Tag: Acoustic neuroma

Posted on

The role of salvage stereotactic radiosurgery for tumor progression following incomplete microsurgical resection of vestibular schwannoma

J Neurosurg 144:1403–1409, 2026

This clinical study evaluates salvage stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for vestibular schwannoma (VS) that progresses after incomplete microsurgical resection, reporting long-term tumor control, freedom from additional treatment (FFAT), and complication rates in a 64-patient cohort. Key outcomes include 10- and 15-year tumor control of 87.5% and 84.4%, and FFAT of 95.3% and 92.2%, respectively.

The methods describe retrospective selection, radiosurgical dosimetry (median margin 12.5 Gy), imaging and follow-up protocols, and statistical analyses using Kaplan–Meier and Cox models; no factors significantly predicted control or FFAT, and common complications included trigeminal neuropathy and hearing worsening.

Objective Assess safety/efficacy of salvage stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for vestibular schwannoma (VS) that progresses after incomplete microsurgical resection, including factors affecting tumor control and freedom from additional treatment (FFAT).

Cohort Retrospective series of 64 adults treated with salvage SRS for post-resection tumor progression; median age 51.5 years and 46.9% male.

Treatment parameters Median marginal dose 12.5 Gy (median isodose 50%); median tumor volume 1.6 cm³; median time from surgery to salvage SRS 38.8 months.

Long-term control Tumor control rates after salvage SRS were 87.5% at 10 years and 84.4% at 15 years.

Durability (FFAT) FFAT rates were 95.3% at 10 years and 92.2% at 15 years, indicating most patients avoided further intervention long term.

Predictors No evaluated factors (e.g., Koos grade, age/sex, cranial nerve neuropathies, marginal dose, extent of resection, tumor volume) were significantly associated with tumor control or FFAT in Cox modeling.

Complications Most common post-SRS issue was worsening/new trigeminal neuropathy (15.6% total); hearing worsened in 14.1% (Gardner-Robertson class), and facial nerve function worsened in 4.7% (House-Brackmann).

Conclusion Salvage SRS is a safe and effective long-term strategy for VS tumor progression after incomplete resection, supporting continued monitoring and consideration of SRS once progression is documented.

Posted on

Stereotactic Radiosurgery Versus Observation in Small- and Medium-Sized Vestibular Schwannoma Patients With Normal Hearing: A Retrospective International Multicenter Study

Neurosurgery 98:887–894, 2026

This multicenter retrospective study compares stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with observation (OBS) for small-to-medium vestibular schwannomas (Koos I–II) in patients presenting with normal (AAO‑HNS class A) hearing. Propensity-score–matched cohorts (57 SRS, 57 OBS) were analyzed for serviceable hearing preservation (SHP), tumor control (TC), and cranial nerve outcomes over median follow-ups of 49 and 37 months.

Results show SRS achieved markedly superior tumor control (≈98% at 5–10 years) while producing noninferior hearing outcomes versus observation (5‑year SHP: SRS 76.2% vs OBS 56.1%; difference not statistically significant). The authors conclude SRS is preferable for TC without compromising hearing, emphasizing individualized decision-making given study limitations.

Clinical question Comparison of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) vs observation (OBS) for small/medium Koos I–II vestibular schwannomas in patients with AAO-HNS class A (normal) hearing at presentation, focusing on hearing preservation and tumor control

Design Retrospective international multicenter study with propensity score matching (age, sex, tumor volume, PTA, SDS) yielding 57 SRS vs 57 OBS matched patients

Serviceable hearing preservation No statistically significant difference in long-term serviceable hearing preservation between SRS and OBS in the matched analysis (log-rank P = .17), despite numerically higher SRS rates

Hearing rates over time Matched-cohort 5-/9-year serviceable hearing preservation: SRS 76.2% / 42.4% vs OBS 56.1% / 16.8%

Class A hearing Class A preservation was similar: 57.9% (SRS) vs 52.6% (OBS) (P = .70)

Tumor control SRS achieved markedly superior tumor control (log-rank P < .0001); 5-/10-year tumor control: SRS 97.9% / 97.9% vs OBS 40.9% / 15.1%

Other clinical outcomes No significant matched-cohort differences in cranial nerve deficits, vestibulopathy, or composite CN/tinnitus worsening; tinnitus worsening trended higher with OBS (21.1% vs 8.8%) but was not significant (P = .066)

Overall conclusion SRS provided noninferior hearing outcomes while being significantly better for tumor control, supporting SRS as a favored option while still emphasizing individualized decision-making

Posted on

Long-term tumor control after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for sporadic vestibular schwannoma

J Neurosurg 144:965–971, 2026

This clinical study evaluates long-term tumor control after single-fraction Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for sporadic vestibular schwannoma in 749 adults treated from 2000–2022, reporting Kaplan–Meier control rates of 100%, 98%, 96%, 92%, and 91% at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 years respectively. Patient demographics, SRS dosing, and complication rates—including low persistent facial paresis—are summarized with statistical analysis and clear definitions for growth, pseudoprogression, and salvage.

