Tag: Glossopharyngeal neuralgia

Posted on

How I do it: microvascular decompression for vago-glossopharyngeal neuralgia

Acta Neurochirurgica (2026) 168:62

This surgical how-to describes microvascular decompression (MVD) for vago‑glossopharyngeal neuralgia, detailing patient selection, imaging requirements, anesthesia, positioning, and a retrosigmoid infrafloccular approach to expose the IX–X root entry zones. It emphasizes preoperative high-resolution MRI identification of neurovascular conflict—most often PICA or vertebrobasilar compression—and perioperative neurophysiological monitoring.

The technique section outlines stepwise microsurgical maneuvers: arachnoid dissection, vessel mobilization or transposition, cautious Teflon interposition when needed, hemostasis, watertight closure, and targeted postoperative surveillance for dysphagia, hoarseness, CSF leak, and other complications. Practical tips for avoiding complications and key informed‑consent elements are provided.

Vago-Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia (VGN): Rare craniofacial pain syndrome (<1% of facial pain cases), often caused by neurovascular conflict involving the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) and sometimes the vertebrobasilar artery.

Clinical Features: Characterized by paroxysmal, lancinating pain in the oropharynx, tonsillar fossa, base of tongue, or deep ear canal, typically triggered by swallowing, talking, or coughing.

Diagnosis: High-resolution MRI (T2-weighted CISS/FIESTA/DRIVE, 3D TOF angiography) is mandatory to demonstrate neurovascular conflict and guide surgical planning.

First-line Surgical Treatment: Microvascular decompression (MVD) is the most effective and durable option for drug-refractory VGN, aiming to relieve neurovascular conflict without damaging nerve rootlets.

Surgical Approach: Keyhole retrosigmoid craniectomy with infrafloccular approach exposes the root entry zone of cranial nerves IX and X; careful arachnoid dissection and vessel mobilization or Teflon interposition are performed.

Intraoperative Considerations: Intraoperative neuromonitoring of lower cranial nerves is recommended to minimize risk of postoperative deficits such as dysphagia or hoarseness.

Complications: Main risks include transient dysphagia, hoarseness, or lower cranial nerve palsies, which are usually temporary and resolve within three months.

Outcomes: MVD offers superior and lasting pain relief with functional preservation compared to ablative procedures, making it the preferred surgical option.

Posted on

Prognostic factors for long-term outcomes of microvascular decompression in the treatment of glossopharyngeal neuralgia: a retrospective analysis of 97 patients

J Neurosurg 137:820–827, 2022

The authors aimed to investigate predictors of postoperative outcomes of microvascular decompression (MVD) for the treatment of glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN).

METHODS A cohort of 97 patients with medically refractory GPN who underwent MVD at the authors’ institution between January 2010 and July 2019 was retrospectively reviewed. Univariate and multivariate regression models were used to identify predictors of long-term outcome in patients after MVD.

RESULTS Eighty-nine patients (91.8%) reported immediate and complete relief of pain after the procedure. Of the remaining 8 patients (8.2%), 6 achieved partial pain relief and pain gradually diminished within 2 weeks after surgery, and 2 did not experience postoperative pain relief. In univariate Cox regression analysis, venous compression of the glossopharyngeal nerve root entry zone (HR 3.591, 95% CI 1.660–7.767, p = 0.001) and lower degree of neurovascular conflict (HR 2.449, 95% CI 1.177–5.096, p = 0.017) were significantly associated with worse pain-free survival. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, venous compression (HR 8.192, 95% CI 2.960–22.669, p < 0.001) and lower degree of neurovascular conflict (HR 5.450, 95% CI 2.069–14.356, p = 0.001) remained independently associated with worse pain-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS Venous compression of the glossopharyngeal nerve root entry zone and lower degree of neurovascular conflict were significantly correlated with shorter pain-free survival in patients who underwent MVD for GPN. Microvascular decompression is a safe, feasible, and durable approach with a low complication rate for the treatment of GPN.

Posted on

Neurosurgical Choice for Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia: A Benefit–Harm Assessment of Long-Term Quality of Life

Neurosurgery 88( 1) 2021: 131–139

Microvascular decompression (MVD) and vagoglossopharyngeal rhizotomy (VGR) are effective treatment for glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GN). However, surgical choice is controversial due to the need to maximize pain relief and reduce complications.

