Category: Spine

Posted on

Sarcopenia Predicts Early Adjacent Segment Disease Development After Anterior and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Operative Neurosurgery 29:667–677, 2025

his clinical study evaluates whether sarcopenia, measured by psoas-to-vertebral body morphometrics on preoperative MRI, predicts early adjacent segment disease (ASD) within three years after anterior or oblique lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF/OLIF). Retrospective analysis of 104 patients found sarcopenia strongly associated with ASD, with sarcopenic patients showing markedly higher ASD rates and greater muscle fat infiltration.

The paper reports that psoas area, P:VBR ratios, and age remained significant predictors on multivariate analysis, while spinopelvic parameters lost significance after adjustment. The authors propose routine preoperative morphometric screening to guide surgical planning, risk counseling, and targeted perioperative optimization for high-risk patients.

• Sarcopenia: Preoperative sarcopenia, defined by reduced psoas muscle area relative to vertebral body area, is a strong independent predictor of early adjacent segment disease (ASD) within 3 years after anterior or oblique lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF/OLIF) ().

• ASD Incidence: 24% of patients developed ASD within 3 years post-ALIF/OLIF; 84.21% of sarcopenic patients developed ASD compared to 10.59% of nonsarcopenic patients.

• Morphometric Assessment: Psoas:vertebral body ratio (P:VBR) at L4 on preoperative MRI provides a simple, objective screening tool for sarcopenia and ASD risk stratification.

• Spinopelvic Parameters: Postoperative pelvic tilt (PT) and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch were associated with ASD in univariate analysis, but not after multivariate adjustment; sarcopenia remained the strongest predictor.

• Other Risk Factors: Older age, higher preoperative disability (ODI), more instrumented/interbody levels, and prior lumbar surgery also increased ASD risk, while gender, BMI, and comorbidities did not.

• Instrumentation vs. Stand-alone Cages: Patients with stand-alone ALIF/OLIF (no posterior instrumentation) had lower rates of ASD, possibly due to less mechanical stress on adjacent segments.

• Clinical Implications: Identifying sarcopenia preoperatively can inform surgical planning, patient counseling, and may guide targeted pre- and postoperative interventions to improve outcome.

• Future Directions: Further research is needed to determine if interventions like resistance training or dietary modification can reduce ASD risk in sarcopenic patients, and to establish standardized diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia in spine surgery.

Posted on

Does the Presence of Preoperative Myelomalacia Impact Outcomes Following ACDF?

Spine 2025;50:1539–1546

This retrospective cohort study examines whether preoperative cervical myelomalacia on MRI influences patient-reported outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in 518 adults. Results show similar modified JOA (mJOA) recovery between groups, with myelomalacia not independently predicting worse mJOA up to one year postoperatively.

Secondary findings reveal myelomalacia patients had lower baseline pain/disability and less frequent NDI MCID achievement, but multivariable analysis attributed those differences to baseline scores, smoking, and demographics rather than myelomalacia itself. Multilevel myelomalacia correlated with worse baseline mJOA but did not independently affect long-term improvement.

• Preoperative Myelomalacia: Presence of myelomalacia on MRI before anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in patients with mild-moderate myelopathy does not predict worse postoperative mJOA scores or overall patient-reported outcomes at any time point up to one year after surgery.

• Functional Outcomes: Both patients with and without preoperative myelomalacia achieve similar improvements in functional outcomes (mJOA), with no significant difference in the likelihood of reaching the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for mJOA.

• Neck Disability Index (NDI): Patients with myelomalacia less commonly achieve MCID for NDI at one year, but this is attributable to less severe baseline symptoms and higher rates of current smoking, not the presence of myelomalacia itself.

• Multilevel Myelomalacia: Patients with two or more levels of myelomalacia have worse preoperative mJOA scores but show greater short-term improvement, resulting in similar one-year outcomes compared to single-level myelomalacia; preoperative severity, not the extent of myelomalacia, predicts improvement.

• Baseline Differences: Patients with myelomalacia tend to have lower baseline pain and disability, possibly due to earlier surgical intervention prompted by MRI findings rather than symptom severity.

• Other Patient-Reported Outcomes: Myelomalacia patients may have better physical component scores (SF-12 PCS) and lower neck pain (VAS neck) at one year, but these differences are small and likely reflect baseline characteristics rather than effects of myelomalacia.

• Prognostic Value: Myelomalacia seen on MRI should not be used as a binary prognostic indicator for surgical outcomes in mild-moderate myelopathy; clinical decision-making should consider baseline function and other patient factors.

