Category: meta-analysis

Posted on

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Endovascular Versus Surgical Treatment in Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Spine 2025;50:562–574

This systematic review and meta-analysis reveal that surgical treatment for spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVFs) achieves higher rates of complete occlusion and successful treatment compared to endovascular approaches, with lower recurrence and retreatment rates, despite similar neurological improvements and periprocedural complications.

• Objective: Compare the efficacy and safety of surgical vs. endovascular treatments for spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVFs) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

• Methods: Searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases until July 2024, identifying 1192 articles, with 40 studies meeting inclusion criteria, involving 1818 patients.

• Results: Surgical treatment showed higher rates of complete occlusion (96.8%) and successful treatment (97.5%) compared to endovascular treatment (72.5% and 66.7%, respectively).

• Recurrence and Retreatment: Lower rates in the surgical group, with endovascular treatment showing higher initial treatment failure.

• Neurological Improvement: Both treatments had similar improvements in neurological status and periprocedural complications, but surgery showed greater improvement in the ALS score.

• Conclusion: Surgical treatment is preferred for definitive results in SDAVFs, but decisions should be individualized based on patient-specific factors. Further research is needed.

• Limitations: Potential publication bias and heterogeneity among included studies.

• Key Insight: This study is the most updated and comprehensive meta-analysis on SDAVF treatments, providing valuable insights for clinical and policy decisions.

Posted on

Laser interstitial thermal therapy for cavernous malformations: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data

J Neurosurg 142:1014–1024, 2025

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) shows promise for treating cavernous malformations, offering high seizure freedom rates and significant CM volume reduction. Immediate neurological deficits are a risk but often transient. Further research is needed for long-term outcomes and safety validation.

• Study Objective: Evaluate laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) for cavernous malformations (CMs).

• Methodology: PRISMA-compliant systematic review and patient-level data meta-analysis.

• Patient Demographics: 39 patients, 28 with epilepsy, treated at six centers.

• Seizure Freedom Rate: 88% at last follow-up for epilepsy patients.

• Immediate Postoperative Deficits: 15.4% experienced transient neurological deficits.

• CM Volume Reduction: 73.7% for epileptogenic, 53.8% for nonepileptogenic CMs.

• No Perioperative Hemorrhage: No reported hemorrhages during or after procedures.

• Study Limitations: Small patient cohort, limited follow-up time.

• Predictors of Seizure Freedom: No significant predictors identified.

• Adverse Events Analysis: No significant predictors for adverse events post-LITT.

• Radiographic Outcomes: No significant differences based on CM location.

• Pooled Effect Size Analysis: Frequentist and Bayesian models used for volume reduction estimates.

• Future Research Needs: Larger cohorts and longer follow-up required for validation.

Posted on

Is It Justified to Sacrifice the Pituitary Stalk During Craniopharyngioma Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Neurosurgery 96:725–733, 2025

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the impact of pituitary stalk sacrifice during craniopharyngioma surgery. It found that sacrificing the stalk significantly increases the risk of postoperative endocrine dysfunction without reducing tumor recurrence or progression, highlighting the importance of preserving the stalk when possible.

• Pituitary stalk sacrifice increases risk of endocrine dysfunction without reducing recurrence risk.

• Preservation of the pituitary stalk is recommended whenever possible.

• Fourteen studies with 2074 patients were included in the meta-analysis.

• Stalk sacrifice associated with higher endocrine dysfunction risk (OR = 6.69, P < .0001).

• No significant decrease in recurrence risk with stalk sacrifice (OR = 0.80, P = .13).

• Retrospective studies were included, no randomized trials.

• Endoscopic endonasal and transcranial approaches were evaluated.

• Molecular biology factors like β-catenin mutations affect recurrence risk.

• Confounding factors like age and preoperative endocrinopathy impact outcomes.

• Future prospective studies recommended to assess confounding factors.

• Stalk preservation linked to better outcomes in normal preoperative endocrine function.

• Radiation therapy recommended post-GTR for β-catenin positive cases to prevent progression.

• Stalk preservation does not increase recurrence/progression risk according to multiple studies.

Posted on

Effect of pituitary stalk preservation during craniopharyngioma removal on pituitary function, extent of resection, and recurrence: systematic review and meta-analysis

J Neurosurg 142:741–755, 2025

The meta-analysis evaluates the impact of pituitary stalk preservation during craniopharyngioma surgery on pituitary function, resection extent, and recurrence. Preservation reduces diabetes insipidus risk but may increase incomplete resection risk in pediatric patients. Results are cautious due to small study sizes and reporting biases.