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively compare safety, efficacy, long-term quality of life (QOL), and global impression of change following MVD and VGR for treatment of GN. METHODS: Patient database reviews and telephone surveys were conducted to assess baseline characteristics and long-term outcomes. The effects of pain and complications on QOL were assessed using Brief Pain Inventory-Facial (BPI-Facial) questionnaire. Complication tolerance and surgery satisfaction were sorted using the global impression of change survey.

RESULTS: Of 87 patients with GN, 63 underwentMVD alone, 20 underwent VGR alone, and 4 underwent VGR following a failed MVD. The long-term rate of pain relief was slightly, but not significantly, lower following MVD than VGR (83.6% vs 91.7%, P = .528). However, long-term complications occurred much more frequently following VGR (3.0% vs 50.0%, P < .001). The BPI-Facial, which evaluates pain and complications, showed that MVD had better postoperative QOL than VGR (P < .001). However, 91.7% of patients who underwent VGR experienced no or mild complications. There was no significant difference in the overall satisfaction rates between the groups (83.3% vs 83.6%, P > .99).

CONCLUSION: Although VGR resulted in lower postoperative QOL due to a high complication rate, most of these complications were mild. The overall satisfaction rates for the 2 surgeries were similar.

Posted on

The emerging role of gamma knife radiosurgery in the management of glossopharyngeal neuralgia

Neurosurg Rev (2019) 42:31–38

Glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN) represents a rare craniofacial disorder accounting for about 1% of all craniofacial pain syndromes. GPN shares several pathophysiologic and clinical features with the more common trigeminal neuralgia. Medical therapy and microvascular decompression, in case of vascular nerve compression, represented the mainstay of GPN management. Other ablative therapies have been reported to date; however, few data are available because of the rarity of this pain syndrome. Among the ablative procedures, gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has been recently introduced in the management of GPN with good pain control and low complication rates.

Authors performed a systematic review of the published literature about GKRS in the management of GPN. Radiosurgical treatment data, pain control and recurrence rate have been analysed and compared.

GKRS represented a valuable and effective treatment option for the management of GPN. Pain control and complication rates are better than those reported by other ablative procedures and microvascular decompression; however, future studies should be focused on the long-term efficacy of GKRS.

Posted on

Microvascular decompression for glossopharyngeal neuralgia: a retrospective analysis of 228 cases

Acta Neurochir (2018) 160:117–123

Glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN) is an uncommon craniofacial pain syndrome caused by neurovascular conflict. Compared to trigeminal neuralgia or hemifacial spasm, the incidence of GPN was very low. Until now, little is known about the long-term outcome following microvascular decompression (MVD) process.

Methods Between 2006 and 2016, 228 idiopathic GPN patients underwent MVD in our department. Those cases were retrospectively reviewed with emphasis on intraoperative findings and long-term postoperative outcomes. The average period of follow-up was 54.3 ± 6.2 months.

Results Intraoperatively, the culprit was identified as the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) in 165 cases (72.3%), the vertebral artery (VA) in 14 (6.1%), vein in 10 (4.4%), and a combination of multiple arteries or venous offending vessels in 39 (17.2%). The immediately postoperative outcome was excellent in 204 cases (89.5%), good in 12 (5.3%), fair in 6 (2.6%) and poor in 6 (2.6%). More than 5-year follow-up was obtained in 107 cases (46.9%), which presented as excellent in 93 (86.9%), good in 6 (5.6%), fair in 3 (2.8%) and poor in 5 (4.7%). Thirty-seven (16.2%) of the patients experienced some postoperative neurological deficits immediately, such as dysphagia, hoarseness and facial paralysis, which has been improved at the last follow-up in most cases, except 2.

Conclusions This investigation demonstrated that MVD is a safe and effective remedy for treatment of GPN.

Posted on

Neurosurgical treatment of glossopharyngeal neuralgia: analysis of 103 cases

GP neuralgia

J Neurosurg 124:1088–1092, 2016

The object of this study was to investigate the immediate and long-term follow-up results of glossopharyngeal nerve rhizotomy (GPNR) with or without partial vagus nerve rhizotomy (VNR) for treating glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN).

Methods A retrospective review of the case notes of patients who had undergone surgery for GPN in the authors’ department between 2008 and 2013 was performed to investigate baseline characteristics and immediate outcomes during the hospitalization. For the long-term results, a telephone survey was performed, and information on pain recurrence and permanent complications was collected. Pain relief meant no pain or medication, any pain persisting after surgery was considered to be treatment failure, and any pain returning during the follow-up period was considered to be pain recurrence. For comparative study, the patients were divided into 2 cohorts, that is, patients treated with GPNR alone and those treated with GPNR+VNR.

