Category: Trauma

Posted on

Cerebral Hemodynamic Changes in Severe Head Injury Patients Undergoing Decompressive Craniectomy

J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2009;21:339–345

Objective: To assess the intracranial hemodynamic modifica- tions induced by a decompressive craniectomy (DC) after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), using transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasonography and intracranial pressure (ICP) sensor. Mor- tality rate and neurological outcomes were also evaluated after this procedure.

Design: A prospective study was carried out on 26 TBI patients, measuring transcranial Doppler and ICP before, immediately after, and 48 hours after the DC, allowing for statistical analysis of hemodynamic changes. The mortality rate and the neuro- logical outcomes were assessed.

Measurements and Results: After DC, ICP decreased from 37±17 to 20±13mm Hg (P=0.0003). The global cerebral blood flow was modified with diastolic velocities rising from 23±15 to 31±13cm/s (P=0.0038) and a pulsatility index decreasing from 1.70±0.66 to 1.18±0.37 (P=0.0012). This normalization of the global cerebral hemodynamics after the DC was immediate, symmetric, and constant during the first 48 hours. Outcome was evaluated at 6 months: good recovery or moderate disability was observed in 11 patients (42%), persistent vegetative state in 7 patients (27%), and 8 patients died (31%).

Conclusions: The DC results in a significant, immediate, and durable improvement of ICP associated with a normalization of cerebral blood flow velocities in most TBI patients with refractory intracranial hypertension.


Posted on

Cerebral Hemodynamic Changes in Severe Head Injury Patients Undergoing Decompressive Craniectomy

J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2009;21:339–345

A prospective study was carried out on 26 TBI patients, measuring transcranial Doppler and ICP before, immediately after, and 48 hours after the DC, allowing for statistical analysis of hemodynamic changes. The mortality rate and the neuro- logical outcomes were assessed.

Measurements and Results: After DC, ICP decreased from 37±17 to 20±13mm Hg (P=0.0003). The global cerebral blood flow was modified with diastolic velocities rising from 23±15 to 31±13cm/s (P=0.0038) and a pulsatility index decreasing from 1.70±0.66 to 1.18±0.37 (P=0.0012). This normalization of the global cerebral hemodynamics after the DC was immediate, symmetric, and constant during the first 48 hours. Outcome was evaluated at 6 months: good recovery or moderate disability was observed in 11 patients (42%), persistent vegetative state in 7 patients (27%), and 8 patients died (31%).

Conclusions: The DC results in a significant, immediate, and durable improvement of ICP associated with a normalization of cerebral blood flow velocities in most TBI patients with refractory intracranial hypertension.

Posted on

Indications for Brain Computed Tomography and Hospital Admission in Pediatric Patients with Minor Head Injury

Pediatr Neurosurg 2009;45:262–270. DOI: 10.1159/000228984

Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of patients with a minor head injury (MHI) who were admitted to a pediatric emergency unit and to identify the clinical signs and symptoms that most reliably predict the need for cranial computed tomography (CCT) and hospital admission following MHI.

Methods: All patients were retrospectively evaluated according to age, gender, details of injury, presenting symptoms, physical examination findings, radiological investigations ordered and results, length of stay, outcome of the injury and hospitalization rates.

Results:The factors affecting indications for computed tomography and hospitalization were retrospectively analyzed in 916 patients – 585 males and 331 females, aged between 1month and 15 years (mean: 5.01 8 3.58 years), with MHI. A multivariate analysis revealed significant correlations between CCT abnormalities and Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 13 or 14, headache, posttraumatic amnesia, blurred vision, cephalohematomas, periorbital ecchymoses, otorrhea and abnormal neurological findings. CCT abnormalities were identified in 67 (19.8%) of the 338 CCT scans. Twenty of the 67 patients (29.9%) with CCT scan abnormality had no clinical signs. Of all cases, 125 (13.6%) were hospitalized, 617 (67.4%) were treated as outpatients, and 174 (19.0%) left the emergency department based on a personal decision.

