Category: Spine

Posted on

Results After Lumbar Decompression With and Without Discectomy: Comparison of the Transspinous and Conventional Approaches

Neurosurgery 66[ONS Suppl 1]:ons152-ons160, 2010 DOI: : 10.1227/01.NEU.0000365826.15986.40

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of the transspinous approach compared with the conventional approach in single-level lumbar laminotomies with and without discectomies.
METHODS: Forty consecutive patients underwent single-level lumbar decompression with or without a discectomy. The first 20 patients underwent surgery by the conventional approach (11 with discectomy and 9 without), and the transspinous approach was used in the remaining 20 patients (11 with discectomy and 9 without). Results between the groups were assessed by comparing the following measures: length of inpatient hospital stay, postoperative pain and analgesia use, estimated blood loss, rate of postoperative disability and complications, and incision length.
RESULTS: The groups did not differ significantly with respect to age, level of pathology, insurance status, or type of analgesia used. The primary outcome was physical disability, measured using the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. The secondary outcome was pain intensity, measured using the Brief Pain Inventory. Patients who underwent the transspinous approach had better outcomes across all measures with significance appreciated in those who underwent transspinous decompression with discectomies. Other statistically significant differences were identified in incision length and postoperative analgesia use at the end of 1 week. No statistically significant differences were identified in the rates of complications, estimated blood loss, inpatient narcotic analgesia use, or length of inpatient hospital stay.
CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent single-level lumbar decompression with or without discectomy had similar outcomes as those who underwent the conventional approach. Although of modest clinical significance, the transspinous approach may afford early mobilization and reduced postoperative pain while providing a satisfactory neurological and functional outcome.

Posted on

Overview of disc arthroplasty—past, present and future

Acta Neurochir (2010) 152:393–404. DOI 10.1007/s00701-009-0529-5

Degenerative disc disease is one of the most frequent spinal disorders. The anatomy and the biomechanics of the intervertebral disc are very complex, and the pathomechanics of its degeneration are poorly understood. Despite this complexity and uncertainty, great advances have been made in the field of disc replacement technology, with promising results. Difficulties are continuously being encountered, but careful analysis of the results and intensive research and development will assist in countering these problems. There are approximately 40 clinical reports in the literature describing various aspects of randomised controlled trials involving intervertebral disc arthroplasty. However, the majority of these publications do not provide reliable information, in that they give only interim results and/or the results from just one of the many centres in multicentre studies. Such publications must be interpreted with caution, since they do not always represent the results of the whole study population and may hence be underpowered. We identified six randomised controlled trials that compared the final clinical outcomes of disc arthroplasty and spinal fusion. The present systematic review attempts to give an overview of the current status of disc arthroplasty.

Posted on

Comparative fixation methods of cervical disc arthroplasty versus conventional methods of anterior cervical arthrodesis: serration, teeth, keels, or screws?

J Neurosurg Spine 12:214–220, 2010 (DOI: 10.3171/2009.9.SPINE08952)

Object. Using a synthetic vertebral model, the authors quantified the comparative fixation strengths and failure mechanisms of 6 cervical disc arthroplasty devices versus 2 conventional methods of cervical arthrodesis, highlighting biomechanical advantages of prosthetic endplate fixation properties.
Methods. Eight cervical implant configurations were evaluated in the current investigation: 1) PCM Low Profile; 2) PCM V-Teeth; 3) PCM Modular Flange; 4) PCM Fixed Flange; 5) Prestige LP; 6) Kineflex/C disc; 7) anterior cervical plate + interbody cage; and 8  ) tricortical iliac crest. All PCM treatments contained a serrated implant surface (0.4 mm). The PCM V-Teeth and Prestige contained 2 additional rows of teeth, which were 1 mm and 2 mm high, respectively. The PCM Modular and Fixed Flanged devices and anterior cervical plate were augmented with 4 vertebral screws. Eight pullout tests were performed for each of the 8 conditions by using a synthetic fixation model consisting of solid rigid polyurethane foam blocks. Biomechanical testing was conducted using an 858 Bionix test system configured with an unconstrained testing platform. Implants were positioned between testing blocks, using a compressive preload of −267 N. Tensile load-to-failure testing was performed at 2.5 mm/second, with quantification of peak load at failure (in Newtons), implant surface area (in square millimeters), and failure mechanisms.
Results. The mean loads at failure for the 8 implants were as follows: 257.4 ± 28.54 for the PCM Low Profile; 308.8 ± 15.31 for PCM V-Teeth; 496.36 ± 40.01 for PCM Modular Flange; 528.03± 127.8 for PCM Fixed Flange; 306.4 ± 31.3 for Prestige LP; 286.9 ± 18.4 for Kineflex/C disc; 635.53 ± 112.62 for anterior cervical plate + interbody cage; and 161.61 ± 16.58 for tricortical iliac crest. The anterior plate exhibited the highest load at failure compared with all other treatments (p < 0.05). The PCM Modular and Fixed Flange PCM constructs in which screw fixation was used exhibited higher pullout loads than all other treatments except the anterior plate (p < 0.05). The PCM VTeeth and Prestige and Kineflex/C implants exhibited higher pullout loads than the PCM Low Profile and tricortical iliac crest (p < 0.05). Tricortical iliac crest exhibited the lowest pullout strength, which was different from all other treatments (p < 0.05). The surface area of endplate contact, measuring 300 mm2 (PCM treatments), 275 mm2 (PrestigeLP), 250 mm2 (Kineflex/C disc), 180 mm2 (plate + cage), and 235 mm2 (tricortical iliac crest), did not correlate with pullout strength (p > 0.05). The PCM, Prestige, and Kineflex constructs, which did not use screw fixation, all failed by direct pullout. Screw fixation devices, including anterior plates, led to test block fracture, and tricortical iliac crest failed by direct pullout.
Conclusions. These results demonstrate a continuum of fixation strength based on prosthetic endplate design.Disc arthroplasty constructs implanted using vertebral body screw fixation exhibited the highest pullout strength. Prosthetic endplates containing toothed ridges (≥ 1 mm) or keels placed second in fixation strength, whereas endplates containing serrated edges exhibited the lowest fixation strength. All treatments exhibited greater fixation strength than conventional tricortical iliac crest. The current study offers insights into the benefits of various prosthetic endplate designs, which may potentially improve acute fixation following cervical disc arthroplasty.

