Tag: Heparin

Posted on

Low-Dose Intravenous Heparin Infusion After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage is Associated With Decreased Risk of Delayed Neurological Deficit and Cerebral Infarction

Neurosurgery 88 (3)2021: 523–530

Patients who survive aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) are at risk for delayed neurological deficits (DND) and cerebral infarction. In this exploratory cohort comparison analysis, we compared in-hospital outcomes of aSAH patients administered a low-dose intravenous heparin (LDIVH) infusion (12 U/kg/h) vs those administered standard subcutaneous heparin (SQH) prophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis (DVT; 5000 U, 3 × daily).

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of LDIVH in aSAH patients.

METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 556 consecutive cases of aSAH patients whose aneurysm was secured by clipping or coiling at a single institution over a 10-yr period, including 233 administered the LDIVH protocol and 323 administered the SQH protocol. Radiological and outcome datawere compared between the 2 cohorts using multivariable logistic regression and propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).

RESULTS: The unadjusted rate of cerebral infarction in the LDIVH cohort was half that in SQH cohort (9 vs 18%; P = .004). Multivariable logistic regression showed that patients in the LDIVH cohort were significantly less likely than those in the SQH cohort to have DND (odds ratio (OR) 0.53 [95% CI: 0.33, 0.85]) or cerebral infarction (OR 0.40 [95% CI: 0.23, 0.71]). Analysis following IPTWshowed similar results. Rates of hemorrhagic complications, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and DVT were not different between cohorts.

CONCLUSION: This cohort comparison analysis suggests that LDIVH infusion may favorably influence the outcome of patients after aSAH. Prospective studies are required to further assess the benefit of LDIVH infusion in patients with aSAH.

Posted on

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Cranial Neurosurgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Neurosurgery 68:571–581, 2011 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182093145

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have usually supported using heparin prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing cranial neurosurgery. The tradeoff between benefit and bleeding risk, however, has not been adequately characterized.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the extent to which low-dose unfractionated heparin (LDUH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) prophylaxis reduces the rate of VTE and increases the rate of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and other bleeding in patients undergoing elective cranial neurosurgery.

METHODS: We selected RCTs that evaluated LDUH or LMWH prophylaxis of VTE in patients undergoing elective cranial neurosurgery. A meta-analysis assessing heparins vs no heparin (either with or without mechanical methods) was performed.

RESULTS: Eight RCTs were identified. Six RCTs involving 1170 patients evaluated LDUH or LMWH vs a control group. Five of 6 trials found a significant reduction in the risk of symptomatic and asymptomatic VTE with heparin prophylaxis. The pooled risk ratio was 0.58 (95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.75). ICH was more common in those receiving heparin, but not statistically significantly. For every 1000 patients who receive heparin prophylaxis, 91 VTE events will be prevented (approximately 35 of which are proximal deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism and 9 to 18 of which are symptomatic), whereas 7 ICHs and 28 more minor bleeds will occur.

CONCLUSION: Heparin prophylaxis for patients undergoing elective cranial neurosurgery reduces the risk of VTE but may also increase bleeding risks with a ratio of serious or symptomatic VTE relative to serious bleeding that is only slightly favorable.

Proudly powered by WordPress