• Pituitary stalk preservation reduces risk of postoperative diabetes insipidus (DI) and anterior pituitary dysfunction.

• Preservation shows no significant impact on tumor recurrence or extent of resection.

• Pediatric patients face higher risk of incomplete resection with stalk preservation.

• Meta-analysis included 33 studies with 2366 patients.

• Significant heterogeneity observed in DI and recurrence risk across studies.

• Stalk preservation benefits posterior pituitary function long-term, not anterior.

• High risk of bias in individual studies; findings should be interpreted cautiously.

• Subgroup analysis highlights higher recurrence risk in pediatric stalk preservation.

• Egger’s test indicates publication bias in DI analysis.

• Previous meta-analysis by Li et al. lacked age stratification and EEA cases.

• Authors recommend careful consideration of stalk preservation in pediatric cases.

• Lack of age-stratified data limits analysis and may increase bias.

• Study methods followed PRISMA guidelines, with data extracted from eligible studies

Posted on

Anterior choroidal artery aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes and ischemic complications following surgical and endovascular treatment

J Neurosurg 142:127–137, 2025

Anterior choroidal artery (AChA) aneurysms account for 2%–5% of all intracranial aneurysms. Treatment considerations include microsurgical clipping, flow diversion, or coiling with or without adjunctive devices. AChA aneurysms pose challenges in treatment due to the origination of the aneurysm from the origin or proximal segment of the AChA. The AChA is particularly susceptible to vasospasm and occlusion during treatment with devastating neurological deficits, including hemiparesis, hemianesthesia, lethargy, neglect, and hemianopia. In this study, the authors performed a meta-analysis to quantify the outcomes and complication rates across treatment modalities for AChA aneurysms and to identify risk factors reported in the literature.

METHODS The authors performed a systematic review of AChA aneurysms treated with surgical clipping, endovascular coiling, or flow diversion and reported in the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane search databases. Single-arm meta-analyses of the selected outcomes were performed in RStudio.

RESULTS Literature review yielded 25 studies that met the inclusion criteria. In total, 1627 patients were included in the analysis, with 554 males, 1009 females, and 64 unspecified. The rate of any complication in the full cohort was 11.6%, with a rate of ischemic complications of 5.5% and a favorable recovery rate of 90.3% of all patients treated. In total, 1064 patients underwent surgical clipping, 443 were treated with coiling, and 120 patients with flow diversion. In clipped patients, the rate of total surgical complications was 17.6%, with an ischemic complication rate of 9.4%. The rate of good functional recovery, defined on the basis of a Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 4–5 or modified Rankin Scale score of 0–2, was 88.0%, and complete obliteration was achieved in 84.5% of surgically clipped aneurysms. The complication rate in coiled patients was 10.3%, with an ischemic complication rate of 3.0%. Good functional recovery was achieved in 88.6% of coiled patients and complete aneurysm obliteration in 74.1%. Flow diversion resulted in a complication rate of 1.3%, with 0.7% rate of ischemic complications. Good functional recovery was achieved in 98.4% of patients and complete aneurysm obliteration in 79.0% in the flow diversion group. Aneurysm morphological features that impacted the complication rate were also identified to augment quantitative data and to help guide treatment selection for AChA aneurysms.

CONCLUSIONS Flow diversion showed significantly lower total and ischemic complications and improved outcomes compared to clipping and coiling. There may be differences in outcomes between treatment types, especially when considering the varied patient presentations that guide treatment selection.

Posted on

Endoscopic Versus Traditional Thoracic Discectomy: A Multicenter Retrospective Case Series and Meta-Analysis

Neurosurgery 96:152–171, 2025

Surgical treatment for symptomatic thoracic disc herniations (TDH) involves invasive open surgical approaches with relatively high complication rates and prolonged hospital stays. Although advantages of full endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) are well-established in lumbar disc herniations, data are limited for the endoscopic treatment of TDH despite potential benefits regarding surgical invasiveness. The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive evaluation of potential benefits of FESS for the treatment of TDH.

METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus were systematically searched for the term “thoracic disc herniation” up to March 2023 and study quality appraised with a subsequent meta-analysis. Primary outcomes were perioperative complications, need for instrumentation, and reoperations. Simultaneously, we performed a multicenter retrospective evaluation of outcomes in patients undergoing full endoscopic thoracic discectomy.