The authors detail three post-SRS tumor behavior patterns, finding 13% pseudoprogression (mostly within 5 years) and 42 salvage treatments (median 3.7 years), and conclude that SRS offers durable control while emphasizing the need for prolonged surveillance and nuanced clinical decision-making about retreatment.

Objective Assess long-term efficacy of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as primary treatment for adult, treatment-naïve sporadic vestibular schwannoma (Gamma Knife), treated from 2000–2022.

Cohort 749 adults included; 76% had tumors extending into the cerebellopontine angle (CPA) at SRS; median age 62; 50% women; 99% had House-Brackmann (HB) grade I facial nerve function at SRS.

Long-term tumor control Tumor control after SRS remained high: 100% (1 yr), 98% (3 yr), 96% (5 yr), 92% (10 yr), and 91% (15 yr).

Radiosurgical failure/salvage 42 patients required salvage (35 microsurgery, 7 repeat SRS), median 3.7 years post-SRS; 3 salvage treatments occurred >10 years after SRS, indicating late failures can occur.

Risk factors Age, macrocystic tumor presence, and treated tumor volume were not significantly associated with risk of salvage in univariable analysis.

Post-SRS tumor patterns Three post-SRS behaviors were observed: (1) stability/shrinkage, (2) pseudoprogression (growth then stability/shrinkage), and (3) continued growth without stability at last follow-up.

Pseudoprogression timing 13% experienced pseudoprogression; all but 4 showed it by year 5 post-SRS, though some initial growth occurred later (e.g., 5.1–8.6 years) with subsequent stability on follow-up imaging.

Conclusion/implication SRS provides durable control through 15 years for most patients (91%), but ongoing long-term surveillance is needed because failures may occur even beyond 10 years and pseudoprogression can be seen out to ≥5 years.

Posted on

Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guideline on Surgical Resection for the Treatment of Patients With Vestibular Schwannomas: Update

Neurosurgery 98:272–277, 2026

These updated Congress of Neurological Surgeons guidelines review surgical management of sporadic vestibular schwannomas using literature from 2015–2022, reaffirming many prior recommendations and highlighting persistent evidence gaps. Key recommendations address approach selection (middle fossa, retrosigmoid, translabyrinthine), hearing-preservation surgery options, and counseling patients about outcomes after prior stereotactic radiosurgery.

The document details systematic review methods, inclusion criteria, and evidence grading, noting most data are class III and insufficient to prove superiority of specific surgical approaches for many questions. It emphasizes individualized treatment decisions, need for multicenter registries or trials, and future research priorities to resolve unanswered clinical issues.

Surgical Approach Selection: No surgical approach (middle fossa, retrosigmoid, or translabyrinthine) has proven superiority for facial nerve preservation or gross total resection in sporadic vestibular schwannoma; choice depends on individual patient factors and tumor characteristics.

Hearing Preservation: Hearing preservation surgery via middle fossa or retrosigmoid approach may be considered for patients with good preoperative hearing as an alternative to observation, but evidence for long-term superiority is limited.

Subtotal Resection and Radiosurgery: Subtotal resection followed by stereotactic radiosurgery does not have sufficient evidence to support better facial nerve or hearing outcomes compared to complete resection.

Microsurgery After SRS: Patients undergoing microsurgical resection after prior stereotactic radiosurgery should be counseled about increased risk of subtotal resection and worse facial nerve function.

Trigeminal Neuralgia: Surgical resection may provide better relief of trigeminal neuralgia symptoms compared to stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma.

Balance and Observation: There is insufficient evidence to support surgery or radiosurgery for improving preoperative balance problems, and no clear evidence that surgery should be primary treatment for small tumors eligible for observation.

Evidence Quality: All reviewed evidence is class III (retrospective series, flawed controls), with significant potential for bias and limitations in drawing strong conclusions.

Future Directions: Improved data from multicenter registries or randomized trials are needed to clarify optimal management, as current recommendations reflect standard practice but lack high-level evidence for many questions.

Posted on

Predictors of trigeminal neuropathy in patients receiving Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma

J Neurosurg 142:1134–1140, 2025

The study investigates predictors of trigeminal neuropathy (Tn) in patients receiving Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma. It identifies the volume of cranial nerve V receiving ≥11 Gy as a significant factor in Tn development, suggesting it be included in dosimetric planning to minimize risk.

