A Staged Approach for Surgical Management of Basilar Invagination

Operative Neurosurgery 27:424–430, 2024

Patients with basilar invagination (BI) can be treated with several surgical options, ranging from simple posterior decompression to circumferential decompression and fusion. Here, we aimed at examining the indications and outcomes associated with these surgical strategies to devise a staged algorithm for managing BI.

METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in 2 neurosurgical centers and included patients with a BI, as defined by a position of the dens tip at least 5 mm above the Chamberlain line. Other craniovertebral junction anomalies, such as atlas assimilation, platybasia, and Chiari malformations, were documented. C1-C2 stability was assessed with a dynamic computed tomography scan.

RESULTS: We included 30 patients with BI with a mean follow-up of 56 months (min = 12, max = 166). Posterior decompression and fusion (n = 8) was only performed in cases of obvious atlanto-axial instability (eg, increased atlanto-dental interval or hypermobility on flexion/extension), while anterior decompression (transoral or transnasal) was reserved to patients with lower cranial nerves deficits (eg, swallowing dysfunction) and irreducible anterior compression (n = 9). Patients with posterior signs (eg, Valsalva headaches) or myelopathy but without C1-C2 instability nor anterior signs were managed with an isolated foramen magnum decompression, with or without duraplasty (n = 13). Complications were more frequent for combined procedures, including neurological deterioriation (n = 4) and tracheostomy (n = 2), but reinterventions were more likely in patients undergoing posterior decompression alone (n = 3).

CONCLUSION: Patient selection is key to determine the appropriate surgical strategy for BI: In our experience, combined approaches are only needed for patients with irreducible and symptomatic anterior compression, while fusion should be restricted to patient with obvious signs of atlanto-axial instability. Other BI patients can be managed by foramen magnum decompression alone to minimize surgical morbidity.

Failed Foramen Magnum Decompression in Chiari I Malformation Is Associated With Failure to Restore Normal Intracranial Compliance

Neurosurgery 86:E552–E557, 2020

The standard treatment for symptomatic Chiari malformation (CM) I is foramen magnum decompression (FMD) to facilitate cerebral spinal fluid flow through the foramen magnum, improve intracranial compliance, and alleviate symptoms (commonly headache). This procedure has a variable success rate, with a significant proportion of patients having persistent symptoms after surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate intracranial pressure (ICP) hydrodynamics in symptomatic surgery-naïve patients with CM I and symptomatic patients who have had prior FMD.

METHODS: We undertook a retrospective, observational cohort study, extracting data from our departmental ICP database. Patients with untreated (“Virgin”) Chiari malformations (VCM), patients with previous “failed” FMD (ie, with persistent classical Chiari symptoms) (fFMD) and a normal control group, all with existing continuous ICP monitoring date were included. Median ICP (mICP) and median pulse amplitude (mPA) were compared between the groups.

RESULTS: A total of 33 CM patients (22 VCM and 11 fFMD) and 42 normal controls were included for analysis. mICP did not differ significantly between the normal control, VCM, and fFMD groups. mPA in the VCM and fFMD groups was significantly higher than the control group (P< .01 and P< .05, respectively).

CONCLUSION: In this cohort, patients with persistent symptoms after FMD have persistently impaired intracranial compliance, similar to patients who have not undergone surgery at all when compared with a control group. The reasons for this are not clear, and further research is required to establish the causation and optimum management for failed FMD.

Treatment Options for Hydrocephalus Following Foramen Magnum Decompression for Chiari I Malformation: A Multicenter Study

Neurosurgery 86(4): 500-508, 2020

New-onset hydrocephalus following foramen magnum decompression (FMD) for Chiari I malformation (CM-I) is rare; its natural history and pathophysiology are poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a series of patients who developed hydrocephalus following FMD for CM-I, provide possible explanations of this phenomenon, and outline treatment options.

METHODS: Out of patients undergoing FMD for CM-I from 6 different tertiary centers, we evaluated patients presenting with new-onset hydrocephalus following FMD. The retrospectively collected data included demographics, clinical, and radiological findings of the CM-I and hydrocephalus patients. Time from FMD and hydrocephalus onset, treatment, and surgical techniques were assessed.

RESULTS: Of 549 patients who underwent FMD for CM-I, 28 (5.1%) subsequently developed hydrocephalus (18 females, 10 males), with a mean age of 11.7 ± 11.9 yr (range 6 mo to 52 yr). Hydrocephalus occurred on average 2.2 ± 2.6 mo after FMD (range 1 wk to 8 mo). Four patients did not have a violation of the arachnoid during the FMD surgery. Main presenting symptoms of hydrocephalus were headaches (17, 41%), vomiting (10, 24.4%), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak or pseudomeningocele (7, 17%). Overall, 23 patients (82.1%) underwent CSF shunting, 1 patient (3.5%) had an endoscopic third ventriculostomy, 3 patients (10.7%) temporary CSF diversion only, and 1 patient (3.5%) was treated with acetazolamide.

