Tag: Diskectomy

Posted on

The Timing of Diskectomy as a Predictor of Outcomes in Patients With Lumbar Disk Herniation

Neurosurgery 98:1051–1062, 2026

This prospective cohort study evaluates how the duration of preoperative symptoms influences outcomes after microdiskectomy for lumbar disk herniation. Outcomes measured include radicular pain, low back pain, disability (ODI), and motor and sensory deficits, with follow-up at 6 weeks, 6, 12, and 24 months in 1,120 analyzed patients.

Key finding: surgical intervention within one month of symptom onset yields faster, more pronounced pain relief and neurological recovery, whereas symptoms persisting beyond two years associate with the highest rates of residual motor and sensory deficits at 24 months.

Objective Evaluate how the preoperative duration of low back pain, disability, radicular leg pain, and motor/sensory deficits relates to postoperative outcomes after microdiskectomy for lumbar disk herniation (LDH).

Design/setting Prospective cohort (April 2015–October 2022) of adults undergoing microdiskectomy for symptomatic LDH with imaging-confirmed herniation consistent with symptoms.

Assessments & follow-up Pain measured by NRS, disability by ODI, motor deficit by MRC grading, sensory deficit as present/absent; assessed pre-op and at 6 weeks, 6, 12, and 24 months post-op.

Cohort size 1222 patients enrolled; 69 recurrences and 33 lost to follow-up excluded, leaving 1120 for statistical analyses.

Symptom-duration grouping Patients categorized by symptom duration thresholds ≤1, ≤6, ≤24, and ≥25 months for LDH-related symptoms (pain/disability/neurologic symptomatology).

Key outcome (timing) Surgery performed within 1 month of symptom onset was associated with more favorable outcomes than longer symptom duration, including faster improvement in neurological deficit and more significant radicular pain relief.

Residual deficits at 2 years Residual motor and sensory deficits at 24 months were least common when preoperative neurological symptoms lasted ≤1 month, and more common when symptoms exceeded 1 month.

Worst outcomes with long duration LDH symptoms persisting beyond 2 years were associated with the least favorable postoperative outcomes, including the highest residual motor and sensory deficits at 2 years.

Posted on

Influence of Time of Discharge and Length of Stay on 30-Day Outcomes After Elective Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery

Neurosurgery 90:734–742, 2022

Encouraging early time of discharge (TOD) for medical inpatients is commonplace and may potentially improve patient throughput. It is unclear, however, whether early TOD after elective spine surgery achieves this goal without a consequent increase in re-presentations to the hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether early TOD results in increased rates of hospital read- mission or return to the emergency department after elective anterior cervical spine surgery.

METHODS: We analyzed 686 patients who underwent elective uncomplicated anterior cervical spine surgery at a single institution. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between sociodemographic, procedural, and discharge characteristics, and the outcomes of readmission or return to the emergency department and TOD.

RESULTS: In multiple logistic regression, TOD was not associated with increased risk of readmission or return to the emergency department within 30 days of surgery. Weekend discharge (odds ratio [OR] 0.33, 95% CI 0.21-0.53), physical therapy evaluation (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.28-0.71), and occupational therapy evaluation (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.17-0.63) were all significantly associated with decreased odds of discharge before noon. Disadvantaged status, as measured by area of deprivation index, was associated with increased odds of readmission or re-presentation (OR 1.86, 95% CI 0.95-3.66), although this result did not achieve statistical significance.

CONCLUSION: There does not appear to be an association between readmission or return to the emergency department and early TOD after elective spine surgery. Overuse of inpatient physical and occupational therapy consultations may contribute to decreased patient throughput in surgical admissions.

Posted on

Motor Recovery Depends on Timing of Surgery in Patients With Lumbar Disk Herniation

Neurosurgery 90:347–353, 2022

Although approximately half of the patients undergoing lumbar disk surgery present with motor deficits, timing of surgery for radicular weakness is largely unclear.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of surgical timing on motor recovery in patients with lumbar disk herniation (LDH) and to identify an ideal time window for intervention.

METHODS: In a single-center observational trial, 390 patients with LDH-associated motor deficits were prospectively followed for a minimum of 12 months after nonelective mi- croscopic disk surgery. The duration of motor deficit before surgery was documented. Motor function was graded according to the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale. Statistical analysis of motor recovery applied unbiased recursive partitioning conditional inference tree to determine cutoff times for optimal surgical intervention. The slope of recovery calculated as the change of the MRC grade over time served as the primary outcome.