• Objective: Validate predictors of trigeminal neuropathy (Tn) in patients receiving stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for vestibular schwannoma (VS).

• Methodology: Study included 204 patients treated with SRS, excluding those with pre-existing Tn symptoms or less than 2 years of follow-up.

• Key Finding: The volume of cranial nerve (CN) V receiving ≥ 11 Gy is the only significant predictor of Tn development post-SRS.

• Results: 11.3% of patients developed Tn, with 7.8% experiencing permanent symptoms.

• Statistical Analysis: Maximum dose to CN V was significant in univariate analysis but not in multivariate analysis.

• Tumor Compression: Not significantly correlated with Tn development.

• Clinical Implication: Dosimetric planning should account for CN V volume receiving ≥ 11 Gy to minimize Tn risk.

• Recommendation: Early treatment advised to maintain gap between VS and CN V, reducing Tn risk.

Posted on

Vestibular Schwannoma Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Octogenarians

Neurosurgery 93:1099–1105, 2023

The management of octogenarians with vestibular schwannomas (VS) has received little attention. However, with the increase in octogenarian population, more effort is needed to clarify the value of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in this population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SRS in this patient age group.

METHODS: A retrospective study of 62 patients aged 80 years or older who underwent single-session SRS for symptomatic VS during a 35-year interval was performed. The median patient age was 82 years, and 61.3% were male. SRS was performed as planned adjuvant management or for delayed progression after prior partial resection in 5 patients.

RESULTS: SRS resulted in a 5-year tumor control rate of 95.6% with a 4.8% risk of adverse radiation effects (ARE). Tumor control was unrelated to patient age, tumor volume, Koos grade, sex, SRS margin dose, or prior surgical management. Four patients underwent additional management including 1 patient with symptomatic progression requiring surgical resection, 2 patients with symptomatic hydrocephalus requiring cerebrospinal fluid diversion, and 1 patient whose tumor-related cyst required delayed cyst aspiration. Three patients developed ARE, including 1 patient with permanent facial weakness (House-Brackmann grade II), 1 who developed trigeminal neuropathy, and 1 who had worsening gait disorder. Six patients had serviceable hearing preservation before SRS, and 2 maintained serviceable hearing preservation after 4 years. A total of 44 (71%) patients died at an interval ranging from 6 to 244 months after SRS.

CONCLUSION: SRS resulted in tumor and symptom control in most octogenarian patients with VS.

Posted on

Surgical outcomes in large vestibular schwannomas: should cerebellopontine edema be considered in the grading systems?

Acta Neurochirurgica (2023) 165:1749–1755

Large (> 3 cm) vestibular schwannomas pose complexity in surgical management because of narrow working corridors and proximity to the cranial nerves, brainstem, and inner ear structures. With current vestibular schwannoma classifications limited in information regarding cerebellopontine edema, our retrospective series examined this radiographic feature relative to clinical outcomes and its possible role in preoperative scoring.

Methods Of 230 patients who underwent surgical resection of vestibular schwannoma (2014–2020), we identified 107 patients with Koos grades 3 or 4 tumors for radiographic assessment of edema in the middle cerebellar peduncle (MCP), brainstem, or both. Radiographic images were graded and patients grouped into Koos grades 3 or 4 or our proposed grade 5 with edema. Tumor volumes, radiographic features, clinical presentations, and clinical outcomes were evaluated.

Results The 107 patients included 22 patients with grade 3 tumors, 39 with grade 4, and 46 with grade 5. No statistical differences were noted among groups for demographic data or complication rates. Unlike grades 3 and 4 patients, grade 5 patients presented with worse hearing (p < 0.001), larger tumors (p < 0.001), lower rates of gross total resection (GTR), longer hospital stays, and higher rates of balance dysfunction.

Conclusion With edema detected in 43% of this cohort, special considerations are warranted for grade 5 vestibular schwannomas given the preoperative findings of worse hearing, lower GTR rates, longer hospital stays, and 96% who pursued postoperative balance therapy. We propose that grade 5 with edema offers a more nuanced interpretation of a radiographic feature that holds relevance to treatment selection and patient outcomes.

Posted on

Matched Comparison of Hearing Outcomes in Patients With Vestibular Schwannoma Treated With Stereotactic Radiosurgery or Observation

Neurosurgery 91:641–647, 2022

Previous studies comparing hearing outcomes in patients managed with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and a watch-and-wait strategy were limited by small sample sizes that prevented controlling for potential confounders, including initial hearing status, tumor size, and age.

OBJECTIVE: To compare hearing outcomes for patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS) managed with observation and SRS while controlling for confounders with propensity score matching.

