The surgical management of chronic subdural hematoma

Neurosurg Rev DOI 10.1007/s10143-011-0349-y

Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is an increasingly common neurological disease process. Despite the wide prevalence of cSDH, there remains a lack of consensus regarding numerous aspects of its clinical management. We provide an overview of the epidemiology and pathophysiology of cSDH and discuss several controversial management issues, including the timing of postoperative resumption of anticoagulant medications, the effectiveness of anti-epileptic prophylaxis, protocols for mobilization following evacuation of cSDH, as well as the comparative effectiveness of the various techniques of surgical evacuation.

A PubMed search was carried out through October 19, 2010 using the following keywords: “subdural hematoma”, “craniotomy”, “burr-hole”, “management”, “anticoagulation”, “seizure prophylaxis”, “antiplatelet”, “mobilization”, and “surgical evacuation”, alone and in combination. Relevant articles were identified and back-referenced to yield additional papers. A meta-analysis was then performed comparing the efficacy and complications associated with the various methods of cSDH evacuation.

There is general agreement that significant coagulopathy should be reversed expeditiously in patients presenting with cSDH. Although protocols for gradual resumption of anti-coagulation for prophylaxis of venous thrombosis may be derived from guidelines for other neurosurgical procedures, further prospective study is necessary to determine the optimal time to restart fulldose anti-coagulation in the setting of recently drained cSDH. There is also conflicting evidence to support seizure prophylaxis in patients with cSDH, although the existing literature supports prophylaxis in patients who are at a higher risk for seizures.

The published data regarding surgical technique for cSDH supports primary twist drill craniostomy (TDC) drainage at the bedside for patients who are high-risk surgical candidates with non-septated cSDH and craniotomy as a first-line evacuation technique for cSDH with significant membranes. Larger prospective studies addressing these aspects of cSDH management are necessary to establish definitive recommendations.

Thromboembolic Complications of Elective Coil Embolization of Unruptured Aneurysms: The Effect of Oral Antiplatelet Preparation on Periprocedural Thromboembolic Complication

Neurosurgery 67:743-748, 2010 DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000374770.09140.FB

We retrospectively evaluated whether antiplatelet preparation lowered the thromboembolic complication rate during the perioperative period.

METHODS:We reviewed 328 elective coil embolization procedures in which only microcatheters were used for coiling. No antiplatelet medication was prescribed before the procedure in 95 cases (29%, group 1), whereas antiplatelet therapy was used in 233 cases (71%, group 2; 61 [18.6%] with a single agent [aspirin or clopidogrel] and 172 [52.4%] with both agents). Antiplatelet agents were not given after coiling unless atherosclerosis, severe coil protrusion, or a thromboembolic complication occurred during the procedure. A thromboembolic complication was defined as a procedural thromboembolic event or transient ischemic attack or stroke occurring within 2 days of embolization.

RESULTS: Thromboembolic complications occurred in 11 cases (3.4%): 6 (6.3%) in group 1 and 5 (2.1%) in group 2 (P = .085). In 195 cases (59.5%) treated by the single microcatheter technique, the risk of thromboembolic complications was low and not affected by antiplatelet preparation (1.8% [no preparation] vs 2.2% [preparation]; P = 1.000). However, in 133 cases (40.5%) treated by the multiple microcatheter technique, antiplatelet preparation significantly reduced the thromboembolic complication risk by 85.2% (12.8% [no preparation] vs 2.1% [preparation]; odds ratio, 0.148; 95% confidence interval, 0.027-0.798; P = .023). The aneurysms treated by the multiple microcatheter technique had more complex configurations for coiling (P < .001). The risk of hemorrhage was not increased by antiplatelet preparation (P = .171).

CONCLUSION: Antiplatelet preparation lowered the periprocedural thromboembolic complication rate in unruptured aneurysms treated by the multiple microcatheter technique and did not increase the risk of hemorrhage. Therefore, antiplatelet preparation can help to reduce complications in patients in whom technical difficulties are expected without the risk of hemorrhage.