Suprasellar Versus Third Ventricular Cysts: Anatomic and Surgical Considerations

Operative Neurosurgery 30:468–471, 2026

This surgical case instruction contrasts suprasellar arachnoid cysts (SACs) and third ventricular cysts (3VCs), emphasizing their distinct imaging features, clinical presentations, and risks of obstructive hydrocephalus. It summarizes patient examples, MRI findings, and outcomes after endoscopic cyst fenestration, demonstrating restoration of cerebrospinal fluid flow and symptom resolution.

The article details stepwise endoscopic techniques—cyst plane development, wall reduction, excision, and membrane management—highlighting anatomical cues that guide whether endoscopic third ventriculostomy is necessary. Practical tips on preserving hypothalamic structures, restoring aqueduct patency, and minimizing reaccumulation are provided for neurosurgical practice.

Prevalence Intracranial arachnoid cysts occur in ~2.6% of children and ~1.4% of adults; suprasellar arachnoid cysts (SACs) comprise ~9%–21% of pediatric arachnoid cysts and can be confused with rarer third ventricular cysts (3VCs).

Presentation SACs and 3VCs often enlarge and cause obstructive hydrocephalus with symptoms of increased intracranial pressure, prompting urgent treatment to restore CSF circulation.

Imaging differences (SAC) SACs elevate the third ventricular floor, displace mammillary bodies superiorly/posteriorly, and elongate/stretch the midbrain and aqueduct, with aqueduct occlusion from distortion and the posterior cyst wall.

Imaging differences (3VC) 3VCs displace the third ventricular floor and mammillary bodies inferiorly with midbrain compaction; the aqueduct is obstructed by midbrain distortion and the inferoposterior cyst wall.

Treatment rationale A shunt without cyst fenestration can lead to asymmetric hydrocephalus and/or continued cyst enlargement due to cyst-related occlusion of the foramina of Monro; neuroendoscopy enables cyst fenestration with low morbidity risk at experienced centers.

Endoscopic steps A stepwise intraventricular endoscopic approach includes: developing the cyst/ventricle plane; reducing cyst wall size (coagulation); excising roof/lateral/medial walls (with caution laterally in SACs due to hypothalamic fusion); removing/reducing floating membranes (especially posteriorly) to open access to the aqueduct.

Inferior wall strategy In SACs, inferior membrane fenestration may be unnecessary because the prepontine cistern is already exposed/communicates with the third ventricle; in 3VCs, the inferior aspect is the third ventricular floor, and endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) is an option.

ETV decision point If posterior membrane resection fully restores aqueduct patency, ETV may not be necessary; reducing expansile membranes is pursued to lower risk of reaccumulation from scarring.

Microsurgical pineal cyst fenestration: A safe and effective treatment strategy in patients with symptomatic pineal cyst syndrome

Acta Neurochirurgica (2025) 167:179

Microsurgical fenestration of pineal cysts significantly improved symptoms in 94% of non-hydrocephalic patients with nonspecific symptoms, with no mortality or severe adverse events. Cyst size and radiological features did not predict outcomes. The study supports fenestration as a safe, effective treatment, but optimal indications remain unclear.

• Microsurgical fenestration of pineal cysts (PC) was studied as a treatment for symptomatic patients without hydrocephalus.

• Most patients had nonspecific symptoms like headache, dizziness, and sleep disturbances; nearly all saw surgery as a last resort.

• 47 patients were analyzed, with an average follow-up of about 7 years post-surgery.

• Significant symptom improvement was observed: mean pain score (VAS) dropped from 7 to 1, with 96% reporting relief.

• No mortality or severe complications occurred; minor complications included CSF leaks (10%) and one surgical site infection.

• No clinical or radiological factors predicted better outcomes; even small cysts could benefit from surgery.

• Fenestration of both anterior and posterior cyst walls was seen as key to success, potentially safer than full resection.

• Further research is needed to define indications, optimal technique, and pathophysiology of symptomatic pineal cysts.