Tag: Neuromonitoring

Posted on

Low Posterior Electromyographic Threshold and Functional Outcomes After L4-5 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Operative Neurosurgery 30:566–570, 2026

This single-institution retrospective study evaluates whether low posterior electromyography (EMG) stimulation thresholds during lateral L4-5 lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) correlate with postoperative femoral nerve motor or sensory neurapraxia. Forty-two lateral-position single-level L4-5 LLIFs with neuromonitoring data showed no significant association between posterior EMG threshold or retractor time and transient postoperative anterior thigh numbness or weakness.

The cohort experienced transient sensory neurapraxia in 38% at six weeks that resolved by six months; only one patient had temporary motor neurapraxia. Limitations include small sample size, retrospective design, and short follow-up, leading authors to conclude no demonstrable link between posterior EMG threshold and plexus injury in this series.

Context: In L4-5 transpsoas LLIF, the retractor is placed near the lumbar plexus; directional EMG stimulation thresholds are used intraoperatively to estimate nerve proximity and potentially reduce injury risk.

Objective: Assessed whether posterior EMG stimulation threshold was associated with lumbar plexus injury/neurapraxia after single-level L4-5 LLIF performed in the lateral position.

Design/criteria: Retrospective, single-institution review of single-level L4-5 LLIF (Jan 2019–May 2022) with available neuromonitoring thresholds and retractor time; excluded cases with additional levels or missing monitoring data.

Cohort/intraop metrics: 42 patients (mean age 66 years); mean retractor time 12.4 minutes; mean posterior EMG threshold 10.4 mA.

Neurologic outcomes: Femoral motor neurapraxia occurred in 1 patient (2%); sensory neurapraxia (anterior thigh numbness) occurred in 16 patients (38%) at 6 weeks and resolved to 0% by 6 months.

Main finding: Posterior EMG threshold was not associated with postoperative motor neurapraxia or sensory neurapraxia at 6 weeks (including logistic regression showing OR 1.00; P=.98 for thigh numbness).

Other associations: No significant correlation between posterior EMG threshold and retractor time (Spearman ρ=0.11; P=.50) or postoperative ODI (ρ=0.17; P=.33).

Notable case/interpretation: The single motor neurapraxia case had 27-minute retractor time with posterior EMG 5 mA and recovered by 6 months; median retractor time in the cohort was low (10.8 minutes), limiting conclusions about longer retraction durations.

Posted on

Radiofrequency thermocoagulation under neuromonitoring guidance and general anesthesia for treatment of refractory trigeminal neuralgia

Acta Neurochirurgica (2024) 166:56

Radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFT) for refractory trigeminal neuralgia is usually performed in awake patients to localize the involved trigeminal branches. It is often a painful experience. Here, we present RFT under neuromonitoring guidance and general anesthesia.

Method Stimulation of trigeminal branches at the foramen ovale with the tip of the RFT cannula is performed under short general anesthesia. Antidromic sensory–evoked potentials (aSEP) are recorded from the 3 trigeminal branches. The cannula is repositioned until the desired branch can be stimulated and lesioned.

Conclusion aSEP enable accurate localization of involved trigeminal branches during RFT and allow performing the procedure under general anesthesia.

Posted on

Safe Electromyography Stimulation Thresholds Within Kambin’s Triangle During Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Neurosurgery 91:150–158, 2022

Transforaminal endoscopic approaches through Kambin’s triangle traditionally require surgery to be performed without general anesthesia to allow live patient feedback. No reliable intraoperative neuromonitoring method specific to the dorsal root ganglion (DRG), the structure most at risk during this approach, currently exists.

OBJECTIVE: To correlate evoked electromyography (EMG) thresholds within Kambin’s triangle with new postoperative pain or sensorimotor symptoms potentially resulting from DRG irritation.

METHODS: Data were prospectively collected for all patients undergoing endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) under general anesthesia at a single institution. A stimulation probe was inserted into Kambin’s triangle under fluoroscopic and robotic guidance, before passage of endoscopic instruments. EMG thresholds required to elicit corresponding myotomal responses were measured. Postoperatively, any potential manifestations of DRG irritation were recorded.

RESULTS: Twenty-four patients underwent a total of 34 transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion levels during the study period, with symptoms of potential DRG irritation occurring in 5. The incidence of new onset symptoms increased with lower stimulation thresholds. Sensitivities for EMG thresholds of ≤4, ≤8, and ≤11 mA were 0.6, 0.8, and 1, respectively. Corresponding specificities were 0.90, 0.69, and 0.55, respectively.

CONCLUSION: We demonstrated for the first time the feasibility of direct intraoperative neuromonitoring within Kambin’s triangle in transforaminal endoscopic surgery. Eight milliampere seems to be a reasonable compromise between sensitivity and specificity for this monitoring technique. In the future, larger-scale studies are required to refine safe stimulation thresholds.

Proudly powered by WordPress