Posted on

Effect of bupivacaine on intervertebral disc cell viability

The Spine Journal 10 (2010) 159–166

Bupivacaine is a local anesthetic commonly used to relieve or control pain in interventional spine procedures. Bupivacaine has been shown to be toxic to articular cartilage, which has similarities to intervertebral disc (IVD) cartilage, raising concern over a potentially negative effect of bupivacaine on the disc.

PURPOSE: To determine bupivacaine’s effect on cell viability of IVD cells in vitro and to elucidate whether this is through apoptosis or necrosis.

STUDY DESIGN: In vitro controlled study of bupivacaine effect on cell viability in human and rabbit IVD cells.

SUBJECTS: Rabbit annulus fibrosus (AF) tissue, nucleus pulposus (NP) cells, and knee articular chondrocytes were isolated from New Zealand white rabbits. Human AF and NP cells were isolated from stage 3 to 4 degenerative disc surgical specimens.

OUTCOME MEASURES: Cell viability was assessed after exposure to bupivacaine via trypan blue staining or flow cytometry.

METHODS: Annulus fibrosus and NP cells were grown in monolayer and alginate beads, respectively, to simulate their physiologic environment. The cells were then exposed to bupivacaine or saline control at 60 and 120 minutes and examined for cell viability. RESULTS: Rabbit NP cell death demonstrated a time and dose dependence in response to bupivacaine. In addition, cell death was greater than that observed for articular chondrocytes. Rabbit AF tissue also demonstrated increased cell death in response to bupivacaine exposure. Human NP cells demonstrated time-dependent cell death, with greater necrosis than apoptosis. Annulus fibrosus cells grown in monolayers also resulted in similar effects, with greater necrosis rather than apoptosis.

CONCLUSIONS: Despite its pain relieving properties, bupivacaine decreases cell viability in rabbit and human disc cells in a time-dependent manner. In addition, the changes observed are greater than that seen for articular chondrocytes. This increase in cell death appears to be related to an increase in necrosis rather than apoptosis. Whether bupivacaine exerts similar effects in vivo or how this relates to overall clinical outcome remains to be explored.

Posted on

Long-term back pain after a single-level discectomy for radiculopathy: incidence and health care cost analysis

J Neurosurg Spine 12:178–182, 2010.(DOI: 10.3171/2009.9.SPINE09410)

Object. The most common spinal procedure performed in the US is lumbar discectomy for disc herniation. Long- term disc degeneration and height loss occur in many patients after lumbar discectomy. The incidence of mechanical back pain following discectomy varies widely in the literature, and its associated health care costs are unknown. The authors set out to determine the incidence of and the health care costs associated with mechanical back pain attributed to segmental degeneration or instability at the level of a prior discectomy performed at their institution.

Methods. The authors retrospectively reviewed the data for 111 patients who underwent primary, single-level lumbar hemilaminotomy and discectomy for radiculopathy. All diagnostic modalities, conservative therapies, and operative treatments used for the management of postdiscectomy back pain were recorded. Institutional billing and accounting records were reviewed to determine the billed costs of all diagnostic and therapeutic measures.

