Tag: Vascular injury

Posted on

Avoidance of Major Vascular Injury in Transcranial Brain Tumor Surgery Using Real-Time Doppler Navigation

Operative Neurosurgery 29:633–638, 2025

This clinical technical note and case series evaluates real-time Doppler probe navigation during transcranial craniotomy for brain tumor resection, describing technique, operative workflow, and outcomes from 501 operations where the Doppler was used. The authors report a low rate of major vessel injury (<1%) and discuss how Doppler guidance complements neuronavigation and ultrasound as tumor resection progresses and brain shift reduces image accuracy.

The paper details patient selection, surgical approaches, probe specifications and intraoperative use, illustrates three case examples with video, and analyzes stroke and infarction rates attributable to vasospasm or small-vessel injury. Limitations include retrospective design and variable probe penetrance; the authors recommend routine Doppler adjunctive use for tumors encasing or adherent to major arteries.

Posted on

Risk factors for vascular injuries in anterior lumbar interbody fusion

J Neurosurg Spine 41:17–23, 2024

Vascular injuries in anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) occur due to the vascular manipulation needed to achieve optimal disc space exposure. In this study, the authors aimed to evaluate intraoperative vascular injuries in patients undergoing single- and multilevel ALIF at a large tertiary academic center.

METHODS Prospectively collected data specifically addressing postoperative complications in patients who underwent ALIF by neurosurgery spine faculty working with a specialized vascular surgeon were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic characteristics and intraoperative data were collected. Patients were split into vascular injury and non–vascular injury groups. Outcome comparisons were conducted using the chi-square exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for categorical and continuous data, respectively. Logistic regression was used to investigate associations with vascular injury, with univariate analysis first conducted to identify candidate associations. Based on these results, variables demonstrating a between-groups test statistic of p < 0.10 were included in the multivariate analysis to determine the independent predictors of vascular injuries.

RESULTS In total, 323 patients who underwent ALIF procedures were identified: 51% were male (n = 166) and 49% were female (n = 157). The mean age was 57.1 years, with 56% (n = 182) having undergone prior lumbar surgery. Vascular injuries were encountered intraoperatively in 7.1% (n = 23) of patients, and the majority (91% [n = 21]) involved the left common iliac vein. Patients with vascular injuries were statistically older (mean 63.6 vs 56.6 years), had greater incidence rates of coronary artery disease, opioid use, multilevel ALIF surgery involving the L2–3 level, and surgery involving multiple disc spaces, had more multilevel anterior instrumentation, and experienced greater blood loss during surgery and longer length of stay (all p < 0.05). Overall, there was 1 death (0.3%) secondary to aortic artery injury. Multivariate analysis identified opioid use, multilevel ALIF involving L2–3, and multiple interbodies as statistically independent predictors of vascular injury (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS Identifying patient risk factors can reduce the risk of vascular injuries in ALIF. Opioid use, multilevel ALIF involving L2–3, and multiple interbodies were independent predictors of vascular injuries in ALIF.

Posted on

Incidence of major and minor vascular injuries during lateral access lumbar interbody fusion procedures

Neurosurgical Review (2022) 45:1275–1289

During lateral lumbar fusion, the trajectory of implant insertion approaches the great vessels anteriorly and the segmental arteries posteriorly, which carries the risk of vascular complications.

We aimed to analyze vascular injuries for potential differences between oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) procedures at our institution. This was coupled with a systematic literature review of vascular complications associated with lateral lumbar fusions. A retrospective chart review was completed to identify consecutive patients who underwent lateral access fusions. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used for the systematic review with the search terms “vascular injury” and “lateral lumbar surgery.”

Of 260 procedures performed at our institution, 211 (81.2%) patients underwent an LLIF and 49 (18.8%) underwent an OLIF. There were no major vascular complications in either group in this comparative study, but there were four (1.5%) minor vascular injuries (2 LLIF, 0.95%; 2 OLIF, 4.1%). Patients who experienced vascular injury experienced a greater amount of blood loss than those who did not (227.5 ± 147.28 vs. 59.32 ± 68.30 ml) (p = 0.11). In our systematic review of 63 articles, major vascular injury occurred in 0–15.4% and minor vascular injury occurred in 0–6% of lateral lumbar fusions.

The systematic review and comparative study demonstrate an increased rate of vascular injury in OLIF when compared to LLIF. However, vascular injuries in either procedure are rare, and this study aids previous literature to support the safety of both approaches.

Posted on

Major vascular injury following lateral transpsoas approach

Major vascular injury following lateral transpsoas approach

J Neurosurg Spine 21:794–798, 2014

Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) has gained popularity among spine surgeons for treating multiple conditions of the lumbar spine. In contrast to the anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) approach, the minimally invasive XLIF approach affords wide access to the lumbar disc space without an access surgeon and causes minimal tissue disruption. The XLIF approach offers many advantages over other lumbar spine approaches, with a reportedly low complication profile.

The authors describe the first fatality reported in the literature following an XLIF approach. They describe the case of a 50-year-old woman who suffered a fatal intraoperative injury to the great vessels during a lateral transpsoas approach to the L4–5 disc space.

Posted on

Carotid Artery Injury During Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery: Incidence and Outcomes

Carotid Artery Injury During Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery- Incidence and Outcomes

Neurosurgery 73[ONS Suppl 2]:ons261–ons270, 2013

Injury to the internal carotid artery (ICA) during endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery is a feared complication that is not well studied or reported.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence, to identify potential risk factors, and to present management strategies and outcomes of ICA injury during endonasal skull base surgery at our institution. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all endoscopic endonasal operations performed at our institution between 1998 and 2011 to examine potential factors predisposing to ICA injury. We also documented the perioperative management and outcomes after injury.

RESULTS: There were 7 ICA injuries encountered in 2015 endonasal skull base surgeries, giving an incidence of 0.3%. Most injuries (5 of 7) involved the left ICA, and the most common diagnosis was chondroid neoplasm (chordoma, chondrosarcoma; 3 of 7 [2% of 142 cases]). Two injuries occurred during 660 pituitary adenoma resections (0.3%). The paraclival ICA segment was the most commonly injured site (5 of 7), and transclival and transpterygoid approaches had a higher incidence of injury, although neither factor reached statistical significance. Four of 7 injured ICAs were sacrificed either intraoperatively or postoperatively. No patient suffered a stroke or neurological deficit. There were no intraoperative mortalities; 1 patient died postoperatively of cardiac ischemia. One of the 3 preserved ICAs developed a pseudoaneurysm over a mean follow-up period of 5 months that was treated endovascularly.

CONCLUSION: ICA injury during endonasal skull base surgery is an infrequent and manageable complication. Preservation of the vessel remains difficult. Chondroid tumors represent a higher risk and should be resected by surgical teams with significant experience.

Proudly powered by WordPress