Results One hundred three procedures, consisting of GPNR alone in 38 cases and GPNR+VNR in 65 cases, were performed in 103 consecutive patients with GPN. Seventy-nine of the 103 patients could be contacted for the follow-up study, with a mean follow-up duration of 2.73 years (range 1 month–5.75 years). While there were similar results (GPNR vs GPNR+VNR) in immediate pain relief rates (94.7% vs 93.8%), immediate complication rates (7.9% vs 4.6%), and longterm pain relief rates (92.3% vs 94.3%) between the 2 cohorts, a great difference was seen in long-term complications (3.8% vs 35.8%). The long-term complication rate for the combined GPNR+VNR cohort was 9.4 times higher than that in the GPNR cohort. There was no operative or perioperative mortality. Immediate complications occurred in 6 cases, consisting of poor wound healing in 3 cases, and CSF leakage, hoarseness, and dystaxia in 1 case each. Permanent complications occurred in 20 patients (25.3%) and included cough while drinking in 10 patients, pharyngeal discomfort in 8 patients, and hoarseness and dysphagia in 1 case each.

Conclusions In general, this study indicates that GPNR alone or in combination with VNR is a safe, simple, and effective treatment option for GPN. It may be especially valuable for patients who are not suitable for the microvascular decompression (MVD) procedure and for surgeons who have little experience with MVD. Of note, this study renews the significance of GPNR alone, which, the authors believe, is at least valuable for a subgroup of GPN patients, with significantly fewer long-term complications than those for rhizotomy for both glossopharyngeal nerve and rootlets of the vagus nerve.

Posted on

Vago-glossopharyngeal neuralgia

Vago-glossopharyngeal neuralgiaActa Neurochir (2015) 157:311–321

Glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN), or better named vago-glossopharyngeal neuralgia (VGPN), is a rare disorder amounting to 1 % of the incidence of trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Pain is paroxysmal, of the electrical shooting type, and mainly provoked by stimulation of the pharynx or deep throat, especially during swallowing. Due to its rarity, VGPN is often misdiagnosed. The front line of medical treatment is based on anticonvulsants. Surgery should be considered when the pain is refractory to medications. In most patients, the cause is neurovascular conflict on root entry zone (REZ) or midcistern portion, of the IXth and/or Xth cranial nerves. Compressive vessels can be evidenced by means of a high sensibility and a high specificity resolution MR imaging in most centers.

Present consensus is that the first option of neurosurgical treatment be microvascular decompression. In patients with precarious general conditions, stereotactic radiosurgery may be considered. Also, thermo-rhizotomy at the pars nervosa of foramen jugularis or tractotomy-nucleotomy at brainstem may be alternatives, but these methods entail a significant risk of deficits.

In this article, the authors reviewed the main literature series on neurosurgical treatments of this disease.

Posted on

Stitched sling retraction technique for microvascular decompression: procedures and techniques based on an anatomical viewpoint

Neurosurg Rev (2011) 34:373–380. DOI 10.1007/s10143-011-0310-0

The success of microvascular decompression stitched sling retraction techniques for treating trigeminal neuralgia (TN), hemifacial spasm (HFS), and glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN), focusing on the stitching point for slinging the offending artery in the appropriate direction.

Between January 2007 and March 2009, 28 patients with TN, 5 patients with HFS, and 3 patients with GPN underwent MVD with a sling retraction technique. In cases of TN, MVD was performed using the infratentorial lateral supracerebellar approach, and the offending superior cerebellar artery was superomedially transposed with a sling stitched to the tentorium cerebelli. In cases of HFS, MVD was performed using the lateral suboccipital infrafloccular approach, and the offending vertebral artery was superolaterally transposed with a sling stitched to the petrous dura. In cases of GPN, MVD was performed using the transcondylar fossa approach, in which the posterior inferior cerebellar artery was inferolaterally mobilized with a sling secured to the jugular tubercle. No patient suffered recurrence in the follow-up period.

For the sling retraction technique to be performed successfully, it is important for a stitch to be placed at a suitable site to sling the offending vessel in the intended direction. An appropriate surgical approach must be used to obtain a sufficient operative field for performing the stitching procedures safely.

Proudly powered by WordPress