Results. At a mean follow-up of 37.3 months after primary discectomy, 75 patients (68%) experienced minimal to no back pain, 26 (23%) had moderate back pain requiring conservative treatment only, and 10 (9%) suffered severe back pain that required a subsequent fusion surgery at the site of the primary discectomy. The mean cost per patient for conservative treatment alone was $4696. The mean cost per patient for operative treatment was $42,554. The esti- mated cost of treatment for mechanical back pain associated with postoperative same-level degeneration or instability was $493,383 per 100 cases of first-time, single-level lumbar discectomy ($4934 per primary discectomy).

Conclusions. Postoperative mechanical back pain associated with same-level degeneration is not uncommon in patients undergoing single-level lumbar discectomy and is associated with substantial health care costs.

Posted on

Economic impact of improving outcomes of lumbar discectomy

The Spine Journal 10 (2010) 108–116.doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2009.08.453

BACKGROUND: Lumbar discectomy is usually a successful operation with a relatively low cost. Potential adjunctive procedures, such as repairing the anulus fibrosus or nucleus replacements, necessitate a cost-benefit analysis.

PURPOSE: This economic analysis was performed to understand the potential value of advanced implantable technologies designed to improve outcomes after discectomy.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Using an insurance claims–based database, the economics of lessthan- favorable outcomes after lumbar discectomy were studied. Estimates of improved clinical outcomes because of adjunctive surgical procedural items were modeled.

PATIENT SAMPLE: Using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT-4) codes and International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification procedure codes (ICD-9 CM), all lumbar discectomy patients were identified in a 6-month period from a large, 2002, commercially available claims-based data set representing 3.1 million insured lives.

OUTCOME MEASURES: Not applicable.

METHODS: Longitudinal data analysis from 3 years (2002–2004) of the database was performed for evidence of claims after the insured’s discectomy (up to 18 months post) as a utilization estimate of surgical and medical treatment resultant of less-than-favorable outcomes. Incidence and cost of secondary operations, medical management, and complications were determined. Using these inputs, an economic model was generated to estimate the effect of improvement in discectomy outcomes.

RESULTS: Of the 494 patients who had a discectomy within a 6-month period, 137 (28%) had subsequent claims that suggested the outcome was less than favorable within 18 months. Patients whose insurance claims included codes for a second operation (n552 patients with 56 operations; 11%) and patients being medically/nonsurgically managed (n585, 17%) were studied. Average reimbursed charges incurred (2006 dollars) of repeated discectomy (80% of cases) was $6,907 and for arthrodesis (20% of cases) was $24,375. Average additional medical treatment cost to diagnose or manage poor outcome requiring another surgery was $3,365. Procedure-related complications within 40 days of surgery were evident in 15% of the group; with additional average cost to manage of $3,939.

CONCLUSIONS: Substantial cost associated with poor discectomy outcomes is often overlooked or underappreciated. Surgical technologies that can improve outcomes of discectomy by 50% to 70% thus improving patient quality of life can be overall cost-neutral between $971 and $1,655 additionally per patient.

Posted on

Outcome After Surgical Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. The Lumbar Extension Test Is Not a Predictive Factor

Spine 2009;34:E930–E935

Study Design. A prospective clinical study.

Objectives. To investigate the predictive value of the lumbar extension test for outcome after surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

Summary of Background Data. Studies have indicated that aggravation of the symptoms from LSS by extension of the lumbar spine has predictive value for the outcome after decompression. The aim of this study was to investigate this theory in a larger group of patients.

Methods. One hundred forty-six consecutive patients surgically treated for LSS were included in the study. The clinical condition was recorded before surgery and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery using 3 different scoring systems: Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, Neurogenic Claudication Outcome Score, and Oswestry Disability Index. The group of patients with preoperative aggravation of the symptoms by the lumbar extension test, (positive extension test), was compared with the group of patients without aggravation by the test, (negative extension test).

Results. Before surgery, patients with a positive extension test scored significantly worse on all disability scoring systems than patients with a negative test. However, the extension test itself had no prognostic value for the overall outcome after lumbar decompression. Using regression models with the 2-year Oswestry Disability Index as dependent variable, only before surgery self-reported health and age were found to have prognostic significance.

Conclusion. The lumbar extension test has no predictive value for the outcome after surgical treatment of LSS

Posted on

Aceclofenac–tizanidine in the treatment of acute low back pain: a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, multicentric, comparative study against aceclofenac alone

Eur Spine J (2009) 18:1836–1842DOI 10.1007/s00586-009-1019-4

Tizanidine and aceclofenac individually have shown efficacy in the treatment of low back pain. The efficacy and tolerability of the combination have not yet been established.