• Research Implications: Further studies are needed to clarify the impact of myelomalacia severity, chronicity, and timing on outcomes, especially in patients with more severe myelopathy or more extensive cord signal changes

Posted on

Comparison of Sagittal Plane Correction With “Bullet” Versus “Banana” Type Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices

Operative Neurosurgery 29:624–632, 2025

This clinical study evaluates whether “Banana” versus “Bullet” transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) devices produce different immediate postoperative segmental lordosis in one- and two-level degenerative lumbar fusions. Using 241 treated levels from 198 patients, the authors compare radiographic outcomes and perform multivariable regression to identify independent predictors of postoperative segmental lordosis and its change.

Findings show univariable advantages for “Banana” cages in small magnitudes, but multivariable analysis identifies preoperative segmental lordosis, implant-listed lordosis, pelvic incidence, and use of bilateral TLIF windows—not cage morphology—as primary predictors of immediate postoperative segmental correction. The paper recommends further work on subsidence risk and maintenance of correction.

Posted on

Five-year follow-up after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus decompression alone for grade 1 spondylolisthesis: are there any differences in outcomes?

J Neurosurg Spine 43:547–556, 2025

This multicenter, prospective registry study compares 60-month outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) versus minimally invasive tubular decompression for Meyerding grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis. Patient-reported outcomes (ODI, NRS for back/leg pain, EQ-5D, NASS satisfaction) improved significantly in both cohorts, with MIS TLIF showing greater back-pain reduction and higher satisfaction rates.

Durability differs: MIS TLIF had a markedly lower 5-year reoperation rate than MIS decompression (2.8% vs 15.5%), and multivariable analysis found fusion reduced reoperation odds despite similar long-term PROs. Authors conclude both MIS approaches benefit selected patients, but fusion offers superior reoperation durability.

Posted on

Risk Factors Associated With Revision Microdiscectomy or Subsequent Spinal Fusion Within Two Years of Index Lumbar Microdiscectomy

Spine 2025;50:1392–1399

This large retrospective study found that within two years of lumbar microdiscectomy, 5.5% required revision surgery and 6.6% required spinal fusion. Age 40–59, female sex, and at least one Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) comorbidity significantly increased the risk of subsequent fusion, but not revision microdiscectomy.

Revision microdiscectomy rates after index lumbar microdiscectomy were 3.5% at one year and 5.5% at two years.

• Lumbar fusion rates were 2.9% at one year and 6.6% at two years after index surgery.

• Age 40–59, female sex, and presence of at least one Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) comorbidity significantly increased risk of lumbar fusion, but not revision microdiscectomy.

• Having ≥1 CCI comorbidity increased the likelihood of needing fusion by about 80%.

• Specific comorbidities (e.g., congestive heart failure, peripheral/cerebrovascular disease, diabetes) were strong predictors for time-to-fusion.

• Age, sex, and CCI score were not predictive of time-to-revision microdiscectomy.

• Results suggest CCI may help identify patients at higher risk for spinal fusion after microdiscectomy.

• Findings may guide surgeons in perioperative decision-making and patient counseling.

Posted on

Development and Validation of Interpretable Machine Learning Models Incorporating Paraspinal Muscle Quality to Predict Cage Subsidence Risk Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Spine 2025;50:1375–1385

This multicenter retrospective study developed and validated an interpretable LightGBM machine learning model incorporating paraspinal muscle quality and bone metrics to accurately predict cage subsidence risk after PLIF. Key risk factors included lower psoas muscle index, higher fat infiltration, reduced bone density, and suboptimal cage parameters.

• A machine learning model (LightGBM) was developed to predict cage subsidence risk after PLIF, achieving high accuracy (AUC 0.9752, 92% accuracy, F1 score 0.92).

• Key independent risk factors include lower psoas muscle index (PMI), higher fat infiltration (FI), reduced bone density (HU value, VBQ), suboptimal cage position/height, and greater postoperative changes in intervertebral height (IH) and segmental angle (SA).

• Paraspinal muscle quality was a major contributor; removing muscle indicators reduced model accuracy substantially.

• Patients with cage subsidence had poorer paraspinal muscle and bone quality compared to those without subsidence.

• The model was externally validated and deployed as a web-based tool for real-time, individualized clinical risk assessment.

• Findings support personalized surgical planning and risk mitigation strategies for PLIF patients.

• The study emphasizes a multifactorial approach, integrating skeletal, muscular, and surgical parameters for optimal prediction.