RESULTS: We identified 3190 patients from 108 studies for the traditional thoracic discectomy meta-analysis. Pooled incidence rates of complications were 25% (95% CI 0.22-0.29) for perioperative complications and 7% (95% CI 0.05-0.09) for reoperation. In this cohort, 37% (95% CI 0.26-0.49) of patients underwent instrumentation. The pooled mean for estimated blood loss for traditional approaches was 570 mL (95% CI 477.3-664.1) and 7.0 days (95% CI 5.91-8.14) for length of stay. For FESS, 41 patients from multiple institutions were retrospectively reviewed, perioperative complications were reported in 4 patients (9.7%), 4 (9.7%) required revision surgery, and 6 (14.6%) required instrumentation. Median blood loss was 5 mL (IQR 5-10), and length of stay was 0.43 days (IQR 0-1.23).

CONCLUSION: The results suggest that full endoscopic thoracic discectomy is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with symptomatic TDH. When compared with open surgical approaches, FESS dramatically diminishes invasiveness, the rate of complications, and need for prolonged hospitalizations. Full endoscopic spine surgery has the capacity to alter the standard of care for TDH treatment toward an elective outpatient surgery.

Posted on

Optimal Timing of Microsurgical Treatment for Ruptured Arteriovenous Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Neurosurgery 96:18–28, 2025

The timing of microsurgical treatment (MST) for ruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVM) is a contentious issue in the literature. This study aimed to investigate the impact of MST timing on outcomes in patients with ruptured bAVMs, considering MST with and without preoperative endovascular treatment (EVT).

METHOD: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases, yielding 15 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. The timing was defined as the duration from the rupture of bAVM to the MST. The patients were divided into 4 different groups based on MST timing: <48 hours, <1 week, <2 weeks, and <1 month. The primary outcome was favorable outcome defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 or a Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 4 to 5 in the last clinical follow-up. Secondary outcomes included periprocedural mortality and complete excision.

RESULTS: MST time >48 hours were associated with a significantly higher favorable outcome rate (odds ratio: 9.71, 95% Cl: 3.09-30.57, P < .01) and a lower mortality rate (OR: 0.15, 95% Cl: 0.02-0.88, P = .04) compared with MST timing ≤48 hours. After exclusion of patients who underwent MST with preoperative EVT, MST time >48 hours had a significantly higher rate of favorable outcome (OR: 9.39, 95% CI: 2.53-34.89, P < .01).

CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that delayed surgical intervention beyond 48 hours may be associated with improved favorable outcomes in patients who underwent MST with and without preoperative EVT for ruptured bAVMs.

Posted on

Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomies for Surgical Correction of Fixed Sagittal Imbalance: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Neurosurgery 95:1223–1231, 2024

Disruption of the spine’s sagittal balance is associated with significant negative impacts on quality of life. Compared with other spinal osteotomies, pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), which can potentially offer greater correction, is considered technically challenging and performed at lower rates. The aim of this study was to review the use of PSO to correct fixed sagittal imbalance and assess its efficacy and associated perioperative complications.

METHODS: In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, the PubMed, EBSCO host, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar databases were queried for full-text English manuscripts published from 1961 to 2022, exploring PSO for the management of fixed sagittal imbalance. Studies were included if they reported preoperative and postoperative radiographic measurements. The mean Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS) for included articles was 9.6 ± 1.1. The outcomes of interest included etiology, operative time, blood loss, complications, radiographic outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using a random-effects, inverse variance-weighted meta-analysis of observational data. Pre and postoperative radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared using a Student t-test.

RESULTS: Fourteen studies with 595 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that the mean operative time was 7.2 ± 2.0 hours, and the average blood loss was 2033 ± 629 mL. After PSO, there was a significant improvement in sagittal vertebral axis (12.41-3.92 cm, P = .0003), LL (13.35°-42.60°, P = .000002), PSO angle (5.11°to À26.91°, P = .0001), and Oswestry Disability Index (55.36-27.35, P = .02). Common complications include pseudarthrosis (8.1%), neurological deficits (7.8%), and proximal junctional failure (6.0%).

CONCLUSION: PSO offers significant correction of sagittal vertebral axis, lumbar lordosis, PSO angle, and Oswestry Disability Index scores despite its reduced utilization in recent years. Blood loss and high complication rates must be considered when evaluating the efficacy of this procedure; however, surgeon experience and operative techniques can be used to reduce morbidity.