The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aceclofenac-tizanidine fixed dose combination against aceclofenac alone in patients with acute low back pain.

This double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, comparative, multicentric, parallel group study enrolled 197 patients of either sex in the age range of 18–70 years with acute low back pain. The patients were randomized to receive either aceclofenac (100 mg)–tizanidine (2 mg) b.i.d or aceclofenac (100 mg) alone b.i.d for 7 days. The primary efficacy outcomes were pain intensity (on movement, at rest and at night; on VAS scale) and pain relief (on a 5-point verbal rating scale). The secondary efficacy outcomes measures included functional impairment (modified Schober’s test and lateral body bending test) and patient’s and investigator’s global efficacy assessment.

Aceclofenac–tizanidine was significantly superior to aceclofenac for pain intensity (on movement, at rest and at night; P < 0.05) and pain relief (P = 0.00) on days 3 and 7. There was significant increase in spinal flexion in both the groups from baseline on days 3 and 7 with significant difference in favour of the combination group (P < 0.05). There were significantly more number of patients with excellent to good response for the aceclofenac–tizanidine treatment as compared to aceclofenac alone (P = 0.00). Both the treatments were well tolerated.

In this study, aceclofenac–tizanidine combination was more effective than aceclofenac alone and had a favourable safety profile in the treatment of acute low back pain.

Posted on

The Efficacy of Plate Construct Augmentation Versus Cage Alone in Anterior Cervical Fusion

Spine 2009 Dec 15;34(26):2886-92.DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b64f2c

Study Design. Retrospective study.
Objective. To compare the efficacy of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with cage alone (ACDF-CA) with cage and plate construct (ACDF-CPC) in regards to fusion rate, radiologic and clinical outcomes.
Summary of Background Data. ACDF-CA has shown good results; however, debate exists regarding the high rate of complications such as pseudarthrosis, subsidence, and local kyphosis. In an attempt to avoid these complications, the authors have performed ACDF with cage and plate construct (ACDF-CPC).
Methods. A total of 78 consecutive patients who underwent 1- or 2-level ACDF-CA or ACDF-CPC suffering from cervical radiculopathy were divided into 2 groups; Group A (n = 38) underwent ACDF-CA; Group B (n = 40) underwent ACDF-CPC. Fusion rate, segmental kyphosis, disc height, and subsidence rate were assessed by radiographs. Clinical outcomes were assessed using Robinson criteria.
Results. Solid fusion was achieved in 78.9% (30/38) of subjects in group A compared to 97.5% (39/40) of subjects in group B (P = 0.01). Segmental kyphosis was noted in 42.1% (16/38) in group A compared with 10% (4/40) in group B (P < 0.01). There was a significant decrease in disc height in group A compared to group B (P < 0.05). Subsidence occurred in 32.3% (19/59 levels) of group A compared with 9.7% (6/62 levels) of group B (P < 0.01). Clinical outcomes were similar for both treatment groups. The pseudarthrosis rate in group A was higher than that in group B (P = 0.01). Revision surgery was required in 10.5% (4/38) of group A, whereas none of group B required reoperation (P < 0.01).
Conclusion. The use of cage and plate construct in 1- or 2-level ACDF results in a more lordotic alignment, an increased disc height, a higher fusion rate, a lower subsidence rate, and a lower complication rate than that of cage alone; however, there is no significant difference in clinical outcome between groups

Posted on

Understanding inconsistencies in patient-reported outcomes after spine treatment: response shift phenomena

Not uncommonly, spine surgeons and physiatrists note a mismatch between patient-reported outcome measures, where one measure might indicate a good outcome and another indicates an inferior outcome after spine treatment. This may be the result of patient characteristics that lead to changes in internal standards, values, and conceptualization of their own health-related quality of life. This can result in a ‘‘moving goal post’’ when a self-report outcome measure is used for prepost comparisons. These ‘‘response shifts’’ may obfuscate relevant changes of interest to clinicians and are meaningful and worthy of study in and of themselves.

PURPOSE: To provide a background on response shift with an emphasis on distinctions relevant to spinal interventions, both surgical and nonsurgical. To describe current methods for detecting and investigating response shift phenomena, and to propose specific hypotheses that can be tested in collaborative research. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two types of methods will be briefly described: methods that require new data collection; and methods that use recent statistical and technical advances to implement secondary analysis of existing data. Two specific testable hypotheses for spinal disorders are suggested along with suggested methods for testing these hypotheses. CONCLUSIONS: A response shift will cause the patient to use the same functional outcome report measure differently pre- and posttreatment. Response shift phenomena are likely to affect the measurement properties of standard spine outcome measures and to obfuscate differences between treatments in clinical trials and cost-effectiveness studies. They point to a need for developing strategies in clinical practice to manage response shifts so that they enhance patient well-being.