METHODS: Propensity score matching was used to compare 198 patients with unilateral VS with initial serviceable hearing (99 treated with SRS and 99 managed with observation alone) and 116 with initial class A hearing (58 managed with SRS and 58 with observation), matched by initial hearing status, tumor volume, age, and sex. Kaplan–Meier survival methods were used to compare risk of losing class A and serviceable hearing.

RESULTS: Between patients with VS managed with SRS or observation alone, there was no significant difference in loss of class A hearing (median time 27.2 months, 95% CI 16.843.4, and 29.2 months, 95% CI 20.4-62.5, P = .88) or serviceable hearing (median time 37.7 months, 95% CI 25.7-58.4, and 48.8 months, 95% CI 38.4-86.3, P = .18). For SRS patients, increasing mean cochlear dose was not related to loss of class A hearing (hazard ratio 1.3, P = .17) but was associated with increasing risk of serviceable hearing loss (hazard ratio of 1.5 per increase in Gy, P = .017).

CONCLUSION: When controlling for potential confounders, there was no significant difference in loss of class A or serviceable hearing between patients managed with SRS or with observation alone.

Posted on

Resection of vestibular schwannomas after stereotactic radiosurgery

J Neurosurg 135:881–889, 2021

Multiple short series have evaluated the efficacy of salvage microsurgery (MS) after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for treatment of vestibular schwannomas (VSs); however, there is a lack of a large volume of patient data available for interpretation and clinical adaptation. The goal of this study was to provide a comprehensive review of tumor characteristics, management, and surgical outcomes of salvage of MS after SRS for VS.

METHODS The Medline/PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were queried according to PRISMA guidelines. All English-language and translated publications were included. Studies lacking adequate study characteristics and outcomes were excluded. Cases involving neurofibromatosis type 2, previous MS, or malignant transformation were excluded when possible.

RESULTS Twenty studies containing 297 cases met inclusion criteria. Three additional cases from Rush University Medical Center were added for 300 total cases. Tumor growth with or without symptoms was the primary indication for salvage surgery (92.3% of cases), followed by worsening of symptoms without growth (4.6%) and cystic enlargement (3.1%). The average time to MS after SRS was 39.4 months. The average size and volume of tumor at surgery were 2.44 cm and 5.92 cm3, respectively. The surgical approach was retrosigmoid (42.8%) and translabyrinthine (57.2%); 59.5% of patients had a House-Brackmann (HB) grade of I or II. The facial nerve was preserved in 91.5% of cases. Facial nerve preservation and HB grades were lower for the translabyrinthine versus retrosigmoid approach (p = 0.31 and p = 0.18, respectively); however, fewer complications were noted in the translabyrinthine approach (p = 0.29). Gross-total resection (GTR) was completed in 55.7% of surgeries. Studies that predominantly used subtotal resection (STR) were associated with a lower rate of facial nerve injury (5.3% vs 11.3%, p = 0.07) and higher rate of HB grade I or II (72.9% vs 48.0%, p = 0.00003) versus those using predominantly GTR. However, majority STR was associated with a recurrence rate of 3.6% as compared to 1.4% for majority GTR (p = 0.29).

CONCLUSIONS This study showed that the leading cause of MS after SRS was tumor growth at an average of 39.4 months after radiation. There were no significant differences in outcomes of facial nerve preservation, postoperative HB grade, or complication rate based on surgical approach. Patients who underwent STR showed statistically significant better HB outcomes compared with GTR. MS after SRS was considered by most authors to be more difficult than primary MS. These data support the notion that the surgical goals of salvage surgery are debulking of tumor mass, decreasing compression of the brainstem, and not necessarily pursuing GTR.

Posted on

Large and small vestibular schwannomas: same, yet different tumors

Acta Neurochirurgica (2021) 163:2199–2207

Vestibular schwannomas (VS) present at variable size with heterogeneous symptomatology. Modern treatment paradigms for large VS include gross total resection, subtotal resection (STR) in combination with observation, and/or radiation to achieve optimal function preservation, whereas treatment is felt to be both easier and safer for small VS. The objective is to better characterize the presentation and surgical outcomes of large and small VS.

Methods We collected data of patients who had surgically treated VS with a posterior fossa diameter of 4.0 cm or larger (large tumor group, LTG) and smaller than 1.0 cm in cisternal diameter (small tumor group, STG). Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.

Results LTG included 48 patients (average tumor size: 44.9 mm) and STG 38 (7.9 mm). Patients in STG presented more frequently with tinnitus and sudden hearing loss. Patients in LTG underwent more STR than STG (50.0% vs. 2.6%, p < 0.0001). LTG had more complications (31.3% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.049). Postoperative facial nerve function in STG was significantly better than LTG. STG had better hearing preoperatively (p < 0.0001) and postoperatively than LTG (p = 0.0002). Postoperative headache was more common in STG (13.2% vs. 2.1%, p = 0.045). The rate of recurrence/progression needing treatment was not statistically different between the groups (12.5% in LTG vs. 7.9% in STG, p = 0.49). Those patients who required periprocedural cerebrospinal fluid diversion had higher risk of infection (20.8% vs 4.8%, p = 0.022).

