Tag: medial thalamus

Posted on

Bilateral focused ultrasound medial thalamotomies for trigeminal neuropathic pain: a randomized controlled study

J Neurosurg 140:1799–1809, 2024

Medial thalamotomy has been shown to benefit patients with neuropathic pain, but widespread adoption of this procedure has been limited by reporting of clinical outcomes in studies without a control group. This study aimed to minimize confounders associated with medial thalamotomy for treating chronic pain by using modern MRI-guided stereotactic lesioning and a rigorous clinical design.

METHODS This prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial in 10 patients with trigeminal neuropathic pain used sham procedures as controls. Participants underwent assessments by a pain psychologist and pain management clinician, including use of the following measures: the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS); patient-reported outcome measures; and patient’s impression of improvement at baseline, 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postprocedure. Patients in the treated group underwent bilateral focused ultrasound (FUS) medial thalamotomy targeting the central lateral nucleus. Patients in the control group underwent sham procedures with energy output disabled. The primary efficacy outcome measure was between-group differences in pain intensity (using the NPRS) at baseline and at 3 months postprocedure. Adverse events were measured for safety and included MRI analysis. Exploratory measures of connectivity and metabolism were analyzed using diffusion tensor imaging, functional MRI, and PET, respectively.

RESULTS There were no serious complications from the FUS procedures. MRI confirmed bilateral medial thalamic ablations. There was no significant improvement in pain intensity from baseline to 3 months, either for patients undergoing FUS medial thalamotomy or for sham controls; and the between-group change in NPRS score as the primary efficacy outcome measure was not significantly different. Patient-reported outcome assessments demonstrated improvement (i.e., a decrease) only in pain interference with enjoyment of life at 3 months. There was a perception of benefit at 1 week, but only for patients treated with FUS and not for the sham cohort. Advanced neuroimaging showed that these medial thalamic lesions altered structural connectivity with the postcentral gyrus and demonstrated a trend toward hypometabolism in the insula and amygdala.

CONCLUSIONS This randomized controlled trial of bilateral FUS medial thalamotomy did not reduce the intensity of trigeminal neuropathic pain, although it should be noted that the ability to estimate the magnitude of treatment effects is limited by the small cohort.

Clinical trial registration no.: NCT03309813 (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Posted on

DBS for Tourette syndrome: a single-center series

J Neurosurg 128:596–604, 2018

Tourette syndrome (TS) is a complex neuropsychiatric disorder characterized by multiple motor and phonic tics. While pharmacological and behavioral therapy can be effective in most patients, a subset of patients remains refractory to treatment. Increasing clinical evidence from multiple centers suggests that deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the medial thalamus can be effective in many cases of refractory TS.

METHODS The authors retrospectively reviewed outcomes in 13 patients with refractory TS who underwent medial thalamic DBS performed by their team over a 7-year period. Patients were evaluated by a multidisciplinary team, and preoperative objective assessments were performed using the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) and Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale. YGTSS scores were calculated at visits immediately postoperatively and at the most recent follow-up in patients with a minimum of 6 months of postoperative follow-up. Coordinates of the active DBS contacts were calculated and projected onto each patient’s pre- and postoperative images.

RESULTS Patients showed an average decrease of 37% (p = 0.0063) in the total tic severity at their first postoperative visit. At their latest visit, their scores achieved significance, decreasing from preoperative scores by an average of 50% (p = 0.0014). The average position of the active contact was noted to be at the junction of the posterior ventralis oralis internus/ centromedian-parafascicular nuclei. Device-related complications occurred in 2 patients, necessitating additional surgeries. All patients continued to use the system at last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS The authors’ data are consistent with the small but growing body of literature supporting DBS of the ventralis oralis internus/centromedian-parafascicular thalamus as an effective and relatively safe treatment for severe, refractory TS.

Proudly powered by WordPress