Endoscopic Retrolabyrinthine Craniotomy for Exposure of the Trigeminal Nerve Root Entry Zone

Operative Neurosurgery 27:464–470, 2024

Exposure of the root entry zone (REZ) of the trigeminal nerve (TN) for microvascular decompression is commonly obtained with a retrosigmoid approach, with or without endoscopic assistance. We hypothesized that adequate exposure of the TN REZ could be obtained through an endoscopic retrolabyrinthine (RL) approach. We aim to quantify exposure of the REZ of the TN using endoscopic RL approach, with and without drilling of the suprameatal tubercle of the internal auditory canal.

METHODS: Surgical dissection was performed bilaterally on 3 embalmed cadaveric human heads at the anatomy laboratory of the House Institute. Heads were scanned for volumetric analysis using 3D Slicer software both before and after dissection. Extent of exposure was quantified in 2 ways: first, by assessment of the surgeon’s ability to visualize 16 predetermined anatomic landmarks with the endoscope and second, we estimated the “working” area by placing fiducials under the fully endoscopic view and calculating the resultant 3D volume.

RESULTS: Using the standard endoscopic RL approach, anaverageof 13.8 landmarks (range 12-16) was visualized. The estimated working volume exposed by the RL on each side of each head varied from 189.28 to 527.85 mm3 . Drilling of the suprameatal tubercle provided both increases in landmark visualization and, on average, an additional 55 mm 3 of working volume.

CONCLUSION: The endoscopic RL approach is a viable alternative to the standard retrosigmoid approach. Potential advantages of the RL include a more lateral trajectory that minimizes the need for cerebellar retraction and a shorter working distance and shallower angle to the cerebellopontine angle. Potential disadvantages include longer surgery time, increased technical difficulty of exposure, and potential for cerebrospinal fluid leak and or hearing loss.

Petrosal approaches to brainstem cavernous malformations

Neurosurg Focus 33 (2):E10, 2012

Although they provide excellent ventral and lateral exposure of the brainstem, petrosal approaches to brainstem cavernous malformations (CMs) are infrequently reported.

Methods. The authors reviewed their experience with petrosal approaches to brainstem CMs in combination with a comprehensive review of the literature to elucidate resection rates, complication rates, and outcomes.

Results. Including their own results, the authors found 65 cases in 20 reports of brainstem CMs treated with petrosal approaches. The specific approaches were posterior petrosal in 37 cases (57%), anterior petrosal in 17 (26%), extended posterior petrosal in 10 (15%), and a combined petrosal approach in 1 case (2%). For 50 cases in 16 reports with detailed outcome information, the overall complete resection rate was 90%, with early postoperative morbidity reported in 30% of cases and permanent morbidity in 14%. The rate of CSF leakage was 6%.

Conclusions. The versatile petrosal approaches to brainstem CMs are associated with good outcomes and an acceptable morbidity rate. More expansive lesions can be approached using a combination of the standard anterior and posterior petrosal approach, preserving hearing and avoiding the greater complication rates associated with extended posterior petrosal approaches.