Posted on

Effective lordosis: analysis of sagittal spinal canal alignment in cervical spondylotic myelopathy

J Neurosurg Spine 11:667–672, 2009. (DOI: 10.3171/2009.7.SPINE08656)

Object. Analysis of cervical sagittal deformity in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) requires a thorough clinical and radiographic evaluation to select the most appropriate surgical approach. Angular radiographic measurements, which are commonly used to define sagittal deformity, may not be the most appropriate to use for surgical planning. The authors present a simple straight-line method to measure effective spinal canal lordosis and analyze its reliability. Furthermore, comparisons of this measurement to traditional angular measurements of sagittal cervical alignment are made in regards to surgical planning in patients with CSM.

Methods. Twenty preoperative lateral cervical digital radiographs of patients with CSM were analyzed by 3 independent observers on 3 separate occasions using a software measurement program. Sagittal measurements included C2–7 angles utilizing the Cobb and posterior tangent methods, as well as a straight-line method to measure effective spinal canal lordosis from the dorsal-caudal aspect of the C2–7 vertebral bodies. Analysis of variance for repeated measures or Cohen 3-way (kappa) correlation coefficient analysis was performed as appropriate to calculate the intra and interobserver reliability for each parameter. Discrepancies in angular and effective lordosis measurements were analyzed.

Results. Intra and interobserver reliability was excellent (intraclass coefficient > 0.75, kappa > 0.90) utilizing all 3 techniques. Four discrepancies between angular and effective lordotic measurements occurred in which images with a lordotic angular measurement did not have lordosis within the ventral spinal canal. These discrepancies were caused by either spondylolisthesis or dorsally projecting osteophytes in all cases.

Conclusions. Although they are reliable, traditional methods used to make angular measurements of sagittal cervical spine alignment do not take into account ventral obstructions to the spinal cord. The effective lordosis measurement method provides a simple and reliable means of determining clinically significant lordosis because it accounts for both overall alignment of the cervical spine as well as impinging structures ventral to the spinal cord. This method should be considered for use in the treatment of patients with CSM.


Posted on

No effect of traction in patients with low back pain: a single centre, single blind, randomized controlled trial of Intervertebral Differential Dynamics Therapy

Eur Spine J (2009) 18:1843–1850 DOI 10.1007/s00586-009-1044-3

Low back pain (LBP) poses a significant problem to society. Although initial conservative therapy may be beneficial, persisting chronic LBP still frequently leads to expensive invasive intervention. A novel non- invasive therapy that focuses on discogenic LBP is Intervertebral Differential Dynamics Therapy (IDD Therapy, North American Medical Corp. Reg U.S.). IDD Therapy consists of intermittent traction sessions in the Accu-SPINA device (Steadfast Corporation Ltd, Essex, UK), an FDA approved, class II medical device. The intervertebral disc and facet joints are unloaded through axial distraction, positioning and relaxation cycles. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of IDD Therapy when added to a standard graded activity program for chronic LBP patients. In a single blind, single centre, randomized controlled trial; 60 consecutive patients were assigned to either the SHAM or the IDD Therapy. All subjects received the standard conservative therapeutic care (graded activity) and 20 sessions in the Accu-SPINA device. The traction weight in the IDD Therapy was systematically increased until 50% of a person’s body weight plus 4.45 kg (10 lb) was reached. The SHAM group received a non-therapeutic traction weight of 4.45 kg in all sessions. The main outcome was assessed using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) for LBP. Secondary outcomes were VAS scores for leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short-Form 36 (SF-36). All parameters were measured before and 2, 6 and 14 weeks after start of the treatment. Fear of (re)injury due to movement or activities (Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia), coping strategies (Utrecht Coping List) and use of pain medication were recorded before and at 14 weeks. A repeated measures analysis was performed. The two groups were comparable at baseline in terms of demographic, clinical and psychological characteristics, indicating that the random allocation had succeeded. VAS low back pain improved significantly from 61 (±25) to 32 (±27) with the IDD protocol and 53 (±26) to 36 (±27) in the SHAM protocol. Moreover, leg pain, ODI and SF-36 scores improved significantly but in both groups. The use of pain medication decreased significantly, whereas scores for kinesiophobia and coping remained at the same non-pathological level. None of the parameters showed a difference between both protocols. Both treatment regimes had a significant beneficial effect on LBP, leg pain, functional status and quality of life after 14 weeks. The added axial, intermittent, mechanical traction of IDD Therapy to a standard graded activity program has been shown not to be effective.

Posted on

Risk factors for adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion

Eur Spine J (2009) 18:1637–1643 DOI 10.1007/s00586-009-1060-3

The incidence of adjacent segment problems after lumbar fusion has been found to vary, and risk factors for these problems have not been precisely verified, espe- cially based on structural changes determined by magnetic resonance imaging.

