Tag: Observation

Posted on

Stereotactic Radiosurgery Versus Observation in Small- and Medium-Sized Vestibular Schwannoma Patients With Normal Hearing: A Retrospective International Multicenter Study

Neurosurgery 98:887–894, 2026

This multicenter retrospective study compares stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with observation (OBS) for small-to-medium vestibular schwannomas (Koos I–II) in patients presenting with normal (AAO‑HNS class A) hearing. Propensity-score–matched cohorts (57 SRS, 57 OBS) were analyzed for serviceable hearing preservation (SHP), tumor control (TC), and cranial nerve outcomes over median follow-ups of 49 and 37 months.

Results show SRS achieved markedly superior tumor control (≈98% at 5–10 years) while producing noninferior hearing outcomes versus observation (5‑year SHP: SRS 76.2% vs OBS 56.1%; difference not statistically significant). The authors conclude SRS is preferable for TC without compromising hearing, emphasizing individualized decision-making given study limitations.

Clinical question Comparison of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) vs observation (OBS) for small/medium Koos I–II vestibular schwannomas in patients with AAO-HNS class A (normal) hearing at presentation, focusing on hearing preservation and tumor control

Design Retrospective international multicenter study with propensity score matching (age, sex, tumor volume, PTA, SDS) yielding 57 SRS vs 57 OBS matched patients

Serviceable hearing preservation No statistically significant difference in long-term serviceable hearing preservation between SRS and OBS in the matched analysis (log-rank P = .17), despite numerically higher SRS rates

Hearing rates over time Matched-cohort 5-/9-year serviceable hearing preservation: SRS 76.2% / 42.4% vs OBS 56.1% / 16.8%

Class A hearing Class A preservation was similar: 57.9% (SRS) vs 52.6% (OBS) (P = .70)

Tumor control SRS achieved markedly superior tumor control (log-rank P < .0001); 5-/10-year tumor control: SRS 97.9% / 97.9% vs OBS 40.9% / 15.1%

Other clinical outcomes No significant matched-cohort differences in cranial nerve deficits, vestibulopathy, or composite CN/tinnitus worsening; tinnitus worsening trended higher with OBS (21.1% vs 8.8%) but was not significant (P = .066)

Overall conclusion SRS provided noninferior hearing outcomes while being significantly better for tumor control, supporting SRS as a favored option while still emphasizing individualized decision-making

Posted on

Matched Comparison of Hearing Outcomes in Patients With Vestibular Schwannoma Treated With Stereotactic Radiosurgery or Observation

Neurosurgery 91:641–647, 2022

Previous studies comparing hearing outcomes in patients managed with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and a watch-and-wait strategy were limited by small sample sizes that prevented controlling for potential confounders, including initial hearing status, tumor size, and age.

OBJECTIVE: To compare hearing outcomes for patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS) managed with observation and SRS while controlling for confounders with propensity score matching.

METHODS: Propensity score matching was used to compare 198 patients with unilateral VS with initial serviceable hearing (99 treated with SRS and 99 managed with observation alone) and 116 with initial class A hearing (58 managed with SRS and 58 with observation), matched by initial hearing status, tumor volume, age, and sex. Kaplan–Meier survival methods were used to compare risk of losing class A and serviceable hearing.

RESULTS: Between patients with VS managed with SRS or observation alone, there was no significant difference in loss of class A hearing (median time 27.2 months, 95% CI 16.843.4, and 29.2 months, 95% CI 20.4-62.5, P = .88) or serviceable hearing (median time 37.7 months, 95% CI 25.7-58.4, and 48.8 months, 95% CI 38.4-86.3, P = .18). For SRS patients, increasing mean cochlear dose was not related to loss of class A hearing (hazard ratio 1.3, P = .17) but was associated with increasing risk of serviceable hearing loss (hazard ratio of 1.5 per increase in Gy, P = .017).

CONCLUSION: When controlling for potential confounders, there was no significant difference in loss of class A or serviceable hearing between patients managed with SRS or with observation alone.

Proudly powered by WordPress