O-Arm–Guided Balloon Kyphoplasty: Prospective Single-Center Case Series of 54 Consecutive Patients

Neurosurgery 68[ONS Suppl 2]:ons250–ons256, 2011 DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31821421b9

Balloon kyphoplasty is widely used to treat vertebral compression fractures. Procedure outcome and safety are directly linked to precise radiological imaging requiring 1 or 2 C arms to allow correct visualization throughout the procedure. This minimally invasive spinal surgery is associated with radiation exposure for both patient and surgeon. In our center, we switched from using a C-arm to an O-arm image guidance system to perform balloon kyphoplasty. Our preliminary experience is reported in Acta Neurochirurgica, and the encouraging results led us to study this subject more extensively. This article presents our complete results. To the best of our knowledge, there is no comparable clinical series describing O-arm use in kyphoplasty procedures published in the literature. OBJECTIVE: To report our complete results of using the O-arm guidance system to perform balloon kyphoplasty.

METHODS: We prospectively evaluated O-arm–guided kyphoplasty procedure in 54 consecutive patients and measured x-ray exposure and fluoroscopy time.

RESULTS: The mean surgical time for the procedure was 38 minutes with a mean fluoroscopy procedure time of 3.1 minutes. The mean fluoroscopy time by level was 2.5 minutes. Mean irradiation dose by procedure was 220 mGy and by level was 166 mGy. There was a significant reduction in fluoroscopy time and x-ray exposure from 5.1 minutes with classic C-arm use to 3.1 minutes when with O-arm use without additional time required for positioning the system.

CONCLUSION: With this new intraoperative system, the overall surgical and fluoroscopy times can be further reduced in the near future.

A Comparative Analysis of the Results of Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures

Neurosurgery 67[ONS Suppl 1]:ons171-ons188, 2010 DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000380936.00143.11

The most common complication of osteoporosis is vertebral fractures, which occur more frequently than all other fractures (hip, wrist, and ankle).

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively analyze vertebroplasty compared with kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures using improvement in pain, functional capacity, and quality of life as outcome measures.

METHODS: The study population included 28 patients in the vertebroplasty group and 24 patients in the kyphoplasty group. The mean follow-up period was 42.2 weeks and 42.3 weeks in the vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty groups, respectively. Outcomes were measured pre- and postoperatively using the visual analogue scale, the Oswestry Disability Index, the EuroQol-5D questionnaire, and the Short-Form 36 Health Survey.

RESULTS: In the vertebroplasty group, visual analogue scale scores improved from a mean of 8.0 cm to 5.5 cm at last follow-up (P = .001). Preoperatively, the Oswestry Disability Index was 57.6, which improved to 38.4 (P = .006). The EuroQol-5D score preoperatively was 0.157 and improved to 0.504 (P = .001). The Short-Form 36 Health Survey showed greatest improvement in the areas of physical health, role physical, body pain, and vitality. In the kyphoplasty group, visual analogue scale scores improved from a mean of 7.5 cm preoperatively to 2.5 cm postoperatively (P = .000001). The mean Oswestry Disability Index preoperatively was 50.7 and improved to 28.8 (P = .002). The EuroQol-5D score improved from a mean of 0.234 preoperatively to 0.749 (P = .00004). The Short-Form 36 Health Survey showed greatest improvement in the areas of physical health, physical functioning, role physical, body pain, and social functioning.

CONCLUSION: Both vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are effective at improving pain, functional disability, and quality of life; however, kyphoplasty provides better results, which are maintained over long-term follow-up.