Single-Session Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization With Concomitant Evacuation Surgery for Chronic Subdural Hematomas: A Multicenter Assessment of Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy

Operative Neurosurgery 30:270–277, 2026

This multicenter retrospective cohort assesses feasibility, safety, and short-term efficacy of performing middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) concurrently with surgical evacuation for chronic subdural hematoma in a single anesthetic session. Among 157 patients, technical success was 97.4%, radiographic improvement occurred in 91.7%, and 63.1% achieved ≥50% hematoma reduction, with a 10.8% overall complication rate and 0.6% procedure-related mortality.

The report compares outcomes to recent randomized trials and existing series, noting similar intraprocedural complication rates and favorable reintervention and functional-independence outcomes (83.9% mRS ≤2 at median 54 days). Authors highlight potential resource and LOS advantages, acknowledge retrospective limitations, and call for prospective studies to define long-term benefit, cost impact, and selection criteria.

Single-session MMAE plus evacuation: Performing middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) and surgical evacuation for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) in a single anesthetic session is feasible and technically successful in 97.4% of cases, with no major intraprocedural failures reported.

Safety profile: The overall complication rate for the combined procedure is 10.8%, with a low intraprocedural complication rate of 2.5% and a procedure-related mortality of 0.6%, comparable to or better than staged approaches and recent randomized trials.

Radiographic and functional outcomes: Radiographic improvement is observed in 91.7% of patients, with 63.1% achieving at least a 50% reduction in hematoma thickness; 83.9% of patients maintain or achieve functional independence (mRS ≤2) at short-term follow-up.

Hospital length of stay (LOS): The median hospital LOS is 6 days, which is slightly shorter than reported in comparable studies using staged procedures, suggesting potential for reduced resource utilization.

Reintervention rates: Unplanned reoperations during the index hospitalization are low (2.5%), including for recurrent hematomas and subdural empyema, which favorably compares to other large studies and randomized trials.

Patient selection and anesthesia: Most procedures use general anesthesia (92%), but monitored anesthesia care (MAC) or conscious sedation may further streamline care in selected patients and reduce anesthesia-related risks.

Applicability to complex cases: The single-session approach is effective and safe even in patients with bilateral cSDH, who are often considered more complex.

Future directions: Prospective studies are needed to assess long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, ideal patient selection, and whether this approach reduces recurrence and enhances recovery compared to staged strategies.

Feasibility, Clinical Potential, and Limitations of Trans-Burr Hole Ultrasound for Postoperative Evaluation of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Prospective Pilot Study

Neurosurgery 95:924–931, 2024

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is commonly managed through burr hole surgery. Routine follow-up using computed tomography (CT) imaging is frequently used at many institutions, contributing to significant radiation exposure. This study evaluates the feasibility, safety, and reliability of trans-burr hole sonography as an alternative postoperative imaging modality, aiming to reduce radiation exposure by decreasing the frequency of CT scans.

METHODS: We conducted a prospective pilot study on 20 patients who underwent burr hole surgery for CSDH. Postoperative imaging included both CT and sonographic examinations through the burr hole. We assessed the ability to measure residual subdural fluid thickness under the burr hole sonographically compared with CT, the occurrence of complications, and the potential factors affecting sonographic image quality. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to demonstrate relationships between CT and ultrasound and axial and coronal ultrasound.

RESULTS: Sonography through the burr hole was feasible in 73.5% of cases, providing measurements of residual fluid that closely paralleled CT findings, with an average discrepancy of 1.2 mm for axial and 1.4 mm for coronal sonographic views. A strong positive correlation was found between axial and coronal ultrasound (r = 0.955), CT and axial ultrasound (r = 0.936), and CT and coronal ultrasound (r = 0.920). The primary obstacle for sonographic imaging was the presence of air within the burr hole or the subdural space, which typically resolved over time after surgery.

CONCLUSION: Trans-burr hole sonography emerges as a promising technique for postoperative monitoring of CSDH, with the potential to safely reduce reliance on CT scans and associated radiation exposure in selected patients. Our results support further investigation into the extended use of sonography during the follow-up phase. Prospective multicenter studies are recommended to establish the method’s efficacy and to explore strategies for minimizing air presence postsurgery.