• Limitations include retrospective design, use of a single cage type, and lack of comorbidity indices; further prospective studies are needed.

Posted on

Development and internal validation of a risk score for subsidence of expandable spacers in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery

Brain and Spine 5 (2025) 104322

This study developed and internally validated the Expandable TLIF Subsidence Index (ETSI) to predict risk of cage subsidence after TLIF surgery with expandable spacers. Key risk factors include high ASA score, non-degenerative indication, lower lumbar levels, small cage size, and posterior cage position.

• A risk score (Expandable TLIF Subsidence Index, ETSI) was developed to predict cage subsidence (CS) after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) using expandable spacers.

• The study analyzed 388 patients (482 levels), finding a 31.7% CS rate at 3 months.

• Independent risk factors for CS included high ASA score, non-degenerative surgical indication, lower lumbar level, small cage size, and posterior cage position.

• The ETSI score ranges from -2 to 6; higher scores indicate higher CS risk (each point increases CS odds by about 2x).

• Modifiable risk factors (cage size and position) can reduce CS risk if addressed during surgery.

• Higher ETSI scores are also associated with increased risk of non-union/pseudarthrosis.

• The ETSI demonstrated moderate predictive performance (AUROC ≈ 0.68).

• The score may aid surgical planning and should be externally validated in future studies.

Posted on

Cervical deformity correction: comparison of neurological, radiographic, and patient-reported outcome measures by three-column osteotomy level

J Neurosurg Spine 43:433–442, 2025

Three-column osteotomy (3CO) for cervical deformity at C7–T1 is linked to higher neurological deficits, less radiographic correction, and worse Neck Disability Index outcomes compared to T2–6 levels. Surgeons should prefer 3CO below T1 when feasible for better neurological and functional results.

• Study compared outcomes of three-column osteotomy (3CO) for cervical deformity at C7–T1 vs T2–6 levels.

• Patients with 3CO at C7–T1 had higher rates of new postoperative neurological deficits (56% vs 18%).

• T2–6 3CO resulted in greater radiographic correction (T1 slope and C2–T4 SVA) than C7–T1 3CO.

• Neck Disability Index (NDI) improved after T2–6 3CO but worsened after C7–T1 3CO at 1 year.

• All patients with neurological deficits had at least partial recovery; 20% achieved complete recovery.

• 3CO level selection is multifactorial, but caudal to T1 is recommended when feasible due to better outcomes.

• Study limitations include retrospective design and single-institution data.

• Largest study to date comparing neurological, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes by 3CO level.

Posted on

Risk Factors of 90-Day Unplanned Readmission After Lumbar Spine Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Disk Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Neurosurgery 97:908–916, 2025

This meta-analysis identified a 7.72% 90-day unplanned readmission rate after lumbar spine surgery. Significant risk factors include older age, higher BMI, depression, diabetes, hypertension, renal failure, and ASA grade >2. Enhanced preoperative optimization and targeted strategies for high-risk patients are recommended to reduce readmissions.

• A meta-analysis of 11 studies (648,415 patients) found a 7.72% incidence of unplanned 90-day readmission after lumbar spine surgery.

• Significant risk factors for readmission include older age, higher body mass index (BMI), depression, diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN), renal failure, and an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade greater than 2.

• Surgical factors such as fusion and laminectomy were not significantly associated with readmission.

• Main causes for readmission included wound infection, wound dehiscence, and implant failure; disk reherniation was the leading cause at 90 days.

• Enhanced preoperative optimization and careful patient selection are recommended, especially for elderly and high-comorbidity patients.

• Targeted preventive strategies may reduce readmissions and improve healthcare resource utilization.

• Limitations include retrospective study designs and insufficient data on some perioperative risk factors.

Posted on

Evaluation of Discrepancy Between Radiographic Success and Patient Satisfaction in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

Neurosurgery 97:821–828, 2025

Despite radiographic success in adult spinal deformity surgery, 24.1% of patients remained dissatisfied, mainly due to postoperative lumbar stiffness-related disability. Satisfaction was not linked to radiographic parameters but was independently predicted by the modified lumbar stiffness disability index, highlighting the importance of counseling patients about this trade-off.

• About 24.1% of patients were dissatisfied with adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery despite radiographic success.

• Radiographic success was defined as optimal alignment, no mechanical complications, and no revision surgery.

• Patient satisfaction was measured using SRS-22; scores <4.0 indicated less satisfaction.

• Clinical outcomes (pain, disability, quality of life) improved after surgery, but lumbar stiffness (M-LSDI) worsened.

