Month: June 2026

Posted on

Same-day spine surgery at an ambulatory surgical center versus hospital outpatient department

J Neurosurg Spine 44:835–846, 2026

This clinical study compares safety, complications, and patient-reported outcomes for same-day anterior cervical arthrodesis/arthroplasty and lumbar decompression performed in ambulatory surgical centers (ASC) versus hospital outpatient departments (HOPD) using a propensity-matched statewide registry. Primary outcomes included complication rates, return to OR, ED visits, and readmissions; secondary outcomes assessed PROMs and return-to-work at 90 days and 1 year.

Matched analysis of 3,351 lumbar decompressions and 806 anterior cervical procedures found no differences in PROs between ASC and HOPD, comparable safety for anterior cervical surgery, but a slightly higher rate of return to OR—driven by reherniation—for lumbar decompression performed in ASCs. Authors recommend future cost-effectiveness and patient-selection research.

Objective Compare safety and outcomes of same-day discharge anterior cervical arthrodesis/arthroplasty (1–2 levels) and lumbar decompression performed in an ambulatory surgical center (ASC) versus a hospital outpatient department (HOPD).

Design/Data source Retrospective, propensity-matched comparative cohort analysis using the statewide Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MSSIC) registry for cases from Jan 1, 2021 to Jun 30, 2023.

Matching approach HOPD:ASC cohorts matched 4:1 using BMI, ASA class, and number of operative levels to improve comparability and power.

Primary outcomes Assessed any complication, return to operating room (OR) within 90 days, and ED visit or readmission within 30 and 90 days; secondary outcomes included PROs at 90 days/1 year and return to work.

Sample size (matched) Included 3351 lumbar decompressions (2679 HOPD, 672 ASC) and 806 anterior cervical cases (644 HOPD, 162 ASC).

Cervical results No significant ASC vs HOPD differences for complications, PROs at 90 days or 1 year, or return to work at 90 days or 1 year (p > 0.05).

Lumbar results (safety) ASC had higher rates of any complication (8% vs 5.5%) and return to OR (4.9% vs 2.1%) than HOPD in univariate analysis, and this persisted in multivariate analysis (IRR 1.5 for any complication; IRR 2.3 for return to OR).

Lumbar results (driver & outcomes) Elevated return-to-OR risk in ASC was driven primarily by lumbar reherniation requiring reoperation (3.2% ASC vs 1.0% HOPD), while PROs at 90 days and 1 year were otherwise similar between settings.

Posted on

Diagnosing Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunt Failure: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Noninvasive and Minimally Invasive Tests in Children and Adults

Neurosurgery 98:1206–1220, 2026

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates diagnostic performance of noninvasive and minimally invasive tests (X-ray shunt series, CT, MRI, nuclear scintigraphy, thermal flow) for cerebrospinal fluid shunt failure in pediatric and adult patients, synthesizing 33 studies and 8,077 patients. Pooled accuracy was 82%, sensitivity 67%, and specificity 88%, with X-ray series showing lower sensitivity but higher specificity compared with CT.

The analysis highlights substantial study bias—especially in patient selection and reference standards—and concludes no existing test is adequate as a standalone diagnostic for shunt failure, underscoring the need to optimize diagnostic pathways, reduce harm, and develop improved point-of-care functional tests.

Objective Assess diagnostic performance of noninvasive/minimally invasive tests (X-ray shunt series, CT, MRI, nuclear scintigraphy, thermal flow evaluation) for suspected CSF shunt failure in pediatric and adult patients.

Methods Systematic review/meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42024596142) including patients with permanent CSF shunts who underwent the above index tests; performance (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity) modeled via meta-regression incorporating test type, age group, follow-up timeframe, and shunt type.

Evidence base PubMed search (Oct 22, 2024) screened 465 articles; 33 studies included, totaling 8077 patients.

Pooled performance Overall pooled accuracy 82%, sensitivity 67%, specificity 88% across included tests.

Key comparative finding (sensitivity) X-ray shunt series had significantly lower sensitivity than CT (OR 0.106, 95% CI 0.056–0.201; overall effect of test type on sensitivity P = .013).

Key comparative finding (specificity) No overall effect of test type on specificity (P = .192), but X-ray shunt series showed higher specificity than CT in subgroup analysis (OR 4.04, 95% CI 1.938–8.424).

Covariates No significant effects of age group, follow-up timeframe, or shunt type on accuracy, sensitivity, or specificity.

Conclusion/limitations No test performed well enough to serve as a standalone diagnostic for shunt failure; evidence limited by high risk of bias, especially in the reference standard domain for most studies.

Proudly powered by WordPress