A Review of Complications Associated With Craniocervical Fusion Surgery

Neurosurgery 67:1396–1403, 2010 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181f1ec73

Fusion at the craniovertebral junction is performed to treat instability of the upper cervical spine and occiput. The literature consists exclusively of case series in which complication rate and avoidance are variably addressed.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the rates of various complications encountered during craniocervical fusions and discuss preoperative and perioperative strategies useful for risk reduction. METHODS: A computerized search of PubMed for literature on craniocervical fusion and other upper cervical fusions was performed. Keywords used in the search included: occipitocervical fusion, odontoid screw, atlantoaxial fusion, with and without complications, anterior fixation, lateral mass screw, transarticular screw, halo, vertebral artery injury, and odontoid fracture. References were limited to studies on human subjects. Other sources were identified from the reference lists of relevant publications.

RESULTS: Twenty-two reports described data derived from 2274 procedures analyzed for complications. The most commonly encountered perioperative complications were related to instrumentation failure after nonunion with rates as high as 7% during occipitocervical fusion and 6.7% during atlantoaxial fusion. Other commonly encountered complications included injury to the vertebral artery (1.3%-4.1% during placement of C1-C2 transarticular screws, most commonly in the case of high-riding vertebral artery), dural tears, and wound infection.

CONCLUSION: Occipitocervical or atlantoaxial fusion procedures can be performed with low morbidity. Safety is enhanced with appropriate preoperative assessment of anatomic variants and preparation for perioperative management of complications.

Outcome of 132 Operations in 97 Patients With Chordomas of the Craniocervical Junction and Upper Cervical Spine

Neurosurgery 66:59-65, 2010 DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000362000.35742.3D

OBJECTIVE: To study the outcomes of surgery for chordomas of the craniocervical junction and upper cervical spine as well as complication rates, survival, and associated adverse factors.

METHODS: Retrospective review of patients (1982-2007) at 2 European centers who underwent transoral, transfacial, transmandibular, and anterior cervical approaches for excision of chordomas of the craniocervical junction and cervical spine. The χ2 test and Fisher exact test were used to determine significant adverse factors (P < .05), and log-rank survival analysis was used to compare outcome in different groups.

RESULTS: One hundred thirty-two operations were performed in 97 patients. The most common operations were transoral surgeries and maxillotomies. After surgery, neck pain was the same or better in 98.1% of patients. Of the 18.6% of patients who presented with myelopathy, 27.8% improved, 44.4% remained unchanged, and 27.8% deteriorated. Major complication rates were velopharyngeal incompetence, 3.1%; vertebral artery stroke, 1%; wound infection, 3.1%; dysphagia, 3.1%; failure of fixation, 2.1%; sepsis, 3.1%; meningitis, 3.1%; and cerebrospinal fluid leakage, 6.2%. Five- and 10-year overall survivals were 55% and 36%, respectively. Patients who presented to our units for revision surgery, after prior attempts at resection elsewhere, were associated with a worse survival than patients who underwent de novo surgery.

CONCLUSION: We present, to our knowledge, the largest published series of chordomas at the craniocervical junction. Complication rates for these major operations can be minimized at specialist centers, with careful patient selection and counseling. As complete or as radical an operation as possible should be performed at first presentation; the best chance for the patient is the first chance.