RESULTS: A preoperative motor deficit of MRC ≤2/5 and the duration of paresis were identified as the most important predictors of recovery (P < .001). Surgery within 3 days was associated with a better recovery for both severe and moderate/mild deficits (P = .017 for MRC ≤ 2/5; P < .001 for MRC > 2/5; number needed to treat [NNT] <2). A sensitivity analysis in mild motor deficits indicated a cutoff of 8 days.

CONCLUSION: Timing of surgery is crucial for motor recovery in LDH-associated deficits. Immediate diagnosis, imaging, and referral should be aimed for to allow disk surgery within 3 days in patients with severe and moderate radicular weakness. If functionally disabling, even mild deficits may warrant decompression within a week.

 
Posted on

Effectiveness of Surgical Decompression in Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

Neurosurgery 89:844–851, 2021

Conflicting evidence exists regarding the effectiveness of surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), particularly in mild DCM.

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the impact of surgery on patient-reported outcomes in patients with mild (modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association [mJOA]≥15), moderate (mJOA 12-14), and severe (mJOA < 12) DCM.

METHODS: Prospective, multicenter cohort study of patients with DCM who underwent surgery between 2015 and 2019 and completed 1-yr follow-up. Outcome measures (mJOA, Neck Disability Index [NDI], EuroQol-5D [EQ-5D], Short Form [SF-12] Physical Component Score [PCS]/Mental Component Score [MCS], numeric rating scale [NRS] neck, and arm pain) were assessed at 3 and 12 mo postoperatively and compared to baseline, stratified by DCM severity. Changes in outcome measures that were statistically significant (P < .05) and met their respective minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) were deemed clinically meaningful. Responder analysis was performed to compare the proportion of patients betweenDCMseverity groups whomet the MCID for each outcome measure.

RESULTS: The cohort comprised 391 patients: 110 mild, 163 moderate, and 118 severe. At 12 mo after surgery, severe DCM patients experienced significant improvements in all outcome measures; moderate DCM patients improved in mJOA, NDI, EQ-5D, and PCS; mild DCM patients improved in EQ-5D and PCS. There was no significant difference between severity groups in the proportion of patients reaching MCID at 12 mo after surgery for any outcome measure, except NDI.

CONCLUSION: At 12 mo after surgery, patients with mild, moderate, and severe DCM all demonstrated improved outcomes. Severe DCM patients experienced the greatest breadth of improvement, but the proportion of patients in each severity group achieving clinically meaningful changes did not differ significantly across most outcome measures.

Posted on

Are There Any Risk Factors Associated with the Presence of Cauda Equina Syndrome in Symptomatic Lumbar Disk Herniation?

World Neurosurg. (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.260

Risk factors for developing cauda equina syndrome (CES) caused by lumbar disk herniation (LDH) remain controversial and have not been established yet. The aim of the study was to investigate whether there is a relationship among age, sex, body mass index (BMI), or the degree of spinal canal compromise and the presence of CES in patients undergoing lumbar microdiskectomy.

METHODS: Between 2015 and 2019, 506 patients who had an operation for LDH compressing the dural sac were prospectively identified. The “prolapse-to-canal ratio” (PCR) was calculated as a proportion of the cross-sectional area of the disk prolapse compared with the total crosssectional area of the spinal canal.

RESULTS: In total, 35 CES (6.9%) patients were identified. Multivariate logistic regression, adjusted for age, gender, BMI, and PCR, shows that only PCR was associated with the presence of CES (P < 0.001, area under the curve 0.7431). BMI was not associated with an increased risk of CES.

CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a significant correlation between the size of LDH relative to size of the spinal canal and the presence of CES. A finding of LDH causing >60% obstruction of the spinal canal should be considered a red flag, and such patients need to be watched more closely.

Posted on

Lumbar Disk Herniation in Children and Adolescents

Lumbar Disk Herniation in Children and Adolescents

Neurosurgery 77:954–959, 2015

Lumbar disk herniation in adults is thought to be caused by repetitive overloading and age-rated degenerative changes. However, these causes are absent in children and adolescent patients. We assume that structural malformations in the lumbar spine could predispose intervertebral disks to early degeneration and hence need to be surgically fused. This issue has never been raised before.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the assumption that structural malformations in the lumbar spine could predispose intervertebral disks to early degeneration and hence need to be surgically fused.