Conclusion Large and small VS present differently. LTG showed more unsatisfactory outcomes in facial nerve function and postoperative hearing despite maximal efforts undertaken toward function-preservation strategy; however, similar tumor control was achieved.

Posted on

A critical comparison between the semisitting and the supine positioning in vestibular schwannoma surgery: subgroup analysis of a randomized, multicenter trial

J Neurosurg 133:249–256, 2020

Patient positioning in vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery is a matter of ongoing discussion. Factors to consider include preservation of cranial nerve functions, extent of tumor resection, and complications. The objective of this study was to determine the optimal patient positioning in VS surgery.

METHODS A subgroup analysis of a randomized, multicenter trial that investigated the efficacy of prophylactic nimodipine in VS surgery was performed to investigate the impact of positioning (semisitting or supine) on extent of resection, functional outcomes, and complications. The data of 97 patients were collected prospectively. All procedures were performed via a retrosigmoid approach. The semisitting position was chosen in 56 patients, whereas 41 patients were treated while supine.

RESULTS Complete resection was obtained at a higher percentage in the semisitting as compared to the supine position (93% vs 73%, p = 0.002). Logistic regression analysis revealed significantly better facial nerve function in the early postoperative course in the semisitting group (p = 0.004), particularly concerning severe facial nerve paresis (House- Brackmann grade IV or worse; p = 0.002). One year after surgery, facial nerve function recovered. However, there was still a tendency for better facial nerve function in the semisitting group (p = 0.091). There were no significant differences between groups regarding hearing preservation rates. Venous air embolism with the necessity to terminate surgery occurred in 2 patients in the semisitting position (3.6%). Supplementary analysis with a 2-tailed permutation randomization with 10,000 permutations of treatment choice and a propensity score matching showed either a tendency or significant results for better facial nerve outcomes in the early postoperative course and extent of resection in the semisitting group.

CONCLUSIONS Although the results of the various statistical analyses are not uniform, the data indicate better results concerning both a higher rate of complete removal (according to the intraoperative impression of the surgeon) and facial nerve function after a semisitting as compared to the supine position. These advantages may justify the potential higher risk for severe complications of the semisitting position in VS surgery. The choice of positioning has to consider all individual patient parameters and risks carefully.

Posted on

Postoperative Hearing Preservation in Patients Undergoing Retrosigmoid Craniotomy for Resection of Vestibular Schwannomas: A Systematic Review of 2034 Patients

Neurosurgery 2019 DOI:10.1093/neuros/nyz147

Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are benign tumors derived from Schwann cells ensheathing the vestibulocochlear nerve. The retrosigmoid (RS) surgical approach is useful to resect tumors of multiple sizes while affording the possibility of preserving postoperative hearing.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of published literature investigating hearing preservation rates in patients who underwent the RS approach for VS treatment.

METHODS: The PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases were surveyed for studies that reported preoperative and postoperative hearing grades on VS patients who underwent RS treatment. Hearing preservation rates were calculated, and additional patient demographic data were extracted. Tumor size data were stratified to compare hearing preservation rates after surgery for intracanalicular, small (0-20 mm), and large (>20 mm) tumors.

RESULTS: Of 383 deduplicated articles, 26 studies (6.8%) met eligibility criteria for a total of 2034 patients with serviceable preoperative hearing, for whom postoperative hearing status was evaluated. Aggregate hearing preservation was 31% and 35% under a fixed and random effects model, respectively. A mixed effects model was used to determine hearing preservation rates depending on tumor size, which were determined to be 57%, 37%, and 12% for intracanalicular, small, and large tumors, respectively. Significant crossstudy heterogeneity was found (I2 = 93%, τ 2 = .964, P < .01; Q = 287.80, P = < .001), with rates of hearing preservation ranging from 0% to 100%.

CONCLUSION: Tumor size may have an effect on hearing preservation rates, but multiple factors should be considered. Discussion of a patient’s expectations for hearing preservation is critical when deciding on VS treatment plans.

Posted on

Is There a Need for a 6-Month Postradiosurgery Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Treatment of Vestibular Schwannoma?

