Tag: lesional epilepsy

J Neurosurg 144:259–272, 2026

This study analyzes national inpatient trends from 2009–2020 comparing lesional and nonlesional epilepsy patients who underwent surgical or neuromodulation treatments. Using NIS data with propensity score matching, it reports demographic differences, socioeconomic disparities, and shifting utilization patterns across VNS, RNS, DBS, resection, radiosurgery, and LITT.

The findings reveal increasing adoption of RNS and LITT, declining VNS and radiosurgery, higher costs for most interventions, and shorter length of stay with LITT. Persistent racial and income-based inequities in access and differing outcomes by lesion status prompt calls for tailored care and further cost-effectiveness and long-term outcome studies.

Distinct Patient Profiles: Lesional epilepsy patients are older, more likely male, have higher comorbidity burdens, and higher income/Medicare coverage compared to nonlesional epilepsy patients, who are more prevalent in lower income quartiles and rely more on Medicaid or private insurance.

Surgical Treatment Trends: Use of responsive neurostimulation (RNS) and laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) increased significantly for both lesional and nonlesional epilepsy from 2009–2020, while vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) declined for nonlesional epilepsy; deep brain stimulation (DBS) and radiosurgery declined for both groups.

Resective Surgery Patterns: Resective surgery utilization increased significantly for nonlesional epilepsy, but not for lesional epilepsy, indicating a growing acceptance of surgery in nonlesional cases despite the absence of overt lesions.

Healthcare Disparities: White patients, and those in higher income quartiles, have higher probabilities of receiving advanced treatments (VNS, RNS, DBS, resective surgery, radiosurgery); Black patients have persistently lower access regardless of income, and Hispanic patients show variable, income-dependent access.

Outcomes by Modality: RNS and LITT are associated with shorter or unchanged length of stay (LOS) and higher likelihood of routine discharge, while DBS and resective surgery increase LOS and costs; all surgical interventions increase hospital charges.

LITT Advantages: LITT is linked to decreased LOS and improved routine discharge rates, especially for lesional epilepsy, but incurs higher total charges compared to other modalities.

Mortality Impact: None of the interventions (VNS, RNS, DBS, resective surgery, radiosurgery, LITT) significantly affected mortality in either lesional or nonlesional epilepsy groups.

Need for Tailored Approaches: Persistent demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical differences between lesional and nonlesional epilepsy patients highlight the importance of individualized treatment strategies and further research on long-term and cost-effectiveness outcomes.