Tag: Failed back surgery syndrome

Posted on

Long-Term Outcome of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: 20 Years of ExperienceWith 224 Consecutive Patients

Neurosurgery (84) 5-1011–1018

Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a challenging condition that lacks a curative treatment. In selected patients, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has provided a satisfactory outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term outcome of SCS in FBSS, as measured by (1) the explantation rate, (2) complications, and (3) patient satisfaction with the global perceived effect (GPE).

METHODS: We studied 224 consecutive FBSS patients who underwent an SCS trial with surgically implanted leads at our hospital between January 1996 and December 2014. The patients’ satisfaction with the GPE of treatment was measured through a postal questionnaire at the end of follow-up.

RESULTS: Based on a 1-wk trial, permanent SCS was implanted in 175 (78%) patients. Out of these patients, 153 (87%) reported satisfactory outcomes after 2 mo. During the mean follow-up of 6 yr, 34 (19%) of SCS devices were permanently explanted due to inadequate pain relief, and 11 (6%) were explanted for other reasons. Electrode revision due to inadequate pain relief was done for 22 patients. In total, 26 complications were reported due to: 7 deep infections, 11 hardwaremalfunctions, 1 subcutaneous hematoma, 4 instances of discomfort due to the pulse generator, and 3 electrode migrations. One hundred thirty patients (74%) continued with SCS until the end of follow-up. Of them, 61 (47%) returned the questionnaire, and 42 (69%) reported substantially improved or better GPE.

CONCLUSION: SCS can provide a good outcome in the treatment of FBSS. Patient selection could be further improved by developing novel predictive biomarkers.

Posted on

Epidural spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain

Spinal_Cord_Stimulation_Devices_clip_image010

Acta Neurochir (2015) 157:739–741

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a technique used worldwide to treat several types of chronic neuropathic pain refractory to any conservative treatment. The aim of this data collection is to enforce evidence of SCS effectiveness on neuropathic chronic pain reported in the literature and to speculate on the usefulness of the trial period in determining the long–term efficacy. Moreover, the very low percentage of undesired side effects and complications reported in our case series suggests that all implants should be performed by similarly well-trained and experienced professionals.

Method A multicentric data collection on a common database from 11 Italian neurosurgical departments started 3years ago. Two different types of electrodes (paddle or percutaneous leads) were used. Of 122 patients, 73 % (N=89) were submitted to a trial period, while the remaining patients underwent the immediate permanent implant (N=33). Statistical comparisons of continuous variables between groups were performed.

Results Most of the patients (80 %) had predominant pain to their lower limbs, while only 17 % of patients had prevalent axial pain. Significant reduction in pain, as measured by variation in visual analogue scale (VAS) score, was observed at least 1 year after implantation in 63.8%of the cases, 59.5%of patients who underwent a test trial and 71.4% of patients who underwent permanent implant at once. No statistical differences were found between the lower-limb pain group and the axial pain group.

Conclusions No relevant differences in long-term outcomes were observed in previously tested patients compared with patients implanted at once. Through this analysis we hope to recruit new centres, to give more scientific value to our results.

Posted on

The immediately failed lumbar disc surgery

Micro-Lumbar-Discectomy-surgery4

Neurosurg Rev (2015) 38:191–195

Studies on immediate failed back surgery syndrome (iFBSS) following lumbar microdiscectomy are rare. Our aim is to describe the incidence and the causes of these immediate failures to define the value of radiological imaging for identification of the underlying pathology and to propose a management algorithm.

We defined iFBSS as persistence, deterioration or recurrence (during hospital stay) of radicular pain and/or sensorimotor deficits and/or sphincter dysfunction after microdiscectomy, which was uneventful from the surgeon’s perspective.

The medical records of 1546 patients undergoing discectomy for mediolateral lumbar disc herniations were screened for iFBSS. The pre- and postoperative imaging, surgical records, therapy and outcome of patients with iFBSS were reviewed. Forty-four of 1546 patients (2.8 %) with iFBSS were identified. All patients underwent reoperation. Overseen disc material/re-herniation (n=22), epidural hematoma (n=6), inadequate decompression of accompanying recessal stenosis (n=2) and dural tear with fascicle herniation (n=1) were found to be causative. In 13 patients, who revealed no clear pathology intraoperatively, we diagnosed a battered root syndrome (nerve root swelling due to excessive surgical manipulation). The correct diagnosis could be established by neuroradiological imaging in 25 of 43 radiologically investigated patients (57 %). In our study, the radiological workup was of limited value for the correct differentiation of the various aetiologies of iFBSS.

Therefore, the authors believe that the treatment strategy should strongly rely on the clinical presentation. To avoid unnecessary surgery in cases of battered root syndrome, we propose to proceed to reoperation only in patients with new or persistent radiculopathy despite adequate antiedematous medical therapy.

Posted on

Multicolumn Spinal Cord Stimulation Lead Implantation Using an Optic Transligamentar Minimally Invasive Technique

MINIMALLY INVASIVE IMPLANTATION IN MULTICOLUMN SCS

Neurosurgery 73:550–553, 2013 

A new generation of neurostimulation surgical leads is used to increase the success of spinal cord stimulation in difficult-to-treat indications such as failed back surgery syndrome. Minimal access spinal technologies (MASTs) have previously been used for surgical lead implantation. However, only a unilateral approach was possible, causing difficulties for median lead placement, and not always preventing laminectomy. A recent MAST technique was used to implant spinal cord stimulation leads without these limitations.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the MAST technique used in a pilot study.

METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive patients were implanted with a multicolumn surgical lead for refractory chronic back and leg pain by using the optic transligamentar MAST technique.

RESULTS: The MAST technique allowed median lead placement, facilitated visualization of the spine, and permitted transligamentar insertion that minimized scarring and muscle damage. No technique-related adverse events or lead revisions were reported.

CONCLUSION: Use of a MAST approach could be useful in safe implantation of multicolumn surgical leads in difficult-to-treat, refractory lower back pain conditions such as failed back surgery syndrome.

Proudly powered by WordPress