Posted on

Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy versus Open Surgery for Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

World Neurosurg. (2024) 192:224-235

Epilepsy surgery offers a vital treatment option for drug-resistant mesial temporal lobe epilepsy, with temporal lobe resection (TLR) and magnetic resonanceguided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) being fundamental interventions.

This meta-analysis specifically examines seizure outcomes at extended follow-up periods exceeding 24 months, visual field deficits as measured by perimetry, and complication rates both overall and categorized based on duration as minor (transient <6 months) or major (persistent >6 months) to inform clinical decision-making.

For seizure freedom, TLR was superior, with 72.5% [65.6%, 78.5%] of patients achieving postoperative seizure freedom compared to 57.1% [51.2%, 62.7%] for MRgLITT (P value <0.01). Visual field deficits were observed in 79.4% [59.5%, 91.0%] of TLR patients and 49.8% [23.6%, 76.0%] of MRgLITT patients, a difference not reaching statistical significance (P value: 0.08). Overall complication rates were 11.4% [7.4%, 17.2%] for TLR and 6.5% [3.3%, 12.3%] for MRgLITT (P value 0.15). Major complications occurred in 2.0% [1.1%, 3.09%] of TLR cases and 2.7% [1.4%, 5.2%] of MRgLITT cases (P value 0.54), while minor complications were significantly more frequent with TLR at 9.9% [6.4%, 15.0%] versus MRgLITT’s 4.1% [1.9%, 8.4%] (P value 0.04). MRgLITT had a more favorable outcome regarding confrontation naming, while more studies are needed regarding verbal memory to be able to draw firm conclusions. TLR provides superior seizure freedom but comes with an increased risk of transient complications. Although there was no statistical significance in visual field deficits, the trend suggests a higher frequency with TLR.

The study’s extensive data analysis, including rigorous sensitivity checks, ensures the robustness of these conclusions, reflecting a comprehensive analysis of the available data at this time point.

Posted on

Antibiotic-Impregnated Ventriculoperitoneal Shunts Decrease Bacterial Shunt Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Neurosurgery 95:1263–1273, 2024

Antibiotic-impregnated shunts seem to be beneficial in preventing bacterial infections and decreasing mortality by effectively inhibiting microbial growth in the shunt system and reducing the risk of shunt-associated infections. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic-impregnated shunt catheters (AISC) in reducing the incidence of bacterial shunt infection in patients with hydrocephalus.

METHODS: The protocol was registered on PROSPERO. A meta-analysis was conducted by searching 3 databases (PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL) for relevant randomized controlled trials and observational studies. We included all studies published until November 2022 in any language. The primary outcome was the rate of bacterial infections, whereas the rate of shunt failure was our secondary endpoint. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI were calculated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS: A total of 27 articles with 27 266 shunt operations were included in this study. The results indicated that using AISC is significantly associated with reduction in infections (OR = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.33-0.54). Regarding shunt failure, there was a tendency in favor of AISC use (OR = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.51-1.06).

CONCLUSION: Our study provided evidence that AISC is significantly associated with the reduction in the rate of bacterial ventriculoperitoneal-shunt infection. In addition, there was a tendency toward AISC to decrease shunt failure compared with the standard shunt.

Posted on

Segmental Sagittal Alignment in Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Review of Evidence-Based Evaluation of Preoperative Measurement, Surgical Planning, Intraoperative Execution, and Postoperative Evaluation

Operative Neurosurgery 27:533–548, 2024

Maintaining and restoring global and regional sagittal alignment is a well-established priority that improves patient outcomes in patients with adult spinal deformity. However, the benefit of restoring segmental (level-by-level) alignment in lumbar fusion for degenerative conditions is not widely agreed on. The purpose of this review was to summarize intraoperative techniques to achieve segmental fixation and the impact of segmental lordosis on patient-reported and surgical outcomes.

METHODS: In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were queried for the literature reporting lumbar alignment for degenerative lumbar spinal pathology. Reports were assessed for data regarding the impact of intraoperative surgical factors on postoperative segmental sagittal alignment and patient-reported outcome measures. Included studies were further categorized into groups related to patient positioning, fusion and fixation, and interbody device (technique, material, angle, and augmentation).