The purpose of this retrospective clinical study was to describe the incidence and clinical features of adjacent segment disease (ASD) after lumbar fusion and to determine its risk factors.

We assessed the incidence of ASD in patients who underwent lumbar or lumbosacral fusions for degenerative conditions between August 1995 and March 2006 with at least a 1-year follow- up. Patients less than 35 years of age at the index spinal fusion, patients with uninstrumented fusion, and patients who had not achieved successful union were excluded.

Of the 1069 patients who underwent fusions, 28 (2.62%) needed secondary operations because of ASD and were included in this study. In order to identify the risk factors, we matched a disease group and a control group. The disease group consisted of 26 of the 28 patients with ASD, excluding the 2 patients for whom we did not have initial MRI data. Each patient in the disease group was matched by age, sex, fusion level and follow-up period with a control patient. The assumed risk factors included disc and facet degeneration, instability, listhesis, rotational defor- mity, and disc wedging. The mean age of the 28 patients with ASD requiring surgical treatment was 58.4 years, which did not differ significantly from that of the population in which ASD did not develop (58.2years, p = 0.894). Of the 21 patients who underwent floating fusion, only 1 developed distal ASD. Facet degeneration was a significant risk factor (p<0.01) on logistic regression analysis. The incidence of distal ASD was much lower than that of proximal ASD. Pre-existing facet degeneration may be associated with a high risk of adjacent segment problems following lumbar fusion procedures.

Posted on

Effect of spinal cord signal intensity changes on clinical outcome after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy

J Neurosurg Spine 11:562–567, 2009.DOI: 10.3171/2009.6.SPINE091

The presence of intramedullary T2 high signal intensity changes in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) indicates the existence of a chronic spinal cord compressive lesion. However, the prognostic significance of signal intensity changes remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of spinal cord T2 signal intensity changes on the outcome after surgery for CSM.

Method. In a prospective study, 64 patients with CSM who underwent surgical treatment between October 2006 and April 2008 using an anterior approach were included. Based on the clinical symptoms and signs present, the severity of neurological deficits of all patients was scored according to a modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale score for CSM just before the surgery and at 6 months follow-up. Recovery rates were calculated at 6 months.

Results. There were 22 patients who did not have spinal cord intensity changes on MR imaging and 44 who demonstrated high-intensity signal changes on T2-weighted images (focal or segmental). No statistically significant differences were found in recovery rates between cases with T2 signal intensity changes and those with no signal intensity changes. However, the postoperative modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale scores and the recovery rates were much lower in patients with multisegmental signal intensity changes compared with those without these changes or those with focal signal intensity change, and ANOVA demonstrated this difference to be statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Conclusion. Multisegmental spinal cord signal intensity changes on T2-weighted MR imaging are predictors of a poor outcome in terms of functional recovery rate in patients undergoing operations for CSM.

Posted on

The major complications of transpedicular vertebroplasty

J Neurosurg Spine 11:607–613, 2009. DOI: 10.3171/2009.4.SPINE08466

Vertebroplasty is a well-known technique used to treat pain associated with vertebral. Despite a success rate of up to 90% in different series, the procedure is often associated such as cord and root compression, epidural and subdural hematomas (SDHs), and other minor complications. In this study, the authors discuss the major complications of and their clinical implications during the postoperative course.

Methods. Vertebroplasty was performed in 12 vertebrae of 7 patients. Five patients had fractures, 1 had tumoral compression fractures, and 1 had a traumatic fracture. Two leakage, 1 had epidural leakage, 1 had subdural cement leakage, 2 had a spinal SDH, and after the procedure.

Results. Three patients had paraparesis (2 had SDHs and 1 had epidural cement leakage), 3 had root symptoms, and 1 had lower back pain. Two of the 3 patients with paraparesis recovered after evacuation of the SDH and subdural cement; however, 1 patient with paraparesis did not recover after epidural cement leakage, despite cement evacuation. Two patients with foraminal leakage and 1 with subdural cement leakage had root symptoms and recovered after evacuation and conservative treatment. The patient with the split fracture had no neurological symptoms and recovered with conservative treatment.

Conclusions. Transpedicular vertebroplasty may have major complications, such as a spinal SDH and/or cement leakage into the epidural and subdural spaces, even when performed by experienced spinal surgeons. Early diagnosis with CT and intervention may prevent worsening of these complications.

Posted on

Imaging correlation of the degree of degenerative L4–5 spondylolisthesis with the corresponding amount of facet fluid

J Neurosurg Spine 11:614–619, 2009. DOI: 10.3171/2009.6.SPINE08413

The aim of this study was to correlate the degree of L4–5 spondylolisthesis on plain flexion-extension radiographs with the corresponding amount of L4–5 facet fluid visible on MR images.