• No significant differences in radiographic parameters were found between satisfied and less satisfied groups.

• High postoperative lumbar stiffness (M-LSDI score) was the single independent risk factor for dissatisfaction.

• Longer fusion length was associated with higher lumbar stiffness and lower satisfaction.

• Patients should be informed about the trade-off between pain relief and increased lumbar stiffness before surgery.

Posted on

Intraoperative vancomycin for preventing infection after open spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

J Neurosurg Spine 43:509–518, 2025

A meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials found that intraoperative vancomycin use in open spine surgery did not significantly reduce rates of superficial or deep surgical site infections. Further large-scale studies are needed to clarify its efficacy and inform clinical guidelines.

• A systematic review and meta-analysis of 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 2235 patients assessed the efficacy of intraoperative vancomycin in preventing infections after open spine surgery.

• No significant reduction in overall surgical site infections (SSI), deep infections, or superficial infections was found with intraoperative vancomycin compared to control.

• Subgroup analyses showed no benefit in either instrumented or uninstrumented spine surgeries.

• There was no significant shift toward gram-negative or culture-negative infections with vancomycin use.

• Potential risks include local cytotoxicity and possible impairment of bone healing and spinal fusion.

• Current evidence is limited by small sample sizes, heterogeneity in vancomycin administration, and variable follow-up durations.

• The study concludes intraoperative vancomycin may not reduce infection risk and further large RCTs are warranted.

Posted on

Which interbody device minimized nonunion, subsidence, and reoperation after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?

J Neurosurg Spine 43:453–463, 2024

This meta-analysis found that allograft spacers in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) result in lower nonunion and revision rates compared to PEEK cages, with no significant difference in subsidence risk. Allograft offers enhanced fusion and minimizes revision without increasing subsidence.

• Allograft and PEEK cages are the most commonly used interbody spacers in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), replacing autograft due to lower donor site morbidity.

• This meta-analysis included 10 studies with 1462 patients comparing allograft and PEEK cages for ACDF, analyzing nonunion, subsidence, and reoperation rates.

• Allograft showed a significantly lower rate of nonunion than PEEK cages (OR 0.33, p = 0.01), indicating better fusion outcomes.

• Reoperation due to nonunion was significantly higher with PEEK cages compared to allograft (OR 0.28, p < 0.01), but overall reoperation rates for any cause were not significantly different.

• No significant difference was found in the incidence or amount of subsidence between allograft and PEEK cages.

• Allograft’s osteoconductive properties likely contribute to its higher fusion rate, while PEEK cages may lead to fibrous interface formation, reducing solid fusion.

• Meta-regression showed no significant effect of smoking, age, or number of fused levels on nonunion rates.

• Conclusion: Allograft is advantageous over PEEK cages in ACDF due to higher fusion rates and lower revision risk, without increasing subsidence

Posted on

Surgical outcomes for spinal arachnoid cysts and webs: a case series

Acta Neurochirurgica (2025) 167:248

This retrospective case series found that surgical treatment for spinal arachnoid cysts (SAC) and webs (SAW) resulted in favorable outcomes (mMC I-II) in 90% and 83% of patients, respectively, with low complication and recurrence rates. Surgery should be considered for symptomatic patients.

• Spinal arachnoid cysts (SAC) and spinal arachnoid webs (SAW) are rare intradural pathologies causing pain and myelopathic symptoms.

• MRI is the main diagnostic tool, but distinguishing between SAC and SAW can be difficult; both may show the “scalpel sign”.

• This retrospective study reviewed 35 patients (29 SAC, 6 SAW) treated surgically from 2011–2023.

• Most patients presented with pain, gait disturbance, sensory, or motor deficits; preoperative neurological status was often not severe.

• Surgical treatment (fenestration or resection) led to favorable outcomes (mMC I-II) in 90% of SAC and 83% of SAW patients.

• Complications occurred in 14.7% of SAC cases but resolved without lasting deficits; no complications in SAW group.

• Recurrence was rare (2.7% in SAC, none in SAW) during short-term follow-up.

• Surgery is recommended for symptomatic patients, with generally favorable short-term results, but larger and longer-term studies are needed.

Posted on

Does Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Reduce Mechanical Complication and Pseudarthrosis Rate at the Lumbosacral Junction in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery in Comparison to Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion?

Int J Spine Surg 2025, 19 (4) 409-417

In adult spinal deformity surgery, anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) at the lumbosacral junction significantly reduces mechanical complications, pseudarthrosis, and reoperation rates compared to posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), suggesting ALIF should be preferred unless direct posterior decompression is necessary.

