Acta Neurochirurgica (2026) 168:122
This review chronicles the development and technical refinement of the far‑lateral approach (FLA) for accessing the foramen magnum, lower clivus, and craniovertebral junction, tracing its origins from lateral suboccipital exposures to contemporary transcondylar, supracondylar, paracondylar, and extreme lateral transodontoid variants. It summarizes modifications in skin incisions, bony resection strategies, VA management, positioning, and closure techniques that improved exposure while minimizing brain retraction and craniovertebral morbidity.
The article evaluates clinical outcomes, biomechanical data, and technological integrations—endoscopic assistance, neuronavigation, and neuromonitoring—emphasizing a tailored, pathology-driven philosophy: remove only the bone necessary, mobilize the vertebral artery judiciously, and consider occipitocervical fusion when stability thresholds are exceeded to balance maximal resection with minimal long‑term instability and CSF complications.
Purpose: Provides a more anterior, tangential corridor to the foramen magnum/lower clivus/CVJ for ventrolateral or anterior brainstem pathology, reducing the need for brainstem/cerebellar retraction compared with older midline posterior and transoral routes.
Origins: Evolved from posterolateral aneurysm surgery—early unilateral suboccipital routes in the 1970s, with the first detailed “lateral suboccipital” (far-lateral) description by Heros in 1986 to reach distal vertebral and basilar trunk aneurysms by extending bone removal to the lateral foramen magnum rim.
Key bone-work concept: The major exposure-expanding step is selective occipital condyle drilling (transcondylar variant), typically about one-third to one-half to improve the angle of attack while aiming to preserve craniocervical stability; complete condyle removal is rare and generally prompts fusion.
Modular variants: The approach is used as adjustable “modules,” most notably transcondylar, supracondylar (jugular tubercle drilling), and paracondylar extensions, chosen based on lesion location and direction of extension.
Soft-tissue refinements: Incisions shifted from simple linear cuts to more tailored curvilinear/hockey-stick/C-shaped designs with larger musculocutaneous flaps to improve exposure, enable layered closure, and reduce wound/CSF-leak complications.
Positioning evolution: Use moved away from sitting (air embolism risk) toward lateral/modified park-bench positioning to leverage gravity-assisted relaxation and minimize fixed retraction.
Neurovascular strategy: Standardization of extradural vertebral artery (V3/V4) exposure and mobilization (when needed) improved proximal control and widened the corridor, turning the artery from an obstacle into a structure that can be safely managed to expand working space.
Modern extensions & technology: Continued refinement includes endoscope-assisted visualization, neuronavigation, and neuromonitoring; an extreme extension (ELTO) adds aggressive bony removal (including odontoid/C1 elements) for midline-crossing lesions but carries high instability risk, so occipitocervical fusion is typically performed.













You must be logged in to post a comment.