Methods. Patients underwent evaluation at the Neurosurgical Spine Clinics of Stanford University Medical Center and National Health Insurance Medical Center (Goyang, South Korea) between January 2006 and December 2007. Only patients who were diagnosed with L4–5 degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) and who had both lumbosacral flexion-extension radiographs and MR images available for review were eligible for this study. Each patient’s dynamic motion index (DMI) was measured using the lateral lumbosacral plain radiograph and was the percentage of the degree of anterior slippage seen on flexion versus that seen on extension. Axial T2-weighted MR images of the L4–5 facet joints obtained in each patient was analyzed for the amount of facet fluid, using the image showing the widest portion of the facets. The facet fluid index was calculated from the ratio of the sum of the amounts of facet fluid found in the right plus left facets over the sum of the average widths of the right plus left facet joints.

Results. Fifty-four patients with L4–5 DS were included in this study. Of these 54 patients, facet fluid was noted on MR images in 29 patients (53.7%), and their mean DMI was 6.349 ± 2.726. Patients who did not have facet fluid on MR imaging had a mean DMI of 1.542 ± 0.820; this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). There was a positive linear association between the facet fluid index and the DMI in the group of patients who exhibited facet fluid on MR images (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.560, p < 0.01). In the subgroup of 29 patients with L4–5 DS who showed facet fluid on MR images, flexion-extension plain radiographs in 10 (34.5%) showed marked anterolisthesis, while the corresponding MR images did not.

Conclusions. There is a linear correlation between the degree of segmental motion seen on flexion-extension plain radiography in patients with DS at L4–5 and the amount of L4–5 facet fluid on MR images. If L4–5 facet fluid in patients with DS is seen on MR images, a corresponding anterolisthesis on weight-bearing flexion-extension lateral radiographs should be anticipated. Obtaining plain radiographs will aid in the diagnosis of anterolisthesis caused by an L4–5 hypermobile segment, which may not always be evident on MR images obtained in supine patients.

Posted on

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy associated with kyphosis or sagittal sigmoid alignment: outcome after anterior or posterior decompression

J Neurosurg Spine 11:521–528, 2009. DOI: 10.3171/2009.2.SPINE08385

The effects of sagittal kyphotic deformities or mechanical stress on the development of cervical spondylotic myelopathy, or the reduction and fusion of kyphotic sagittal alignment have not been consistently documented. The aim in this study was to determine the effects of kyphotic sagittal alignment of the cervical spine in terms of neurological morbidity and outcome after 2 types of surgical intervention.

Methods. The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of 476 patients who underwent cervical spine surgeries for spondylotic myelopathy between 1993 and 2006 at their university medical center. Among these were identified 43 patients—30 men and 13 women, with a mean age of 58.8 years—who had cervical kyphosis exceeding 10° on preoperative sagittal lateral radiographs obtained in the neutral position, and their cases were analyzed in this study. Anterior decompression with interbody fusion was conducted in 28 patients, and en bloc open-door C3–7 laminoplasty in 15 patients. Both pre- and postoperative neurological, radiographic, and MR imaging findings were assessed in both surgical groups.

Results. The mean preoperative kyphotic angle in all 43 patients was 15.9 ± 5.9° in the neutral position. Seg- mental instability was noted in 26 patients (61%) and reversed dynamic spinal canal stenosis at the level above the local kyphosis in 22 (51%). Preoperative T2-weighted MR images showed high-intensity signal within the cord at and around the level of maximal compression or segmental instability in 28 patients (65%). The mean kyphotic angle in both the neutral and flexion positions was significantly smaller at 4–6 weeks after surgery in the anterior spondylectomy group than in the laminoplasty group (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the angle in the neutral position was significantly smaller on follow-up in the anterior spondylectomy group than in the laminoplasty group (p = 0.034). The transverse area of the spinal cord was significantly larger in the anterior spondylectomy group than in the lamino- plasty group on follow-up (p = 0.037). Preoperative neurological scores (assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale) and improvement on follow-up ≥ 2 years after treatment (average 3.3 years) were not significantly different between the 2 groups; however, there was a significant difference in Japanese Orthopaedic Association score at 4–6 weeks postoperatively (p = 0.047).

Conclusions. Kyphotic deformity and mechanical stress in the cervical spine may play an important role in neurological dysfunction. In a select group of patients with kyphotic deformity ≥ 10°, adequate correction of local sagittal alignment may help to maximize the chance of neurological improvement

Posted on

Surgical results of cervical myelopathy in patients older than 80 years of age

J Neurosurg Spine 11:421–426, 2009. DOI: 10.3171/2009.4.SPINE08584

In this prospective analysis the authors describe the clinical results of surgical treatment in patients > 80 years of age in whom spinal function was evaluated with motor evoked potential (MEPs) monitoring.