CONCLUSION:Hydrocephalus following FMDforCM-I is uncommon,but important. Based on our series and literature review, its incidence is about 5% to 7% and most likely will require further surgery. Shunting appears to be the favored treatment option.

Is atlantoaxial instability the cause of Chiari malformation? Outcome analysis of 65 patients treated by atlantoaxial fixation

Is atlantoaxial instability the cause of Chiari malformation?

J Neurosurg Spine 22:116–127, 2015

Understanding that atlantoaxial instability is the cause of Chiari malformation (CM), the author treated 65 patients using atlantoaxial stabilization. The results are analyzed.

Methods Cases of CM treated using atlantoaxial fixation during the period from January 2010 to November 2013 were reviewed and analyzed. Surgery was aimed at segmental arthrodesis.

Results The author treated 65 patients with CM in the defined study period. Fifty-five patients had associated syringomyelia. Forty-six patients had associated basilar invagination. Thirty-seven patients had both basilar invagination and syringomyelia. Three patients had been treated earlier using foramen magnum decompression and duraplasty. According to the extent of their functional capabilities, patients were divided into 5 clinical grades. On the basis of the type of facetal alignment and atlantoaxial instability, the patients were divided into 3 groups. Type I dislocation (17 patients) was anterior atlantoaxial instability wherein the facet of the atlas was dislocated anterior to the facet of the axis. Type II dislocation (31 patients) was posterior atlantoaxial instability wherein the facet of the atlas was dislocated posterior to the facet of the axis. Type III dislocation (17 patients) was the absence of demonstrable facetal malalignment and was labeled as “central” atlantoaxial dislocation. In 18 patients, dynamic images showed vertical, mobile and at-least partially reducible atlantoaxial dislocation. All patients were treated with atlantoaxial plate and screw fixation using techniques described in 1994 and 2004. Foramen magnum decompression or syrinx manipulation was not performed in any patient. Occipital bone and subaxial spinal elements were not included in the fixation construct. One patient died, and death occurred in the immediate postoperative phase and was related to a vertebral artery injury incurred during the operation. One patient had persistent symptoms. In the rest of the patients there was gratifying clinical improvement. More remarkably, in 7 patients, the symptoms of lower cranial nerve paresis improved. No patient worsened in their neurological function after surgery. Reductions in the size of the syrinx and regression of the CM were observed in 6 of 11 cases in which postoperative MRI was possible. During the follow-up period, there was no delayed worsening of neurological function or symptoms in any patient. Sixty-three patients improved after surgery, and the improvement was sustained during the average follow-up period of 18 months.

Conclusions On the basis of outcomes in this study, it appears that the pathogenesis of CM with or without associated basilar invagination and/or syringomyelia is primarily related to atlantoaxial instability. The data suggest that the surgical treatment in these cases should be directed toward atlantoaxial stabilization and segmental arthrodesis. Except in cases in which there is assimilation of the atlas, inclusion of the occipital bone is neither indicated nor provides optimum stability. Foramen magnum decompression is not necessary and may be counter-effective in the long run.

Dura splitting decompression in Chiari type 1 malformation: clinical experience and radiological findings

Neurosurg Rev (2009) 32:465–470. DOI 10.1007/s10143-009-0214-4

To restore the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow at the craniocervical junction in Chiari I malformation (CM-I), most surgeons practice a suboccipital craniectomy with duraplasty. To reduce the risk of CSF leak, a dura splitting decompression is created removing only the dural outer layer. We report on a series of 11 patients with CM-I (five with syringomyelia) operated on between 2000 and 2007 using this technique. Neurological examination and cerebro-spinal MRI scan were performed before and after surgery. Symptoms improved completely in six patients. Headaches and cervicalgias disappeared for all patients. Dizziness and paresthesia in the upper limb remained unchanged for three and two patients, respectively. We observed no complications such as CSF leak, meningocele, or meningitis. Postoperative MRI scan showed a significant craniocervical decompression in ten patients. Four patients had a new cisterna magna. Two syringomyelias completely disappeared, two decreased, and one was stable. Dural splitting can be practiced to treat CM-I. Clinical results are similar to the other techniques with less complications. Radiological findings show satisfying posterior fossa decompression.