RESULTS: A total of 885 studies were screened, of which 43 met inclusion criteria examining segmental rather than regional or global alignment. Of these, 3 examined patient positioning, 8 examined fusion and fixation, 3 examined case parameters, 26 examined or compared different interbody fusion techniques, 5 examined postoperative patient-reported outcomes, and 3 examined the occurrence of adjacent segment disease. The data support a link between segmental alignment and patient positioning, surgical technique, and adjacent segment disease but have insufficient evidence to support a relationship with patient-reported outcomes, cage subsidence, or pseudoarthrosis.

CONCLUSION: This review explores segmental correction’s impact on short-segment lumbar fusion outcomes, finding the extent of correction to depend on patient positioning and choice of interbody cage. Notably, inadequate restoration of lumbar lordosis is associated with adjacent segment degeneration. Nevertheless, conclusive evidence linking segmental alignment to patient-reported outcomes, cage subsidence, or pseudoarthrosis remains limited, underscoring the need for future research.

Posted on

Comparison of accuracy, revision, and perioperative outcomes in robot-assisted spine surgeries: systematic review and meta-analysis

J Neurosurg Spine 41:519–531, 2024

Pedicle screw placement guidance is critical in spinal fusions, and spinal surgery robots aim to improve accuracy and reduce complications. Current literature has yet to compare the relative merits of available robotic systems. In this review, the authors aimed to 1) assess the current state of spinal robotics literature; 2) conduct a meta-analysis of robotic performance based on accuracy, speed, and safety; and 3) offer recommendations for robotic system selection.

METHODS Following PRISMA guidelines, the authors conducted a systematic literature review across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus as of April 28, 2022, for studies on approved robots for placing lumbar pedicle screws. Three reviewers screened and extracted data relating to the study characteristics, accuracy rate, intraoperative revisions, and reoperations. Secondary performance metrics included operative time, blood loss, and radiation exposure. The authors statistically compared the performance of the robots using a random-effects model to account for variation within and between the studies. Each robot was also compared with performance benchmarks of traditional techniques including freehand, fluoroscopic, and CT-navigated insertion. Finally, we performed a Duval and Tweedie trim-and-fill test to assess for the presence of publication bias.

RESULTS The authors identified 46 studies, describing 4670 patients and 25,054 screws, that evaluated 4 different robotic systems: Mazor X, ROSA, ExcelsiusGPS, and Cirq. The weighted accuracy rates of Gertzbein-Robbins classification grade A or B screws were as follows: ExcelsiusGPS, 98.0%; ROSA, 98.0%; Mazor, 98.2%; and Cirq, 94.2%. No robot was significantly more accurate than the others. However, the accuracy of the ExcelsiusGPS was significantly higher than that of traditional methods, and the accuracies of the Mazor and ROSA were significantly higher than that of fluoroscopy. The intraoperative revision rates were Cirq, 0.55%; ROSA, 0.91%; Mazor, 0.98%; and ExcelsiusGPS, 1.08%. The reoperation rates were Cirq, 0.28%; ExcelsiusGPS, 0.32%; and Mazor, 0.76% (no reoperations were reported for ROSA). Operative times were similar for all robots. Both the ExcelsiusGPS and Mazor were associated with significantly less blood loss than the ROSA. The Cirq had the lowest radiation exposure. Robots tended to be more accurate and generally their use was associated with fewer reoperations and less blood loss than freehand, fluoroscopic, or CT-navigated techniques.

CONCLUSIONS Robotic platforms perform comparably based on key metrics, with high accuracy rates and low intraoperative revision and reoperation rates. The spinal robotics publication rate will continue to accelerate, and choosing a robot will depend on the context of the practice.

Posted on

Radiographic Risk Factors for Adjacent Segment Disease Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Global Spine Journal 2024, Vol. 14(7) 2183–2200

Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objectives: To assess the radiographic risk factors for adjacent segment disease (ASD) following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for degenerative cervical spine pathologies.

Methods: PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library databases were searched up to December 2023. The primary inclusion criteria were degenerative spinal conditions treated with ACDF, comparing radiological parameters in patients with and without postoperative ASD. The radiographic parameters included intervertebral disc height, cervical sagittal alignment, sagittal segmental alignment, range of motion, segmental height, T1 slope, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), thoracic inlet angle (TIA), and plate to disc distance (PPD). Risk of bias was assessed for all studies. The Cochrane Review Manager was utilized to perform the meta-analysis.