Neurosurgery, Volume 86, Issue 2, February 2020, Pages 250–256

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a common treatment modality for vestibular schwannoma (VS), with a role in primary and recurrent/progressive algorithms. At our institution, routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is obtained at 6 and 12 mo following SRS for VS.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the safety and financial impact of eliminating the 6-mo post-SRS MRI in asymptomatic VS patients. METHODS: A prospectively maintained SRS database was retrospectively reviewed for VS patients with 1 yr of post-treatment follow-up, 2005 to 2015. Decisions at 6-mo MRI were binarily categorized as routine follow-up vs clinical action—defined as a clinical visit, additional imaging, or an operation as a direct result of the 6-mo study.

RESULTS: A total of 296 patients met screening criteria, of whom 53 were excluded for incomplete follow-up and 8 for NF-2. Nine were reimaged prior to 6 mo due to clinical symptoms. Routine 6-mo post-SRS MRI was completed by 226 patients (76% of screened cohort), following from which zero instances of clinical action occurred.When scaled using national insurance database-derived financials—which estimated the mean per-study charge for MRI of the brain with and without contrast at $1767—the potential annualized national charge reduction was approximated as $1 611 504.

CONCLUSION: For clinically stable VS, 6-mo post-SRS MRI does not contribute significantly to management. We recommend omitting routine MRI before 12 mo, in patients without new or progressive neurological symptoms. If extrapolated nationally to the more than 100 active SRS centers, thousands of patients would be spared an inconvenient, nonindicated study, and national savings in health care dollarswouldbe on the order ofmillions annually.

Posted on

Treatment Outcomes and Dose Rate Effects Following Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas

Neurosurgery 85:E1084–E1094, 2019

Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS; Elekta AB) remains a well-established treatment modality for vestibular schwannomas. Despite highly effective tumor control, further research is needed toward optimizing long-term functional outcomes. Whereas dose-rate effects may impact post-treatment toxicities given tissue dose-response relationships, potential effects remain largely unexplored.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate treatment outcomes and potential dose-rate effects following definitive GKRS for vestibular schwannomas.

METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 419 patients treated at our institution between 1998 and 2015, characterizing baseline demographics, pretreatment symptoms, and GKRS parameters. The cohort was divided into 2 dose-rate groups based on the median value (2.675 Gy/min). Outcomes included clinical tumor control, radiographic progression-free survival, serviceable hearing preservation, hearing loss, and facial nerve dysfunction (FND). Prognostic factors were assessed using Cox regression.

RESULTS: The study cohort included 227 patientswith available follow-up. Following GKRS 2-yr and 4-yr clinical tumor control rates were 98% (95% CI: 95.6%-100%) and 96% (95% CI: 91.4%-99.6%), respectively. Among 177 patients with available radiographic follow-up, 2-yr and 4-yr radiographic progression-free survival rateswere 97% (95% CI: 94.0%-100.0%) and 88% (95% CI: 81.2%-95.0%). The serviceable hearing preservation rate was 72.2% among patients with baseline Gardner-Robertson class I/II hearing and post-treatment audiological evaluations. Most patients experienced effective relief from prior headaches (94.7%), tinnitus (83.7%), balance issues (62.7%), FND (90.0%), and trigeminal nerve dysfunction (79.2%), but not hearing loss (1.0%). Whereas GKRS provided effective tumor control independently of dose rate, GKRS patients exposed to lower dose rates experienced significantly better freedom from post-treatment hearing loss and FND (P = .044).

CONCLUSION:Whereas GKRS provides excellent tumor control and effective symptomatic relief for vestibular schwannomas, dose-rate effectsmay impact post-treatment functional outcomes. Further research remains warranted.

Posted on

Hearing preservation in vestibular schwannoma surgery via retrosigmoid transmeatal approach

Acta Neurochirurgica (2019) 161:2265 –2269

Advances in various diagnostic and/or treatment modalities, including radiological imaging, neuromonitoring, and microsurgical techniques, have resulted in treatments of vestibular schwannomas being aimed at preserving facial and hearing functions while achieving optimal tumor control.

Method We describe our surgical technique for hearing preservation in vestibular schwannoma surgery.

Conclusion The retrosigmoid transmeatal approach under continuous neuromonitoring (auditory brainstem response, cochlear nerve action potentials, and continuous facial nerve monitoring) enables gross-total resection of vestibular schwannomas, while preserving hearing and facial functions. Radiological assessment and microsurgical techniques, such as meticulous tumor dissection, are also essential for functional preservation with sufficient tumor removal.

Posted on

Comparing costs of microsurgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma

J Neurosurg 131:1395–1404, 2019

Given rising scrutiny of healthcare expenditures, understanding intervention costs is increasingly important. This study aimed to compare and characterize costs for vestibular schwannoma (VS) management with microsurgery and radiosurgery to inform practice decisions and appraise cost reduction strategies.

