Neurosurgery 98:256–268, 2026
This clinical study evaluates deep learning models that predict whether intracranial pressure (ICP) exceeds 15 mm Hg from brain CT scans, integrating demographic and Glasgow Coma Scale data into image inputs. Four 3D architectures—including MobileNetV2 3D and DenseNet201 3D—were trained on 578 paired CT–ICP cases with preprocessing, augmentation, and explainability via class activation maps.
Results show MobileNetV2 3D achieved the best generalization (AUC 0.883, recall 81.8%), with demographic embedding improving performance; limitations include single-center data, class imbalance, and lack of external validation, and authors recommend multicenter expansion and refined region-specific feature extraction before clinical deployment.
Intracranial Pressure (ICP) Risk: Elevated ICP is a critical, potentially fatal condition requiring rapid diagnosis and intervention, but current gold-standard invasive monitoring methods carry risks and are not always feasible in emergency settings.
Noninvasive ICP Assessment Challenge: Existing noninvasive methods (e.g., CT-based qualitative markers) lack sufficient accuracy and reliability for routine emergency use, highlighting the need for improved approaches.
Deep Learning Solution: Four deep learning models were trained on a custom dataset of 578 paired brain CT scans, demographic information, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores to classify whether ICP exceeds 15 mm Hg, addressing the gap in noninvasive, rapid ICP estimation.
Data Integration Innovation: Demographic and GCS data were embedded and merged with CT imaging, creating a multimodal input that improved model performance compared to imaging-only approaches.
Best Model Performance: The MobileNetV2 3D model with demographic data achieved the highest test AUC of 88.3% and recall of 81.8%, outperforming other architectures and showing promise for high-sensitivity emergency applications.
Explainability: Class Activation Maps (CAMs) were used to visualize which regions of the brain CT scans influenced model predictions, enhancing transparency and interpretability of the AI system.
Limitations: The study’s main limitations include a relatively small, single-center dataset with class imbalance, lack of external/multicenter validation, and potential inconsistencies due to timing mismatches between CT and ICP measurements.
Clinical Impact & Future Directions: This AI approach could reduce reliance on invasive monitoring and accelerate ICP triage in neurocritical care; further multicenter studies, prospective validation, and expansion to multiclass classification are needed for clinical deployment.








You must be logged in to post a comment.