Fully Navigated Single-Position Prone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Detailed Technical Report and Description of 15 Cases

Int J Spine Surg 2025, 19 (1) 70-80

Surgical Technique and Study Overview

• Single-position prone lateral lumbar interbody fusion improves surgery efficiency and safety.

• Navigation enhances precision in pedicle screw placement and reduces radiation exposure.

• Study involved 15 patients with simultaneous cage and screw placement using intraoperative navigation.

• Mean surgery duration was 263 ± 94 minutes with blood loss of 315 ± 143 mL.

• No major complications reported, except for two cases of cerebrospinal fluid leakage.

Clinical Outcomes and Findings

• Significant improvements in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores post-surgery (51.38 to 32.81).

• Segmental lordosis improved significantly from 3.26° to 13.09° (P < 0.001).

• No significant changes in total lumbar lordosis or sagittal vertical axis.

Technical Insights and Considerations

• Intraoperative navigation used for cage and screw placement without additional fluoroscopy.

• Radiation exposure reduced for surgical teams due to minimized fluoroscopy use.

• Simultaneous screw and cage placement guided by navigation and neuromonitoring.

• Challenges include navigation system inaccuracies due to segmental distraction.

• Learning curve observed with new workflow implementation affecting time savings.

Real-Time Atlas-Based Stereotactic Neuronavigation

Real-Time Atlas-Based Stereotactic Neuronavigation

Neurosurgery 74:128–134, 2014

Surgery for tumors in eloquent brain faces immense challenges when attempting to maximize resection and avoid neurological deficits.

OBJECTIVE: In order to give the surgeon real-time atlas-based anatomic information linked to the patient’s anatomy, we developed a software-based interface between deformable anatomic templates (DATs) and an intraoperative navigation system.

METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), diffusion tensor imaging, and/or functional MRI were performed on 3 patients preoperatively for the purposes of tumor resection by the use of neuronavigation. The DAT was registered to the patients’ navigation coordinate system and utilized coordinates from the navigation system during surgery. This provided the surgeon with a list of proximal anatomic and functional structures and a real-time image of the atlas at that location fused to the patient’s MRI. The clinical feasibility of this approach was evaluated during the resection of 3 eloquent tumors (right postcentral gyrus, left inferior frontal gyrus, and left occipital cuneus gyrus).

RESULTS: Tumor resection was performed successfully in all 3 patients. With the use of the coordinates from the navigation system, anatomic and functional structures and their distances were visualized interactively during tumor resection by using the DAT.

CONCLUSION: This is a proof of concept that an interactive atlas-based navigation can provide detailed anatomic and functional information that supplements MRI, diffusion tensor imaging, and functional MRI. The atlas-based navigation generated distances to important anatomic structures from the navigation probe tip. It can be used to guide direct electrical stimulation and highlight areas to avoid during tumor resection.

Fusion of MRI/MRA images for navigation in AVM surgery

Neurosurg Focus 32 (5):E7, 2012. (http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2012.1.FOCUS127)

Microsurgical resection of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) is facilitated by real-time image guidance that demonstrates the precise size and location of the AVM nidus. Magnetic resonance images have routinely been used for intraoperative navigation, but there is no single MRI sequence that can provide all the details needed for characterization of the AVM. Additional information detailing the specific location of the feeding arteries and draining veins would be valuable during surgery, and this detail may be provided by fusing MR images and MR angiography (MRA) sequences.

The current study describes the use of a technique that fuses contrast-enhanced MR images and 3D time-of-flight MR angiograms for intraoperative navigation in AVM resection.

Methods. All patients undergoing microsurgical resection of AVMs at the Dartmouth Cerebrovascular Surgery Program were evaluated from the surgical database. Between 2009 and 2011, 15 patients underwent surgery in which this contrast-enhanced MRI and MRA fusion technique was used, and these patient form the population of the present study.

Results. Image fusion was successful in all 15 cases. The additional data manipulation required to fuse the image sets was performed on the morning of surgery with minimal added setup time. The navigation system accurately identified feeding arteries and draining veins during resection in all cases. There was minimal imaging-related artifact produced by embolic materials in AVMs that had been preoperatively embolized. Complete AVM obliteration was demonstrated on intraoperative angiography in all cases.

Conclusions. Precise anatomical localization, as well as the ability to differentiate between arteries and veins during AVM microsurgery, is feasible with the aforementioned MRI/MRA fusion technique. The technique provides important information that is beneficial to preoperative planning, intraoperative navigation, and successful AVM resection.

Fusion of MRI/MRA images for navigation in AVM surgery

Neurosurg Focus 32 (5):E7, 2012. http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2012.1.FOCUS127

Microsurgical resection of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) is facilitated by real-time image guidance that demonstrates the precise size and location of the AVM nidus. Magnetic resonance images have routinely been used for intraoperative navigation, but there is no single MRI sequence that can provide all the details needed for characterization of the AVM. Additional information detailing the specific location of the feeding arteries and draining veins would be valuable during surgery, and this detail may be provided by fusing MR images and MR angiography (MRA) sequences. The current study describes the use of a technique that fuses contrast-enhanced MR images and 3D time-of-flight MR angiograms for intraoperative navigation in AVM resection.

Methods. All patients undergoing microsurgical resection of AVMs at the Dartmouth Cerebrovascular Surgery Program were evaluated from the surgical database. Between 2009 and 2011, 15 patients underwent surgery in which this contrast-enhanced MRI and MRA fusion technique was used, and these patient form the population of the present study.

Results. Image fusion was successful in all 15 cases. The additional data manipulation required to fuse the image sets was performed on the morning of surgery with minimal added setup time. The navigation system accurately identified feeding arteries and draining veins during resection in all cases. There was minimal imaging-related artifact produced by embolic materials in AVMs that had been preoperatively embolized. Complete AVM obliteration was demonstrated on intraoperative angiography in all cases.

Conclusions. Precise anatomical localization, as well as the ability to differentiate between arteries and veins during AVM microsurgery, is feasible with the aforementioned MRI/MRA fusion technique. The technique provides important information that is beneficial to preoperative planning, intraoperative navigation, and successful AVM resection.