Optimal Timing of Microsurgical Treatment for Ruptured Arteriovenous Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Neurosurgery 96:18–28, 2025

The timing of microsurgical treatment (MST) for ruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVM) is a contentious issue in the literature. This study aimed to investigate the impact of MST timing on outcomes in patients with ruptured bAVMs, considering MST with and without preoperative endovascular treatment (EVT).

METHOD: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases, yielding 15 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. The timing was defined as the duration from the rupture of bAVM to the MST. The patients were divided into 4 different groups based on MST timing: <48 hours, <1 week, <2 weeks, and <1 month. The primary outcome was favorable outcome defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 or a Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 4 to 5 in the last clinical follow-up. Secondary outcomes included periprocedural mortality and complete excision.

RESULTS: MST time >48 hours were associated with a significantly higher favorable outcome rate (odds ratio: 9.71, 95% Cl: 3.09-30.57, P < .01) and a lower mortality rate (OR: 0.15, 95% Cl: 0.02-0.88, P = .04) compared with MST timing ≤48 hours. After exclusion of patients who underwent MST with preoperative EVT, MST time >48 hours had a significantly higher rate of favorable outcome (OR: 9.39, 95% CI: 2.53-34.89, P < .01).

CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that delayed surgical intervention beyond 48 hours may be associated with improved favorable outcomes in patients who underwent MST with and without preoperative EVT for ruptured bAVMs.

Outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery for hemorrhagic arteriovenous malformations with or without prior resection or embolization

J Neurosurg 135:733–741, 2021

The major concern about ruptured arteriovenous malformations (rAVMs) is recurrent hemorrhage, which tends to preclude stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as a therapeutic modality for these brain malformations. In this study, the authors aimed to clarify the role of SRS for rAVM as a stand-alone modality and an adjunct for a remnant nidus after surgery or embolization.

METHODS Data on 410 consecutive patients with rAVMs treated with SRS were analyzed. The patients were classified into groups, according to prior interventions: SRS-alone, surgery and SRS (Surg-SRS), and embolization and SRS (Embol- SRS) groups. The outcomes of the SRS-alone group were analyzed in comparison with those of the other two groups.

RESULTS The obliteration rate was higher in the Surg-SRS group than in the SRS-alone group (5-year cumulative rate 97% vs 79%, p < 0.001), whereas no significant difference was observed between the Embol-SRS and SRS-alone groups. Prior resection (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.30–2.43, p < 0.001), a maximum AVM diameter ≤ 20 mm (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.43–2.30, p < 0.001), and a prescription dose ≥ 20 Gy (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.28–3.27, p = 0.003) were associated with a better obliteration rate, as demonstrated by multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses. In the SRS-alone group, the annual post-SRS hemorrhage rates were 1.5% within 5 years and 0.2% thereafter and the 10-year significant neurological event–free rate was 95%; no intergroup difference was observed in either outcome. The exclusive performance of SRS (SRS alone) was not a risk for post-SRS hemorrhage or for significant neurological events based on multivariate analyses. These results were also confirmed with propensity score–matched analyses.

CONCLUSIONS The treatment strategy for rAVMs should be tailored with due consideration of multiple factors associated with the patients. Stand-alone SRS is effective for hemorrhagic AVMs, and the risk of post-SRS hemorrhage was low. SRS can also be favorably used for residual AVMs after initial interventions, especially after failed resection.