Minimally invasive modification of the Goel-Harms atlantoaxial fusion technique

Neurosurg Focus 54(3):E14, 2023

The Goel-Harms atlantoaxial screw fixation technique for the treatment of atlantoaxial instability and unstable odontoid fractures is reliable and reproducible for a variety of anatomies. The drawbacks of the technique are the potential for significant bleeding from the C2 nerve root venous plexus and the risks associated with posterior midline exposure and retraction, such as pain and wound complications. The authors developed a minimally invasive surgical (MIS) modification of the Goel-Harms technique using intra-articular grafting to facilitate placement of percutaneous lateral mass and pars screws with extended tabs for minimally invasive subfascial rod placement. The objective of this study was to present the authors’ first series of 5 patients undergoing minimally invasive modification in comparison with 51 patients undergoing open atlantoaxial fusion.

METHODS A retrospective analysis of patient comorbid conditions, blood loss, length of surgery, and length of stay was performed on patients undergoing Goel-Harms instrumented fusion (GHIF) for unstable odontoid fractures performed between 2016 and 2021.

RESULTS Patients undergoing the minimally invasive procedure showed significantly less blood loss than those undergoing the open atlantoaxial fusion procedure, with a median blood loss of 30 ml compared with 150 ml using the open technique (p < 0.01). The patients showed no significant differences in length of stay (2 days for MIS vs 4 days for open atlantoaxial fusion, p = 0.25). There were no significant differences in length of surgery for MIS, but a possible trend toward increased operative duration (234 vs 151 minutes, p = 0.112).

CONCLUSIONS In this small pilot study, it was shown that MIS-GHIF can be performed with decreased blood loss in atlantoaxial instability and odontoid fractures. This technique may allow for greater and safer application of the procedure in the elderly and infirm.

 

Atlantoaxial Instability of Inflammatory Origin in Adults

Atlantoaxial Instability of Inflammatory Origin in Adults

Neurosurgery 76:E226–E232, 2015

Acquired atlantoaxial instability of inflammatory origin (Grisel syndrome) is a rare condition. It usually occurs in children with benign upper airway problems and responds well to immobilization, rarely requiring C1-2 arthrodesis. Our recent experience with 2 adult cases suggests this may not be true in an older subpopulation.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 71-year-old man developed C1-2 instability in the setting of culture-negative endocarditis. Initial immobilization was attempted for 8 weeks but new imaging revealed progressive destruction of the odontoid and worsening instability. Symptoms resolved after C1-4 arthrodesis. A 35-year-old woman developed C1-2 instability after a molar extraction and otitis media. Despite 12 weeks of immobilization and antibiotics, symptoms persisted and the atlantodental interval increased. She was successfully treated with a C1-2 arthrodesis.

CONCLUSION: A literature review revealed 13 reports (14 cases) of inflammatory atlantoaxial instability in patients aged 18 and older since 1830. Including the 2 cases reported here, 11 cases underwent initial nonoperative treatment with durable satisfactory results in only 2 of them (18.2%). Aspiration of the C1-2 phlegmon was diagnostic in only 4 of these 16 cases. Destruction of the odontoid was seen in a minority of cases (5/16, 31.3%). In this first review of the topic since the introduction of screwbased C1-2 fixation, it is suggested that nonoperative treatment is futile for inflammatory atlantoaxial instability in adults and strong consideration should be given to C1-2 arthrodesis. This procedure can reliably produce good outcomes with minimal morbidity.

Is inclusion of the occiput necessary in fusion for C1–2 instability in rheumatoid arthritis?

Is inclusion of the occiput necessary in fusion for C1–2 instability in rheumatoid arthritis?

J Neurosurg Spine 18:50–56, 2013

The atlantoaxial joint is the location most and earliest affected in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In longstanding disease, ligamentous and osseous destruction can progress and involve all cervical segments. If surgical intervention is necessary, some prefer, to be safe, undertaking fusion to the occiput, whereas others advocate 1-level fusion of C1–2. Sparing the occiput (Oc)–C1 segment would allow retention of a considerable amount of physiological range of motion and seems beneficial against subaxial overload. Previous clinical studies on this topic have provided only nonspecific data after short-term follow-up, rendering a segment-sparing approach questionable. The purpose of the present investigation was to assess long-term progression of inflammatory or degenerative destruction in the Oc–C1 segment after isolated C1–2 fusion for RA.

Methods. In a series of 113 consecutive patients with RA-related destruction restricted to the craniocervical junction, 14 individuals underwent Oc–C2 fusion and 99 underwent surgery exclusively at the C1–2 level. After a mean follow-up period of 9.4 years (range 4.9–14.7 years), 46 patients were available for clinical and radiographic examination, including CT imaging.

Results. None of the 46 patients needed additional surgery to extend the fusion to the occiput. Despite marked deterioration in the subaxial cervical spine, in general there were little or no changes in the atlantooccipital region. All but one patient presented with bony fusion of the fixed C1–2 level at follow-up.

Conclusions. The results of this investigation suggest that if the Oc–C1 joint is free of osseous destructions on conventional radiographs and free of abnormalities on MRI scans at the time of surgery (for transarticular fixation and fusion of C1–2), there is a very low risk for relevant destruction in the following 5–14 years. Thus, no prophylactic oligosegmental approach, but rather a segment-sparing monosegmental approach, is preferred, even in patients with high inflammatory levels.