Neurosurgery 99:19–29, 2026
This systematic review evaluates intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) use in guiding the extent of posterior fossa decompression (PFD versus PFD+) for Chiari malformation type 1, analyzing nine studies (844 patients) for iUS criteria, conversion rates, and positive predictive values. It finds substantial heterogeneity in acquisition, qualitative versus quantitative criteria, and outcome reporting, limiting iUS’s reliability for intraoperative decision making.
The authors propose a standardized reporting framework emphasizing defined CSF space measurements, dynamic metrics (e.g., CSF flow velocity, tonsillar excursion), triplicate measurements with dual raters, and ≥12-month validated outcomes to enable reproducible research and clearer assessment of iUS utility.
Clinical dilemma Bone-only posterior fossa decompression (PFD) is less invasive, while dural opening/expansion (PFD+) may be more effective but has higher complication risk; intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) is used to help decide whether PFD alone is sufficient, but its role/criteria are not defined.
Evidence base 9 studies (1 prospective, 8 retrospective) totaling 844 patients (pediatric and adult) were included; risk of bias was low in 1 study, moderate in 3, and high in 5.
How iUS was applied iUS was used after bony decompression and before dural opening; none of the studies used iUS after opening the dura.
Decision criteria heterogeneity 8 studies used qualitative criteria (e.g., “enough space,” tonsillar pulsation, piston-like motion, bidirectional flow), and 1 study used a quantitative CSF flow-velocity threshold.
Conversion surgery outcomes “Conversion” (later revision from PFD to PFD+ due to persistent/worsening symptoms) occurred in 35/844 patients (5% overall), with study-level conversion rates from 0% to 16%.
Predictive value variability Positive predictive value (PPV) for iUS-guided PFD success ranged from 0.857 to 1.000 across studies, varying with criteria and study design.
Main conclusion Current evidence does not support iUS as a robust intraoperative test for deciding extent of decompression because of heterogeneous application and lack of standardized assessment criteria; sensitivity/specificity cannot be determined with available data structure.
Proposed path forward A standardized reporting framework is proposed, emphasizing defined acquisition parameters, quantitative/operationalized criteria, validated outcome measures, and ≥12-month follow-up to enable comparability and future pooled analyses.
You must be logged in to post a comment.