Methods. The authors included 57 patients > 80 years of age who were suspected of having cervical myelopathy. The mean age of the patients was 83.0 years (range 80–90 years). The central motor conduction time (CMCT) was calculated from the latencies of the MEPs following transcranial magnetic stimulation and from M and F waves fol- lowing peripheral nerve stimulation.

Results. Preoperative electrophysiological evaluation demonstrated significant elongation of CMCT or abnor- malities in MEP waveforms in 37 patients (65%), and 35 patients of these underwent laminoplasty. In 30 patients cervical spondylotic myelopathy was diagnosed and 5 patients ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament was diagnosed. The preoperative mean Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scale score was 8.6 (range 3–12.5) and the mean postoperative score was 12.6 (range 6–14.5) with an average recovery rate of 45% (range −21 to 100%). There were no major complications in any of the patients during the operative period and there were no cases of death resulting from operative intervention.

Conclusions. Sufficient clinical results are expected even in patients with myelopathy who are older than 80 years of age, provided the patients are correctly selected by electrophysiological evaluation with MEPs and CMCT.


Posted on

Cross-sectional magnetic resonance imaging study of lumbar disc degeneration in 200 healthy individuals

J Neurosurg Spine 11:501–507, 2009. (DOI: 10.3171/2009.5.SPINE08675)

Object. The current cross-sectional observational MR imaging study aimed to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of lumbar disc degeneration in a healthy population and to establish the baseline data for a prospective longitudinal study.

Methods. Two hundred healthy volunteers participated in this study after providing informed consent. The status of lumbar disc degeneration was assessed by 3 independent observers, who used sagittal T2-weighted MR imaging. Demographic data collected included age, sex, body mass index, episode(s) of low-back pain, smoking status, hours of standing and sitting, and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire scores. There were 68 men and 132 women whose mean age was 39.7 years (range 30–55 years). Eighty-two individuals (41%) were smokers, and the Roland- Morris Disability Questionnaire scores were averaged to 0.6/24.

Results. The prevalence of disc degeneration was 7.0% in L1–2, 12.0% in L2–3, 15.5% in L3–4, 49.5% in L4–5, and 53.0% in L5–S1. A herniated disc was observed at the corresponding levels in 0.5, 3.5, 6.5, 25.0, and 35.0% of cases respectively. Spondylolisthesis was observed in < 3% of this population. Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that age and hours sitting were significantly related to L4–5 disc herniation. Episode of low-back pain, smoking status, body mass index, and hours standing did not affect the prevalence of disc degeneration.

Conclusions. The current study established the baseline data of lumbar disc degeneration in a 30- to 55-year-old healthy population for a prospective longitudinal study. Hours spent sitting significantly increased the prevalence of disc herniation, but episode of low-back pain, smoking status, obesity, and standing hours were not significant risk factors.

Posted on

Primary Intramedullary Tumors of the Spinal Cord

SPINE Volume 34, Number 22S, pp S69 –S77, 2009

Study Design. Clinically based systematic review.

Objective. To define optimal clinical care for primary intramedullary spinal cord tumors using a systematic re- view with expert opinion.

Methods. Focused questions on the treatment of primary intramedullary spinal cord tumors were refined by a panel of spine oncology surgeons, medical and radiation oncologist. Keyword were searched through Medline database and pertinent abstracts and manuscripts obtained. The quality of literature was rated as high, moderate, low, or very low. Using the GRADE evidence based review system the proposed questions were answered using the literature review and expert opinion. These treatment recommendations were then rated as either strong or weak based on the quality of evidence and clinical expertise.

Results. The literature searches revealed low and very low quality evidence with no prospective or randomized studies. The MEDLINE search engine returned 9000 articles which was restricted to articles about human subjects and written in the English language. The subsequent search resulted in a return of: “spinal cord tumor” (5053), “ependymoma” (580), “astrocytoma” (420), and “glioma” (235) articles. Seventeen articles referenced timing of surgical intervention and symptomatology for intramedullary spinal cord tumors. One hundred fifty-eight chemotherapy and 183 radiation therapy articles for intramedullary spinal cord tumors were reviewed.

Conclusion. The most important factor in determining the IMSCT patient’s long-term neurologic and functional outcome after surgery is the patient’s preoperative neurologic status. However, this must be taken in the context of the underlying tumor histology. Therefore, resection is reserved for progressive neurologic decline and serial monitoring for asymptomatic individuals. Adjuvant therapy is an option for high grade astrocytomas (WHO grades 3–4).


Proudly powered by WordPress