• ALIF (anterior lumbar interbody fusion) at the lumbosacral junction significantly reduces mechanical complications and pseudarthrosis rates compared to PLIF (posterior lumbar interbody fusion) in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.

• ALIF is associated with lower rates of implant-related pain and reoperation than PLIF.

• PLIF is an independent risk factor for mechanical complications in long-segment ASD constructs.

• ALIF results in significantly less blood loss, fewer transfusions, and shorter ICU and hospital stays than PLIF.

• ALIF provides superior biomechanical stability and fusion rates, likely due to better endplate preparation and larger cage footprint.

• PLIF remains suitable for cases requiring direct neural decompression, such as severe stenosis or spondylolisthesis.

• Surgical technique selection should consider patient anatomy, surgical goals, and specific pathology at the lumbosacral junction.

• Study limitations include retrospective design, single-center data, and potential selection bias; further multicenter studies are needed.

Posted on

The First Grade III Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Treated With the Novel 360° Artificial Disc/Artificial Facet Replacement Solution

Int J Spine Surg 2025, 19 (4) 362-369

This case report describes the first use of a combined 360° motion-preserving surgery—utilizing Prodisc L Artificial Disc and TOPS facet replacement—for grade III lumbar spondylolisthesis, showing rapid pain relief, improved function, and high patient satisfaction, suggesting a potential alternative to spinal fusion for select patients.

• First reported case of grade III lumbar spondylolisthesis treated with a novel 360° motion-preserving solution combining Prodisc L Artificial Disc Replacement and the Premia TOPS System.

• Traditional treatment is spinal fusion, but it reduces motion and can cause adjacent segment disease, especially problematic for younger, active patients.

• The patient, a 36-year-old man with progressive L5-S1 grade III spondylolisthesis and severe disc collapse, had failed conservative therapy and declined fusion.

• Surgery was performed in two stages: anterior artificial disc replacement, followed by posterior facet replacement with the TOPS device.

• Significant improvements were seen in pain, function, and satisfaction, with the patient pain-free and highly satisfied by 3 and 9 months post-op.

• This case suggests the 360° arthroplasty approach may offer a motion-preserving alternative to fusion for high-grade spondylolisthesis.

• Further research and long-term data are needed to confirm safety, durability, and broader effectiveness.

Posted on

Comparison of outcomes after anterior versus posterior surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy

The Spine Journal 25 (2025) 1964−1973

This pooled analysis of 980 DCM patients found that anterior surgical decompression led to greater improvements in quality of life and disability at 1 year compared to posterior surgery, especially in mild cases. Anterior surgery had higher dysphagia risk; posterior surgery had more wound infections and pseudoarthrosis.

• Anterior surgical decompression for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) leads to greater improvements in 1-year patient-reported quality of life and disability compared to posterior decompression.

• The benefit of anterior surgery is especially pronounced in patients with mild DCM, with significantly better outcomes in physical function, disability, and functional status.

• Improvements with anterior surgery are mainly driven by reductions in pain and enhanced ability to engage in recreational and physical activities.

• Dysphagia is more common after anterior surgery, while pseudoarthrosis and wound infections are more frequent after posterior surgery.

• No significant differences were found between the two approaches in mental health outcomes or overall neurological improvement as measured by mJOA and SF36-MCS.

• The study pooled data from three large, prospective multicenter clinical trials, analyzing 980 surgical patients with DCM.

• Results were robust across multiple sensitivity analyses and consistent with recent real-world and meta-analytic studies.

• The findings help inform surgical decision-making but do not dictate a single preferred approach for all patients.

Posted on

Spinal Cord Tract Integrity in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

Neurosurgery 97:681–690, 2025

This study used diffusion tensor imaging to assess spinal cord tract integrity in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). Significant injury was found in the lateral corticospinal tract, fasciculus gracilis, and fasciculus cuneatus, suggesting these are key tracts affected in DCM, while other tracts may support compensatory recovery.

• Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most common cause of spinal cord dysfunction, often resulting in persistent motor deficits despite surgery.

• This study used diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and atlas-based analysis to assess specific spinal cord tract integrity in DCM patients versus healthy controls.

• Fractional anisotropy (FA) was significantly reduced in the lateral corticospinal tract, fasciculus gracilis, and fasciculus cuneatus in DCM patients compared to healthy volunteers.

• No significant FA differences were found between mild and moderate-to-severe DCM patients for any tract.

