Month: September 2010

Posted on

Near-infrared indocyanine green videoangiography versus microvascular Doppler sonography in aneurysm surgery

Acta Neurochir (2010) 152:1519–1525.DOI 10.1007/s00701-010-0723-5

The quality of surgical treatment of intracranial aneurysms is determined by complete aneurysm occlusion and restoration of flow in the parent, branching and perforating vessels. In postoperative digital subtraction angiography (DSA), unexpected aneurysm residuals and vessel occlusions are frequently detected. Here, the value of two nearly noninvasive and cost-effective techniques for intraoperative flow evaluation (near-infrared indocyanine green video angiography (ICG-VA) and microvascular Doppler sonography (mDs)) is investigated in a prospective study.

Patients and methods Over a period of 10months, the authors surgically clipped 50 aneurysms under intraoperative pre- and post-clipping evaluation of flow in the parent, branching and perforating vessels and the aneurysm sack by the two techniques. Intraoperative applicability of each technique was compared to each other and to postoperative digital subtraction angiography as standard evaluation technique.

Results Forty-five aneurysms were totally occluded without vessel compromise (90%). Intraoperatively, ICG-VA was considered useful in 43 cases (86%) and mDs in 44 cases (88%), respectively. Both techniques could compensate each other’s weak points to a certain degree; but two branch occlusions (4%) and three neck remnants (6%) were revealed by postoperative DSA.

Conclusion Both techniques have specific drawbacks that could be compensated by each other, to a certain extent. Intraoperatively, ICG-VA and mDs should not be considered competitive, but complementary. This study implicates that the combination of both applications on a routine basis assures the quality of aneurysm surgery by nearly noninvasive and cost-effective techniques. However, DSA remains the gold standard for evaluation of aneurysm occlusion.

Posted on

Endoscopic Treatment of Arachnoid Cysts: A Detailed Account of Surgical Techniques and Results

Neurosurgery 67:824-836, 2010 DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000377852.75544.E4

Surgical treatment of arachnoid cysts remains under debate. Although many authors favor endoscopic techniques, others attribute a higher recurrence rate to the endoscope.

OBJECTIVE: The authors report their experience with endoscopic procedures for arachnoid cyst.

METHODS: All pure endoscopic procedures for arachnoid cysts performed by the authors were analyzed. Particular reference was given to surgical complications and patient outcome in relation to cyst location and endoscopic technique.

RESULTS: Sixty-six endoscopic procedures were performed in 61 patients (mean age, 28 years; range, 23 days to 74 years; 35 males, 26 females). The main presenting symptoms were cephalgia (61%), hemisymptoms (18%), and macrocephalus (18%). Cyst location was temporobasal (34%), suprasellar (21%), at the cisterna quadrigemina (18%), paraxial supratentorial (16%), and various (10%). Thirty cystocisternostomies, 14 ventriculocystostomies, 12 cystoventriculostomies, and 10 ventriculocystocisternostomies were performed. The overall clinical success rate was 90%. The endoscopic technique was abandoned in 4 cases (7%). Postoperative complications were found in 16%; there was only one permanent deficit (2%). Five recurrences (8%) occurred up to 7 years after the first procedure. Of the various locations, the temporobasal cysts were the most difficult to treat with lowest clinical success (81%), highest recurrence (19%), and highest complication rate (24%). Of the various endoscopic techniques, ventriculocystostomy and ventriculocystocisternostomy reached the highest success rates with 100%.

CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic techniques provide very good results in arachnoid cyst treatment. The most frequent cyst location is the most difficult to treat. A long-term follow-up is recommended since recurrences can occur many years after the procedure

Proudly powered by WordPress