Operative Neurosurgery 30:525–532, 2026
This study compares quantitative diffusion MRI tractography outcomes after deep-seated brain tumor resections using tubular retraction (TR) versus open craniotomy (OC) with spatula/cottonoid retraction. In a matched cohort of 20 patients, TR achieved comparable extent of resection with improved postoperative fractional and geodesic anisotropy metrics and a greater mean increase in Karnofsky Performance Score.
Methods include pre/postoperative 1.5T DTI, autosegmented tractography of ipsilateral tracts, and statistical comparison of FA, GA, diffusivity metrics, and tract volume. Results suggest TR reduces certain retraction-related white matter distortion without worsening diffusivity markers, supporting TR as a viable technique for deep subcortical lesions with potential functional benefit.
Goal Quantitatively compare cerebral retraction–related white matter tract changes after deep-seated tumor surgery using tubular retraction (TR) vs open craniotomy (OC) with spatula retraction via diffusion MRI tractography metrics.
Design Retrospective matched-pair analysis of 20 patients (10 TR vs 10 OC), matched by tumor size, depth, and age; all surgeries performed by a single surgeon.
Tractography process/metrics Pre- and postoperative DTI tractography (1.5T MRI) autosegmented ipsilateral supratentorial tracts; quantified FA, GA, MD, RD, AD, and tract volume across specified tracts (e.g., corticospinal, arcuate/SLF, ILF, IFOF, fornix, uncinate, optic radiations).
Extent of resection Resection was comparable between groups (TR 90.4% vs OC 94.8%, P = .395).
Functional outcome Change in Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) favored TR (mean +11 points) vs OC (no change), P = .035.
Key quantitative findings Postoperative FA and GA differed significantly in favor of TR (FA 0.322 TR vs 0.029 OC, P = .011; GA increased in TR 0.441 vs decreased in OC 0.411, P = .012).
Other imaging metrics Postoperative tract volume was higher in TR than OC (14.9 cm³ vs 10.6 cm³, P = .036), while diffusivity metrics (MD, RD, AD) were broadly comparable between cohorts.
Conclusion TR offers a viable approach for deep-seated tumors with similar resection extent while mitigating some components of retraction injury as reflected by quantitative tractography changes and improved KPS.
You must be logged in to post a comment.