• Most other spinal tracts, including reticulospinal and rubrospinal, showed no significant FA changes, suggesting possible preservation and compensatory potential.

• Limitations include small sample size, age differences between groups, and inability to analyze tracts at the site of maximal compression.

• Findings suggest injury to specific tracts in DCM, with other tracts as potential targets for future therapies and compensatory recovery.

• Further studies with larger cohorts and improved imaging are needed to validate and expand these results.

Posted on

Less is more: complication rates and outcome measures of intradiscal osteotomy versus pedicle subtraction osteotomy in adult spinal deformity

J Neurosurg Spine 43:313–323, 2025

In adults with spinal deformity, intradiscal osteotomy (IDO) is as effective as pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) for lordosis restoration and sagittal balance, with similar complication rates but significantly less blood loss, shorter operative time, and less postoperative back pain at 3 months.

• Intradiscal osteotomy (IDO) and pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) are both used to correct adult spinal deformity, aiming to restore lumbar lordosis and sagittal balance.

• IDO and PSO showed similar fusion rates and complication profiles, with no statistically significant difference in rates of proximal junctional kyphosis, hardware failure, DVT, wound infection, or pseudarthrosis.

• IDO resulted in significantly less estimated blood loss (800 ml vs. 1400 ml) and shorter operative time (7 vs. 8.5 hours) compared to PSO.

• IDO patients reported less back pain at 3 months post-op (VAS 1 vs. 3, p=0.01) than PSO patients.

• Both techniques effectively restored lumbar lordosis, but IDO achieved better postoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA) correction (5 cm vs. 7 cm, p=0.01).

• Higher BMI was a significant risk factor for postoperative complications in both groups.

• IDO is less technically complex, preserves vertebral body integrity, and is more familiar to spine surgeons than PSO.

• IDO can be considered an effective and potentially safer alternative to PSO for selected adult spinal deformity patients.

Posted on

Outcomes After Decompression Only Versus Decompression and Fusion for Lumbar Facet Cysts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Neurosurgery 97:536–544, 2025

This meta-analysis compared decompression only (DO) versus decompression and fusion (DF) for lumbar facet cysts. DF reduced cyst recurrence and improved back pain resolution but had longer hospital stays. Reoperation and radiculopathy resolution rates were similar between groups. Most studies lacked standardized criteria for choosing DF over DO.

• Lumbar facet cysts (LFCs) are associated with facet degeneration and segmental instability; surgical management is debated between decompression only (DO) and decompression with fusion (DF).

• This systematic review and meta-analysis included 9 comparative studies with 3393 patients (DO: 1940, DF: 1453).

• Spondylolisthesis rates were significantly higher in the DF group (65.8% vs 24.3% in DO).

• DO had higher odds of cyst recurrence (6.3% vs 0%) and lower odds of back pain resolution (56.6% vs 74.5%) compared to DF.

• Reoperation rates (DO 7.2%, DF 5.9%) and radiculopathy resolution (DO 77.3%, DF 87.2%) were similar between groups.

• Length of hospital stay was shorter in the DO group.

• Criteria for choosing DF vs DO varied and were often not clearly defined across studies.

• The study concludes DF reduces cyst recurrence and improves back pain resolution but has longer hospital stays; reoperation and radiculopathy outcomes are comparable.

Posted on

Does Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Provide More Value than Microdiscectomy?

Operative Neurosurgery 29:209–218, 2025

Microdiscectomy (MD) provided greater value than transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (TED) for lumbar disc herniations at this institution, with higher improvement in patient-reported outcomes per dollar spent and shorter operative times. TED had higher costs and a steeper learning curve, but similar reoperation rates.

• This study compares the value of transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TED) and microdiscectomy (MD) for lumbar disc herniation using a novel Operative Value Index (OVI).

• OVI measures percent change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) per $1000 spent intraoperatively, integrating patient outcomes and time-driven activity-based costing.

• MD had a significantly higher OVI, lower operative times, and lower intraoperative costs than TED; no significant difference in length of stay or reoperation rates was found.

• Only 43.5% of TED cases achieved clinically important improvement (MCID), compared to 66.3% for MD.

• TED was mainly used for foraminal herniations and had a higher proportion of older patients and comorbidities.

• Longer OR setup times and higher costs for TED may relate to the learning curve and surgeon experience.

• Authors suggest OVI is a practical, real-time value metric but note limitations including small TED sample size and retrospective design.

• Future studies should assess long-term outcomes, total episode costs, and track OVI as surgeons gain TED experience.

Proudly powered by WordPress