METHODS In conjunction with medical records, internal hospital financial data were used to evaluate costs. Total cost was divided into index costs (costs from arrival through discharge for initial intervention) and follow-up costs (through 36 months) for 317 patients with unilateral VSs undergoing initial management between June 2011 and December 2015. A retrospective matched cohort based on tumor size with 176 patients (88 undergoing each intervention) was created to objectively compare costs between microsurgery and radiosurgery. The full sample of 203 patients treated with resection and 114 patients who underwent radiosurgery was used to evaluate a broad range of outcomes and identify cost contributors within each intervention group.

RESULTS Within the matched cohort, average index costs were significantly higher for microsurgery (100% by definition, because costs are presented as a percentage of the average index cost for the matched microsurgery group; 95% CI 93–107) compared to radiosurgery (38%, 95% CI 38–39). Microsurgery had higher average follow-up costs (1.6% per month, 95% CI 0.8%–2.4%) compared to radiosurgery (0.5% per month, 95% CI 0.4%–0.7%), largely due to costs incurred in the initial months after resection. A major contributor to total cost and cost variability for both resection and radiosurgery was the need for additional interventions in the follow-up period, which were necessary due to complications or persistent functional deficits. Although tumor size was not associated with increased total costs for radiosurgery, linear regression analysis demonstrated that, for patients who underwent microsurgery, each centimeter increase in tumor maximum diameter resulted in an estimated increase in total cost of 50.2% of the average index cost of microsurgery (95% CI 34.6%–65.7%) (p < 0.001, R 2 = 0.17). There were no cost differences associated with the proportion of inpatient days in the ICU or with specific surgical approach for patients who underwent resection.

CONCLUSIONS This study is the largest assessment to date based on internal cost data comparing VS management with microsurgery and radiosurgery. Both index and follow-up costs are significantly higher when tumors were managed with resection compared to radiosurgery. Larger tumors were associated with increased resection costs, highlighting the incremental costs associated with observation as the initial management.

Posted on

Cystic Vestibular Schwannomas Respond Best to Radiosurgery

Neurosurgery 81:490–497, 2017

Vestibular schwannomas (VS) have a well-documented response to Gamma Knife R  (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). However, there are limited data available regarding the volumetric response of cystic tumors.

OBJECTIVE: This report correlates the radiographic appearance of VS before radiosurgery with the delayed volumetric response.

METHODS: This study reviewed our SRS experience with 219 VS patients between 2003 and 2013. Patients were treatment naïve and had a significant extracanalicular tumor volume. Magnetic resonance imaging at the time of SRS identified 42 contrast-enhancing macrocystic tumors, 45 contrast-enhancing microcystic tumors, and 132 homogeneously enhancing tumors with no intratumoral cyst formation. The median follow-up was 49.1 months. The median tumor volume was 2.6 cm3 (0.70-16.1 cm3) and the median dose was 12.5 Gy (11-13 Gy).

RESULTS: The actuarial tumor control rate was 99.4% at 2 years and 96.4% at 5 years. A volumetric reduction of >20% occurred in 85.4% of macrocystic tumors, 76.1% of microcystic tumors, and 62.8% of homogeneously enhancing VS. The median volume decrease per year for macrocystic, microcystic, and homogenous tumors was 17.2%, 7.5%, and 7.9% per year respectively (P < .001). A 2:1 blinded volumetric case match showed a significant size reduction in macrocystic tumors compared to noncystic tumors (P = .007). Serviceable hearing was maintained in 61.5% of patients that had Gardner-Robertson grade I-II hearing before treatment. Surgical resection or repeat radiosurgery was performed in 8 patients (3.6%) who had sustained tumor progression.

CONCLUSION: SRS provided VS tumor control in >95% of patients, regardless of radiographic characteristics. Tumor volume regression was most evident in patients with cystic tumors.

Posted on

Delayed Facial Palsy After Vestibular Schwannoma Resection

vestibular-schwannoma

Neurosurgery 78:251–255, 2016

Preservation of facial nerve function following vestibular schwannoma surgery is a high priority. Even those patients with normal to near-normal function in the early postoperative period remain at risk for delayed facial palsy (DFP).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence and prognosis of DFP and to identify risk factors for its occurrence.

METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 489 patients who underwent vestibular schwannoma resection at our institution between 2000 and 2014. Delayed facial palsy was defined as deterioration in facial function of at least 2 House-Brackmann (HB) grades between postoperative days 5 to 30. Only patients with a HB grade of I to III by postoperative day 5 were eligible for study inclusion.

RESULTS: One hundred twenty-one patients with HB grade IV to VI facial weakness at postoperative day 5 were excluded from analysis. Of the remaining 368, 60 (16%) patients developed DFP (mean 12 days postoperatively, range: 5-25 days). All patients recovered function to HB grade I to II by a mean of 33 days (range: 7-86 days). Patients that developed DFP had higher rates of gross total resections (83% vs 71%, P = .05) and retrosigmoid approaches (72% vs 52%, P, .01). There was no difference in recovery time between patients who received treatment with steroids, steroids with antivirals, or no treatment at all (P = .530).

