Orientation of the facet joints in degenerative rotatory lumbar scoliosis

Orientation of the facet joints in degenerative rotatory lumbar scoliosis- an MR study on 52 patients

Acta Neurochir (2016) 158:473–479

Because of a degenerative component, degenerative rotatory scoliosis seems different from congenital and idiopathic subtypes of the disease. This study aims to examine the orientation of facet joints, as a known cause of degeneration, in patients with degenerative rotatory scoliosis.

Methods Lumbar magnetic resonance (MR) images and plain radiographs of 52 symptomatic patients (mean age, 50.17 years) with degenerative rotatory lumbar scoliosis (mean curve, 19.22 degrees) and 50 healthy individuals were reviewed. Facet joint angles in rotated segments and the minimum neural foramen width at all lumbar levels were measured by three observers and the average was recorded.

Results The maximum vertebral rotation was most frequent at L4-L5 (75 %), and the majority was of type I (84.6 %) according to the Nash-Moe classification. At all lumbar spinal levels the mean facet joint angles were significantly higher on the side of rotation (L2-L3, 57.92 degrees; L3-L4, 45.00 degrees; L4-L5, 43.88 degrees) compared to those on the contralateral side (L2-L3, 20.42 degrees; L3-L4, 15.48 degrees; L4-L5, 13.12 degrees) and in controls (L2-L3, 30.21 degrees; L3- L4, 40.81 degrees; L4-L5, 45.20 degrees) (p<0.001 for all comparisons). The mean facet joint angle increased significantly from L4-L5 to L2-L3 in cases and reversely in controls. The mean minimum neural foramen width was 1.29 ± 0.85 mm on the side of rotation, 5.50 ± 1.09 mm on the contralateral side, and 6.78± 1.75 mm in controls (p<0.001).

Conclusions Substantial asymmetries and abnormal orientations in facet joints were documented in patients with degenerative rotatory lumbar scoliosis. Such asymmetries may adversely affect neural foramen width.

Can unilateral-approach minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion attain indirect contralateral decompression?

Can unilateral-approach minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion attain indirect contralateral decompression?

Eur Spine J (2014) 23:1144–1149

Few studies have measured the amount of indirect decompression at the contralateral neural foramen after unilateral-approach minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF). This study examined the amount of intraoperative indirect decompression at the contralateral neural foramen after a unilateral-approach MITLIF in patients with bilateral foraminal stenosis.

Methods From February 2009 to October 2012, 66 consecutive patients with bilateral foraminal stenosis underwent unilateral-approach MITLIF and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Direct decompression was performed at the central canal and approach-side neural foramen, while indirect decompression using cage distraction was pursued at the contralateral neural foramen. Qualitative parameters of the central canal (dural sac morphology) and neural foramen (foramen morphology) were analyzed using pre- and post-operative MRI. Quantitative measurement on the central canal (dural sac crosssectional area) and neural foramen (foramen height and width) were also measured.

Results A total of 69 intervertebral levels in the 66 patients were analyzed. Qualitative parameters of the central canal and contralateral neural foramen improved significantly after unilateral-approach MITLIF (both P<0.001). The mean dural sac cross-sectional area increased from 51.1 ± 28.8 to 84.8 ± 30.2 mm2 (P<0.001). The mean preoperative contralateral foramen height, maximum foramen width, and minimum foramen width were 11.8 ± 2.0, 4.9 ± 1.5, and 1.5 ± 0.7 mm, respectively, and these values increased postoperatively to 14.7 ± 2.5, 6.5 ± 1.8, and 2.4 ± 1.0 mm, respectively (all P<0.001).

Conclusion Quantitative and qualitative parameters of the central canal and contralateral neural foramen increased significantly after unilateral-approach MITLIF.