Operative Neurosurgery 31:399–409, 2026
Third-ventricular cavernous malformations are rare lesions in an unforgiving anatomical corridor. This paper combines three institutional operations with a systematic review to examine how lesion position should guide the route of access. Two patients underwent endoscope-assisted supraorbital trans–lamina terminalis resection and one a port-based transsulcal exoscopic procedure. In the literature, transcallosal and transcortical transventricular craniotomies remained the most commonly reported routes. The main message is not that one minimally invasive approach is universally preferable, but that the shortest safe trajectory must be individualized around the fornices, hypothalamus, thalamus, deep veins and ventricular anatomy.
Objective
To describe minimally invasive surgical strategies for symptomatic third-ventricular cavernous malformations and synthesize the published experience to support anatomical approach selection.
Methods
The investigators reviewed a prospectively maintained institutional database and identified three symptomatic patients with imaging evidence of hemorrhage. Demographic, clinical, anatomical and surgical outcome data were analyzed. A PRISMA-based PubMed and Embase search identified the available reports of surgically treated third-ventricular cavernous malformations and the approaches used.
Main results
The institutional group included two men and one woman; all were symptomatic, none had hydrocephalus and all had signs of intralesional hemorrhage. Two lesions were removed through a supraorbital keyhole, endoscope-assisted trans–lamina terminalis route. The third was treated through a right frontal keyhole with a port-based transsulcal, exoscope-assisted route.
The review assembled 54 reported surgical cases. The most frequent routes were interhemispheric transcallosal in 26 cases (48.1%) and transcortical transventricular in 16 (29.6%). The combined experience demonstrates substantial heterogeneity in lesion origin, ventricular size and surface presentation, all of which alter the safest corridor.
Interpretation
“Minimally invasive” should describe limited tissue disruption, not merely a smaller opening. A trans–lamina terminalis route may suit an anterior or inferior lesion with favorable line of sight, whereas a transsulcal or transventricular route may better address a superior or lateral target. High-quality multiplanar and susceptibility imaging, neuronavigation and planned conversion options are more important than allegiance to a single approach.
Limitations
The institutional experience contains only three patients. The systematic review is dominated by case reports and small series, with publication bias, incomplete outcome reporting and no valid comparative groups. Some historical cases predate modern endoscopy, exoscopy, tract-informed planning and contemporary postoperative imaging.
Clinical takeaway
Select the route from the lesion’s precise relationship to the ventricular walls, foramina, fornices, hypothalamus, thalamus and deep venous structures. Use the corridor that offers direct visualization with the least neural transgression, and counsel patients that the evidence for approach superiority remains low level.