Results: From 7044 articles, 13 retrospective studies were included in the final analysis. Three studies had “not serious” bias and the other 10 studies had serious or very serious bias. The total number of patients in the included studies was 1799 patients. Five studies included single-level ACDF, 2 studies included multi-level ACDF, and 6 studies included single or multi-level ACDF. On meta-analysis, the significant risk factors associated with ASD development were reduced postoperative cervical lordosis (mean difference [MD] = 3.35°, P = .002), reduced last-follow-up cervical lordosis (MD = À3.02°, P = .0003), increased preoperative to postoperative cervical sagittal alignment change (MD = À3.68°, P = .03), and the presence of developmental cervical canal stenosis (Odds ratio [OR] = 4.17, P < .001).

Conclusions: Decreased postoperative cervical lordosis, greater change in cervical sagittal alignment and developmental cervical canal stenosis were associated with an increased risk of ASD following ACDF.

Posted on

The Safety and Efficacy of Dorsal Root Entry Zone Lesioning for Pain Management in Patients With Brachial Plexus Avulsion

Neurosurgery 95:259–274, 2024

Persistent neuropathic pain after brachial plexus avulsion (BPA) is common and generally nonresponsive to medical management. Dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) lesioning is the last resort for pain management in patients with BPA. This study aims to investigate and compare the outcomes and complications of DREZ procedures.

METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify all related studies. Comparisons were based on the number of patients with preoperative pain vs postoperative pain, with the effect size calculated using the risk ratio. Mean visual analog scale (VAS) scores were extracted and analyzed between interventions. A meta-regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for final outcomes. The rates of complications were also assessed and analyzed between interventions.

RESULTS: A total of 30 studies with 917 patients (90.0% male and 10.0% female, mean age: 42.9 ± 16.6) were included in this systematic review. Of the 917 patients who underwent surgery, 655 (71.4%) patients had significant pain reduction at the last follow-up (P < .05). The weighted mean preoperative VAS score was 8.3 ± 1.3, compared with postoperative VAS scores (1.9 ± 2.2); a significant improvement was observed (P < .05). The subgroup analysis showed that microsurgical DREZotomy (MDT) is associated with better outcomes in terms of VAS score improvements compared with radiofrequency (RF)-assisted DREZ lesioning (P < .05). Meta-analysis showed that the relative risk of motor deficits was significantly lower in the MDT group, compared with the RF-assisted group (P < .05). Meta-regression showed that older age is correlated with an elevated risk of postoperative motor deficits compared with the incidence of sensory loss.

CONCLUSION: DREZ lesioning is effective for intractable pain alleviation after BPA. Compared with RF-assisted DREZ lesioning, MDT is associated with better VAS score improvements and a lower rate of postoperative motor weakness.

Posted on

Benefits of stereotactic radiosurgical anterior capsulotomy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a meta-analysis

J Neurosurg 141:394–405, 2024

Anterior capsulotomy (AC) is a therapeutic option for patients with severe, treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The procedure can be performed via multiple techniques, with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) gaining popularity because of its minimally invasive nature. The risk-benefit profile of AC performed specifically with SRS has not been well characterized. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to characterize outcomes following stereotactic radiosurgical AC in OCD patients.

METHODS Studies assessing mean Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) scores before and after stereotactic radiosurgical AC for OCD were included in this analysis. Inverse-variance fixed-effect modeling was used for pooling, and random-effects estimate of the ratio of means and standard mean differences were calculated at 6 months, 12 months, and the last follow-up for Y-BOCS scores, as well as the last follow-up for the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)/BDI-II scores. A generalized linear mixed model was used to generate fixed- and random-effects models for categorical outcomes. Univariate random-effects meta-regression was used to evaluate associations between postoperative Y-BOCS scores and study covariates. Adverse events were summed across studies. Publication bias was assessed with Begg’s test.

RESULTS Eleven studies with 180 patients were eligible for inclusion. The mean Y-BOCS score decreased from 33.28 to 17.45 at the last-follow up (p < 0.001). Sixty percent of patients were classified as responders and 10% as partial responders, 18% experienced remission, and 4% had worsened Y-BOCS scores. The degree of improvement in the Y-BOCS score correlated with time since surgery (p = 0.046). In the random-effects model, the mean BDI at the last follow-up was not significantly different from that preoperatively. However, in an analysis performed with available paired pre- and postoperative BDI/BDI-II scores, there was significant improvement in the BDI/BDI-II scores postoperatively. Adverse events numbered 235, with headaches, weight change, mood changes, worsened depression/anxiety, and apathy occurring most commonly.

