J Neurosurg Spine 43:703–716, 2025
This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizes randomized controlled trials comparing cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for degenerative cervical disc disease. Across 25 RCTs (4530 patients), CDA demonstrated higher overall and neurological success, reduced adjacent-segment disease and fewer reoperations, but increased heterotopic ossification and longer operative times.
The authors performed multilevel meta-analysis and meta-regression to explore heterogeneity, finding myelopathy inclusion and follow-up completeness influenced results; sensitivity analyses excluding industry-funded trials showed consistent findings. Conclusions emphasize CDA’s potential benefits for selected patients while recommending longer-term and subgroup-specific trials.
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA) vs. Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF): CDA shows comparable or potentially greater overall and neurological success rates compared to ACDF for degenerative cervical spine disease.
Motion Preservation: CDA preserves cervical spine range of motion at the operated level, while ACDF is associated with loss of motion and potentially increased risk of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD).
Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD): CDA is associated with a significantly lower rate of ASD compared to ACDF, suggesting a protective effect against degeneration of adjacent spinal segments.
Reoperation Rates: CDA results in lower total reoperation rates compared to ACDF, indicating fewer subsequent surgical interventions.
Heterotopic Ossification (HO): CDA has a significantly higher rate of HO, a complication where bone forms in soft tissue, which can potentially reduce the motion-preserving benefit of the procedure.
Operative Time: CDA procedures are associated with significantly longer operative times than ACDF, with no significant difference in blood loss or hospital length of stay between the two techniques.
Pain and Disability Outcomes: No significant differences were found between CDA and ACDF in terms of improvement in arm pain, neck pain, or disability scores (Neck Disability Index) as measured by patient-reported outcomes.
Patient Selection: The benefits of CDA over ACDF are most applicable to patients with 1-2 level degenerative disease, preserved cervical alignment, and no significant instability or deformity; findings may not generalize to more complex cases.











You must be logged in to post a comment.