Tag: Postoperative outcomes

Posted on

Nighttime surgery increases complication risk in chronic subdural hematoma: a population‑based cohort study

Acta Neurochirurgica (2025) 167:311

This population-based retrospective cohort study of 2,860 adults undergoing chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) evacuation at a tertiary neurosurgical center (2006–2023) examines whether nighttime procedures increase postoperative risk. Nighttime surgery—defined by local shift boundaries—was independently associated with higher moderate-to-severe complications (OR 1.58), with risk peaking during final night-shift hours, while adjusted recurrence differences were not statistically significant.

The paper details standardized surgical protocols, staffing patterns, sensitivity analyses using alternative nighttime definitions, and multivariable models adjusting for comorbidity and neurological status. Authors conclude that when clinical stability permits, deferring CSDH evacuation to daytime hours may reduce significant complications, while acknowledging retrospective limitations and potential residual confounding.

Nighttime surgery: Undergoing chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) surgery at night is independently associated with a higher risk of moderate-to-severe postoperative complications compared to daytime surgery (OR 1.58; 95% CI 1.04–2.37; p = 0.028).

Complication risk timing: The risk of complications increases gradually overnight and peaks during the final hours of the night shift, suggesting a circadian or fatigue-related effect.

Absolute risk increase: Nighttime surgery results in a 1.6% absolute increase in moderate-to-severe complications, with a number needed to harm (NNH) of 63, indicating a modest but clinically meaningful risk.

CSDH recurrence: Although recurrence rates were higher after nighttime surgery in unadjusted analysis, this difference was not statistically significant after adjusting for confounders (adjusted OR 1.28; 95% CI 0.98–1.65; p = 0.067).

Complication types: The most common moderate-to-severe complications include subdural empyema (1.4%), surgical site infection requiring revision (0.3%), and cerebral herniation (0.3%).

Clinical recommendation: When feasible and the patient is stable, deferring CSDH surgery to daytime hours is advised to minimize complication risk.

Prior research limitations: Previous studies were often underpowered, used inconsistent nighttime definitions, and found mixed results regarding the safety of nighttime CSDH surgery.

Study limitations: Retrospective design, possible unmeasured confounding, small differences in baseline severity, and limited generalizability to other healthcare settings with different resources or scheduling practices.

Posted on

Surgical intervention for cerebral amyloid angiopathy–related lobar intracerebral hemorrhage

J Neurosurg 141:955–965, 2024

The risks and benefits of surgery for cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA)–related lobar intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) are unclear. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature on this topic.

METHODS The authors conducted a systematic review according to the 2020 PRISMA statement. PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Emcare, and Academic Search Premier were searched (on December 27, 2022) for relevant articles. Study inclusion criteria were: 1) randomized controlled trial (RCT), cohort study, crosssectional design, or case series with more than 5 patients; 2) possible, probable, or definite CAA according to the Boston criteria (version 1.0 or 1.5) or autopsy; 3) surgical intervention for acute ICH; and 4) data on peri- and/or postoperative outcomes. Primary outcomes were the presence of intraoperative hemorrhage (IOH), postoperative hemorrhage (POH), and early ICH recurrence. Secondary outcomes were 3-month mortality, late ICH recurrence, functional outcome at discharge, and factors associated with poor outcome. Pooled estimates were calculated, and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool was used to assess risk of bias.

RESULTS Four cohort studies and 15 case series (n = 738 patients, mean age 70 years, 56% women) were included. IOH occurred in 2 (0.6%) of 352 patients. Pooled estimates for POH were 13.0% (30/225) for less than 48 hours and 6.2% (3/437) for 48 hours to 14 days. Overall recurrent ICH (mean follow-up 19 months, n = 5 studies) occurred in 11% of patients. Outcome was predominantly poor with a pooled 3-month mortality rate of 19% and good outcome of 23%. Factors associated with poor outcome were advanced age, poor condition on admission, preexisting dementia, and concomitant intraventricular, subarachnoid, or subdural hemorrhage. All studies contained possible sources of bias and reporting was heterogeneous.

CONCLUSIONS Surgery in CAA-related ICH is safe with no substantial IOH, POH, and early recurrent hemorrhage risk. Outcome appears to be poor, however, especially in older patients, although good quality of evidence is lacking. Patients with CAA should not be excluded from ongoing surgery RCTs in ICH to enable future subgroup analysis of this specific patient population.

Posted on

Clinical Outcomes of Liposomal Bupivacaine Erector Spinae Block in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery

Neurosurgery 92:590–598, 2023

Postoperative pain is a barrier to early mobility and discharge after lumbar surgery. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) has been shown to decrease postoperative pain and narcotic consumption after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIFs) when injected into the marginal suprafascial/subfascial plane-liposomal bupivacaine (MSSP-LB). Erector spinae plane (ESP) infiltration is a relatively new analgesic technique that may offer additional benefits when performed in addition to MSSP-LB.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate postoperative outcomes of combining ESP-LB with MSSP-LB compared with MSSP-LB alone after single-level TLIF.

METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed for patients undergoing single-level TLIFs under spinal anesthesia, 25 receiving combined ESP-LB and MSSP-LB and 25 receiving MSSP-LB alone. The primary outcome was length of hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain score, time to ambulation, and narcotics usage.

RESULTS: Baseline demographics and length of surgery were similar between groups. Hospitalization was significantly decreased in the ESP-LB + MSSP-LB cohort (2.56 days vs 3.36 days, P = .007), as were days to ambulation (0.96 days vs 1.29 days, P = .026). Postoperative pain area under the curve was significantly decreased for ESP-LB + MSSP-LB at 12 to 24 hours (39.37 ± 21.02 vs 53.38 ± 22.11, P = .03) and total (44.46 ± 19.89 vs 50.51 ± 22.15, P = .025). Postoperative narcotic use was significantly less in the ESP-LB + MSSP-LB group at 12 to 24 hours (13.18 ± 4.65 vs 14.78 ± 4.44, P = .03) and for total hospitalization (137.3 ± 96.3 vs 194.7 ± 110.2, P = .04).

CONCLUSION: Combining ESP-LB with MSSP-LB is superior to MSSP-LB alone for single level TLIFs in decreasing length of hospital stay, time to ambulation, postoperative pain, and narcotic use.

Proudly powered by WordPress