Conclusion: Some clinical risk factors can be used as predictors of abnormalities in CCT scans following MHI, but the absence of such clinical findings does not exclude the possibility of intracranial injuries.

Posted on

Occipital condyle fractures: clinical decision rule and surgical management

JNS Spine DOI: 10.3171/2009.5.SPINE08866

Object. Occipital condyle fractures (OCFs) are rare injuries and their treatment remains controversial. Several classification systems have been proposed, first by Anderson and Montesano and more recently by Tuli and colleagues and Hanson and associates, who sought to stratify these fractures in a manner that would guide treatment that has typically ranged from semirigid collar immobilization to halo fixation or occipitocervical fusion. It has been the authors’ impression, based on experience with OCFs at their institution, that classification is cumbersome and contributes little to the clinical decision-making process, while the identification of craniocervical misalignment and neural element compromise is paramount, and sufficient, for the planning of treatment.

Methods. The authors performed a retrospective review of 24,745 consecutive trauma presentations to a single Level I trauma center (UPMC Presbyterian Hospital) over a 6-year period, identifying 100 patients with 106 OCFs. All patients were evaluated by the spine trauma service and underwent imaging of the craniocervical junction using reconstructed CT scans. Patient characteristics, fracture characteristics (including fracture classification according to the 2 major classification systems), initial management, and status at follow-up were recorded.

Results. The incidence of OCF in this trauma population was 0.4%. Two patients had evidence of craniocervical misalignment on reconstructed CT imaging at the time of admission; both patients underwent occipitocervical fusion. One patient underwent occipitocervical fusion for unrelated C1–2 fractures. The remainder of those surviving to discharge, whose fractures represented all fracture subtypes, received treatment with a rigid cervical collar or counseling alone. No patients, including 4 patients with bilateral OCFs, were found to have developed delayed craniocervical instability or misalignment on follow-up, or to require further neurosurgical intervention for an OCF. Neural element compression was not identified in any of the patients, and there were no cases of delayed cranial neuropathy.

Conclusions. Beyond the identification of craniocervical misalignment on reconstructed CT scans at admission, further classification of OCFs is unnecessary. Management should consist of up-front occipitocervical fusion or halo fixation in cases demonstrating occipitocervical misalignment, or of immobilization in a rigid cervical collar followed by delayed clinical and radiographic evaluation in a spine trauma clinic if misalignment is not present.

Posted on

The evolution of thoracolumbar injury classification systems

The Spine Journal 9, Issue 9, September 2009, Pages 780-788doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2009.04.003

An ideal classification system for thoracolumbar (TL) spine fractures should facilitate communication between treating physicians and guide treatment by means of outlining the natural history of injuries. The classification scheme should also be comprehensive, intuitive, and simple to implement. At the present time, no classification system fully meets these criteria. In this review, the authors attempt to describe the evolution of TL fracture classification systems from their inception to the present day.

The article reviews the salient classification systems that have addressed TL injuries since Boehler’s first attempt in 1929. This progression culminates in the Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Score/Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLISS/TLICS), a system which incorporates features from earlier scales and represents the most comprehensive grading scale to date.

Each successive system played an important role in advancing contemporary understanding of TL injuries. Most classifications were, however, based on a single individual’s, or a comparatively small group’s, retrospective review of a case series. In most instances, these grading systems were never validated or modified by their original developers, a shortcoming that prevented their continued evolution. Despite the many advantages of the TLISS/TLICS system, more work in terms of refining the classification and defining its validity remains to be performed.

The classification of TL injuries has evolved significantly over the course of the last 75 years. Most of these schemes were limited by their complexity, relevance, and/or poor reliability. The TLISS classification system represents the most recent evolution as it combines several important factors capable of guiding the management of TL injuries. Nonetheless, more research regarding this rating scale remains to be performed.

Proudly powered by WordPress