METHODS: Lumbar spine configurations, including the height of the intercrestal line, the length of L5 transverse processes, and the presence of transitional vertebrae, were recorded from anteroposterior radiographs taken from 63 consecutive pediatric patients with lumbar disk herniation admitted to our hospital over a period of 8 years. Each configuration was compared in relation to the level of disk herniation. Diskectomy alone was performed in 36 cases; arthrodesis was added in the remaining 27 cases. Patients’ back and leg pain visual analog scale scores and frequency and their Oswestry Disability Index scores were recorded before surgery and at follow-up. The results were compared for assessment of outcome.

RESULTS: Patients with high intercrestal lines and long L5 transverse processes had a significantly higher incidence of L4/5 disk herniation, whereas low intercrestal line and lumbarization were associated with L5/S1 disk herniation. Patients’ visual analog scale scores, pain frequency, and Oswestry Disability Index score all improved significantly after surgery, but there was no significant difference with or without arthrodesis.

CONCLUSION: Pediatric lumbar disk herniation is significantly associated with structural malformations of the lumbar spine, but arthrodesis does not improve the clinical outcome.

Posted on

Motion Preservation and Clinical Outcome of Porous Coated Motion Cervical Disk Arthroplasty

Neurosurgery 71:30–37, 2012 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31824e512e

Artificial cervical disk replacements are commonly used to treat radiculomyelopathy caused by degenerative disk disease. However, long-term disk mobility and an effect on adjacent segment disease have yet to be demonstrated. We report improvements in clinical outcome after disk replacement but also demonstrate potential limitations.

OBJECTIVE: To review clinical and radiological outcomes after diskectomy and disk replacement with the Porous Coated Motion (PCM) artificial cervical disk.

METHODS: A retrospective review was done of consecutive patients who underwent 1- or 2-level PCM disk replacements. The following criteria were studied: arm pain, neck pain, Neck Disability Index and Short Form-36 questionnaires, and flexion-extension radiographs up to 2 years after surgery.

RESULTS: Eighty PCM artificial disks were implanted in 53 patients. Only 17 disks (21%) maintained physiological movement, and complete fusion was seen in 18.8%. One disk replacement was revised because of anterior displacement. There were no complications of infection, cerebrospinal fluid leak, dysphagia, or hoarse voice. Arm and neck pain improved significantly after diskectomy, but Neck Disability Index questionnaires demonstrated a slight improvement that was not sustained by 2 years. Short Form-36 scores demonstrated a trend toward better outcome with time, but it was significant only for the mental domain.

CONCLUSION: Clinical improvement was seen after PCM disk replacement, but adequate range of movement was sustained in only 21% of disk replacements over time. Unclear long-term results of this and other disk replacements suggest caution in adopting these new devices as the gold standard.

Posted on

Long-term Outcome After Microendoscopic Diskectomy for Lumbar Disk Herniation: A Prospective Clinical Study With a 5-Year Follow-up

Neurosurgery 68:1568–1575, 2011 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31820cd16a

Several authors have reported results obtained with the microendoscopic diskectomy (MED) technique, but the long-term outcome has not been described. This report summarizes our clinical experience with the lumbar MED technique with a long-term follow-up period.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of the MED for lumbar disk herniation and to report long-term outcome and complications (5-year follow-up).

METHODS: One hundred twenty consecutive patients with lumbar disk herniation were treated with the METRx system.We included all types of lumbar herniated disks: contained, not contained, foraminal, and migrated disk herniations. The results were evaluated with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score, Oswestry Disability Index score, patient satisfaction questionnaire, and modified Macnab criteria.

RESULTS: The average age of patients was 41 years; 65 were men and 55 were women. The most commonly affected level was L5-S1 (54.2%). The follow-up time after surgery was 5 years in all cases. We obtained good or excellent results in 75% of patients and regular results in 18%. Good subjective satisfaction was observed with surgery in 92% of patients. The mean decrease in the Oswestry Disability Index score was 52.8 ± 21.6; the mean decrease in leg VAS score was 6.1 ± 2.3; and the mean decrease in lumbar VAS score was 1.9 ± 3.3. Adjusted mean differences were statistically significant in all cases (P < .05).

CONCLUSION: MED not only reduces the incision, tissue damage, and postoperative period of incapacity but also offers long-term results comparable to those of conventional techniques.

Proudly powered by WordPress