

Results We summarized the standard operating procedure of EMVD for primary TN with surgeon performing two-hand manipulation and assistant holding endoscope. In addition, acicular bipolar electrocoagulation technique was developed to handle venous compression. During the follow-up period, good pain relief was achieved in 178 patients (94.2%) and recurrence of pain was observed in 4 patients (2.1%). Postoperative temporary complications included trigeminal dysesthesias (7 patients, 4.8%), cerebrospinal fluid leak (2 patients, 1.1%), hearing difficulty (3 patient, 1.6%), facial paresis (2 patients, 1.1%) and vertigo (5 patients, 2.7%). There were no cases of intracranial hemorrhage, cerebellar swelling and death.

Conclusion This EMVD technique is reliable and effective, and can be used as a routine surgical procedure for primary TN.

Transposition versus interposition method in microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia

J Neurosurg 140:1777–1784, 2024

Operative interposition of material between the trigeminal nerve and offending artery for surgical treatment of drug-resistant trigeminal neuralgia (TGN), following the Jannetta method, has been proven to be the most successful invasive treatment. Reexplorations of patients with recurrence of TGN have revealed nerve root irritations and scarring due to interposed material. To prevent these complications, modifications of microvascular decompression (MVD) aim at transposing the vessel away from the trigeminal nerve, without attachment of additional material to the nerve root. Given that both techniques (interposition and transposition) have been performed in the authors’ institution, they decided to analyze them for the short- and midterm outcomes.

METHODS All patients who had undergone MVD for drug-resistant TGN in the authors’ institution between 2008 and 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Outcome at discharge and follow-up was evaluated using the Barrow Neurological Institute pain intensity score. Additionally, complications and pain recurrence were assessed.

RESULTS A total of 114 patients were operated on using transposition and 110 patients were treated using interposition. For transposition 102 patients were followed up for a median of 31.5 months, and for interposition 100 patients were followed up for a median of 95 months. At discharge 92.1% versus 94.5% of patients in the transposition and interposition groups, respectively, experienced a good outcome (Barrow Neurological Institute pain intensity scores I–III). At followup, 83.3% versus 85% of patients in the transposition and interposition groups, respectively, continued to demonstrate a good outcome. In 4.9% of patients in the transposition group and in 6% of patients in the interposition group, recurrence of pain occurred. Complications occurred in 24.6% of patients in the transposition and in 27.3% of those in the interposition group. The most frequent complications were facial hypesthesia (10.5% vs 11.8%, transposition vs interposition), followed by CSF leaks (2.6% vs 8.2%).

CONCLUSIONS Transposition for MVD is an elegant way of solving vessel-nerve conflicts at the cerebellopontine angle. Similar to interposition, transposition shows positive short- and midterm outcomes for patients experiencing drugresistant TGN. However, the main objective of transposition, which is improved prevention of recurrence and reduction of complications at the trigeminal nerve, could not be confirmed in this study.