CONCLUSIONS Stereotactic radiosurgical AC is an effective technique for treating OCD. Its efficacy is similar to that of AC performed via other lesioning techniques.

Posted on

Interbody cages versus structural bone grafts in lumbar arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

J Neurosurg Spine 41:188–198, 2024

The role of interbodies in lumbar arthrodesis has been insufficiently supported by evidence, impacting clinical decision-making and occasionally insurance coverage. This study aimed to compare clinical and radiological outcomes between lumbar arthrodesis with a synthetic interbody spacer (cage) versus structural bone graft alone (autograft or allograft) in patients with degenerative spine disease.

METHODS A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify studies directly comparing outcomes of lumbar interbody arthrodesis with and without interbody cage use. The outcomes of individual studies were synthesized in meta-analyses using random-effects models.

RESULTS Twenty studies with 1508 patients (769 with an interbody cage and 739 without an interbody cage) were included. Interbody cage placement was associated with a significantly greater increase in disc height after surgery (4.0 mm vs 3.4 mm, p < 0.01). There was a significantly greater reduction of back pain (visual analog scale [VAS] score) in cases in which an interbody cage was used (5.4 vs 4.7, p = 0.03). Fusion rates were 5.5% higher in the cage group (96.3% vs 90.8%) and reached statistical significance (p = 0.03). No statistically significant differences were identified between the two groups regarding all-cause reoperation rates, complication rates, or improvement in Oswestry Disability Index score or leg pain (VAS score).

CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that implantation of an interbody cage is associated with higher rates of fusion, more effective maintenance of disc height, and greater improvement of back pain. This study underlines the clinical value of interbody cages in lumbar arthrodesis for patients with degenerative spine disease.

Posted on

Radiosurgery With Prior Embolization Versus Radiosurgery Alone for Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations

Neurosurgery 94:478–496, 2024

The addition of adjuvant embolization to radiosurgery has been proposed as a means of improving treatment outcomes of intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). However, the relative efficacy and safety of radiosurgery with adjuvant embolization vs radiosurgery alone remain uncertain. Moreover, previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have included a limited number of studies and did not consider the effects of baseline characteristics, including AVM volume, on the outcomes. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of preradiosurgery embolization for intracranial AVMs with consideration to matching status between participants in each treatment group.

METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, up to January 2023. All studies evaluating the utilization of preradiosurgery embolization were included.

RESULTS: A total of 70 studies (9 matched and 71 unmatched) with a total of 12 088 patients were included. The mean age of the included patients was 32.41 years, and 48.91% of the patients were female. Preradiosurgery embolization was used for larger AVMs and patients with previous hemorrhage (P < .01, P = .02, respectively). The obliteration rate for preradiosurgery embolization (49.44%) was lower compared with radiosurgery alone (61.42%, odds ratio = 0.56, P < .01), regardless of the matching status of the analyzed studies. Although prior embolization was associated higher rate of cyst formation (P = .04), it lowered the odds of radiation-induced changes (P = .04). The risks of minor and major neurological deficits, postradiosurgery hemorrhage, and mortality were comparable between groups.

CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that although preradiosurgery embolization is a suitable option to reduce the AVM size for future radiosurgical interventions, it may not be useful for same-sized AVMs eligible for radiosurgery. Utilization of preradiosurgery embolization in suitable lesions for radiosurgery may result in the added cost and burden of an endovascular procedure.

Posted on

Nonoperative versus operative management of type II odontoid fracture in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

J Neurosurg Spine 40:45–53, 2024

Odontoid fractures are the most common fracture of the cervical spine in adults older than 65 years of age. Fracture management remains controversial, given the inherently increased surgical risks in older patients. The objective of this study was to compare fusion rates and outcomes between operative and nonoperative treatments of type II odontoid fractures in the older population.

METHODS A systematic literature review was performed to identify studies reporting the management of type II odontoid fractures in patients older than 65 years from database inception to September 2022. A meta-analysis was performed to compare rates of fusion, stable and unstable nonunion, mortality, and complication.

