Addressing Temporal Muscle Atrophy and Enhancing Cranioplasty Outcome

Operative Neurosurgery 30:588–594, 2026

This multicenter prospective study evaluates a dual-layer dural substitute technique during decompressive craniectomy to prevent adhesions between the temporalis muscle and dura, thereby improving subsequent cranioplasty outcomes. Across 59 patients, the method reduced adhesions, preserved temporalis muscle thickness, shortened cranioplasty operative time, minimized blood loss, and eliminated postoperative cranioplasty-related seizures.

The paper details surgical steps, material selection (Neuro-Patch), intraoperative placement of two dural layers, and cranioplasty retrieval of the superficial patch to restore muscle function. Results show improved wound healing metrics, shorter hospital stays, and a low complication profile, while noting limitations including lack of a control group and nonstandardized long-term follow-up.

Problem: After decompressive craniectomy (DC), adhesions commonly form between the temporalis muscle (TM), dura, and brain surface, making later cranioplasty (CP) dissection difficult and increasing risks such as TM injury/atrophy and poor cosmetic outcome.

Technique: During DC, place a dual-layer dural substitute—a large patch for duraplasty plus a second patch beneath the TM (and sometimes an additional patch between TM and subcutaneous tissue)—to preserve a separable plane for future CP.

CP approach: During CP, reopen the prior incision and elevate the musculocutaneous flap between the two Neuro-Patch layers, then remove the patch under the TM and reposition the TM anatomically over the implant.

Study design: Three-year prospective multicenter series of 59 patients undergoing DC then CP; outcomes included adhesion formation, ease of dissection, TM thickness (CT-based), operative time, blood loss, and postoperative events.

Adhesion/TM preservation results: TM elevation during CP was consistently facilitated with nearly absent fibrotic adhesion, and TM thickness remained essentially unchanged pre- vs postoperatively (median 5.6 mm vs 5.5 mm).

Operative metrics: Median CP operative time was 66 minutes vs a previously estimated 105 minutes in centers not using the technique; mean blood loss was 24 mL.

Safety/complications: No reported infections, wound dehiscence, or CSF leak after DC and CP; 0% post-CP new-onset seizures in this cohort.

Conclusion: Dual-layer dural substitute placement during DC can prevent adhesions and improve subsequent CP by facilitating TM elevation, reducing operative time and blood loss, preserving TM integrity, and potentially lowering post-CP epilepsy rates.