Tag: Robot-assisted surgery

Posted on

Feasibility of Robotic Transorbital Surgery

Operative Neurosurgery 28:506–510, 2025

This study explores the feasibility of robotic-assisted lateral transorbital surgery for accessing Meckel cave. Challenges include tool size and limited entry space, though internal surgical space is adequate. Future advancements in smaller, haptic-enabled tools could enhance the practicality of this approach.

• The study explores the feasibility of robotic-assisted lateral transorbital approach (LTOA) using the DaVinci Xi model for neurosurgery.

• Six cadaver heads were used for dissection to evaluate tool insertion and movement.

• The current robotic tools are too large for effective LTOA, limiting the insertion to one tool and a camera.

• Removing the lateral orbital rim (LOR) provides more space but still limits tool usage due to size constraints.

• There is potential for LTOA with smaller, more precise tools in the future, offering a wide surgical field around Meckel cave.

• The study highlights the need for development of narrower robotic instruments and haptic feedback systems for better surgical outcomes.

• Multiportal techniques, like adding a transnasal portal, could enhance tool use, but haptic feedback remains a critical need.

Posted on

Robotic Spine Surgery: Systematic Review of Common Error Types and Best Practices

Operative Neurosurgery 28:295–302, 2025

• Robotic systems enhance accuracy in pedicle screw placement, reducing complications and hospital stays.

• Common errors in robotic spine surgery include registration, skiving, and interference errors.

• Registration errors occur due to imaging discrepancies or unexpected intraoperative movements.

• Skiving errors result from sliding of drilling instruments, often due to poor entry points.

• Interference errors arise from unintended interactions with soft tissue or robotic system malfunctions.

• Best practices include meticulous preoperative planning and careful patient positioning to minimize errors.

• High BMI and female sex are risk factors for screw deviation due to bone quality issues.

• Modern systems use sharp burrs to reduce skiving by ensuring smooth entry points.

• Soft tissue management is crucial to prevent interference errors during surgery.

• Intraoperative imaging helps confirm accurate screw placement, reducing registration errors.

• Screw failure rates: Registration errors (60%), skiving errors (26.8%), interference errors (19.5%).

• Newer robotic systems show improved accuracy but still face challenges with registration errors.

• Study limitations include varied resources, surgeon experience, and subjective error reporting.

Posted on

A Retrospective Analysis of Pedicle Screw Placement Accuracy Using the ExcelsiusGPS Robotic Guidance System

Operative Neurosurgery 24:242–247, 2023

Robotic guidance has become widespread in spine surgery. Although the intent is improved screw placement, further system-specific data are required to substantiate this intention for pedicle screws in spinal stabilization constructs.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of pedicle screws placed with the aid of a robot in a cohort of patients immediately after the adoption of the robot-assisted surgery technique.

METHODS: A retrospective, Institutional Review Board–approved study was performed on the first 100 patients at a single facility, who had undergone spinal surgeries with the use of robotic techniques. Pedicle screw accuracy was graded using the Gertzbein– Robbins Scale based on pedicle wall breach, with grade A representing 0 mm breach and successive grades increasing breach thresholds by 2 mm increments. Preoperative and postoperative computed tomography scans were also used to assess offsets between the objective plan and true screw placements.

RESULTS: A total of 326 screws were analyzed among 72 patients with sufficient imaging data. Ages ranged from 21 to 84 years. The total accuracy rate based on the Gertzbein– Robbins Scale was 97.5%, and the rate for each grade is as follows: A, 82%; B, 15.5%; C, 1.5%; D, 1%; and E, 0. The average tip offset was 1.9 mm, the average tail offset was 2.0 mm, and the average angular offset was 2.6°.

CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted surgery allowed for accurate implantation of pedicle screws on immediate adoption of this technique. There were no complications attributable to the robotic technique, and no hardware revisions were required.

Posted on

Ninety-day complication, revision, and readmission rates for current-generation robot-assisted thoracolumbar spinal fusion surgery

J Neurosurg Spine 36:841–848, 2022

Robotics is a major area for research and development in spine surgery. The high accuracy of robot-assisted placement of thoracolumbar pedicle screws is documented in the literature. The authors present the largest case series to date evaluating 90-day complication, revision, and readmission rates for robot-assisted spine surgery using the current generation of robotic guidance systems.

METHODS An analysis of a retrospective, multicenter database of open and minimally invasive thoracolumbar instrumented fusion surgeries using the Mazor X or Mazor X Stealth Edition robotic guidance systems was performed. Patients 18 years of age or older and undergoing primary or revision surgery for degenerative spinal conditions were included. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate rates of malpositioned screws requiring revision, as well as overall complication, revision, and readmission rates within 90 days.

RESULTS In total, 799 surgical cases (Mazor X: 48.81%; Mazor X Stealth Edition: 51.19%) were evaluated, involving robot-assisted placement of 4838 pedicle screws. The overall intraoperative complication rate was 3.13%. No intraoperative implant-related complications were encountered. Postoperatively, 129 patients suffered a total of 146 complications by 90 days, representing an incidence of 16.1%. The rate of an unrecognized malpositioned screw resulting in a new postoperative radiculopathy requiring revision surgery was 0.63% (5 cases). Medical and pain-related complications unrelated to hardware placement accounted for the bulk of postoperative complications within 90 days. The overall surgical revision rate at 90 days was 6.63% with 7 implant-related revisions, representing an implant-related revision rate of 0.88%. The 90-day readmission rate was 7.13% with 2 implant-related readmissions, representing an implant-related readmission rate of 0.25% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS The results of this multicenter case series and literature review suggest current-generation robotic guidance systems are associated with low rates of intraoperative and postoperative implant-related complications, revisions, and readmissions at 90 days. Future outcomes-based studies are necessary to evaluate complication, revision, and readmission rates compared to conventional surgery.

 

Posted on

Robot-assisted multi-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion: an anatomical study

Acta Neurochirurgica (2018) 160:1891–189

Minimally invasive surgical approaches still provide limited exposure. Access to the L2–L5 intervertebral discs during a single procedure is challenging and often requires repositioning of the patient and adopting an alternative approach.

Objectives Investigate the windows to the L2–L5 intervertebral discs to assess the dimensions of the interbody implants suitable for the procedure and evaluate the feasibility of multi-level lumbar intervertebral disc surgery in robot-assisted surgery (RAS)

Methods Sixteen fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens underwent a retroperitoneal approach to access the L2–L5 intervertebral discs. The L2–L3 to L4–L5 windows were defined as the distance between the left lateral border of the aorta (or nearest common iliac vessel) and the medial border of the psoas, measured in a static state and after gentle medial retraction of the vascular structures. Two living porcine specimens and one cadaveric specimen underwent da Vinci robot-assisted transperitoneal approach to expose the L2–L3 to L4–L5 intervertebral discs and perform multi-level discectomy and interbody implant placement.

Results The L2–L3 to L4–L5 intervertebral disc windows significantly increased from a static to a retracted state (p < 0.05). The mean L2–L3, L3–L4, and L4–L5 windows measured respectively 20.1, 21.6, and 19.6 mm in the static state, and 27.2, 30.9, and 30.3 mm after gentle vascular retraction. The intervertebral windows from L2–L3 to L4–L5 were successfully exposed through an anterior transperitoneal approach with the da Vinci robot on the cadaveric and living porcine specimens, and interbody implants were inserted.

Conclusion RAS appears to be feasible for a mini-invasive multi-level lumbar intervertebral disc surgery. The RAS procedure, longer and more expensive than conventional MIS approaches, should be reserved for elective patients.

 

Proudly powered by WordPress