Tag: Minimally invasive spinal surgery

Posted on

Outpatient lateral lumbar interbody fusion: single-institution consecutive case series

J Neurosurg Spine 42:140–146, 2025

Outpatient spine surgery could reduce hospital costs and improve patient outcomes. Outpatient lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) can be performed for select patients. This study identified and compared the demographic, clinical, and surgical characteristics of patients who underwent outpatient versus inpatient single-level LLIF.

METHODS A retrospective review was conducted of a prospectively collected database of patients who underwent first-time single-level LLIF at a single institution performed by the same surgeon from January 1, 2017, through December 31, 2022. Demographic characteristics, including age, sex, BMI, and medical comorbidities, were collected. Surgical factors, such as level of surgery, operative duration, and estimated blood loss, were also collected. Length of stay and 30-day readmission were the primary outcomes of interest. Patients discharged on the day of surgery or the following day were considered to be in the outpatient group. ANOVA and chi-square tests were performed to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Univariate logistic regression was used to examine the correlation between baseline demographic and surgical variables and outpatient surgery. If a variable significantly correlated with outpatient surgery on univariate analysis, it was subsequently used in multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS A total of 107 patients underwent first-time single-level LLIF, and 48 (44.9%) did not have posterior instrumentation. Fifty-three (49.5%) patients were women. The median age and BMI were 66.3 years and 28.9, respectively. The mean length of stay was 1 day (range 0–4 days), with 71 (66.4%) of 107 single-level LLIFs managed on an outpatient basis. There were no readmissions within 30 days. Patients in the outpatient group were more likely than patients in the inpatient group to be male (59% [42/71] vs 25% [9/36], p = 0.002), have a low LACE (risk criteria based on length of stay, acuity of the admission, comorbidity of the patient, and emergency department use within 6 months before admission) readmission index (63% [45/71] vs 28% [10/36], p < 0.001), and have a stand-alone construct (62% [44/71] vs 11% [4/36], p < 0.001). The outpatient cohort also had a shorter mean operative duration (104.4 vs 175.5 minutes, p < 0.001) and lower mean estimated blood loss (20 vs 100 mL, p < 0.001). There was no difference in age between the groups. Factors that remained significant on multivariate logistic regression were male sex (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04–0.53; p = 0.004), lower LACE readmission index (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02–0.25; p < 0.001), and stand-alone construct (OR 8.17, 95% CI 1.49–44.74; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS Multiple baseline and surgical characteristics were more common in the outpatient setting. With appropriate patient selection, single-level LLIF can be achieved on an outpatient basis.

Posted on

Augmented Reality in Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery

World Neurosurg. (2023) 176:35-42

Spine surgery has undergone significant changes in approach and technique. With the adoption of intraoperative navigation, minimally invasive spinal surgery (MISS) has arguably become the gold standard. Augmented reality (AR) has now emerged as a front-runner in anatomical visualization and narrower operative corridors. In effect, AR is poised to revolutionize surgical training and operative outcomes. Our study examines the current literature on AR-assisted MISS, synthesizes findings, and creates a narrative highlighting the history and future of AR in spine surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Relevant literature was gathered using the PubMed (Medline) database from 1975 to 2023. Pedicle screw placement models were the primary intervention in AR. These were compared to the outcomes of traditional MISS

RESULTS: We found that AR devices on the market show promising clinical outcomes in preoperative training and intraoperative use. Three prominent systems were as follows: XVision, HoloLens, and ImmersiveTouch. In the studies, surgeons, residents, and medical students had opportunities to operate AR systems, showcasing their educational potential across each phase of learning. Specifically, one facet described training with cadaver models to gauge accuracy in pedicle screw placement. AR-MISS exceeded free-hand methods without unique complications or contraindications.

CONCLUSIONS: While still in its infancy, AR has already proven beneficial for educational training and intraoperative MISS applications. We believe that with continued research and advancement of this technology, AR is poised to become a dominant player within the fundamentals of surgical education and MISS operative technique.

Posted on

Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery in the Elderly: Does It Make Sense?

Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery in the Elderly- Does It Make Sense

Neurosurgery 77:S108–S115, 2015

Lumbar degenerative disease can have varied pathoanatomy, with stenosis, spondylolisthesis, and scoliosis contributing to significant pain and disability. Among appropriately selected patients, surgical intervention can treat both back pain and leg pain and improve quality of life in a cost-effective manner with an acceptable safety profile. The evolution of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques offers the potential to decrease the physiological impact of surgery and to improve the complication profile while achieving the same spine surgical objectives. The utility of such techniques among elderly patients >65 years of age has not been rigorously evaluated, and this systematic review sought to define the utility and safety of MIS spinal surgery for decompression, interbody fusion, and deformity correction in this population.

Review of 2 studies for MIS lumbar decompression reveals that the majority of elderly patients exhibit significant improvements in pain (change in visual analog score for leg pain, 3.4 points) and disability (change in Oswestry Disability Index, 19 points), with inadvertent durotomy in 3% of patients. Review of 4 studies for MIS lumbar interbody fusion reveals robust improvement in pain (change in visual analog score for leg pain, 3.4 points; change in visual analog score for back pain, 7.2 points), with inadvertent durotomy in 5% of patients.

Narrative review was performed for adult degenerative deformity correction, revealing that MIS techniques are feasible for managing such patients with acceptable rates of osseous union and complication. On the basis of largely low-quality, retrospective evidence, we recommend that elderly patients should not be excluded from MIS interventions for symptomatic lumbar degenerative spinal disease.

Proudly powered by WordPress