RESULTS Forty-six articles were included in the final review. There were 2822 patients included in the different studies (48.9% female, 51.1% male), with a mean ± SD age of 81.5 ± 3.6 years. Patients in the operative group were significantly younger than patients in the nonoperative group (81.5 ± 3.5 vs 83.4 ± 2.5 years, p < 0.001). The overall (operative and nonoperative patients) fusion rate was 52.9% (720/1361). The fusion rate was higher in patients who underwent surgery (74.3%) than in those who underwent nonoperative management (40.3%) (OR 4.27, 95% CI 3.36–5.44). The likelihood of stable or unstable nonunion was lower in patients who underwent surgery (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.28–0.49 vs OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.22–0.47). Overall, 4.8% (46/964) of nonoperatively managed patients subsequently required surgery due to treatment failure. Patient mortality across all studies was 16.6% (452/2721), lower in the operative cohort (13.2%) than the nonoperative cohort (19.0%) (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.52–0.80). Complications were more likely in patients who underwent surgery (26.0% vs 18.5%) (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.23–1.95). Length of stay was also higher with surgery (13.6 ± 3.8 vs 8.1 ± 1.9 days, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS Patients older than 65 years of age with type II odontoid fractures had higher fusion rates when treated with surgery and higher stable nonunion rates when managed nonoperatively. Complications and length of stay were higher in the surgical cohort. Mortality rates were lower in patients managed with surgery, but this phenomenon could be related to surgical selection bias. Fewer than 5% of patients who underwent nonoperative treatment required revision surgery due to treatment failure, suggesting that stable nonunion is an acceptable treatment goal.

Posted on

Awake Versus Asleep Craniotomy for Patients With Eloquent Glioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Neurosurgery 94:38–52, 2024

Awake vs asleep craniotomy for patients with eloquent glioma is debatable. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to compare awake vs asleep craniotomy for the resection of gliomas in the eloquent regions. METHODS: MEDLINE and PubMed were searched from inception to December 13, 2022. Primary outcomes were the extent of resection (EOR), overall survival (month), progression-free survival (month), and rates of neurological deficit, Karnofsky performance score, and seizure freedom at the 3-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were duration of operation (minute) and length of hospital stay (LOS) (day).

RESULTS: Fifteen studies yielded 2032 patients, from which 800 (39.4%) and 1232 (60.6%) underwent awake and asleep craniotomy, respectively. The meta-analysis concluded that the awake group had greater EOR (mean difference [MD]= MD= 8.52 [4.28, 12.76], P < .00001), overall survival (MD = 2.86 months [1.35, 4.37], P = .0002), progression-free survival (MD = 5.69 months [0.75, 10.64], P = .02), 3-month postoperative Karnofsky performance score (MD = 13.59 [11.08, 16.09], P < .00001), and 3-month postoperative seizure freedom (odds ratio = 8.72 [3.39, 22.39], P < .00001). Furthermore, the awake group had lower 3-month postoperative neurological deficit (odds ratio = 0.47 [0.28, 0.78], P = .004) and shorter LOS (MD = -2.99 days [-5.09, -0.88], P = .005). In addition, the duration of operation was similar between the groups (MD = 37.88 minutes [-34.09, 109.86], P = .30).

CONCLUSION: Awake craniotomy for gliomas in the eloquent regions benefits EOR, survival, postoperative neurofunctional outcomes, and LOS. When feasible, the authors recommend awake craniotomy for surgical resection of gliomas in the eloquent regions.

Posted on

Modic Changes Increase the Cage Subsidence Rate in Spinal Interbody Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of different Modic changes (MC) grades on the cage subsidence rate after spinal interbody fusion surgery.

METHODS: We comprehensively searched the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception to August 13, 2023, for relevant randomized controlled trials and prospective and retrospective cohort studies. Review Manager 5.3 and STATA13.0 were used to conduct this meta-analysis. The subsidence rate was assessed using relative risk and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS: Six studies with a total of 716 segments were allocated to four groups according to the type of MC. The subsidence rate in the non-Modic changes (NMC) was significantly lower than that in the MC. The subsidence rate in the NMC was significantly lower than that in the MC in the subgroup of cages with extra instrumentation. No significant difference was identified between the 2 groups in the oblique lumbar interbody fusion subgroup. The subsidence rate in the NMC was significantly lower than that in the MC in the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion subgroup. The subsidence rate in the NMC was significantly lower than that in the MC1 and MC2. We found no significant difference between NMC and MC3, MC1 and MC2, MC1 and MC3, or MC2 and MC3.

CONCLUSIONS: MC may be associated with a higher cage subsidence rate. With the increase in MC grades, the incidence of subsidence decreased gradually, but it was always higher than that in the NMC. Oblique lumbar interbody fusion may be a better choice for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease with MC.

Proudly powered by WordPress