CONCLUSION: Patients with a gross total tumor resection or undergoing a retrosigmoid approach may be at higher risk of DFP. The prognosis is favorable, with patients likely recovering to normal or near-normal facial function within 1 month of onset.

Posted on

Retrosigmoid removal of small acoustic neuroma: curative tumor removal with preservation of function

Retrosigmoid removal of small acoustic neuroma

J Neurosurg 121:554–563, 2014

Management of small acoustic neuromas (ANs) consists of 3 options: observation with imaging followup, radiosurgery, and/or tumor removal. The authors report the long-term outcomes and preservation of function after retrosigmoid tumor removal in 44 patients and clarify the management paradigm for small ANs.

Methods. A total of 44 consecutively enrolled patients with small ANs and preserved hearing underwent retrosigmoid tumor removal in an attempt to preserve hearing and facial function by use of intraoperative auditory monitoring of auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) and cochlear nerve compound action potentials (CNAPs). All patients were younger than 70 years of age, had a small AN (purely intracanalicular/cerebellopontine angle tumor ≤ 15 mm), and had serviceable hearing preoperatively. According to the guidelines of the Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, preoperative hearing levels of the 44 patients were as follows: Class A, 19 patients; Class B, 17; and Class C, 8. The surgical technique for curative tumor removal with preservation of hearing and facial function included sharp dissection and debulking of the tumor, reconstruction of the internal auditory canal, and wide removal of internal auditory canal dura.

Results. For all patients, tumors were totally removed without incidence of facial palsy, death, or other complications. Total tumor removal was confirmed by the first postoperative Gd-enhanced MRI performed 12 months after surgery. Postoperative hearing levels were Class A, 5 patients; Class B, 21; Class C, 11; and Class D, 7. Postoperatively, serviceable (Class A, B, or C) and useful (Class A or B) levels of hearing were preserved for 84% and 72% of patients, respectively. Better preoperative hearing resulted in higher rates of postoperative hearing preservation (p = 0.01); preservation rates were 95% among patients with preoperative Class A hearing, 88% among Class B, and 50% among Class C. Reliable monitoring was more frequently provided by CNAPs than by ABRs (66% vs 32%, p < 0.01), and consistently reliable auditory monitoring was significantly associated with better rates of preservation of useful hearing. Long-term follow-up by MRI with Gd administration (81 ± 43 months [range 5–181 months]; median 7 years) showed no tumor recurrence, and although the preserved hearing declined minimally over the long-term postoperative follow-up period (from 39 ± 15 dB to 45 ± 11 dB in 5.1 ± 3.1 years), 80% of useful hearing and 100% of serviceable hearing remained at the same level.

Conclusions. As a result of a surgical technique that involved sharp dissection and internal auditory canal reconstruction with intraoperative auditory monitoring, retrosigmoid removal of small ANs can lead to successful curative tumor removal without long-term recurrence and with excellent functional outcome. Thus, the authors suggest that tumor removal should be the first-line management strategy for younger patients with small ANs and preserved hearing.

Posted on

Hearing preservation surgery for vestibular schwannomas via the retrosigmoid transmeatal approach

Hearing preservation surgery in VS-1

Neurosurg Rev (2014) 37:431–444

Maximum tumor extirpation with preservation of the facial and cochlear nerve function is the goal of surgery for vestibular schwannoma. To preserve cochlear nerve function, the surgeon must employ a detailed knowledge of microanatomy, precise microsurgical techniques, and persistence. This paper describes the “pearls” of surgical techniques based on the anatomical study inside the mastoid from the view of the retrosigmoid transmeatal approach.

A total of 592 consecutive patients underwent surgical removal of unilateral vestibular schwannoma (VS) between January 1994 and December 2009. The hearing preservation rate was 53.7 % for large vestibular schwannomas (>20 mm in diameter) and 74.1 % for tumors of all sizes.

The key procedures for hearing preservation surgery are as follows: bloodless microdissection, sufficient coring-debulking, capsular elevation to locate the facial and cochlear nerves both electrophysiologically and by visual observation, sharp dissection of the facial and cochlear nerves, and avoidance of heat and mechanical injury to the nerves, the internal auditory artery, and the brain stem. Besides these techniques, appropriate instruments are essential to preserve hearing.

The function of the facial and cochlear nerves should be the foremost concern. Meticulous techniques and the knowledge of microsurgical anatomy lead to hearing preservation with maximum tumor removal.

 

Proudly powered by WordPress